Group items tagged

oxidative stress and ROS, produced in cancer-associated fibroblasts, has a “bystander effect” on adjacent cancer cells, leading to DNA damage, genomic instability and aneuploidy, which appears to be driving tumor-stroma co-evolution

tumor cells produce and secrete hydrogen peroxide, thereby “fertilizing” the tumor microenvironment and driving the “reverse Warburg effect.”

This type of stromal metabolism then produces high-energy nutrients (lactate, ketones and glutamine), as well as recycled chemical building blocks (nucleotides, amino acids, fatty acids), to literally “feed” cancer cells

loss of stromal caveolin (Cav-1) is sufficient to drive mitochondrial dysfunction with increased glucose uptake in fibroblasts, mimicking the glycolytic phenotype of cancer-associated fibroblasts.

oxidative stress initiated in tumor cells is transferred to cancer-associated fibroblasts.

Then, cancer-associated fibroblasts show quantitative reductions in mitochondrial activity and compensatory increases in glucose uptake, as well as high ROS production

These findings may explain the prognostic value of a loss of stromal Cav-1 as a marker of a “lethal” tumor microenvironment

Interruption of this process, by addition of catalase (an enzyme that detoxifies hydrogen peroxide) to the tissue culture media, blocks ROS activity in cancer cells and leads to apoptotic cell death in cancer cells

our results may also explain the “field effect” in cancer biology,5 as hydrogen peroxide secreted by cancer cells, and the propagation of ROS production, from cancer cells to fibroblasts, would create an increasing “mutagenic field” of ROS production, due to the resulting DNA damage

aerobic glycolysis takes place in cancer-associated fibroblasts, rather than in tumor cells, as previously suspected.

In this new paradigm, cancer cells induce oxidative stress in neighboring cancer-associated fibroblasts

cancer-associated fibroblasts have the largest increases in glucose uptake

cancer cells secrete hydrogen peroxide, which induces ROS production in cancer-associated fibroblasts

Then, oxidative stress in cancer-associated fibroblast leads to decreases in functional mitochondrial activity, and a corresponding increase in glucose uptake, to fuel aerobic glycolysis

cancer cells show significant increases in mitochondrial activity, and decreases in glucose uptake

fibroblasts and cancer cells in co-culture become metabolically coupled, resulting in the development of a “symbiotic” or “parasitic” relationship.

cancer-associated fibroblasts undergo aerobic glycolysis (producing lactate), while cancer cells use oxidative mitochondrial metabolism.

We have previously shown that oxidative stress in cancer-associated fibroblasts drives a loss of stromal Cav-1, due to its destruction via autophagy/lysosomal degradation

a loss of stromal Cav-1 is sufficient to induce further oxidative stress, DNA damage and autophagy, essentially mimicking pseudo-hypoxia and driving mitochondrial dysfunction

loss of stromal Cav-1 is a powerful biomarker for identifying breast cancer patients with early tumor recurrence, lymph-node metastasis, drug-resistance and poor clinical outcome

this type of metabolism (aerobic glycolysis and autophagy in the tumor stroma) is characteristic of a lethal tumor micro-environment, as it fuels anabolic growth in cancer cells, via the production of high-energy nutrients (such as lactate, ketones and glutamine) and other chemical building blocks

the upstream tumor-initiating event appears to be the secretion of hydrogen peroxide

one such enzymatically-active protein anti-oxidant that may be of therapeutic use is catalase, as it detoxifies hydrogen peroxide to water

numerous studies show that “catalase therapy” in pre-clinical animal models is indeed sufficient to almost completely block tumor recurrence and metastasis

by eliminating oxidative stress in cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment,55 we may be able to effectively cut off the tumor's fuel supply, by blocking stromal autophagy and aerobic glycolysis

breast cancer patients show systemic evidence of increased oxidative stress and a decreased anti-oxidant defense, which increases with aging and tumor progression.68–70 Chemotherapy and radiation therapy then promote further oxidative stress.69 Unfortunately, “sub-lethal” doses of oxidative stress during cancer therapy may contribute to tumor recurrence and metastasis, via the activation of myofibroblasts.

a loss of stromal Cav-1 is associated with the increased expression of gene profiles associated with normal aging, oxidative stress, DNA damage, HIF1/hypoxia, NFκB/inflammation, glycolysis and mitochondrial dysfunction

cancer-associated fibroblasts show the largest increases in glucose uptake, while cancer cells show corresponding decreases in glucose uptake, under identical co-culture conditions

Thus, increased PET glucose avidity may actually be a surrogate marker for a loss of stromal Cav-1 in human tumors, allowing the rapid detection of a lethal tumor microenvironment.

it appears that astrocytes are actually the cell type responsible for the glucose avidity.

In the brain, astrocytes are glycolytic and undergo aerobic glycolysis. Thus, astrocytes take up and metabolically process glucose to lactate.7

Then, lactate is secreted via a mono-carboxylate transporter, namely MCT4. As a consequence, neurons use lactate as their preferred energy substrate

both astrocytes and cancer-associated fibroblasts express MCT4 (which extrudes lactate) and MCT4 is upregulated by oxidative stress in stromal fibroblasts.34

In accordance with the idea that cancer-associated fibroblasts take up the bulk of glucose, PET glucose avidity is also now routinely used to measure the extent of fibrosis in a number of human diseases, including interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, postsurgical scars, keloids, arthritis and a variety of collagen-vascular diseases.

PET glucose avidity and elevated serum inflammatory markers both correlate with poor prognosis in breast cancers.

