Skip to main content

Home/ entreprise2.0/ Group items matching "productivity" in title, tags, annotations or url

Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url

Sort By: Relevance | Date Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Christophe Gauthier

Ten Leading Business Intelligence Software Solutions - 2 views

  •  
    "Ten Leading Business Intelligence Software Solutions By Thor Olavsrud May 5, 2010 The Business Intelligence software market is shaping up as a David vs. Goliath struggle. Behemoths like Microsoft, Oracle and IBM offer feature-rich BI suites along with their many other enterprise software products. Meanwhile, pure-play business intelligence software vendors -- such as MicroStrategy and Tableau -- have avid followers and are known for innovating around new features and quickly adjusting to the shifting marketplace. Why is this important? Because Business Intelligence software is used to extract data from disparate sources -- spreadsheets, databases and other software programs -- inside companies and then analyze that business data to better understand a firm's internal and external strengths and weaknesses. A business relies heavily on this data. Bottom line: Business intelligence software enables managers to better see the relationship between different data for critical decision-making -- particularly opportunities for innovation, cost reduction and optimal resource deployment. The list below includes ten industry-leading BI solutions, from vendors large and not-so-large. If you're looking for a bird's eye view of this rapidly evolving market, the following condensed portraits should help. Business Intelligence Software: Ten Solutions Note: This list is NOT ordered "best to worst." The question of what business intelligence software solution is best for a given company depends on an entire matrix of factors. This list is simply an overview of BI solutions, with the debate about quality left to individual clients. SAP Crystal Reports Crystal Reports is part of SAP's Business Objects portfolio of business intelligence software solutions. It allows users to graphically design interactive reports and connect them to virtually any data source, Microsoft Excel spreadsheets, Oracle databases, Business Objects Enterprise business views and local file system info
Christophe Deschamps

How companies are benefiting from web 2.0: McKinsey Global Survey Results - 0 views

  • 69 percent of respondents report that their companies have gained measurable business benefits, including more innovative products and services, more effective marketing, better access to knowledge, lower cost of doing business, and higher revenues. Companies that made greater use of the technologies, the results show, report even greater benefits.
  • We found that successful companies not only tightly integrate Web 2.0 technologies with the work flows of their employees but also create a “networked company,” linking themselves with customers and suppliers through the use of Web 2.0 tools. Despite the current recession, respondents overwhelmingly say that they will continue to invest in Web 2.0.
  • When we asked respondents about the business benefits their companies have gained as a result of using Web 2.0 technologies, they most often report greater ability to share ideas; improved access to knowledge experts; and reduced costs of communications, travel, and operations. Many respondents also say Web 2.0 tools have decreased the time to market for products and have had the effect of improving employee satisfaction.
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • Respondents also say they have been able to burnish their innovation skills, perhaps because their companies and customers jointly shape and cocreate products using Web 2.0 connections.
  • The median level of gains derived from internal Web 2.0 use ranged from a 10 percent improvement in operational costs to a 30 percent increase in the speed at which employees are able to tap outside experts.
  • Web 2.0 delivers benefits by multiplying the opportunities for collaboration and by allowing knowledge to spread more effectively. These benefits can accrue through companies’ use of automatic information feeds such as RSS2 or microblogs, of which Twitter is the most popular manifestation. Although many companies use a mix of tools, the survey shows that among all respondents deriving benefits, the more heavily used technologies are blogs, wikis, and podcasts—the same tools that are popular among consumers
  • Similarly, among those capturing benefits in their dealings with suppliers and partners, the tools of choice again are blogs, social networks, and video sharing. While respondents tell us that tapping expert knowledge from outside is their top priority, few report deploying prediction markets to harvest collective insights from these external networks.
  • Comparing respondents’ industries, those at high-technology companies are most likely to report measurable benefits from Web 2.0 across the board, followed by those at companies offering business, legal, and professional services
  • These survey results indicate that a different type of company may be emerging—one that makes intensive use of interactive technologies. This networked organization is characterized both by the internal integration of Web tools among employees, as well as use of the technologies to strengthen company ties with external stakeholders—customers and business partners.
  • As such, companies reporting business benefits also report high levels of Web 2.0 integration into employee workflows. They most often deploy three or more Web tools, and usage is high throughout these organizations
  • Respondents reporting measurable benefits say their companies, on average, have Web 2.0 interactions with 35 percent of their customers. These companies forged similar Web ties to 48 percent of their suppliers, partners, and outside experts. An organizational structure that’s more porous and networked may make companies more resilient and adaptive, sharpening their ability to access knowledge and thus innovate more effectively.
  • The survey results confirm that successful adoption requires that the use of these tools be integrated into the flow of users’ work (Exhibit 5). Furthermore, encouraging continuing use requires approaches other than the traditional financial or performance incentives deployed as motivational tools.
  • They also say role modeling—active Web use by executives—has been important for encouraging adoption internally.
    • Christophe Deschamps
       
