Skip to main content

Home/ ETC545 Spring 2009/ Group items tagged Lesson

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Lesson : The Writing Process : Introduction - 0 views

edtechation.com/...wikiwriting

shared by Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09 - Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • Ramsey Adams
      Ramsey Adams on 25 Apr 09
       
      I feel that my use of auditory, visual, and interactive forms to present the lesson materials coincides with not only enhancing the EFL learners experience with the lesson by providing greater exposure to the target language but also fulfilling universal design principles. Combining the ways the lesson is presented makes the lesson accessible to those with particular special needs or learning styles. The lesson is very much structured in the constructivist frameworks of inquiry based and project based learning as learners produce a final product through the process of investigation, discussion, collaboration, and reflection. The lesson provides instruction on how to begin the process and provides adequate scaffolding in the form of videos, supporting links, and discussion forums with both instructors and peers. However the route the learner takes is up to them. An important element of the lesson is that learners choose their own topic. I initially had structured the lesson around animal rights with three possible questions for investigation. However, upon reading related literature which revealed that activities were more successful and learners got more out of them when they pursue their investigation on a topic of personal interest (Clark, 2006). Putting the learner in control increases their motivation and participation as they have taken ownership of the project. Clark A. (2006). Changing classroom practice to include the Project approach. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 8(2). Retrieved on February 20, 2008, from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v8n2/clark.html.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Great thoughts on "). Putting the learner in control increases their motivation and participation as they have taken ownership of the project." Learning management is the key.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • Ramsey Adams
      Ramsey Adams on 24 Apr 09
       
      I have included wikis, discussion forums, and the social bookmarking tool Delicious. The wiki was chosen for its capacity for editing. Given that a large part of the lesson is about peer editing using a wiki was a logical choice. Wetpaint wiki was specifically chosen given the integration of the discussion forum which is used throughout the lesson. Discussion forums were used to get learners thinking about the concepts of the lesson and to build rapport between learners prior to the editing process. Another element of the lesson requires learners to research out information on the Internet and reference those sources. Delicious was chosen because it allows learners to easily keep all the sites they have found in one place and to share resources. Though it was suggested to use Diingo for learners to leave feedback during the peer edit portion of the lesson, I opted not to introduce another technology tool such as Diingo fearing that the lesson would be more about the learning of new technology tools and less about the actual goal of the lesson: writing.
    • Ramsey Adams
      Ramsey Adams on 24 Apr 09
       
      To add to the explanation of why Wetpaint was chosen the ability to add templates to new pages permitted me to integrate the peer edit form directly into a wiki page. This alliviates the need for learners to download and print the form, if for example they do not have access to a printer. Additionally it allows learners to simply switch between pages to view the comments left to them by their peers.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 25 Apr 09
       
      Ramsey, Thanks for reponses! I think you made good chocie on tools. Have you used other wiki tools? Personally, Wetpaint is an effecitve one because it has RSS, tagging, and connected to iGoogle features etc.
    • Ramsey Adams
      Ramsey Adams on 25 Apr 09
       
      I have used pbwiki which I think is a great wiki for those who may be indimidated by the multiple tools available on Wetpaint. pbwiki is extremely straightforward to use. However, for this lesson I need those 'extras'. I even thought about uploading my flash presentation to youtube then embedding them directly into Wetpaint. However, I opted to leave them within the lesson webpages. I didn't want to overcrowd the class wiki with the lesson and keep it solely for the learners work. This is in part due to the limited number of pages Wetpaint permits per site (50 I think). Another reason may be the limited customization permitted with Wetpaint. For example with many blog templates you can customize the CSS page. So far I haven't figured out how to with Wetpaint.
    • Ramsey Adams
      Ramsey Adams on 25 Apr 09
       
      I forgot to mention - with Wetpaint I was able to register the site as an educational site to have the ads taken off the pages. I petitioned and within a day I received a confirmation telling me the adds are gone. This is a great way to keep the site appropriate for use in K-12 and with all learners as their mind stays focused on the materials presented in the text and not be distracted with the ads.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Ramsey, Great informaiotn! :-)
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
    • Ramsey Adams
      Ramsey Adams on 25 Apr 09
       
      I think it is effective, its success cannot be known until it is put into action. However, I feel that I have created an interactive lesson that guides learners through the process of writing an effective essay. The lesson provides many supports including useful vocabulary, links to grammar exercises, video demonstration of all the technology tools, and discussions to share their experiences and discoveries throughout the process. The lesson engages learners not only in discussions but also in the process of peer editing. From an instructor's viewpoint the lesson plan is very detailed with a step by step process of how to implement the lesson. The lesson flows in a natural progression starting learners off by introducing them to the technology tools and providing an explanation of why they need to learn them, stepping them through the writing process and components of a 5 paragraph essay, and then providing support in how to proofread, edit, and finally publish their work. Potential pitfalls may include the lack of access to headsets or speakers for learners to benefit from the audio portion of the lesson. Students may also find working with new technologies intimidating. However, I believe that I have made a good attempted to break the lesson into smaller 'bit sized' pieces so that learners can fully comprehend one step before moving on to the next. The inclusion of identical text-based lessons, I felt, were also important for those learners who either do not have flash installed and for some reason don't want to install it or for those who prefer a traditional text format. Overall, I think I have constructed a theoretically sound lesson that supports learners while permitting them the freedom to discover in their own way.
    • Ramsey Adams
      Ramsey Adams on 26 Apr 09
       
      Other pitfalls: despite my great effort to provide audio and visual documents for learners with specials needs - depending on those needs their contribution to the peer-editing task may be limited. On this same note, having learners edit each others paper directly in the wiki 1) helps them to visual see within the direct context of the paper errors and corrections but 2) coming from a peer may not necessarily be accurate - this is where instructor guidance is key. Furthermore, learners will need to "clean up" their text before final publication. This could however, help to reinforce areas they need improvement. That is to say the act of going over each correction may provide a needed step in remembering.
    • Ramsey Adams
      Ramsey Adams on 03 May 09
       
      Chih, Is there a reason why when I hover over the graphics in the site they don't reveal the ALT tag I have included? If you view source - the alt tags are there - but no coming through?? Any ideas?
Ramsey Adams

Writing With Wikis: The Writing Process - 0 views

edtechation.com/...index.html

web based writing process Wetpaint Wiki

shared by Ramsey Adams on 19 Apr 09 - Cached
  • Ramsey Adams on 19 Apr 09
     
    Web-based lesson which utilizes the Web 2.0 tools Wetpaint Wiki and Delicious as learners research out a chosen topic to then write an argumentation based on the 5 paragraph essay model. Learners will compile, modify, peer-edit, revise and publish their essays using Wetpaint.
  • ...3 more comments...
  • virginia60 Steinmetz on 03 May 09
     
    Ramsey, Great job! The lesson was really great and I enjoyed how you took the time to teach the students how to use the Web 2.0 tools. This is such an important lesson for students today. Aim/Purpose -- The introduction lays out the objectives of the lesson very well - Expert Lesson Plan -- Link to the lesson plan is included and it works - Mastery Student Activity Page -- The student activity pages describe specific learning activities in age appropriate language as well as including flash videos. Copies of grading rubrics are available. - Expert. Parent Page -- Parent page includes creative ideas for engaging students at home as well as the FERPA laws and the rubrics to help the parent encourage their children at home. - Expert Layout -- The web page is very nicely laid out and the white space is used very well. The graphic element at the top enhances the page, and the use of the note page is placed well and very helpful for a quick idea of what the student will learn in the lesson. - Expert Navigation -- All links are clearly marked and go where you expect to go. Some of the links did not work. - Mastery Graphics -- The graphic included relates to instruction, --Expert Accessibility -- Images do not have ALT tags. Lessons are described appropriately. She includes a link to be in either a flash version of the lesson or in a text version of the lesson. - Mastery Fonts -- The use of fonts is consistent and easy to read. The point size varies from heading to text and bold and underline is used appropriately. Color is used to distinguish headings in an appropriate way. - Expert Background -- The background is exceptionally attractive and consistent across the pages. It adds to the theme and purpose of the lesson. - Expert. Color Choices -- Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links were all pleasing. They did not detract from the content and were consistent across the website. - Expert. Spelling & Grammar -- There are 1-3 errors in g
  • virginia60 Steinmetz on 03 May 09
     
    Spelling & Grammar -- There are 1-3 errors in grammar in the final draft of the lesson. - Mastery Copyright -- Fair use guidelines are followed with clear, easy-to-locate and accurate citations for ALL borrowed material. - Expert. I am not sure what happened with the last post here is the rest of it. Virginia
  • Misty Tuttle on 04 May 09
     
    Peer Evaluation for Ramsey Adams by Misty Tuttle Wow! I'm blown away by your website. You put a lot of time and thought into your lessons and web design. Way to go! Aim/Purpose - (expert) Home page clearly outlines the objectives of the website. Lesson Plan - (expert) The lesson plan links loads and displays lesson properly with video lessons. Very cool! Student Activity Page - (expert) Students visit lesson links and watch video lessons. In addition, there is a student resources link. There are a lot of student links. Great student page! Parent Page - (expert) Includes a print version of the lesson plan as well as lesson objectives. Very informative for the parent. Tons of information! Layout - (expert) organized and easy to use. Navigation - (expert) Easy to navigate. Graphics - (expert) Pictures highly support content. Accessibility - (expert) Images reinforce contents of the pages. Fonts - (expert) good use fonts. They are readable and appropriate. Background - (expert) Backgrounds are consistent throughout the site. Color Choices - (expert) I liked the color choices. They add to the content and message. Spelling and Grammar - (expert) I didn't notice any mistakes. Copyright - (expert) Listed at the bottom of the page. Contact Information - (expert) All webpages contain authorship information and copyright information.
  • Stephanie Witsil on 04 May 09
     