PET signal over-estimates the actual anatomical size of the tumor, consistent with the idea that PET glucose avidity is really measuring fibrosis and inflammation in the tumor microenvironment.

human breast and lung cancer patients can be positively identified by examining their exhaled breath for the presence of hydrogen peroxide.

tumor cell production of hydrogen peroxide drives NFκB-activation in adjacent normal cells in culture6 and during metastasis,103 directly implicating the use of antioxidants, NFκB-inhibitors and anti-inflammatory agents, in the treatment of aggressive human cancers.

“Intrinsic processes” include those that result in mutations due to random errors in DNA replication whereas “extrinsic factors” are environmental factors that affect mutagenesis rates (such as UV radiation, ionizing radiation, and carcinogens

intrinsic factors do not play a major causal role.

intrinsic cancer risk should be determined by the cancer incidence for those cancers with the least risk in the entire group controlling for total stem cell divisions

if one or more cancers would feature a much higher cancer incidence, for example, lung cancer among smokers vs. non-smokers, then this most likely reflects additional (and probably extrinsic) risk factors (smoking in this case)

Particularly, for breast and prostate cancers, it has long been observed that large international geographical variations exist in their incidences (5-fold for breast cancer, 25-fold for prostate cancer)14, and immigrants moving from countries with lower cancer incidence to countries with higher cancer rates soon acquire the higher risk of their new country

Colorectal cancer is another high-incidence cancer that is widely considered to be an environmental disease17, with an estimated 75% or more colorectal cancer risk attributable to diet

melanoma, its risk ascribed to sun exposure is around 65–86%

non-melanoma basal and squamous skin cancers, ~90% is attributable to UV

75% of esophageal cancer, or head and neck cancer are caused by tobacco and alcohol

HPV may cause ~90% cases in cervical cancer23, ~90% cases in anal cancer24, and ~70% in oropharyngeal cancer

HBV and HCV may account for ~80% cases of hepatocellular carcinoma

H pylori may be responsible for 65–80% of gastric cancer

While a few cancers have relatively large proportions of intrinsic mutations (>50%), the majority of cancers have large proportions of extrinsic mutations, for example, ~100% for Myeloma, Lung and Thyroid cancers and ~80–90% for Bladder, Colorectal and Uterine cancers, indicating substantial contributions of carcinogen exposures in the development of most cancers

onsistent estimate of contribution of extrinsic factors of >70–90% in most common cancer types. This concordance lends significant credibility to the overall conclusion on the role of extrinsic factors in cancer development

IR also indirectly induces DNA damage by stimulating reactive oxygen species (ROS) production

IR is known to induce EMT in vitro

p53 is activated in response to IR-induced DNA damage

IR paradoxically also promotes tumour recurrence and metastasis

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs)

cancer cells undergoing EMT acquire invasive and metastatic properties

changes in the tumour microenvironment (TME)

IR seems to induce EMT and CSC phenotypes by regulating cellular metabolism

EMT, stemness, and oncogenic metabolism are known to be associated with resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy

Hanahan and Weinberg proposed ten hallmarks of cancer that alter cell physiology to enhance malignant growth: 1) sustained proliferation, 2) evasion of growth suppression, 3) cell death resistance, 4) replicative immortality, 5) evasion of immune destruction, 6) tumour-promoting inflammation, 7) activation of invasion and metastasis, 8) induction of angiogenesis, 9) genome instability, and 10) alteration of metabolism

EMT is a developmental process that plays critical roles in embryogenesis, wound healing, and organ fibrosis

IR is known to induce stemness and metabolic alterations in cancer cells

transforming growth factor-β [TGF-β], epidermal growth factor [EGF]) and their associated signalling proteins (Wnt, Notch, Hedgehog, nuclear-factor kappa B [NF-κB], extracellular signal-regulated kinase [ERK], and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [PI3K]/Akt

activate EMT-inducing transcription factors, including Snail/Slug, ZEB1/δEF1, ZEB2/SIP1, Twist1/2, and E12/E47

Loss of E-cadherin is considered a hallmark of EMT

IR has been shown to induce EMT to enhance the motility and invasiveness of several cancer cells, including those of breast, lung, and liver cancer, and glioma cells

IR may increase metastasis in both the primary tumour site and in normal tissues under some circumstance

sublethal doses of IR have been shown to enhance the migratory and invasive behaviours of glioma cells

ROS are known to play an important role in IR-induced EMT

High levels of ROS trigger cell death by causing irreversible damage to cellular components such as proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids, whereas low levels of ROS have been shown to promote tumour progression—including tumour growth, invasion, and metastasis

hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is involved in IR-induced EMT

Treatment with the N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a general ROS scavenger, prevents IR-induced EMT, adhesive affinity, and invasion of breast cancer cells

Snail has been shown to play a crucial role in IR-induced EMT, migration, and invasion

IR activates the p38 MAPK pathway, which contributes to the induction of Snail expression to promote EMT and invasion

NF-κB signalling that promotes cell migration

ROS promote EMT to allow cancer cells to avoid hostile environments

HIF-1 is a heterodimer composed of an oxygen-sensitive α subunit and a constitutively expressed β subunit.

