Group items tagged

In October and November 2014, H-Soz-Kult publishes a series of essays on "The Status Quo of Digital Humanities in Europe". TABLE OF CONTENTS: Editorial: The Status Quo of Digital Humanities in Europe by Torsten Kahlert and Claudia Prinz, Humboldt-University of Berlin The Status Quo of Digital Humanities in Sweden: Past, Present and Future of Digital History by Thomas Nygren, HUMlab, Umeå University, Department of Education, Uppsala University and Department of History, Stanford University; Anna Foka, HUMlab, Umeå University; Philip I. Buckland, Department of Historical, Philosophical & Religious Studies, Umeå University From "Humanities and Computing" to "Digital Humanities": Digital Humanities in Portugal with a focus on Historical Research by Daniel Alves, Instituto de História Contemporânea, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa Digital Humanities in the Netherlands by Joris van Zundert, Huygens Institute for the History of the Netherlands, Royal Netherlands Academy of Art; Karina van Dalen-Oskam, Huygens Institute for the History of the Netherlands, Royal Netherlands Academy of Art and Sciences / University of Amsterdam The Status Quo of Digital Humanities in Greece by Helen Gardikas-Katsiadakis, Modern Greek History Research Centre, Academy of Athens The Past and Present of Digital Humanities: A View from Russia by Irina Garskova, Moscow Lomonosov State University Vernetzter Geist? Stand und Tendenzen der Digital Humanities in der Schweiz by Eliane Kurmann / Enrico Natale, infoclio.ch A historical perspective on the digital humanities in Spain by Paul Spence, Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London; Elena Gonzalez-Blanco, Dpto. de Literatura Española y Teoría de la Literatura, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia The Slovenian Digital Humanities Landscape - A Brief Overview by Jurij Hadalin, Institute of Contemporary History, Ljubljana Some thoughts on Digital Humanities in Norway by Von Espen S. Ore, Dept. of Linguistics and Sca

Mike James urges programmers to adapt gaming techniques to allow the regular-Joe academic expert to include a simulation quickly and easily into a learning experience (instead of videotaping them as they present it via words or pre-produced visuals)

Tom Caswell's presentation on Washington State Technical and Commity Colleges' Open Education initiative from the #elifocus11 session, Day 1.

While higher ed is a "platform" and not a business, DeMillo posits that we can see the marketplace finding a bypass around universities that have not truly focused on differentiation or embraced openness, states 3 "economic realities" that shows the middle tier of universities (vast majority) waste money and has completely misjudged its value - Rich A. DeMillo is a Distinguished Professor of Computing at the Georgia Institute of Technology, the seventh ranked public university in the U.S. and one of the premier institutions internationally. He currently serves as the Director of the Center for 21st Century Universities (C21U). This presentation was given as part of CFHE12 on Monday, October 15, 2012

interesting points re video of prof working out the problem as demo (vs. slide presented with problem already worked out) and issue of SlideSpeech vs. video transcriptions for cost

Archive and collection presentations for scholars, museums and libraries from the Center for History and New Media - free, open source web-publishing platform. Can be used like a blog or to share collaborative work in digital scholarship. Used by Brown University's Center for Digital Scholarship

Emphasizing lecture capture tool as a cheaper way to gather presentational materials for students to access anytime/anywhere; touches on issue of intellectual property but no analysis; mentions in passing that most of the open material comes from one or two profs from University of South Florida; reminds us that foundational grants are crucial to large initiatives' success

Patrick R. Lowenthal and David Thomas take a strong stance in decrying the use of student-teacher electronic dropboxes for submission of student work. We all know that in the performance arts, students benefit from public critique - and as scholars we insist on this practice for ourselves, making sure we present "papers" at prestigious conferences. So, why expect our students to perform in the "real world" and be subject regularly to critique by the very public that should be supporting the funding of their education?

Mellon Fndtn $ to study educational uses of content in the digital age, including "(i) student use, collection, and creation of diverse content (e.g. web pages, images, video, and audio); (ii) digital activity by other types of established institutions (e.g. public broadcasting; museums); (iii) educational content assembled and presented outside of any traditional institution, particularly on the internet (e.g. the Red Hot Jazz Archive; the Victorian Web); and (iv) grass-roots open source educational projects (e.g. Wikipedia; the online Samuel Pepys Diary)." Also addressing legal obstacles for good practices and effective use of digital media.