    ETC545: Internet for Educators Development of Web-Based Resources for Lesson Plan Self Assessment Rubric Name of Author: Ramsey Adams Title of Lesson: The Writing Process Date: May 3, 2009 Aim/Purpose: Expert- Great introduction. It explains the content very nicely! Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/Instructional Plan: Expert - Link to lesson plan works well and has various elements Student Activity Page: Expert - Copies of rubrics follow with student activities Parent Page: Expert - Great parent page with information on laws and what students are supposed to be doing. Web Design Layout: Expert- well maintained layout Navigation: Expert- It is easy to navigate and your information is tabbed wonderfully! Graphics: Mastery- Graphics go along with the pages and the information given, although there are very little graphics throughout. Accessibility: Mastery- Images do not have alt tags, although there is an immense amount of information on the page Fonts: Expert- Fonts are all the same and easy to read. Backgrounds: Expert- background is consistent and works well with they layout of the page. Color Choices: Expert- great choices in colors, they are consistent and work well together. Spelling and Grammar: Mastery- there are a few spelling errors. Copyright: Expert- great job in this area. Contact Information: Expert- name is displayed on every page.
  • Ramsey Adams on 04 May 09
     
    I double checked - using view source to verify the presence of ALT tags - they are there. ALT tags are designed to show when the image does not - my images load up just fine so you won't see the ALT tag unless you view the HTML source.
Ramsey Adams

The Element of Color / Communication Graphics - Graphic Design 1 - 0 views

grdesign1.wetpaint.com

shared by Ramsey Adams on 21 Apr 09 - Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • Michelle Blunk
      Michelle Blunk on 03 May 09
       
      Group collaboration. Is utilized throughout lesson, from researching sites, comparing notes, application and designing a book for presentation. Production Process - the planning of all learning is taught in the Process Writing Exercise. Pre-production (the beginning) involves the brainstorming. Production (the focus) Drafting and developing. Post-production (feedback) review and adjustment. Expectations: Tried to make sure that there were no questions as to what is expected, and that the lesson was easy to follow.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • Michelle Blunk
      Michelle Blunk on 03 May 09
       
      I have used the wiki thread as a response area to immediately involve the student's use of wiki interaction. I also incorporated NiceNet as another conference area exposing a useful site, set up with the lesson plan as well. Using other websites to teach is purposefully fun, and is a means for collaboration. Actually building a book on-line teaches by example the tools available. The home page is meant to grab the visitors attention with something to do...the use of color for immediate interest and watch a video introduction to graphic design. The script is available for diversity; I would like to further develop a better universal design in my web site. I actually filmed and edited the video, so integrating this technology is what I feel teaching web-based is all about. Application. (and learning how to put the video on the website) :)
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
    • Michelle Blunk
      Michelle Blunk on 03 May 09
       
      I feel my web-based lesson plan is effective and will be successful. The challenges that may hinder the application is the possibility of having too much to do for one lesson. I started the plan with too much content and cut back on what I wanted to cover. Having too much can be overwhelming, not only for the students, but for myself as well. I am sure that I will be able to address this when I put this into action. Is a struggle for me to access the time necessary to be productive and efficient, without over-doing. (but I have sooo much I want to say)
  • ...1 more annotation...
    • Ramsey Adams
      Ramsey Adams on 01 May 09
       
      Michelle, Overall I like the lesson. The lesson is engaging and focused and uses external sites to support the lesson appropriately. You have also provided adequate scaffolding and step by step instructions on how to implement and carry out the lesson. Well done. * Aim/Purpose - Expert : Entry page provides informative video on the lesson topic. Good use of multi-colored fonts to draw reader's attention. * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan : Expert: Lesson plan for teachers is well presented with the content and technology standards and correspond to the objectives and activities. * Student Activity Page: Expert: Lesson is designed for 10-12th graders - activities are appropriate for this age group. Activities are clearly listed in "Steps", are linked to the rubrics, and provide learners with clear idea of what is expected of them. * Parent Page : Expert++ Parent page is full of detailed and clear ideas for extending the learning activity beyond this lesson. - Excellent job. * Web Design: * Layout - Expert: Pages are clearly labeled - users know exactly what they will find on each page. Appropriate use of white space to avoid "over-crowding" of information. Information is organized and easy to read. * Navigation - Expert: All the links are labeled and open to the appropriate site. Important links are found in multiple places (i.e. within the lesson and on the resource page) * Graphics - Mastery: Somewhat limited use of graphics but those that are included are directly related to lesson. * Accessibility - Mastery: ALT tags are not apparent. * Fonts - Expert: Fonts are consistent throughout. Front page utilized colored fonts well. * Background - Expert: White background is simple and consistent and renders the pages easy to view. * Color Choices - Expert: Basic white background with mostly black font renders the site readable and clear. Visited links appear as a different color.
  • Michelle Blunk on 21 Apr 09
     
    Learn the importance of color and its' application in design. - The Element of Color / Communication Graphics
  • George Arredondo on 04 May 09
     
    Michelle, I found your lesson interesting. I enjoyed going to some of the sites you incorporated into your lesson. Students can easily work through this process seeking little or no support to complete each task. Good Job! CONTENT: Aim/Purpose: EXPERT - Home page gives you an insight to what is going to occur with the video and the summary outline. Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan: EXPERT - Lesson plan has the necessary content to follow along through the process corresponding with state standards and objectives through the activities. Student Activity Page: EXPERT - The sophistication of this lesson is appropriatly designed for 10-12th graders - Activities steps are clear, the rubrics, and provide learners with clear idea of what is expected of them. Parent Page : EXPERT - The Parent page has a plethora ideas for a parent to consider, good job. WEB DESIGN: Layout: EXPERT - Pages are clearly labeled - users can expect what they will find on each page. Appropriate use of white space used to effectively organize material. Navigation: EXPERT - All the links are labeled and open to the appropriate site. Key hot links are found in multiple places. Graphics: MASTERY - Graphics was limited. But when used they were relevant to the topic. Accessibility: MASTER - Due to limited graphic's ALT tags were limited. Fonts: EXPERT - Fonts used was clear and easy to read, consistent throughout. Most colored fonts used in the first page. Background: EXPERT - Simple White background used and consistent. Color Choices: EXPERT - Background provided clarity with the content provided. Visited links appear as a different color. Spelling and Grammar: EXPERT - No errors are aparant. Copyright: MASTERY - Graphics were limited to new sites opened. Contact Information: EXPERT - Contact information provided in each page plus the parents page.
George Arredondo

Data and System Security - 0 views

dana.ucc.nau.edu/...arretc545

shared by George Arredondo on 27 Apr 09 - Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
  • ...1 more annotation...
    • Ramsey Adams
      Ramsey Adams on 02 May 09
       
      George, Great lesson that tackles an important topic of Internet safety, provides great definitions, resources, and is very clear and focused throughout. Your lesson uses a nice mix of technology tools (Delicious, Google Docs). * Aim/Purpose - Expert: Opening page provides a brief description of the lesson and WHY it is important to learn the concepts. Excellent! * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan : Expert: Step by step procedures provided (any instructor could implement this lesson based on the information provided). Appropriate content and tech standards. Rubric is aligned with activities/process. One suggestion: have a downloadable version for teachers to print out. * Student Activity Page: Expert: Activities arranged in a logical order are focused and engaging. Great use of delicious for compiling the required lesson links. Activities are appropriate and aligned with the stated objectives. Nice use of tech tools such as Google docs in the collaborative portion of the lesson. One suggestion: depending on the size of the class, dividing the class into smaller groups to contribute to the Google doc. The way the lesson is described it sounds like the whole class participates in the same Google doc - could get overwhelming with 15 plus students. * Parent Page : Expert: Excellent information provided for parents on how to engage their learners outside the learning environment on a particularly important topic of Internet safety. Well Done! * Web Design: * Layout - Mastery: Pages are clearly labeled - users know exactly what they will find on each page. Some text falls outside the white space onto the background - particularly bullet lists. * Navigation - Expert: Easy navigation with the main menu located at the top of each page. * Graphics - Expert: Great use of graphic for both instructional purposes and web design - each one is referenced. * Accessibility - Expert: Graphics contain ALT tags. *
  • George Arredondo on 30 Apr 09
     
    This lesson focuses on the importance of maintaining data integrity and Security issues related to computer hardware and software that manipulates the data. Students will identify issues related to security and describe the impact of viruses that come in many forms. Students will perform one focused research activity using Delicious, one using Google, and acollaboration activity using Google Docs.
  • Stephanie Witsil on 04 May 09
     
    Name of Author: George Arredondo Title of Lesson: Data and System Security Date: May 3, 2009 Aim/Purpose: Expert-homepage describes what the content and lesson plan will be about. Wonderful Job! Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/Instructional Plan: Expert-link is included and it loads properly. Student Activity Page: Expert- gives students more information on how to access the lesson material. Parent Page: Expert-great information for parents!! Web Design Layout: Expert- colors work well with each other, is organized and easy to follow. Navigation: Expert- easy to navigate and information is stated clearly Graphics: Expert- graphics are linked and have appropriate content include. They also relate to the material presented on the web page. Accessibility: Expert- Images have links and states where they are from. Fonts: Expert- the font is clear and effective Backgrounds: Expert- background is attractive and consistent. Color Choices: Expert- color choices are well chosen and are consistent. Spelling and Grammar: Expert- there are no errors in spelling Copyright: Mastery- the source for most of all the photos have cites linked to them. Contact Information: Expert- the parents page has the teachers email and links to leave comments.
  • George Arredondo on 04 May 09
     