Under normoxia, HIF-1α is rapidly degraded, whereas hypoxia induces stabilisation and accumulation of HIF-1α

levels of HIF-1α mRNA are enhanced by activation of the PI3K/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)

IR is known to increase stabilisation and nuclear accumulation of HIF-1α, since hypoxia is a major condition for HIF-1 activation

IR induces vascular damage that causes hypoxia

ROS is implicated in IR-induced HIF-1 activation

IR causes the reoxygenation of hypoxic cancer cells to increase ROS production, which leads to the stabilisation and nuclear accumulation of HIF-1

IR increases glucose availability under reoxygenated conditions that promote HIF-1α translation by activating the Akt/mTOR pathway

The stabilised HIF-1α then translocates to the nucleus, dimerizes with HIF-1β, and increases gene expression— including the expression of essential EMT regulators such as Snail—to induce EMT, migration, and invasion

TGF-β signalling has been shown to play a crucial role in IR-induced EMT

AP-1 transcription factor is involved in IR-induced TGF-β1 expression

Wnt/β-catenin signalling is also implicated in IR-induced EMT

Notch signalling is known to be involved in IR-induced EMT

IR also increases Notch-1 expression [99]. Notch-1 is known to induce EMT by upregulating Snail

PAI-1 signalling is also implicated in IR-induced Akt activation that increases Snail levels to induce EMT

EGFR activation is known to be associated with IR-induced EMT, cell migration, and invasion by activating two downstream pathways: PI3K/Akt and Raf/MEK/ERK

ROS and RNS are also implicated in IR-induced EGFR activation

IR has also been shown to activate Hedgehog (Hh) signalling to induce EMT

IR has been shown to induce Akt activation through several signalling pathways (EGFR, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 [CXCR4]/C-X-C motif chemokine 12 [CXCL12], plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 [PAI-1]) and upstream regulators (Bmi1, PTEN) that promote EMT and invasion

CSCs possess a capacity for self-renewal, and they can persistently proliferate to initiate tumours upon serial transplantation, thus enabling them to maintain the whole tumour

Conventional cancer treatments kill most cancer cells, but CSCs survive due to their resistance to therapy, eventually leading to tumour relapse and metastasis

identification of CSCs, three types of markers are utilised: cell surface molecules, transcription factors, and signalling pathway molecules

CSCs express distinct and specific surface markers; commonly used ones are CD24, CD34, CD38, CD44, CD90, CD133, and ALDH

Transcription factors, including Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, c-Myc, and Klf4,

signalling pathways, including those of TGF-β, Wnt, Hedgehog, Notch, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and JAK/STAT

microRNAs (miRNAs), including let-7, miR-22, miR-34a, miR-128, the miR-200 family, and miR-451

Non-CSCs can be reprogrammed to become CSCs by epigenetic and genetic changes

EMT-inducing transcription factors, such as Snail, ZEB1, and Twist1, are known to confer CSC properties

Signalling pathways involved in EMT, including those of TGF-β, Wnt, and Notch, have been shown to play important roles in inducing the CSC phenotype

TGF-β1 not only increases EMT markers (Slug, Twist1, β-catenin, N-cadherin), but also upregulates CSC markers (Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, Klf4) in breast and lung cancer cells

some CSC subpopulations arise independently of EMT

IR has been shown to induce the CSC phenotype in many cancers, including breast, lung, and prostate cancers, as well as melanoma

Genotoxic stress due to IR or chemotherapy promotes a CSC-like phenotype by increasing ROS production

IR has been shown to induce reprogramming of differentiated cancer cells into CSCs

In prostate cancer patients, radiotherapy increases the CD44+ cell population that exhibit CSC properties

IR also induces the re-expression of stem cell regulators, such as Sox2, Oct4, Nanog, and Klf4, to promote stemness in cancer cells

EMT-inducing transcription factors and signalling pathways, including Snail, STAT3, Notch signalling, the PI3K/Akt pathway, and the MAPK cascade, have been shown to play important roles in IR-induced CSC properties

STAT3 directly binds to the Snail promoter and increases Snail transcription, which induces the EMT and CSC phenotypes, in cisplatin-selected resistant cells

Other oncogenic metabolic pathways, including glutamine metabolism, the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), and synthesis of fatty acids and cholesterol, are also enhanced in many cancers

metabolic reprogramming

HIF-1α, p53, and c-Myc, are known to contribute to oncogenic metabolism

metabolic reprogramming

tumour cells exhibit high mitochondrial metabolism as well as aerobic glycolysis

occurring within the same tumour

CSCs can be highly glycolytic-dependent or oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS)-dependen

mitochondrial function is crucial for maintaining CSC functionality

cancer cells depend on mitochondrial metabolism and increase mitochondrial production of ROS that cause pseudo-hypoxia

HIF-1 then enhances glycolysis

CAFs have defective mitochondria that lead to the cells exhibiting the Warburg effect; the cells take up glucose, and then secrete lactate to 'feed' adjacent cancer cells

lactate transporter, monocarboxylate transporter (MCT)

nutrient microenvironment

Epithelial cancer cells express MCT1, while CAFs express MCT4. MCT4-positive, hypoxic CAFs secrete lactate by aerobic glycolysis, and MCT1-expressing epithelial cancer cells then uptake and use that lactate as a substrate for the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle

MCT4-positive cancer cells depend on glycolysis and then efflux lactate, while MCT1-positive cells uptake lactate and rely on OXPHOS

metabolic heterogeneity induces a lactate shuttle between hypoxic/glycolytic cells and oxidative/aerobic tumour cells

bulk tumour cells exhibit a glycolytic phenotype, with increased conversion of glucose to lactate (and enhanced lactate efflux through MCT4), CSC subsets depend on oxidative phosphorylation; most of the glucose entering the cells is converted to pyruvate to fuel the TCA cycle and the electron transport chain (ETC), thereby increasing mitochondrial ROS production

the major fraction of glucose is directed into the pentose phosphate pathway, to produce redox power through the generation of NADPH and ROS scavengers

HIF-1α, p53, and c-Myc, are known to contribute to oncogenic metabolism

regulatory molecules involved in EMT and CSCs, including Snail, Dlx-2, HIF-1, STAT3, TGF-β, Wnt, and Akt, are implicated in the metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells

