OKMOOC

The AGORA program, set up by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO) together with major publishers, enables developing countries to gain access to an outstanding digital library collection in the fields of food, agriculture, environmental science and related social sciences. AGORA provides a collection of more than 3500 key journals and 3300 books to 2500 institutions in 116 countries. AGORA is designed to enhance the scholarship of the many thousands of students, faculty and researchers in agriculture and life sciences in the developing world.

Thanks, the site is useful.

FOR OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL

Unfortunately I see it lacks the South African legal journals that I was looking for.

Very useful, especially because of limited budget to buy books and journals.

Information Research, is an open access, international, peer-reviewed, scholarly journal, dedicated to making accessible the results of research across a wide range of information-related disciplines. It is privately published and edited by Professor T.D. Wilson. It is hosted, and given technical support, by Lund University Libraries, Sweden and editorial support by the University of Borås, Sweden.

Open Access Library (www.oalib.com) is an academic search engine and publisher. You can download research papers for free and submit your paper to it. It is a shared academic database.

I have completed the Stanford Open Knowledge MOOC, and my digital project creating this course !

I am Created website for wordpress.com freely available sources

Digital Libraries of the Future: Emerging Trends, Advancements and Challenges of Engineering and Technological Institutions

40 Free educational websites

Sitios web muy atractivos que coadyuvan al aprendizaje sobre: clases de negocios en línea , aprendizaje negocio en línea , la escuela de negocios en línea , cursos universitarios en línea , universidades que ofrecen programas de maestría en línea grado , conciencia , Coursera. aprender idioma , cursos , educación , libre , libre de aprendizaje , aprendizaje , línea , clases de negocios en línea , las clases en línea de la universidad , clases en línea para empresas , clases en línea para que , cursos en línea , educación en línea , clases de la escuela en línea , auto-desarrollo , los sujetos , clases en línea u de u , clases universitarias en línea

Thanks for the information. I find Khan Academy very useful as well as How Stuff Works. I'll try the other websites.

Here is a list of the core readings and additional resources for each module from the Open Knowledge Changing the Global Course of Learning MOOC--a partial textbook for the course.

Sitios muy interesantes: http://mcpress.media-commons.org/plannedobsolescence/five-the-university/the-history-of-the-university-press/ http://www.amacad.org/publications/spring2002/hesse.pdf http://rstl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/1/1-22/1.full.pdf+html http://www.ccel.org/ccel/benedict/rule2/files/rule2.html#ch33 http://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/content/9780262512664_Download_the_full_text.pdf

thanks for sharing this

En este documento se describen y revisan los conceptos de alfabetización informacional y alfabetización digital, a través del análisis de la literatura existente. Se examinan asimismo conceptos relacionados, incluyendo alfabetización informática, la alfabetización bibliotecaria, la alfabetización en redes, la de internet y la hiperalfabetización, y se aclaran las relaciones entre éstas.

Estas alfabetizaciones responden a las necesidades de un entorno informacional más complejo con nuevas tecnologías y una mayor variedad de medios de comunicación y de servicios. Son formas de alfabetización que requieren habilidades, conocimientos y actitudes.

las sociedades científicas de estudiantes de medicina (SOCEM), constituyen agrupaciones sin ánimo de lucro y no gubernamentales, encaminadas a generar un espacio que fomente el espíritu por la investigación en los estudiantes de medicina.

Un claro ejemplo de lo que se debería estar haciendo por los estudiantes en cualquier disciplina

En el entorno global de la información el tiempo se mueve rápidamente. La llegada de Internet ha puesto en cuestión la necesidad de bibliotecas y bibliotecarios

Creo que no sólo de las bibliotecas y bibliotecarios, sino de cualquier persona.

El contenido fundamentalmente disponible en la Web y los medios electrónicos ha cambiado la dinámica de cómo operan y administran su misión las bibliotecas. Lo que está llevando hacia un cambio en cuanto a las responsabilidades y competencias profesionales; los bibliotecarios en esta era digital proporcionan acceso, orientación y formación a los materiales físicos y electrónicos en línea sin dejar de atender las tareas fundamentales que han contribuido a la esencia a la profesión durante siglos.

Nuestro conocimiento del mundo ha ido aumentando rápidamente con el tiempo haciéndose, cada vez,más confiable. Como nunca antes, la adaptación de las sociedades al ritmo del conocimiento se ha vuelto crucial para el desarrollo sostenido. Sin embargo, es importante destacar que el acceso al conocimiento se ha visto restringido; grandes cantidades de personas en el mundo se han quedado atrás en esta enorme y emocionante carrera de nuestros días. Es determinante superar este abismo de cualquier forma posible, especialmente porque cada segmento del mundo depende de los otros actualmente. Una forma de acercarse a un equilibrio es la aplicación de recursos de Acceso Abierto al conocimiento.

Estoy de acuerdo contigo, la tendencia debe ser buscar un equilibrio en la aplicación de los recursos que nos brinda el Acceso Abierto al Conocimiento.

El Arts Council de Inglaterra ha llevado a cabo un proyecto de investigación sobre cómo será el futuro de las bibliotecas y las prioridades que deben afrontar éstas en sus servicios a la comunidad. El objetivo es señalar el valor, la función y el propósito futuro de las bibliotecas.

Muy interesante este artículo, y deberíamos estar pensando en que esto se instrumentara en las universidades.

"Comenius Regio Partnerships are bilateral partnerships between local and regional school authorities, including schools and other stakeholders in school education and youth work. Comenius Regio will foster cooperation among local / regional school authorities to enrich the educational offer to young people at school age in the participating regions or municipalities."

Todos los bibliotecarios deberían conocer y poder trabajar en la herramienta de marcadores digitales Diigo. Esta es una nueva herramienta para nosotros y me gustaría aprender a utilizarla con el fin de ayudar a los estudiantes en mi escuela.