    I hope I did a good job and will convey the importance the lesson. CONTENT: Aim/Purpose: EXPERT - Home page gives you an insight to what is going to be addressedo and the summary outline. Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan: EXPERT - Lesson plan has the necessary content to follow along through the process corresponding with state standards and objectives through the activities. Student Activity Page: EXPERT - The sophistication of this lesson is appropriatly designed for 9 - 12th graders - Activities steps are clear, the rubrics, and provide learners with clear idea of what is expected of them. Parent Page : EXPERT - The Parent page has a helpful tips along with contact information. WEB DESIGN: Layout: EXPERT - Pages are clearly labeled - users can expect what they will find on each page. Appropriate use of white space used to effectively organize material. Navigation: EXPERT - All the links are labeled and open to the appropriate site. Key hot links are found in multiple places. Graphics: MASTERY - Graphics was limited. But when used they were relevant to the topic. Accessibility: MASTER - Due to limited graphic's ALT tags were limited. Fonts: EXPERT - Fonts used was clear and easy to read, consistent throughout. Background: EXPERT - Simple two tone light background used and consistent. Color Choices: EXPERT - Background provided clarity with the content provided. Visited links appear as a different color. Spelling and Grammar: EXPERT - No errors are aparant. Copyright: EXPERT - Graphics were labled. Contact Information: EXPERT - Contact information provided in each page through the hot links.
Chih-Hsiung Tu

New Page 1 - 0 views

pine.ucc.nau.edu/...index.htm

shared by Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09 - Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • Stephanie Witsil
      Stephanie Witsil on 04 May 09
       
      Three most effective instructional strategies integrated in my project are group discussions between those who peer reviewed each others work, being able to have a electronic copy of the lesson plan virtually any where they are (where are computer is present), and the use of invesigation when examining different articles.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • Stephanie Witsil
      Stephanie Witsil on 04 May 09
       
      My students were to use wiki to post and discuss each others work. The focus was for the students to post their papers and have others in the class peer review. The use of the wiki is widely accessible for many students to access every students paper in the class. This in the end provides opportunities for students to have numerous peers evaluate their work.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
    • Stephanie Witsil
      Stephanie Witsil on 04 May 09
       
      I do believe this can be effective in the classroom, although I do think after I teach it I will have to reflect on it to master the art of developing this lesson. Some pitfalls for me as of now is the assesibility of the web site. It is still unclear to me how to put ALT tags on my web site for other to view it. Other than that, I feel I will have to help my students through wiki. Most students will not understand until they completely "get" the whole process.
  • Stephanie Witsil on 21 Apr 09
     
    A more in depth look at persuasive writing and how media persuades young adults.
  • ...2 more comments...
  • Kristin Robertson on 28 Apr 09
     
    Stephanie Witsil Review This was an amazing web site. Well put together and it looked great. Nice job! * Aim/Purpose- Expert- The entry page repeats the goals from the lesson plan. * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan- Mastery- Loaded and displayed quickly. * Student Activity Page- Mastery- Great links/resources available to students. The directions for the lesson are difficult to find. * Parent Page- Mastery- Provides a link to a great site with ideas and tips for parents. * Layout- Expert- Amazing layout, easy to follow, visually pleasing. * Navigation- Expert- Easy to use and clear locations * Graphics- Expert- Graphics are great for the lesson and cited. * Accessibility- N/A * Fonts- Expert- Consistent and appealing. * Background- Expert- Very attractive and consistent. * Color Choices- Expert- Very attractive and pleasing to the user. * Spelling and Grammar- Expert- No errors * Copyright- Expert- Every graphic is clearly cited. * Contact Information- Expert- Available on every page.
  • Chih-Hsiung Tu on 28 Apr 09
     
    Kristin, You left Accessibility- N/A. Make sure to review accessibility, such as universal design etc.
  • virginia60 Steinmetz on 03 May 09
     
    Stephanie, Great job!! I really enjoyed the lesson. Aim/Purpose -- The introduction lays out the objectives of the lesson very well -- Expert Lesson Plan - Link to the lesson plan is included and it works -- Expert Student Activity Page -- The student activity pages include great resources for the students to use, but the instructions are difficult to find - Mastery. Parent Page -- Parent page includes creative ideas for engaging students in the lesson at home as well as a site to help parents extend the learning at home.- Expert Layout -- The web page is very nicely laid out and the white space is used very well. The graphic element enhances the page. -- Expert Navigation -- All links are clearly marked and go where you expect to go. -- Expert Graphics -- The graphic included relates to instruction and are cited. --Expert Accessibility -- Images do not have ALT tags. Lessons are described appropriately. -- Novice Fonts - The use of fonts is consistent and easy to read. The point size varies from heading to text and bold and underline is used appropriately.. -- Expert Background -- The background is exceptionally attractive and consistent across the pages. It adds to the theme and purpose of the lesson. - Expert. Color Choices -- Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links were all pleasing. They did not detract from the content and were consistent across the website. - Expert. Spelling & Grammar -- There are no spelling, punctuation or grammar errors in the final draft of the lesson. -- Expert Copyright -- Fair use guidelines are followed with clear, easy-to-locate and accurate citations for ALL borrowed material. - Expert Contact Information -- Every webpage contains a statement of authorship, school/business name, and date of publication and date last edited. -- Expert
  • Misty Tuttle on 04 May 09
     
    Peer evaluation for Stephanie Witsil by Misty Tuttle I really liked your website. Nice job! Aim/Purpose - (expert) Home page clearly describes what the content of the website is with high student interest. Lesson Plan - (expert) The lesson plan link loads and displays lesson properly. Student Activity Page - (expert) Many different sites for the students to visit. Parent Page - (expert) Expresses the importance of encouraging children to read and write at home. Includes a link to an article for parents to read for more information. Layout - (expert) organized and easy to use. Navigation - (expert) Easy to navigate. Graphics - (expert) Pictures highly support content and are fun. Accessibility - (expert) images do not have alt tag that describes the image in detail. However, many pictures have text that describes the picture. Fonts - (expert) good use fonts. They are readable and appropriate. Background - (expert) Backgrounds are consistent throughout the site. Color Choices - (expert) I liked the color choices. They are not distracting from the content and message. Spelling and Grammar - (expert) I didn't notice any mistakes. Copyright - (expert) The source of all clip art are cited. Contact Information - (expert) There is a separate link for questions and comments with an email address for contact purposes.
Ramsey Adams

WELCOME TO THE PHOENIX COLLEGE BEAR HOSPITAL - John NAU Student II - 0 views

johnnaustudentii.wetpaint.com

shared by Ramsey Adams on 21 Apr 09 - Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • john conway
      john conway on 27 Apr 09
       
      Indirect Study (ID) is very effective in the use of this project. The student can learn and review at their own pace and the instructor takes a back seat becoming a facilitator, supporter, and resource person. The student takes on the responsibility for their learning experience, and sets their own pace, and depth of study. This type of learning process is key when the learners are in their clinical settings. Independent Study (IS) is another effective strategy used in this application. Students are asked to review the content at home. Learners are purposefully provided opportunity to foster the development of individual student initiative, self-reliance, and self-improvement. In nursing clinical(s) such developments are required to become functional as a nurse. Direct Instruction also applies in the context of this project, as the selected websites, provide step by step instructions of where to listen and what is being heard by the learner. The repetitive methodology of this allows the learner to have modeled what they need to achieve. Most of the physical side of nursing is repetition until appropriate skill is achieved, be the techniques of starting an Intravenous site, or diagnosis of normal verus adventitious sounds.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • john conway
      john conway on 27 Apr 09
       
      I do not have a true discussion board assembled for this project. There is a Wiki based response area suggested for each page all connecting main pages, (not links), for comments and questions about the page. There is direction on the learning activities page for participants to dialogue on learning experiences and concepts. I added a Diigo book-marking page under the same name as the web site. As an overkill in the book-marking I also placed a link to delicious. At current retrospect I have probably set up to many locations to blog or chat.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
    • john conway
      john conway on 27 Apr 09
       
      To a point of showing students stethoscope placement, and giving a very basic auditory demonstration of what some anatomical sounds are, I think the lesson is okay. Certainly having so many places for students to write comments to would make tracking questions difficult. Futuristically I would use a better program to generate a web page, that better directs and limits wiki discussions, or blogs. With development of skill in using a web creation program I could greatly improve my project. I think a curriculum construction course would also be greatly helpful in understanding how to put it all together for proper presentation to all.
    • john conway
      john conway on 27 Apr 09
       
      Another thought that just came to me it that the required textbook pages need to be a PDF and available on line. In the context here, I do not have the ability to create PDF, so I did not pursue it. I also believe I would have needed to obtain some permission of it use, so that also detered me from a possibly greatly improving piece to my project.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      It is correct to have many places to have sutdetns to comment is difficult for instructors to track. Consider to have some management tools, such iGoogle to manage all tools we use. Using Web 2.0 tools and not use management tools could be difficult for learning and teaching.
    • john conway
      john conway on 02 May 09
       
      I had not thought of it, adding gadgets would make some features really "cool" as the saying goes. I liked some of the youtube features others have, i am not sure what exists for nursing that would be appropraite. I need to look into it!
  • ...1 more annotation...
    • Ramsey Adams
      Ramsey Adams on 30 Apr 09
       