HIF-1 induces the expression of glycolytic enzymes, including the glucose transporter GLUT, hexokinase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and MCT, resulting in the glycolytic switch

HIF-1 represses the expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK), which inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), thereby inhibiting mitochondrial activity

STAT3 has been implicated in EMT-induced metabolic changes as well

TGF-β and Wnt play important roles in the metabolic alteration of cancer cells

Akt is also implicated in the glycolytic switch and in promoting cancer cell invasiveness

EMT, invasion, metastasis, and stemness

pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2), LDH, and pyruvate carboxylase (PC), are implicated in the induction of the EMT and CSC phenotypes

decreased activity of PKM2 is known to promote an overall shift in metabolism to aerobic glycolysis

LDH catalyses the bidirectional conversion of lactate to pyruvate

High levels of LDHA are positively correlated with the expression of EMT and CSC markers

IR has been shown to induce metabolic changes in cancer cells

IR enhances glycolysis by upregulating GAPDH (a glycolysis enzyme), and it increases lactate production by activating LDHA, which converts pyruvate to lactate

IR enhances glycolysis by upregulating GAPDH (a glycolysis enzyme), and it increases lactate production by activating LDHA, which converts pyruvate to lactate

IR also elevates MCT1 expression that exports lactate into the extracellular environment, leading to acidification of the tumour microenvironment

IR increases intracellular glucose, glucose 6-phosphate, fructose, and products of pyruvate (lactate and alanine), suggesting a role for IR in the upregulation of cytosolic aerobic glycolysis

Lactate can activate latent TGF-

lactate stimulates cell migration and enhances secretion of hyaluronan from CAF that promote tumour metastasis

promote tumour survival, growth, invasion, and metastasis; enhance the stiffness of the ECM; contribute to angiogenesis; and induce inflammation by releasing several growth factors and cytokines (TGF-β, VEGF, hepatocyte growth factor [HGF], PDGF, and stromal cell-derived factor 1 [SDF1]), as well as MMP

tumours recruit the host tissue’s blood vessel network to perform four mechanisms: angiogenesis (formation of new vessels), vasculogenesis (de novo formation of blood vessels from endothelial precursor cells), co-option, and modification of existing vessels within tissues.

immunosuppressive cells such as tumour-associated macrophages (TAM), MDSCs, and regulatory T cells, and the immunosuppressive cytokines, TGF-β and interleukin-10 (IL-10)

immunosuppressive cells such as tumour-associated macrophages (TAM), MDSCs, and regulatory T cells, and the immunosuppressive cytokines, TGF-β and interleukin-10 (IL-10)

intrinsic immunogenicity or induce tolerance

cancer immunoediting’

three phases: 1) elimination, 2) equilibrium, and 3) escape.

The third phase, tumour escape, is mediated by antigen loss, immunosuppressive cells (TAM, MDSCs, and regulatory T cells), and immunosuppressive cytokines (TGF-β and IL-10).

IR can elicit various changes in the TME, such as CAF activity-mediated ECM remodelling and fibrosis, cycling hypoxia, and an inflammatory response

IR activates CAFs to promote the release of growth factors and ECM modulators, including TGF-β and MMP

TGF-β directly influences tumour cells and CAFs, promotes tumour immune escape, and activates HIF-1 signalling

MMPs degrade ECM that facilitates angiogenesis, tumour cell invasion, and metastasis

IR also promotes MMP-2/9 activation in cancer cells to promote EMT, invasion, and metastasis

IR-induced Snail increases MMP-2 expression to promote EMT

Radiotherapy has the paradoxical side-effect of increasing tumour aggressiveness

IR promotes ROS production in cancer cells, which may induce the activation of oncogenes and the inactivation of tumour suppressors, which further promote oncogenic metabolism

Metabolic alterations

oncogenic metabolism

elicit various changes in the TME

Although IR activates an antitumour immune response, this signalling is frequently suppressed by tumour escape mechanisms

In normal embryogenesis and homeostasis, the canonical WNT pathway is activated by secreted WNT ligands produced in highly controlled context-dependent manners and in precise amounts. WNT activity is transduced in the cytoplasm, inactivates the APC destruction complex, and results in the translocation of activate β-CATENIN to the nucleus, where it cooperates with DNA-binding TCF/LEF factors to regulate WNT-TCF targets and the ensuing genomic response

beyond the loss of activity of the APC destruction complex, for instance throughAPC mutation, phosphorylation of β-CATENIN at C-terminal sites is required for the full activation of WNT-TCF signaling and the ensuing WNT-TCF responses in cancer.

The WNT-TCF response blockade that we describe for low doses of Ivermectin suggests an action independent to the deregulation of chloride channels

involve the repression of the levels of C-terminally phosphorylated β-CATENIN forms and of CYCLIN D1, a critical target that is an oncogene and positive cell cycle regulator.

the Avermectin single-molecule derivative Selamectin, a drug widely used in veterinarian medicine (Nolan & Lok, 2012), is ten times more potent acting in the nanomolar range

Ivermectin also diminished the protein levels of CYCLIN D1, a direct TCF target and oncogene, in both HT29 and H358 tumor cells

Activated Caspase3 was used as a marker of apoptosis by immunohistochemistry 48 h after drug treatment. Selamectin and Ivermectin induced up to a sevenfold increase in the number of activated Caspase3+ cells in two primary (CC14 and CC36) and two cell line (DLD1 and Ls174T) colon cancer cell types (Fig​(Fig2C).2C). All changes were significative

