Social media helps dictators, not just protesters - The Washington Post - 3 views
www.washingtonpost.com/...-dictators-not-just-protesters
authoritarianism resilience socialmedia social media autocracy analysis
shared by Ed Webb on 30 Mar 15
- No Cached
-
In a recent article (ungated), I document the co-option of social media by governments in Russia, China, and the Middle East, and find four different ways in which they have begun to use social media to prolong their rule.
-
social media is increasingly being used to actually boost regime stability and strength, transforming it from an obstacle to government rule into another potential tool of regime resilience
-
social media is becoming a safe and relatively cheap way for rulers to discover the private grievances and policy preferences of their people
- ...7 more annotations...
-
social media is a reliable way to gauge the effectiveness of local officials, who are often unaccountable to their constituencies. Since they usually operate through opaque and byzantine institutions, the central government often knows little about the competence and popularity of their local representatives, who have every reason to lie about their performance
-
Cracking down on local corruption in turn makes the central government appear more responsive, increasing its effectiveness and legitimacy
-
social media provides an effective way to reach out to the regime’s supporters. Just as opposition leaders use social media to mobilize protesters, regimes can use it to organize and rally their own domestic allies – military or business elites, but also regular citizens motivated by patriotism or ideology
-
social media offers a convenient way to shape the contours of public discourse among the public at large. Governments have always used mass media – newspapers, radio, and TV – to disseminate regime-friendly propaganda. Social media, however, has the added benefit of being inherently decentralized, interactive, and non-hierarchical, and can thus more easily avoid the appearance of artifice
-
The opposite of Internet freedom may not be brute-force censorship but a deceptive blend of control, co-option, and manipulation
-
By shaping dominant narratives and mobilizing supporters, social media can help incumbents to guard themselves not only from domestic unrest but also from external pressures for reform
-
Autocrats have proven to be remarkably adaptive and resilient in the face of new challenges, and their subversion of social media could mean long-term problems for the future of democracy