      John, Overall I like the lesson. The content is well out of my range of knowledge but I particularly like how the lesson is very focused on one main objective and engages learners in experimentation and discussion which directly links to their readings and in-class work. Well done. * Aim/Purpose - Expert : very clear and focused purpose to the lesson. * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan : Page contains appropriate content and technology standards. Somewhat brief explanation of lesson. Couldn't find a link to download a printable version. * Student Activity Page: Activities arranged in a logical order and included the required links (which worked) to the activity. Q and A discussion forum established to provide support to learners. * Parent Page : No parent page included and as the lesson is designed for adults it would have been inappropriate to include a parent page. * Web Design - Chose basic design within the Wetpaint Wiki templates. * Layout - layout is simple and non-distracting - keeps learners focused on the content. * Navigation - easy navigation with appropriate pages available on the left and a link on each page back to the main page. * Graphics - are appropriate and have alt tags, however, could not find references to the graphics. * Accessibility - no apparent issues with accessibility. * Fonts - are consistent throughout with larger font sizes and bold used to designate headers. * Background - the dark green background made some of the links disappear on the page. * Color Choices - some of the links appeared as light green which was a great choice for the dark green background but most of them appeared as the standard blue and were difficult to read. * Spelling and Grammar - no apparent spelling or grammar mistakes * Copyright - at the top of each page author provides information on the intent of the lesson for the Phoenix College Nursing. * Contact Informat
  • john conway on 21 Apr 09
     
    John C. ETC 545 Lesson 6 Teaching Wiki Page
  • ...3 more comments...
  • Michelle Blunk on 24 Apr 09
     
    I am not sure about this process ... so I will start here. Hi John, sure have a nice looking website! Michelle
  • Chih-Hsiung Tu on 25 Apr 09
     
    Michelle, Thanks for feedback! Could you be more specific on your evaluations. Thanks! :-)
  • john conway on 27 Apr 09
     
    Well it is a start for this digitally devided old dog. I have quite impressed by others I have seen, (one on Chocolate, and another on the Oregon Trail) and can only hope to develop like skills with similar programs. Thanks!
  • Michelle Blunk on 03 May 09
     
    John, this topic is a hard one for many (like myself) but I think you underestimate how well your site is put together. I was pulled in to want to know more and I could feel the personalization, without knowing you well. Fine Job! Expert * Aim/Purpose The who, what, where, and why are answered on the Home Page - Mastery * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan is very thorough. May want subtitles left aligned - Expert * Student Activity Page All links work - very understandable * Parent Page None; however a neat twist on this might be on taking care of/assisting needs of parents of the students. (elderly) - just a creative thought. Expert * Web Design - being a wiki, how did you design with your own color choice, no template... Expert * Layout -consistant throughout Expert * Navigation Consistant link back to Home at the bottom of all pages. Organized and flows. Expert * Graphics I love the humor. With such a technical subject, and one that is hard to be interested in if you're not, your choice of images/cartoons pulls me in to read more. (citations?) Novice * Accessibility ALT tag that describes the image and if it links anywhere - Expert * Fonts Clean and easy to read. Consistant throughout web site. Expert * Background Does not distract from design even though dark. Color-coordinated .Is your choice school colors? Mastery * Color Choices The 'norm' suggests that we don't do as you have; white on dark. I personally like it, but do notice that after awhile it glares at you. Expert * Spelling and Grammar All very professional. Novice * Copyright No copyright. Novice * Contact Information On Student Feedback only. No authorship on each page.
  • George Arredondo on 04 May 09
     
    John, I found your lesson interesting, but out of my field. I enjoyed going to some of the sites you incorporated into your lesson. Good Job! CONTENT: Aim/Purpose: EXPERT - Home page gives you an insight to what is going to occur along with a summary outline. Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan: MASTERY - Lesson plan has the limited content to follow along through the process. It corresponding with state standards and objectives through the activities. Student Activity Page: MASTERY - The sophistication of this lesson is limited. Parent Page : NOVICE - The Parent page is non-existent. WEB DESIGN: Layout: EXPERT - Pages are clearly labeled - users can expect what they will find on each page. Navigation: EXPERT - All the links are labeled and open to the appropriate site. Key hot links are found in multiple places. Graphics: EXPERT - Graphics use added to the topics relevance. Accessibility: EXPERT - ALT tags use with graphics linked to resourcesful sites. Fonts: MASTERY - Fonts used was not as clear and easy to read, consistent throughout. Background: EXPERT - Simple green background used and consistent. Color Choices: EXPERT - Background provided clarity with the content provided. Visited links appear as a different color. Spelling and Grammar: EXPERT - No errors are aparant. Copyright: MASTERY - Graphics used did not have references. Contact Information: NOVICE - Name was on top of each page but not consistent on Contact information.
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Weather Home - Weather - 0 views

weatherpatterns.wetpaint.com

shared by Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09 - Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
  • Kristin Robertson on 28 Apr 09
     
    Misty Tuttle Review The simple and consistent format of the web page is appropriate for the age of the students. * Aim/Purpose- Expert- Entry page identifies the goal for the lesson. * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan- Mastery- Easy to find and load. * Student Activity Page- Mastery- Page has fun activities but unclear connection to the presentations and kid pix assignments. * Parent Page- Expert- Page has great and creative activities for parents to do at home. * Layout- Expert- Site is easy to use, organized, simple, and understandable. * Navigation- Expert- Use the menu on the left to navigate through the site. * Graphics- Mastery- Pictures enhance lesson, but are not cited. * Accessibility- N/A * Fonts- Expert- Consistent and simple. * Background- Expert- Consistent and simple. * Color Choices- Expert- Consistent and simple. * Spelling and Grammar- Expert- No errors. * Copyright- N/A * Contact Information- Expert- Provided by Wiki
  • ...1 more comment...
  • Tracy Robbins on 29 Apr 09
     
    Tracy Robbins Review This website adheres to the principals stated below. What a great way to involve the children in weather concepts. The parent activities look to be a lot of fun. Lesson plan is very good. I like the addition of a discussion page for students and parents to collaborate. Aim/Purpose - (expert) home page accurately describes what the intention of the website is and the goal for the webpage. Lesson Plan - (mastery) The lesson plan link is easy to find and load quickly and properly Student Activity Page - (expert) Several choices of sites to go to for the students and each link describes what the students will be learning at that site. Parent Page - (expert) Great activities to assist the parents in getting involved in the learning. Layout - (expert) organized and easy to use. Navigation - (expert) Easy to navigate around each individual page and throughout the webpage. Graphics - (expert) Pictures match content. Good use of pictures to pre-assess learning. Accessibility - (mastery) images do not have alt tag that describes the image in detail. They do, however, list "weather" as a tag. Fonts - (expert) good use of various fonts to enhance the webpage and they are easily readable and appropriate. Background - (expert) Backgrounds are consistent throughout the site. Whitespace allows the reader to focus on the text. Color Choices - (expert) good. Do not distract from the content and message. Spelling and Grammar - (expert) no errors noticed. Copyright - (expert) looks good to me Appears that most pictures were taken from clipart and those that were not are marked with webaddress. References are sited. Contact Information - (expert) All contact information is posted at the bottom of the webpages.
  • Chih-Hsiung Tu on 29 Apr 09
     
    Tracy, You indicated: "Accessibility - (mastery) images do not have alt tag that describes the image in detail. They do, however, list "weather" as a tag. " Great observations! How about universal design?
  • virginia60 Steinmetz on 03 May 09
     
    Misty, I really enjoyed the lesson on weather. I was just a little confused about the KidPix part of the lesson since I couldn't find it in the student activities pages. I can believe this would be a great lesson for the students and the Parent activities were great. Great job!! Virginia Aim/Purpose -- The entry page tells what the Aim/Purpose of the lesson is to the student - Mastery Lesson Plan - Link to the lesson plan is included and it works -- Mastery Student Activity Page -- The student activity pages describe learning activities in age appropriate language. The rubric is for a lesson on KidPix, but I didn't see anything in the student activities for KidPix. Copies of grading rubrics are available. - Mastery. Parent Page -- Parent page includes creative ideas for engaging students at home. Really creative ideas. I thought the idea of reading the book and making a cake was great, also making the cloud in a jar was cool. - Expert Layout -- The wiki page is very nicely laid out. The graphics on the first page are an interesting start. I especially like the layout on the Parent page. The layout on the student activity page looks shifted to the right, but otherwise all the pages were well done. -- Expert Navigation -- All links are clearly marked and go where you expect to go. All of the links worked -- Expert Graphics -- The graphics used related to the topic and enhanced the instruction. --Expert Accessibility -- Images have ALT tags. -- Expert Fonts - The use of fonts is consistent and easy to read. The point size varies from heading to text and bold and underline is used appropriately. -- Expert Background -- The background is exceptionally attractive and consistent across the pages. It adds to the theme and purpose of the lesson. - Expert. Color Choices -- Colors of background, fonts, unvisited and visited links were all pleasing. They did not detract from the content and were consistent across the website. - Expert. Spelling & Grammar -
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Animal Research Project Home - Animal Research Project - 0 views

robertsonanimalprojects.wetpaint.com

shared by Chih-Hsiung Tu on 19 Apr 09 - Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • Kristin Robertson
      Kristin Robertson on 28 Apr 09
       
      The students are using a hand-on approach to retrieving and creating information. They will be responsible for their own learning in this way. They will be creating many aspects to their final projects, report, diorama, presentation, and posted picture. By them taking a hands on approach they will be more invested and engaged in their learning. The students can also choose to be working cooperatively or independently. The choice gives students the opportunity to determine the best learning for themselves. They are also determining which style of learner they are which will benifit them in all other learning endevours. The students will also be working on time management, organization, and long term projects. They will be developing these skills to enhance their future and curent education.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • Kristin Robertson
      Kristin Robertson on 28 Apr 09
       
      The instructional technologies that are in this lesson are posting a digital picture to the web page, having a discussion or commenting in the discussion area, and (I know it is not an instructional technology, but it is a very important skill to learn) navigating the websites to complete a task. Uploading the picture to the web page is going to be the most challenging technology part of the lesson. The students can, and I predict will, be using the discussion section to chat with each other.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
    • Kristin Robertson
      Kristin Robertson on 28 Apr 09
       