The strong downregulation of the expression of the intestinal stem cell genesASCL2 andLGR5 (van der Flieret al, 2009; Scheperset al, 2012; Zhuet al, 2012b) by Ivermectin and Selamectin (Fig​(Fig2D)2D) raised the possibility that these drugs could affect WNT-TCF-dependent colon cancer stem cell behavior

Pre-established H358 tumors responded to Ivermectin showing a ˜ 50% repression of growth

Ivermectin hasin vivo efficacy against human colon cancer xenografts sensitive to TCF inhibition with no discernable side effects

Ivermectin (Campbellet al, 1983), an off-patent drug approved for human use, and related macrocyclic lactones, have WNT-TCF pathway response blocking and anti-cancer activities

these drugs block WNT-TCF pathway responses, likely acting at the level of β-CATENIN/TCF function, affecting β-CATENIN phosphorylation status.

anti-WNT-TCF activities of Ivermectin and Selamectin

Ivermectin has a well-known anti-parasitic activity mediated via the deregulation of chloride channels, leading to paralysis and death (Hibbs & Gouaux, 2011; Lynagh & Lynch, 2012). The same mode of action has been suggested to underlie the toxicity of Ivermectin for liquid tumor cells and the potentiation or sensitization effect of Avermectin B1 on classical chemotherapeutics

the specificity of the blockade of WNT-TCF responses we document, at low micromolar doses for Ivermectin and low nanomolar doses for Selamectin, indicate that the blockade of WNT-TCF responses and chloride channel deregulation are distinct modes of action

What is key then is to find a dose and a context where the use of Ivermectin has beneficial effects in patients, paralleling our results with xenografts in mice.

Cell toxicity appears at doses greater (> 10 μM for 12 h or longer or > 5 μM for 48 h or longer for Ivermectin) than those required to block TCF responses and induce apoptosis.

Our data point to a repression of WNT-β-CATENIN/TCF transcriptional responses by Ivermectin, Selamectin and related macrocylic lactones.

(i) The ability of Avermectin B1 to inhibit the activation of WNT-TCF reporter activity by N-terminal mutant (APC-insensitive) β-CATENIN as detected in our screen

(ii) The ability of Avermectin B1, Ivermectin, Doramectin, Moxidectin and Selamectin to parallel the modulation of WNT-TCF targets by dnTCF

(iii) The finding that the specific WNT-TCF response blockade by low doses of Ivermectin and Selamectin is reversed by constitutively active TCF

(iv) The repression of key C-terminal phospho-isoforms of β-CATENIN resulting in the repression of the TCF target and positive cell cycle regulator CYCLIN D1 by Ivermectin and Selamectin

(v) The specific inhibition ofin-vivo-TCF-dependent, but notin-vivo-TCF-independent cancer cells by Ivermectin in xenografts.

These results together with the reduction of the expression of the colon cancer stem cell markersASCL2 andLGR5 (e.g., Hirschet al, 2013; Ziskinet al, 2013) raise the possibility of an inhibitory effect of Ivermectin, Selamectin and related macrocyclic lactones on TCF-dependent cancer stem cells.

the capacity of cancer cells to form 3D spheroids in culture, as well as the growth of these, is also WNT-TCF-dependent (Kanwaret al, 2010) and they were also affected by Ivermectin treatment

If Ivermectin is specific, it should only block TCF-dependent tumor growth. Indeed, the sensitivity and insensitivity of DLD1 and CC14 xenografts to Ivermectin treatment, respectively, together with the desensitization to Ivermectin actionin vivo by constitutively active TCF provide evidence of the specificity of this drug to block an activated WNT-TCF pathway in human cancer.

Ivermectin has a good safety profile since onlyin-vivo-dnTCF-sensitive cancer xenografts are responsive to Ivermectin treatment, and we have not detected side effects in Ivermectin-treated mice at the doses used

previous work has shown that side effects from systemic treatments with clinically relevant doses in humans are rare (Yang, 2012), that birth defects were not observed after exposure of pregnant mothers (Pacquéet al, 1990) and that this drug does not cross the blood–brain barrier (Kokozet al, 1999). Similarly, only dogs with mutantABCB1 (MDR1) alleles leading to a broken blood–brain barrier show Ivermectin neurotoxicity (Mealeyet al, 2001; Orzechowskiet al, 2012)

Indications may include treatment for incurable β-CATENIN/TCF-dependent advanced and metastatic human tumors of the lung, colon, endometrium, and other organs.

Ivermectin, Selamectin, or related macrocyclic lactones could also serve as topical agents for WNT-TCF-dependent skin lesions and tumors such as basal cell carcinomas

they might also be useful as routine prophylactic agents, for instance against nascent TCF-dependent intestinal tumors in patients with familial polyposis and against nascent sporadic colon tumors in the general aging population

PAK1 is essential for the growth of more than 70% of all human cancers, including breast, prostate, pancreatic, colon, gastric, lung, cervical and thyroid cancers, as well as hepatoma, glioma, melanoma, multiple myeloma and for neurofibromatosis tumors

Ivermectin suppresses breast cancer by activating cytostatic autophagy, disrupting cellular signaling in the process, probably by reducing PAK1 expression

Cancer stem cells are a key factor in cancer cells developing resistance to chemotherapies and these results indicate that a combination of chemotherapy agents plus ivermectin could potentially target and kill cancer stem cells, a paramount goal in overcoming cancer

Triple-negative breast cancers, which lack estrogen, progesterone and HER2 receptors, account for 10–20% of breast cancers and are associated with poor prognosis

Ivermectin addition led to transcriptional modulation of genes associated with epithelial–mesenchymal transition and maintenance of a cancer stem cell phenotype in triple-negative breast cancers cells, resulting in impairment of clonogenic self-renewal in vitro and inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis in vivo