This article employs queer theory and challenges the notion of fitting emergent open access practices within current frameworks of academic success. While I was partially surprised by some of the assertions made early on in the article regarding open access journals being perceived as not as valuable as more traditional journal models, I think in part I may just hang out in academic circles that gravitate towards open access (hence... this course). But, I am very compelled by the conclusions made by Gurfinkel. That is, rather than trying to figure out how to systematize open access models to be respected within current academic standards, open access (as informed by queer theory, in this article) challenges us to investigate and question our standards in a more radical way. For example, in open access peer review models or post-publication review, the notion of a "peer" and thus who are considered credible and worthy sources of knowledge--and consequentially, what "knowledge" is-- are put into question. So, more than trying to figure out how to systematize and make more "legitimate" open access models, Gurfinkel wants us to ask what about the academy currently excludes open access models from being meaningful and legitimate practices in the first place.

Online discussions and post-publication analyses are catching mistakes that sneak past editorial review. This article describes the pitfalls with editorial review and pre-publication peer review, and advocates for post-publication crowd-sourced reviewing through social media platforms.

I think having a comments section is a great way to provide feedback on the information provided. Often when I read articles the comments section allows me to understand different perspectives and interpretations of the information.

This article, while not necessarily explicitly, managed to hint at what I find to be a source of problematic practices/outcomes in the academy, publishing, etc. That is, it is not necessarily that traditional peer review processes are ineffective at finding errors or misconduct, but rather it is when our processes and practices become so systematized that we can mindlessly or effortlessly engage in and reproduce them without our full, critical attention that they can produce problems. While I think there are good reasons to critique the notion of peer and "expert" culture within traditional peer review processes, an additional and separate critique is the problems that arise with systematization. The article implicitly addressed this when the author commented that current post-publication environments "provide a public space that is not under the control of journal editors and conference organizers." Yet, as White indicates, there exists skepticism of the value of post-publication reviews along with a simultaneous effort to build post-publication systems that have standards that put those questioning it at ease. The National Institutes of Health establishing requirements that potential post-publication reviewers must meet demonstrated this. That is, they are trying to figure out how to systematize post-publication. For me, what this article indicates is that we ought to figure out how to keep our academic and publishing processes "fresh," so to speak. This way we don't become so comfortable with our methods and practices that they allow us to simply go through the motions without fostering innovative and critical inquiry.

"If, as rumoured, google builds a platform for depositing unrefereed research papers for "peer-reviewing" via crowd-sourcing, can this create a substitute for classical peer-review or will it merely supplement classical peer review with crowd-sourcing?"

Two facts that makes me think, peer-reviewing via crowd-sourcing, at best would supplement the traditional peer-review process. Fact one, there are already open access repositories that allow "deposit first; review later", but those repositories have not taken over other journals. Fact two, Wikipedia is an example in that, though theoretically anyone can contribute and edit the articles, there is definite number of people who would do it. Therefore, I don't see crowd sourcing peer review would really substitute the traditional route.

I appreciated that this source was framed outside of dichotomous thinking by not pitting more traditional and open access peer review models directly against one another, carrying the assumption that a particular publishing process must choose one or another. Although, I think I would challenge Harnad to take this thought process further. Rather than supplementing or complementing one another, traditional and open peer review models are distinct enough to also be applicable in different types of contexts, without necessarily needing to rely on one another. That is not to disagree with Harnad that the two do not "substitute" one another, but precisely because they cannot substitute one another indicates that they serve different purposes and could thus be useful in different contexts…. Or, as Harnad suggest, supplement each other in the same context. I think this very well parallels the context of taxonomies and folksonomies.

Publicado el 7/5/2012 This is a brief overview of several Open Peer Review Models, including ETAI, Nature, ACP, PLoS One and EJCBS. It is recorded based on a Prezi Presentation first developed for Open Access Week 2011 at UBC.

I found this presentation, in particular the visual representations, to be very useful in understanding just how diverse open peer review models can be. Several things stuck out to me throughout the presentation. First, I was surprised that many of the open peer review models either maintained anonymity of the reviewers or self-identification was optional. For example, PLOSone and the Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics journals did not require self-identification. This raises a tension for me in that it does enable more people to participate in the publishing/review process, but it still inherently indicates context does not matter, which is something I disagree with. That is, if, for example, a paper is on student-faculty partnerships or feminism, it seems to me that crucial insights pertain to the particularities of the people reviewing an article. The other aspect that stuck out to me was how crucial it is for a journal to be intentional about implementing, integrating, and valuing an open peer review process. The Nature experiment is a good example of this. While I am sure they spent a great deal of time figuring out how to construct and enable an open peer review process, it was not necessarily emphasized as important by the journal nor well integrated into people's current practice. In contrast, the ETAI did this by permanently archiving the peer comments rather than deleting them unannounced, and editors also sent notifications to people that articles were ready rather than assuming people would seek out articles themselves.

Este artículo presenta el software de código abierto Sphinx para Unix, mismo que es utilizado como un motor de reconocimiento y síntesis de voz, y puede ser implementado para cambiar el enfoque de las nuevas arquitecturas de los programas para no depender del teclado y el mouse sino sólo de la voz

Gran SW para niños, discapacitados, personas mayores, etc. Permite el acceso a la informática a gente con recursos físicos limitadod :)

Publications in indexed journals: the only one indicator of the student's cientific societies production 1 Sociedad Científica de San Fernando. Lima, Perú. Editor en Jefe de CIMEL. Existe una escasez de médicos-científicos o profesionales de la salud que investigan, por ello se han planteado muchas razones para su explicación(1), una de ellas radica en la poca investigación que se realiza en el pregrado.