      I am excited about this lessom plan. I think the students will love to be able to go online to get the information and all of the resources they will need to complete the project. They will benifit from navigating through the site and the individual responsibility they must use to complete the project. As far as pitfalls, the most difficult task for the students which will require help and assistance will be posting their picture of the diorama to the website. I think they will be able to do everything else, and I am hoping they surprise me with their abilities and I will be able to add even more things into the nest web-based lesson plan.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 28 Apr 09
       
      I wonder you may reault the potential pitfall. Could you share with us?
  • Kristin Robertson on 19 Apr 09
     
    Information for the animal research project - Animal Research Project Home
  • ...2 more comments...
  • Kristin Robertson on 28 Apr 09
     
    Self Evaluation * Aim/Purpose - Expert- The entry page states a quick overview and goals of the assignment. * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan - Mastery- Links to the lesson plan page easily and clearly. * Student Activity Page - Expert- Contains links and information pages for the students to use. * Parent Page - Expert- Has trips to take in the area, web-games to allow students to play, and suggestions for at home discussions. * Layout - Expert- The pages are very organized, easy to use, and understandable. * Navigation - Expert- Links take user to expected location, and at the bottom of each page is a link back to home, and users can use the navigation tool bar on the left of the page. * Graphics - Mastery- The pictures are related to the lesson and interesting to students. They are cited at the bottom of the page. * Accessibility - Novice- The pictures have a short written statement/ description. Each picture links to the website about the specific animal. There are no audio clips. * Fonts- Expert- Fonts are consistent and simple. * Background- Expert- Consistent and simple. * Color Choices- Expert- Colors are consistent and simple on all pages. * Spelling and Grammar- Expert- There are no errors. * Copyright- Mastery- All borrowed material is cited, but I don't know if citations are done correctly. * Contact Information- Expert- Contact information is provided by Wiki on each page.
  • Tracy Robbins on 29 Apr 09
     
    Tracy Robbins Review of Kristen Robertson Great way to get kids involved in their research project. This could be adapted to several other topics as well for research. Aim/Purpose - (expert) The home page clearly states the purpose and direction of the webpage. It is very well written. Lesson Plan - (mastery) Lesson Plan link is included and works properly. Student Activity Page - (expert) Provides links to resources the students can use to gather their information. I like that it allows for choice. Parent Page - (expert) Great resources and advice for parents to assist. Games look fun Layout - (expert) Site is organized and easy to use. Navigation - (expert) Easy to navigate around the site. Multiple ways to get to pages and back home. Graphics - (expert) Good pictures. Allows students to see a variety of animals and what they look like. Accessibility - (expert) Good use of alt tags on pictures. Fonts - (expert) A variety of sizes are used correctly to highlight areas of text that should stand out (headings, etc) Background - (expert) Consistent background used throughout the webpage. Color Choices - (expert) Consistent color background to keep the reader focused on the content. Spelling and Grammar - (expert) no errors noticed. Copyright - (expert) Yes, photos were cited at the bottom of the page. Contact Information - (expert) The bottom of each page states the author and last edit date
  • Kim Piranio on 01 May 09
     
    Kim Piranio's review of Kristin Robertson's page Animal research project * Aim/Purpose - Expert: Nice job making the first statement clear and precise. * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan - Expert: Nicely laid out and very descriptive. I especially liked how you labeled the days. * Student Activity Page - Mastery: I liked how you had note taking guides, but would of liked to see some other websites about animals. * Parent Page - Expert: Amazing parent page. I love all the activities you have for parents to do with thier kids at home. * Web Design - Expert: Nicely designed for easy access. * Layout - Expert: Clear layout of pages and information. * Navigation - Expert: I liked how you had links on your home page and on the left side. * Graphics - Expert: Nice pictures. * Accessibility - Expert: Pictures tagged with descriptions. * Fonts - Expert: Nice size change between within pages. * Background - Mastery: Nice simple background * Color Choices - Mastery: Use of a few different colors. * Spelling and Grammar - Expert: All correct * Copyright - Expert: Citations made. * Contact Information - Mastery: I would've liked to see more contact information on the parent page.
  • Michaela Minore on 04 May 09
     
    Hi Kristin, You nailed this final project! I am overly impressed and thank you for sharing; you have made me a better web-designer because of your attention to detail! Content: *no info downloaded for this content area on the rubric* mjm Aim/Purpose: Without looking further, I feel that I know what I will be learning about, based on the entry page. This is very well laid out (Expert) Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan: (Mastery) there is a link to the lesson plan that displays properly. Student Activity Page: You made a very clear concise page that is informative and useful to the students. I think that it was a great idea to include this as your Home page. (Expert) Parent Page: "Oh my gosh" were the words that I spoke out loud when I saw this page. You did a phenomenal job of creating ideas for parents to engage their students. I think that you should share this model with the rest of our class and you deserve a DOUBLE (Expert) rating. Web Design: *no info downloaded for this content area on the rubric* mjm Layout: Simple, easy to use and wonderful to look at (Expert) Navigation: (Expert) Yours was the first project that included links back to the HOME page. I was so impressed that I immediately added a similar function to my project. Thank YOU! Graphics: I really just want to stop reviewing your presentation because I have not found any faults so far :) My only suggestion here would be to include some graphics on your Home page, or any page that is meant for Students, this will help the visual learners. (Mastery) Accessibility: Only the photos on the Directions page did not have ALT tags, and I know from my own experiences that students love to click on photos, regardless of the words on a page. So maybe it is a good idea to keep the graphics off of the Student pages that have Directions. (Mastery) Fonts: Everything is in order here (Expert) Background:Simple is good or in this case it equals... (Expert) Color Choice
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Exploring Improper Fractions Home - Exploring Improper Fractions - 0 views

rachellkastensmith.wetpaint.com

shared by Chih-Hsiung Tu on 19 Apr 09 - Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
  • Phil Howardell on 25 Apr 09
     
    Rachell I have completed a review of your lesson plan wiki. I love the idea of having a class site that assignments are posted, I use a Google Doc website, but only attach my assignments. The lesson looks clear, I'm just worried that as you ask the student to open a link, they now cannot read the directions. My high school kids get lost when I do that. Wikis make putting lessons online easy and clear and your links and formatting were basic but very effective. I struggled on mine using Dreamweaver. Over all, nice job. I will post your rubric, as soon as I figure it out.
  • ...3 more comments...
  • Pamela Idell on 26 Apr 09
     
    Your webpage was very clean and simplistic. Visuals are always nice to have especially when teaching math concepts. Great idea on proposing activity and questions on the webpage.
  • Phil Howardell on 28 Apr 09
     
    Overall nice lesson plan web site. It is basic,clear and easy to follow, especially for 2nd graders. Great parent resources, clear instructions and excellent navigation. Aim-Mastery-Entry page is a general page for the class and not as clear about the lesson. Lesson Plan-Mastery-I found it! Student Activity page-Mastery-If the student goes to the web page requested, http://illuminations.nctm.org/activities.aspx?grade=2 how are they going to read the rest of the instructions? Parewnt Page-Expert-Nice parent page with links to what is going on and an explanation of the lesson. Parents need that, especially with math lessons. Good work here!! Layout-Mastery- Layout is basic, clear with no frills. Very few graphics Navigation-Expert-Navigation is clear and easy and all the links work. I love wikis for this reason. Graphics-Mastery- Very few graphics, no citations needed Accessibility-Novice-No alt tags that I can see. Fonts-Expert-Fonts are consistent and do not distract. Background-Mastery-Background is simple and does not detract. Color Choices-Mastery-Very few colors, but does not distract. Spelling and Grammar-Expert-No errors I can see. Copyright-Expert-Very little content needed citing. Contact Info-Novice-No authorship on each page except that is provided by the wiki.
  • William Jones on 28 Apr 09
     
    Aim- mastery. A straight forward opening. Lesson Plan-Mastery I was able to find it. Student Activity page- expert. The student page was very good. My only issue is that it requires students to go to a different webpage and then follow directions still on the wiki page. Maybe it should say "open this webpage in a new tab and then follow these directions." Parent Page- mastery. there is a parents page. But why is it under the student pages? shouldn't it be its own page? Also there is no section for parent feedback. (this is a wiki and it does allow for multiple people editing it. could there be a section at the bottom for questions from parents? just a thought) Layout- mastery. A wiki keeps it simple. You can petition the wetpaint wiki folks to remove the ads. I posted how to do it in blackboard on our unit 7 stuff. Navigation- mastery. I would like to give it expert, but it is not laid out as easy to navigate. The teachers page is found under the parents page, and it isn not listed on the menu on the left hand side of the screen. So the pages are there, but they are inside of each other, and not accessible from the menu on the left. Graphics mastery. very few graphics, and the ones that are used are repeated from one page to the next. Now they are not really needed. No video's embedded to help further instruction. Accessibility-. N/A. Wiki's are not univerally accessible. I do not believe in punishing a person for something that is NOT part of the program. Fonts- expert. the fonts are well done and the sizes are good. no issues Background- expert. The background is a single simple color that doesn't distract. Again you can petition wetpaint to remove the ads for an educator. Color Choices- expert. simple and straightforward. Spelling and Grammar- expert. There are no spelling errors and no major grammar mistakes. Copyright-. expert. No content needed citing. All links go to external webpages. Contact Info- there is
  • Chih-Hsiung Tu on 28 Apr 09
     
    Will, Is there any instructional strategies that is effective? Could you share with us?
  • Chih-Hsiung Tu on 28 Apr 09
     