Ivermectin-induced cytostatic autophagy also leads to suppression of tumor growth in breast cancer xenografts, causing researchers to believe there is scope for using ivermectin to inhibit breast cancer cell proliferation and that the drug is a potential treatment for breast cancer

ivermectin synergizes with the chemotherapy agents cytarabine and daunorubicin to induce cell death in leukemia cells

Ivermectin inhibits proliferation and increases apoptosis of various human cancers

Activation of WNT-TCF signaling is implicated in multiple diseases, including cancers of the lungs and intestine,

A new screening system has found that ivermectin inhibits the expression of WNT-TCF targets

It represses the levels of C-terminal β-catenin phosphoforms and of cyclin D1 in an okadaic acid-sensitive manner, indicating its action involves protein phosphatases

In vivo, ivermectin selectively inhibits TCF-dependent, but not TCF-independent, xenograft growth without side effects

ivermectin has an exemplary safety record, it could swiftly become a useful tool as a WNT-TCF pathway response blocker to treat WNT-TCF-dependent diseases, encompassing multiple cancers.117

In a recent five-year study of nearly 30,000 rural Chinese people, researchers from the NCI found that daily doses of these three nutrients reduced cancer deaths by 13%.

In a study in Cancer Letters (Evangelou et al. 1997), animals with malignant tumors given high doses of vitamins C and E and selenium manifested a significant prolongation of the mean survival time. Complete remission of tumors developed in 16.8% of the animals

cities and states with high selenium content in the soil also had significantly lower rates of cancer, especially of the digestive and urinary systems.

In one study of hundreds of men, a daily intake of 200 micrograms of selenium cut the incidence of prostate cancer by 60 percent.

The statistics for breast cancer are particularly striking. "The higher the selenium, the lower the breast cancer

In Yugoslavia, scientists studied 33 patients with breast cancer. These women had selenium levels in their bloodstream only half those of healthy volunteers.

The overall reduction in cancer incidence was 37% in the selenium-supplemented group; a 50% reduction in cancer mortality was observed over a 10-year period

The following are the site-specific reductions in cancer incidence observed in the study: colon-rectal cancers (58%), lung cancer (46%), and prostate cancer (63%)

A selenium deficiency appears to increase the risk of prostate cancer fourfold to fivefold

It was determined that, as the male population ages, selenium levels decrease, paralleling an increase in prostate cancer

Studies have shown that the production of nagalase has a mutual relationship with Gc-MAF level and immunosuppression

It has been demonstrated that serum levels of nagalase are good prognosticators of some types of cancer

The nagalase level in serum correlates with tumor burden and it has been shown that Gc-MAF therapy progresses, nagalase activity decreases

It has been shown that Gc-MAF can inhibit the angiogenesis induced by pro-inflammatory prostaglandin E1

The effect of Gc-MAF on chemotaxis or activation of tumoricidal macrophages is likely the main mechanism against angiogenesis.

Administration of Gc-MAF stimulates immune-cell progenitors for extensive mitogenesis, activates macrophages and produces antibodies. “This indicates that Gc-MAF is a powerful adjuvant for immunization.”

Cancer cell lines do not develop into tumor genes in mouse models after Gc-MAF-primed immunization (29-31) and the effect of Gc-MAF has been approved for macrophage stimulation for angiogenesis, proliferation, migration and metastatic inhibition on tumors induced by MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line

The protocol included: "a high dose of second-generation Gc-MAF (0.5 ml) administered twice a week intramuscularly for a total of 21 injections.”

Yamamoto et al. showed that the administration of Gc-MAF to 16 patients with prostate cancer led to improvements in all patients without recurrence

Inui et al. reported that a 74-year-old man diagnosed with prostate cancer with multiple bone metastases was in complete remission nine months after initiation of GcMAF therapy simultaneously with hyper T/NK cell, high-dose vitamin C and alpha lipoic acid therapy

It has also been approved for non-neoplastic diseases such as autism (41), multiple sclerosis (42, 43), chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) (40), juvenile osteoporosis (44) and systemic lupus erythematous (45).

Gc-MAF has been verified for use in colon, thyroid (38), lung (39), liver, thymus (36), pancreatic (40), bladder and ovarian cancer and tongue squamous carcinoma

Prostate, breast, colon, liver, stomach, lung (including mesothelioma), kidney, bladder, uterus, ovarian, head/neck and brain cancers, fibrosarcomas and melanomas are the types of cancer tested thus far

weekly administration of 100 ng Gc-MAF to cancer at different stages and types showed curative effects at different follow-up times

this treatment has been suggested for non-anemic patients

Studies have shown that weekly administration of 100 ng Gc-MAF to cancer patients had curative effects on a variety of cancers

Because the half-life of the activated macrophages is approximately one week, it must be administered weekly

In vivo weekly intramuscular administration of Gc-MAF (100 ng) for 16-22 weeks was used to treat patients with breast cancer

individuals harboring different VDR genotypes had different responses to Gc-MAF and that some genotypes were more responsive than others

Administration of Gc-MAF for cancer patients exclusively activates macrophages as an important cell in adaptive immunity

Gc-MAF supports humoral immunity by producing, developing and releasing large quantities of antibodies against cancer. Clinical evidence from a human model of breast cancer patients supports this hypothesis

There is also evidence that confirms the tumoricidal role of Gc-MAF via Fc-receptor mediation

It is likely that the best therapeutic responses will be observed when the nutritional and inflammatory aspects are taken together with stimulation of the immune system

it should be noted that no harmful side effects of Gc-MAF treatment have been reported, even when it was successfully administered to autistic children

The natural activation mechanism of macrophages by Gc-MAF is so natural and it should not have any side effects on humans or animal models even in cell culture

Besides the Gc-MAF efficacy on macrophage activity, it can be a potential anti-angiogenic agent (28) and an inhibitor of the migration of cancerous cells in the absence of macrophages (47).

Activating or modifying natural killer cells, dendritic cells, DC, CTL, INF and IL-2 have all been recommended for cancer immunotherapy

It has been reported that nagalase cannot deglycosylate Gc-MAF as it has specificity for Gc globulin alone

inflammation-derived macrophage activation with the participation of B and T lymphocytes is the main mechanism

macrophages highly-activated by the addition of Gc-MAF can show tumoricidal activity

Previous clinical investigations have confirmed the efficacy of Gc-MAF. In addition to activating existing macrophages, Gc-MAF is a potent mitogenic factor that can stimulate the myeloid progenitor cells to increase systemic macrophage cell counts by 40-fold in four days

Ivermectin inhibits proliferation of human colon cancer and lung cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo

The anti-proliferative action, affecting both the bulk tumor cells and CSCs, was linked in this study to inhibition of WNT signaling

the anti-WNT IC50 of ivermectin is 5–10 times (~1–2 µM vs. 10 µM) lower than that of its toxic effect against chloride channels

oral bioavailability of the drug, as for other antiparasitic drugs discussed in this section, is very low

Toxicity studies in vivo have also demonstrated a wide therapeutic index for ivermectin

Its anti-proliferative activity has been demonstrated in a wide array of cancer cell lines representative of WNT-dependent cancers: non-small lung carcinoma [96], multiple myeloma [97], hepatoma [98], adrenocortical carcinoma [99], ovarian cancer [100] and glioblastoma

Niclosamide inhibits the canonical WNT pathway

In addition to inhibiting the canonical WNT pathway, niclosamide may mediate its anticancer activities through several other signaling pathways such as NOTCH [107], MTOR [108], NF-κB [97] and STAT3 [96]

surgery per se can promote cancer metastasis through a series of local and systemic events

surgery results in a serious wound that disrupts the structural barrier preventing the outspreading of cancer cells, change the properties of the cancer cells and stromal cells remaining in the tumor microenvironment, or impairs the host defense systems against cancers

After the primary tumor is surgically removed, the metastases can start to grow vigorously via neoangiogenesis because the circulating inhibitors disappear

infection and inflammation during the postoperative period have been reported to increase the risk of cancer recurrence in patients

Surgeons have long suspected that surgery, even if it is a necessary step in cancer treatment, facilitates cancer metastasis

Surgery-induced cancer metastasis has been well established in animal models

tumor cell dissemination, tumor-favoring immune responses, and neoangiogenesis

the surgical resection of primary tumors is beneficial is controversial

CTCs abruptly increase just after surgery

Even externally palpitating tumors for diagnosis could increase the numbers of CTCs in skin cancer and breast cancer

excessive glucocorticoids negatively modulate immune functions

immune surveillance against tumors is considered to be impaired by surgical stress

In addition to glucocorticoids, during stimulation of the HPA axis, the catecholamine hormones epinephrine and norepinephrine are released from the adrenal medulla

NK cell suppression may be attributed to increased levels of catecholamines as well as glucocorticoids

In mice bearing a primary tumor, it was observed that the removal of the primary tumor facilitated the growth of highly vascularized metastases

primary tumors may secrete angiogenic inhibitors as well as angiogenic activators

second phase of tumor recurrence and metastasis, which are newly acquired events, rather than just outcomes of incomplete treatment.

double-edged sword

HIF-1 in neutrophils plays a critical role in NETosis and bacteria-killing activity

neutrophils play various roles in the initiation and progression of cancer

NETosis

many inflammatory and neoplastic diseases

formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which are large extracellular complexes composed of chromatin and cytoplasmic/granular proteins1

NETosis has been highlighted as an inflammatory event that promotes cancer metastasis

Once activated, neutrophils produce intracellular precursors by using DNA, histones, and granular and cytoplasmic proteins and then spread the mature form of NETs out around themselves

A series of these events is called NETosis.

neutrophil elastase, myeloperoxidase, cathepsin G, proteinase 3, lactoferrin, gelatinase, lysozyme C, calprotectin, neutrophil defensins, and cathelicidins

innate immune response against infection

Neutrophils are the most abundant type of granulocytes, comprising 40–70% of all white blood cells

two types of NEToses, suicidal (or lytic) NETosis and vital NETosis

Suicidal NETosis mainly depends on the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS)

Since neutrophils die during this process, it is called suicidal NETosis.

vital NETosis

vital NETosis occurs independently of ROS production

Vital NETosis can be induced by Gram-negative bacteria. LPS

NETs are present in a variety of cancers, such as lung cancer, colon cancer, ovarian cancer, and leukemia

neutrophils actively undergo NETosis in the tumor microenvironment

Hypoxia

NETosis plays a pivotal role in noninfectious autoimmune diseases,

cytokines

tumor-derived proteases

tumor exosomes

NETosis generally actively progresses in the tumor microenvironment.

the proliferative cytokines TGFβ and IL-10 and the angiogenic factor VEGF are representative of neutrophil-derived tissue repair proteins.