    Phil, You stated: "Very few graphics Navigation-Expert-Navigation is clear and easy and all the links work. I love wikis for this reason. " I wonder any weakness for wiki navigation menu.
Michaela Minore

Front Page - 1 views

dana.ucc.nau.edu/...index.html

shared by Michaela Minore on 19 Apr 09 - Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • virginia60 Steinmetz
      virginia60 Steinmetz on 03 May 09
       
      Through indirect instruction students will be problem solving by comparing and contrasting the past and the present to determine the possibility of a particular outcome. They will use the information they learn to write a paper to inform their readers and create a multimedia presentation. The compare and contrast will be an easy approach because they will be able to take the two time periods and put them on charts to see what happened in each time period.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • virginia60 Steinmetz
      virginia60 Steinmetz on 03 May 09
       
      The main student activity is completed in a wiki. The students will complete their paper in the wiki. They will collaboratively compile their research in the wiki and then collaboratively write their paper in the wiki. This is a group project that will be completed in the wiki because I have found that using the wiki allows students to work together and gives them a place to have discussions as well as post the work they gather. PBWiki has a live chat session available so they can set up times for their group to meet and discuss their project as well as work on it on their own time.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
    • virginia60 Steinmetz
      virginia60 Steinmetz on 03 May 09
       
      The main pitfall I see to this lesson plan is going to be the student who does not have access to the internet at home. These are the students that will not contribute to the project as much as they could and will count on the other students to do most of the work. I believe overall the lesson plan is effective and will be successful, I will need to make sure that the students that do not have access to internet outside of school have time at school to work on the project be it before school or after school or during a study hall.
  • virginia60 Steinmetz on 19 Apr 09
     
    Personal Financial planning lesson. Students will create a digital story and collaboratively write a paper in a wiki comparing and contrasting the depression of the 1930's and the current recession. Then the students will use GoogleDocs to create their own Personal Financial Plan.
  • Kristin Robertson on 28 Apr 09
     
    Virginia Steinmetz Review * Aim/Purpose- Expert- The student goals are clearly stated on the entry page. * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan- Mastery- Lesson plan loaded and displayed properly. * Student Activity Page- Expert- Resources, rubrics, and lesson directions are clear and accessible. * Parent Page- Expert- Students are high school level and the parent page is appropriate for the age of the students. * Layout- Expert- Site is very easy to follow and clearly organized. * Navigation- Expert- Links all worked, easy to move through the pages, I was never lost. * Graphics- Mastery- Graphics relate to the lesson and has a citation. * Accessibility- N/A * Fonts- Expert- Fonts are consistent, simple, and readable. * Background- Mastery- Background is attractive, and does not detract. * Color Choices- Expert- Colors are not detracting, links visited and unvisited are clear. * Spelling and Grammar- Expert- No errors * Copyright- N/A * Contact Information- Expert- Provided on every page.
  • Michaela Minore on 04 May 09
     
    Just as a message to you about the evaluation, I feel that you are at a disadvantage (before I begin the review process) because you did not use Wiki and it is harder for me to navigate through FrontPage because I am unfamiliar with it. It does look similar to Dreamweaver. Content: *no info downloaded for this content area on the rubric* mjm Aim/Purpose: Without looking further, I feel that I know what I will be learning about, based on the entry page. (Expert) Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan: (Mastery) there is a link to the lesson plan that displays properly. Student Activity Page: I think that you did a great job on the Rubrics, but I think that some of the activities are not clearly described to the students. (Expert/Mastery) Parent Page: There was information proposed for parents to participate in their child's learning. (Expert) Web Design: *no info downloaded for this content area on the rubric* mjm Layout: I think that the layout could use some tweaking to make it more appealing to student use. I think that if I worked with the site for longer than a day I would get used to the location of the links, and be able to navigate properly. The best page that you have is your first page that opens the lesson set; this one engages me in learning, but the other sites do not make me want to follow through with the exercises and participate (Novice) Navigation: I would have liked to see more internal links for getting back to the main page, especially since I was unfamiliar with the web-design. I was able to use the back button to navigate, however, if I got too many pages away I had to re-open from your main dana page. I also noticed that there was a web address on teh parent page that was missing a link. (Novice) Graphics: I think this is one area that you could develop further to stimulate and engage students. You included a background graphic for the Powerpoint presentation but other than that the only other graphic that I
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Oregon Trail Home - 0 views

dana.ucc.nau.edu/...index.html

shared by Chih-Hsiung Tu on 20 Apr 09 - Cached
john conway liked it
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
  • john conway on 25 Apr 09
     
    Well in review I can certainly see I have more than just much to learn about development of lesson plans. Your though ness in thought and design are staggering to me. I was struggling with the technology, and had no concept of what lesson plans looked like. This is another very impressive and humbling to lesson plan. Excellent work! The only problem noted was a link issue with Oregon Pioneers By Stefanie Flora, my computer could not open it, and I been having a lot of problems of that nature.
  • ...2 more comments...
  • john conway on 28 Apr 09
     
    Elizabeth, the rubric is below (excellant work). 2. Rubric: a. Aim/Purpose: Information very well constructed and stated (expert). b. Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan: Well constructed (expert). c. Student Activity Page: Lots cool interactive links, Awesome (expert). d. Parent Page: Links lead to appropriate sites (expert). e. Layout: Very pleasing to the eye, easy to find information (expert). f. Navigation: links transfer well though out, everything works well (expert). g. Graphics: Visually entertaining, I like the links using images (expert). h. Accessibility: Images and all links work well (expert). i. Fonts: Consistent, and appropriate through out (expert). j. Background: Very pleasing simple, blue is pleasing to the eye (expert). k. Color Choices: Well chosen colors, very settling effect toward study (expert). l. Spelling and Grammar: No errors noted (expert). m. Copyright: Proper details provided (expert). n. Contact Information: Has link to proper E-mail site (expert).
  • Chih-Hsiung Tu on 28 Apr 09
     
    John, You mentioned: "Lots cool interactive links" Could you be more specific on "interactive?"
  • Ashley Doggett on 02 May 09
     
    Aim/Purpose: Expert-Purpose is well stated. Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan: Expert- Link to lesson plan works. Everything seems to be in order. Student Activity Page: Expert- Many links for students to learn from. I like how you use pictures for the students to click on. Parent Page: Expert-Many resouces for parents to look at. Also it is easy for parents to email you. Layout: Expert- Every thing is unifom. You use the same backround for each page. Navigation: Expert- All links work and are useable Graphics: Expert- I enjoyed all of your pictures. As I said before I love how you can click on the picture and it takes you to another page. Accessibility: Expert- All pages are accessible and clear. Very consistent. Fonts: Expert: Consistent throughout Background: Expert- Background is consistent on every page. Color Choices: Expert- Very surine and consistent. Spelling and Grammar: Expert- No errors that I saw. Copyright: Expert- All sources sighted, if needed. Contact Information: Expert- Can contact via email Elizabeth I just wanted to add that I absolutely loved your website. Your links were wonderful and the pictures were great. I would use your site for students!!!
  • Michelle Blunk on 03 May 09
     
    Beth - what a wonderful way to teach history - take them there! I love what you have done here - Not just because Oregon is home to me, I wanted to find out what there was to know and to be sure I had all my needed supplies. :) * Aim/Purpose Expert- Student goals are clearly stated on the entry page. Awesome entry to your site. It is clear what is going to be studied and is visually inviting. * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan Mastery- Lesson plan displayed properly Expert- Resources, rubrics, and lesson directions are clear and accessible. * Student Activity Page Expert-links very interactive; student able to experience the experience of being there with videos and feel what the pioneers had as challenges in their every-day life. You did a wonderful job of putting this activity together, to include having choices available. * Parent Page Expert - linked to interaction with student's learning. * Web Design Expert- pleasing to the eye * Layout Expert - easy to follow * Navigation Expert - Able to follow, easy to read. I, however, expected the 'back' button to take me to the last place I was, instead of home page. * Graphics Expert - well chosen for lesson design. ALL images have an ALT tag that describes the image and if it links anywhere. * Accessibility Expert - all links work. * Fonts Expert - appropriate for age group; easy to read and consistant. * Background Expert - Light blue is soothing, very attractive. * Color Choices Expert - The choices make the graphics pop-out. Consistant throughout site. * Spelling and Grammar Expert - No errors. * Copyright Expert - Noted properly - name on all pages. * Contact Information Expert - Available on all pages; links to email work. Every web page contains a statement of authorship.
Chih-Hsiung Tu

ETC545 Final Project Home - ETC545 final project - 0 views

etc545nauproject.wetpaint.com

shared by Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09 - Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • William Jones
      William Jones on 28 Apr 09
       
      I am using andragogy (which is different than pedagogy) to keep this very directed. Under the theory of andragogy (teaching adults), you want to 1. make it relevant. 2. make it direct. 3. make it hands on. My course is set up so that the instructors can work at their own pace, they have a basic explaination of what the technology/program is, how it is relevant to their teaching, and then they have to work through how to use it (with basic prompting). It is set up to be a problem centered real world issue (how to use these tools in their own classrooms) which motivates them to complete the assignments. This is not some "make believe problem" but a real world actual problem which directly involves them.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • William Jones
      William Jones on 28 Apr 09
       
      Hi Chih. Hi class. This online lesson uses the Wiki platform for the actual course content. It also includes basic image editing software such as paint. It also includes the use of youtube videos which help explain the content we are covering.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
    • William Jones
      William Jones on 28 Apr 09
       