NETosis is a defense system to protect the body from invading pathogens

when neutrophils are excessively stimulated, they produce excess NETs, thereby leading to pathological consequences

plasma levels of NETosis markers are elevated after major surgeries

local invasion, intravasation into the blood or lymphatic vessels, escape from the immune system, anchoring to capillaries in target organs, extravasation into the organs, transformation from dormant cells to proliferating cells, colonization to micrometastases, and growth to macrometastases

NETs promote metastasis at multiple steps

NETs loosen the ECM and capillary wall to promote the intravasation of cancer cells

NETs and platelets wrap CTCs, which protects them from attack by immune cells and shearing force by blood flow

NETs promote the local invasion of cancer cells by degrading the extracellular matrix (ECM)

neutrophil elastase, matrix metalloproteinase 9, and cathepsin G

NETs also promote the intravasation of cancer cells

millions of tumor cells are released into the circulation every day,

NETs can wrap up CTCs with platelets

β1-integrin plays an important role in the interaction between CTCs and NETs

NET-platelet-CTC aggregates.

After metastasizing to distant tissues, tumor cells are often found to remain dormant for a period of time and unexpectedly regrow late

NETs are believed to participate in the reactivation of dormant cancer cells in metastatic regions

NET-associated proteases NE and MMP-9 were found to be responsible for the reactivation of dormant cancer cells

of the approximately 108 cannabinoids produced by C. sativa, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (thc) is the most relevant because of its high potency and abundance in plant preparations

Tetrahydrocannabinol exerts a wide variety of biologic effects by mimicking endogenous substances—the endocannabinoids anandamide3 and 2-arachidonoylglycerol4,5—that engage specific cell-surface cannabinoid receptors

the cb2 receptor was initially described to be present in the immune system6, but was more recently shown to also be expressed in cells from other origins

transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V, member 1

orphan G protein–coupled receptor 55

Most of the effects produced by cannabinoids in the nervous system and in non-neural tissues rely on cb1 receptor activation

two major cannabinoid-specific receptors—cb1 and cb2

cardiovascular tone, energy metabolism, immunity, and reproduction

cannabinoids are well known to exert palliative effects in cancer patients

best-established use is the inhibition of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

thc and other cannabinoids exhibit antitumour effects in a wide array of animal models of cancer

cannabinoid receptors and their endogenous ligands are both generally upregulated in tumour tissue compared with non-tumour tissue

cb2 promotes her2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) pro-oncogenic signalling in breast cancer

pharmacologic activation of cannabinoid receptors decreases tumour growth

endocannabinoid signalling can also have a tumour-suppressive role

pharmacologic stimulation of cb receptors is, in most cases, antitumourigenic. Nonetheless, a few reports have proposed a tumour-promoting effect of cannabinoids

most prevalent effect is the induction of cancer cell death by apoptosis and the inhibition of cancer cell proliferation

impair tumour angiogenesis and block invasion and metastasis

thc and other cannabinoids induce the apoptotic death of glioma cells by cb1- and cb2-dependent stimulation

Autophagy is primarily a cytoprotective mechanism, although its activation can also lead to cell death

autophagy is important for cannabinoid antineoplastic activity

autophagy is upstream of apoptosis in the mechanism of cannabinoid-induced cell death

the effect of cannabinoids in hormone- dependent tumours might rely, at least in part, on the ability to interfere with the activation of growth factor receptors

glioma cells), pharmacologic blockade of either cb1 or cb2 prevents cannabinoid-induced cell death with similar efficacy

other types of cancer cells (pancreatic48, breast24, or hepatic43 carcinoma cells, for example), antagonists of cb2 but not of cb1 inhibit cannabinoid antitumour actions

thc promotes cancer cell death in a cb1- or cb2-dependent manner (or both) at lower concentrations

cannabidiol (cbd), a phytocannabinoid with a low affinity for cannabinoid receptors15, and other marijuana-derived cannabinoids57 have also been proposed to promote the apoptotic death of cancer cells acting independently of the cb1 and cb2 receptors

In cancer cells, cannabinoids block the activation of the vascular endothelial growth factor (vegf) pathway, an inducer of angiogenesi

In vascular endothelial cells, cannabinoid receptor activation inhibits proliferation and migration, and induces apoptosis

cb1 or cb2 receptor agonists (or both) reduce the formation of distant tumour masses in animal models of both induced and spontaneous metastasis, and inhibit adhesion, migration, and invasiveness of glioma64, breast65,66, lung67,68, and cervical68 cancer cells in culture

the ceramide/p8–regulated pathway plays a general role in the antitumour activity of cannabinoids targeting cb1 and cb2

cbd, by acting independently of the cb1 and cb2 receptors, produces a remarkable anti-tumour effect—including reduction of invasiveness and metastasis

cannabinoids can also enhance immune system–mediated tumour surveillance in some contexts

ability of thc to reduce inflammation75,76, an effect that might prevent certain types of cancer

recent observations suggest that the combined administration of cannabinoids with other anticancer drugs acts synergistically to reduce tumour growth

combined administration of gemcitabine (the benchmark agent for the treatment of pancreatic cancer) and various cannabinoid agonists synergistically reduced the viability of pancreatic cancer cells

Other reports indicated that anandamide and HU-210 might also enhance the anticancer activity of paclitaxel89 and 5-fluorouracil90 respectively

Combined administration of thc and cbd enhances the anticancer activity of thc and reduces the dose of thc needed to induce its tumour growth-inhibiting activity

Preclinical animal models have yielded data indicating that systemic (oral or intraperitoneal) administration of cannabinoids effectively decreases tumour growth

Combinations of cannabinoids with classical chemotherapeutic drugs such as the alkylating agent temozolomide (the benchmark agent for the management of glioblastoma80,84) have been shown to produce a strong anticancer action in animal models

pharmacologic inhibition of egfr, erk83, or akt enhances the cell-death-promoting action of thc in glioma cultures (unpublished observations by the authors), which suggests that targeting egfr and the akt and erk pathways could enhance the antitumour effect of cannabinoids