      I have run this with my kids school here in the UAE with several of the teachers. They loved how it is laid out and how easy it is to use the wiki (once they understand it). The only real pitfall I can see with it is that by using wiki's, individuals with sight impairment/vision problems may not have universal accessability. The other issue is that RAKESS (the school) currently blocks Youtube videos (it is possible for them to unblock certain rooms, but it is a pain), and that teachertube is NOT able to be embedded into wetpaint wiki's.
  • William Jones on 21 Apr 09
     
    This is the location of my final project for ETC 545. - ETC545 Final Project Home
  • ...5 more comments...
  • Phil Howardell on 25 Apr 09
     
    Will Very well laid out lesson wiki. Loved you links and the extensive resources. Wikis make simple but effective internet teaching sites. I will post your review after I figure out how to. Any ideas? Phil Howardell
  • Pamela Idell on 26 Apr 09
     
    You website, was enjoyable as you are teaching your students the use of some web 2.0 tools, delicious bookmarking and wetpaint. I loved how you incorporated videos to help expalin how to use the web 2.0 toll websites, clever idea. I know sometimes I can read how to do something and be able to get, but a video is always helpful. Then what better way to but a students knowledge to test, then have them use the tools and create things. Great Lesson!
  • Phil Howardell on 28 Apr 09
     
    Aim/Purpose-Expert- Very clear first page, I know what I'm going to learn. Lesson Plan-Mastery- Student Activity Page-Expert-The assignments page clearly tells the students what they will be doing. Parent Page-Novice-No parent page Layout-Mastery- Layout is basic, clear with no frills. The few graphics fit and tend to be links. Navigation-Expert- Graphics are links that lead to other pages and are cited. Accessibility-Novice-Does Wetpaint wiki support alt tags? NOne on my site. Fonts-Expert- Fonts are consistent and do not distract. Background-Mastery- Background is simple and does not detract. Color Choices-Mastery- Very few colors, but does not distract. Spelling and Grammar-Expert- No errors I can see. Copyright-Expert- Very little content needed citing. Extensive use of links to actual web sites. Contact Information-Novice- No authorship on each page except that is provided by the wiki.
  • William Jones on 28 Apr 09
     
    Hi Phil. I noticed on the student evaluation rubric there were not places for N/A. for example in the parents page, I don't teach children, so I don't have a parents page. I think a N/A option there would be good. as for accessiblity... I don' t know that it is novice... I don't think wiki's support alt tags. would that be a better as an N/A also? i did think of creating a whole CSS page for people with screen readers, and having everyone go there first and get the choice of wiki or universal accessability, but it seemed like a lot of work to go through, and then the universal accessability would not be interactive as the wiki's. should I do that? what do you think?
  • Chih-Hsiung Tu on 29 Apr 09
     
    Wiki made a good note on: "as for accessiblity... I don' t know that it is novice... I don't think wiki's support alt tags. would that be a better as an N/A also?" Anyone like to address it?
  • Phil Howardell on 29 Apr 09
     
    Will I couldn't agree with you more. The point of this activity was to produce a web-based learning activity which you did very effectively. I think the rubric hamstrings reviewers in to looking for things that may not be as important as the content and organization. So in an effort to try to go along with the rubric, some items get marked low. If I had free reign to assess you work, I'd say it was an excellent plan that hit what students need, it was clear, had great teaching resources and I may come back and do the lesson myself. My only comment would be to add in the introduction what your teaching level is so reviewers have some perspective as to who the "customer" is.
  • William Jones on 01 May 09
     
    Self Evaluation * Aim/Purpose - Expert- The entry page states a quick overview and goals of the assignment. * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan - Mastery- I realize I should have used the Taskstream Lesson plan builder to make it much more indepth. * Student Activity Page - Expert- This contains multi channel forms of information, videos, links and assignments. * Parent Page - N/A. I don't teach children, but rather adults. As such I don't have a parents page. I do think I should have included a "stakeholders" page for the student, teachers and administrators, but I would have it tied with the lesson plan. * Layout - Expert- I am using wetpaint wiki, and it makes the layout extremely simple and straight forward. * Navigation - Expert- Each page has its own link on the menu page, and all are accessable from any page in the site. * Graphics - Expert- There are only 2 pictures which are for Delicious and wetpaint, but it also includes several sets of videos which help explain the material.. * Accessibility - N/A. This is a wetpaint wiki and as such it does not support accessbility. The issue I have is that part of this unit is about how to use wiki's and delicious... if you make universial accessible css pages, they are NOT interactive like a wiki. * Fonts- Expert- Fonts are consistent and simple. * Background- Expert- Consistent and simple. * Color Choices- Expert- Colors are consistent and simple on all pages. * Spelling and Grammar- Expert- There are no errors. * Copyright- Mastery- All borrowed material is cited, but I don't know if citations are done correctly. I should have a resources page with the citations for the videos. * Contact Information- mastery- Contact information is provided by Wiki on each page but my contact information as the author are not listed, and my creative commons license is not listed.
Stephanie Witsil

Data and System Security - 12 views

ETC545: Internet for Educators Development of Web-Based Resources for Lesson Plan Self Assessment Rubric Name of Author: George Arredondo Title of Lesson: Data and System Security Date: May 3, 200...

started by George Arredondo on 25 Apr 09 2 follow-ups, last by Stephanie Witsil on 04 May 09
Kim Piranio

Virginia's Lesson Personal Financial Plans - 16 views

Kim Piranio's review of Virgina Steinmetz web page on personal finance. I think that your lesson is a great way for students to learn about personal finance. * Aim/Purpose - Expert: The purpose i...

Wiki GoogleDocs Delicious Collaboration DigitalStory

started by virginia60 Steinmetz on 19 Apr 09 3 follow-ups, last by Kim Piranio on 30 Apr 09
Phil Howardell

Assignment - 0 views

www.chihtu.org/...assignment.html

shared by Phil Howardell on 27 Apr 09 - Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Here is the example how we use rubrics in Diigo. * Aim/Purpose XXX * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan XXX * Student Activity Page * Parent Page * Web Design * Layout * Navigation * Graphics * Accessibility * Fonts * Background * Color Choices * Spelling and Grammar * Copyright * Contact Information
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      We can either use Stick Note or comment to entire page. Either format is acceptable.
    • Phil Howardell
      Phil Howardell on 27 Apr 09
       
      Overall nice lesson plan web site. It is basic,clear and easy to follow, especially for 2nd graders. Great parent resources, clear instructions and excellent navigation. Aim-Mastery-Entry page is a general page for the class and not as clear about the lesson. Lesson Plan-Mastery-I found it! Student Activity page-Mastery-If the student goes to the web page requested, http://illuminations.nctm.org/activities.aspx?grade=2 how are they going to read the rest of the instructions? Parewnt Page-Expert-Nice parent page with links to what is going on and an explanation of the lesson. Parents need that, especially with math lessons. Good work here!! Layout-Mastery- Layout is basic, clear with no frills. Very few graphics Navigation-Expert-Navigation is clear and easy and all the links work. I love wikis for this reason. Graphics-Mastery- Very few graphics, no citations needed Accessibility-Novice-No alt tags that I can see. Fonts-Expert-Fonts are consistent and do not distract. Background-Mastery-Background is simple and does not detract. Color Choices-Mastery-Very few colors, but does not distract. Speeling and Grammar-Expert-No errors I can see. Copyright-Expert-Very little content needed citing. Contact Info-Novice-No authorship on each page except that is provided by the wiki.
  • Ashley Doggett on 04 May 09
     
    * Aim/Purpose- Expert- Purpose is clearly stated. * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan- Expert- Lesson plan is accessible. * Student Activity Page -Expert- * Parent Page - Expert-Explains what students are doing. * Web Design- Expert- consistent and easily maneuverable * Layout - Expert- Consistent * Navigation - Expert- Pages are easy to find and to get to. * Graphics - Expert- I like that you used actual pictures of your students. * Accessibility - Expert * Fonts - Expert- Same throughout * Background - Expert- Same throughout * Color Choices - Expert- Easy on the eyes * Spelling and Grammar - Expert- No misktakes as far as I could see. * Copyright - Expert * Contact Information- Expert- Email and phone number availiable.
Misty Tuttle

Weather - 13 views

Thanks, Tracy. Your feedback has been very helpful! Tracy Robbins wrote: > Tracy Robbins Review for Misty Tuttle > This website adheres to the principals stated below. What a great way to involve...

weather etc545 lesson6 webdevelopment

started by Misty Tuttle on 22 Apr 09 2 follow-ups, last by Misty Tuttle on 04 May 09
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Haiku 2.0 ‎(Hamende5thGradeHaiku)‎ - 0 views

sites.google.com/...Home

shared by Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09 - Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • melmilks
      melmilks on 04 May 09
       
      I think one instructional strategy that is effective is the use of video tutorials for Picassa. After seeing Will's comments about having videos for actual tutorials, it made me realize how visual my students this year are. They are more likely to pay attention to a video than me telling them how to do something. Another would be the use of a photo as inspiration. I think it is important that they take this picture and have owernship in it. So often they have creative blocking when they are told to create from someone else's idea. This will hopefully motivate the creative spirit. And third is group collaboration. I think my students really flourish when they are given the chance to step back and evaulate others. The evaluation and brainstorming is also going to be written so it is something they can visit multiple times to get clarification.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • melmilks
      melmilks on 04 May 09
       
      I am using google sites, which is a wiki. Students will also be using Picassa which in an online gallery/photo editing software. The wiki will act as the discussion board (as soon and I figure that out :) )
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
    • melmilks
      melmilks on 04 May 09
       
      I need to get a parent page up- I am at a loss right now what to include on it since technology is somethign most of my parents do not have access too, also I need to make it bilingual. I think overall my lesson has the potential to be very successful. My students love anythign to do with the digital cameras and this group really got into poetry this year. Any reason to break out technology in my classroom usually equals success for this group of kids. I can forsee their being some confusion on how to collaborate with the revising process and i think that instruction clips on how to create a haiku could be very beneficial. I think that I may even film my opwn students giving the instruction to help promote buy in amongst them.
  • William Jones on 30 Apr 09
     
    Aim/Purpose-Expert- You have a very clear first page which defines what you are going to do. Lesson Plan-EXPERT!! Why didn't I think of using the taskstream lesson plan builder? It is great Student Activity Page-Expert-the activity page shows a very good set of activities. Parent Page-Novice-There is a parents page, but it is empty. In your case you teach 5th graders so I do believe a parents page is necessary. Layout-expert. the page is very nicely laid out. there are no glaring colors, or distracting locations. Navigation-mastery- The upper left hand menu bar doesn't seem thought out. . There is only one choice to naviaget to Haiku 2.0. I cannot access any of the other pages except through Haiku 2.0 (unless I use the site map). You cannot navigate away from the Lesson Plan at all. and the directions at the bottom of the page go in order of haiku 2.0 lesson plan parents plan Q&A resources and then student activities page. They seem jumbled to me. Accessibility- N/A There are very few images, but the ones that she has do not have Alt tags, or any other accessability issues. Fonts-Expert- Fonts are consistent and do not distract. Background-Mastery- Background is simple and cheerful. Color Choices-Mastery- Very few colors, but does not distract. Spelling and Grammar-Expert- No errors I can see. Copyright-Expert- Very little content needed citing. Extensive use of links to actual web sites. Contact Information-Novice- No authorship on each page except that is provided by the google sites. My only other issue is that on this page there is NO other form of instruction besides text. There are no visual images of people making haiku (youtube has tons of videos on haiku). There are no images of the structure or format of a haiku. So it is a single channel method of instruction. With that said, i realllllly like this project. I think it would be fun to do with my kids. I wish the page itself was more interactive.
  • melmilks on 04 May 09
     
    Thanks Will! I know I need a parent page :( I struggled with what to put on that page since technology is something most of my parents do not have access to, plus I need it to be in PSanish as well. Before I use this in my classroom I plan on getting that up and running. I agree that videos about haikus would be very beneficial- thanks for the suggestion!
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Mrs. Robbins' Sandbox Home - Mrs. Robbins' Sandbox - 0 views

mrsrobbinssandbox.wetpaint.com

shared by Chih-Hsiung Tu on 20 Apr 09 - Cached
Kim Piranio liked it
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 21 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
  • Tracy Robbins on 20 Apr 09
     
    This website is a toolbox of interative sites and lessons where students can learn concepts while engaging in interative learning. - Mrs. Robbins' Sandbox Home
  • Tracy Robbins on 29 Apr 09
     
    Tracy Robbins - self assessment Aim/Purpose - (expert) Stated clearly on the home page and is written in a clever, amusing way using a play on words. Lesson Plan - (mastery) Lesson plan is included and the link loads properly. Student Activity Page - (expert) Welcomes students and instructs them where to look for resources. Provides a multitude of resources for the students to peruse to learn the concepts. Parent Page - (expert) Parents are welcomed to the page and instructed where to go to find resources. Layout - (expert) The layout is professional and usable. Proper use of white space. Navigation - (expert) Site is easy to navigate around. Progression of webpages in the left side allows for students/parents to read through the pages before moving on. Graphics - (expert) Graphics are directly correlated to the content on the page. Accessibility - (mastery) Alt tags are used correctly, but audio clips are not included. Fonts - (expert) Good use of fonts size to demonstrate headings. Larger font used for make it easier to read. Background - (expert) Good choice of color to make the page more interesting and not just a white background. All pages are consistent. Color Choices - (expert) Color allows for a pleasing palette. Spelling and Grammar - (expert) no errors noticed. Copyright - (expert) No materials were used from websites that required permission. All photos were gathered from web clipart. Contact Information - (expert) All pages contain a statement of the author and last edit date.
  • Michaela Minore on 04 May 09
     
    Hi Tracy, Content: *no info downloaded for this content area on the rubric* mjm Aim/Purpose: I loved this introduction because it was creative and enticing! I think that it lacks the purpose of the task...but I want to overlook that because of the great graphics and cleverness (Expert) Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan: (Mastery) there is a link to the lesson plan that displays properly. I think that if would be easier to have a link for this under the Home page, (here is another but) I like how you are forced to enter through the Parent page and then the Student page. One way to get around this is too insert internal links into the Welcome Parents page. Student Activity Page: (Expert) This page is inviting and visually appealing which draws the student into the activity. Parent Page: (Mastery) I think that this is a great support page for parents except that it does not mention creative ways for the parents to be involved; it is very sterile. Your Home page was so imaginative that I am sure you can offer a creative suggestion to the parents. Web Design: *no info downloaded for this content area on the rubric* mjm Layout: (Expert) Finally, I can tell you how professionally well organized your site is, and that it is very consistent and user friendly. The overall concept for the site is anything but sterile :) Navigation: I do not get lost in your site, it is simple and easy to use (Expert) Graphics: (Expert) The graphics were very consistent and I was impressed with the simplistic design of each page, I think that your great use of graphics was the key. Accessibility: You used the ALT tags very effectively by thoroughly describing each graphic, great job. (Expert) Fonts: Another great job through simplistic design (Expert) Background: Same comment as above (Expert) Oh, please apply to have the advertisements removed from your website, it is free for educators and takes 1 minute of your time. They will send you a notifi
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Home - 0 views

dana.ucc.nau.edu/ard83

shared by Chih-Hsiung Tu on 19 Apr 09 - Cached
john conway liked it
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question I: Effective Instructional Strategies Please discuss three most effective instructional strategies integrated in your project. Please be sure to justify why they are effective instructional strategies. Remember instructional strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, discussion board etc. It is the integrated soft technologies.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question II: Instructional Technology Please discuss the instructional technologies that you integrate into your lesson plan exclude your web sites/pages because they are the basic technology. Instructional technology is referred to hard technology in this question, such as discussion board, chat, wiki, blog etc.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
      Chih-Hsiung Tu on 27 Apr 09
       
      Common Question III: Pitfalls Do you think your web-based lesson plan is effective and successful? Can you foresee any pitfalls in project? Please describe them.
  • Ashley Doggett on 19 Apr 09
     
    Fun filled website to learn all about chocolate. By the end of the unit the students will have created a chocolate cookbook that will be uploard to the internet for all to see. This site is geared toward third graders.
  • ...2 more comments...
  • john conway on 25 Apr 09
     
    Well I certainly feel humbled here. The only problem I encountered was an inability to open the Milton S. Hershey link, it is probably my computer or my poor net-service. This is quite informative, and very well done. I certainly can take some lessons from your design skills. What program did you use for this, I found myself challenged by the wiki itself for my web page creation. Excellent work!
  • john conway on 28 Apr 09
     
    2. Rubric: a. Aim/Purpose: Information very well constructed and stated (expert). b. Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan: Well constructed (expert). c. Student Activity Page: Lots going on here, very informative (expert). d. Parent Page: Links lead to appropriate sites (expert). e. Layout: Very pleasing to the eye, easy to find information (expert). f. Navigation: links transfer well though out, works well (expert). g. Graphics: Visually entertaining, well done (expert). h. Accessibility: Images do not appear, but others work (mastery). i. Fonts: Consistent, and appropriate through out (expert). j. Background: Very pleasing to the eye, but did not taste good (expert). k. Color Choices: Well chosen colors (expert). l. Spelling and Grammar: No errors noted (expert). m. Copyright: Proper details provided (expert). n. Contact Information: Lacks clear link to proper E-mail site (novice).
  • Michelle Blunk on 04 May 09
     
    Ashley, what a great topic for a perfect age group. Good integration of history and fun. Aim/Purpose: Expert - information well constructed and stated & clearly communicates the purpose. Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan: Expert - Well constructed uniform and easy to follow Student Activity Page: Lots going on here, very informative (expert). Parent Page: Links lead to appropriate sites Expert Layout: Very pleasing to the eye, easy to find information Expert Navigation: having 'Charlie and the Chocolate Factory' underlined throughout site leads me to believe it is a link to somewhere. Other links transfer well throughout - good choices for supportive information. Mastery Graphics: Visually professional and appealing, well done. Expert Accessibility: Images do not appear, but others work (mastery). Fonts: Consistent, and appropriate through out. Expert Background: Very pleasing to the eye, use of white space with texture. Expert Color Choices: Colors well chosen - chocolatey Expert Spelling and Grammar: 'Factory' misspelled on second page. Mastery Copyright: No authorship - who is the teacher? Novice Contact Information: Lacks clear link to proper E-mail site. Novice
  • Ashley Doggett on 04 May 09
     
    * Aim/Purpose -Expert- Purpose is stated * Lesson Plan/Teacher's Guide/ Instructional Plan - Expert * Student Activity Page- mastery * Parent Page - Expert- I like my links for parents * Layout - Expert- Easy to find everything * Navigation- Mastery- I can see how having Charlie and the Chocolate Factory underlined can lead some to beleive that it is a link. * Graphics - Mastery- Could of had more pictures. At times they did not work * Accessibility- Mastery * Fonts - Expert- consistent * Background - Expert- consistent * Color Choices - Expert * Spelling and Grammar - Mastery * Copyright - Mastery * Contact Information - Mastery- I could have used a link to my school email.
melmilks

Haiku 2.0 - 9 views

I am still figuring out Google Sites right now- it was a last minute decision to switch my project over to it so I still have a few kinks that I need to work out before I start using it in my class...

started by melmilks on 21 Apr 09 4 follow-ups, last by melmilks on 04 May 09
1 - 20 of 31 Next ›
Showing 20▼ items per page