      Cf le président de Cisco
  •  
    L'entreprise 2.0 n'est pas qu'un concept et cette étude menée sur 1700 dirigeants le prouve.
Tyme 2.0

Online Meeting, Web Conferencing, Desktop Sharing and Remote Support with Mikogo - 0 views

  •  
    Mikogo is an easy-to-use cross-platform desktop sharing tool, ideal for web conferencing, online meetings or remote support, with up to 10 others participants. Iit's FREE for both commercial and private use. There's also a "portable " version. The organiser/presenter must register, but presenter ( could be another participant) and the viewer participants don't need, they just have to know the session ID Mikogo is a BeamYourScreen company product
  •  
    Une application trés facile à mettre en place avec un collaborateur ou un client, trés facile à utiliser et qui fera gagner beaucoup de temps : Un partage d'écran vaut mieux qu'un long discours au téléphone !
Miguel Membrado

Six ways to make Web 2.0 work - The McKinsey Quarterly - Six ways Web 2.0 work - Business Technology - Application Management - 0 views

  •  
    Excellent article from McKinsey about how web 2.0 tools can improve productivity and efficiency in the company. They are also very well explaining difference between participation and collaboration, which we are ourselves explaining it for many years. It's good to see this difference recognized. The different categories are very well explained also. But one of the key point of this article in the introduction of workflow tecnologies in this area. McKinsey is saying that workflow + participatory technologies is a key enhancer for the company. We agree of course with this, first because companies need both world, and second because providing automation and participation capabilities to the information system is the best way to improve it drastically.
Miguel Membrado

Business starts to take Web 2.0 tools seriously - FT.com / Technology / Digital Business - 0 views

  •  
    These companies, say the authors, are showing that the use of blogs, wikis, widgets and other Web 2.0 tools "encourages horizontal collaboration and harnesses the power of collective intelligence to boost productivity, foster innovation and create enhanced value".
Christophe Deschamps

L'entreprise et le web - 0 views

  • On ne consulte plus le web, on l’utilise.
  • Interfaces légères, utilisation intuitive, dimension sociale : on ne regarde plus le web sans se parler entre nous mais on s’en sert pour intéragir.
  • Soyons honnêtes, tout cela a été quelque peu survendu mais la masse critique était telle qu’il devait forcément en sortir quelque chose.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • Un des éléments nécessaires au succès était le contexte, une dimension largement moins facile à importer que la technologie elle-même.
  • Pour la première fois l’appropriation technologique que l’entreprise pratiquait jusque là avec succès devait se doubler d’une appropriation comportementale. Un challenge d’autant plus difficile que les personnes en charge de l’un ne sont pas celles en charge de l’autre et que les fameux “usages” inquiétaient à juste titre : il fallait de plus les professionnaliser.
  • La professionalisation des usages est possible mais encore difficile à comprendre pour l’entreprise qui a besoin de quelque chose de plus structurant pour avancer. Ce qui amène à penser que la prochaine étape sera davantagé liée aux processus opérationnels.
  • Il n’est plus question ici d’importer des technologies mais de construire des “services” répondant à des besoins organisationnels. Cela peut sembler complexe mais c’est en fait plus compréhensible pour l’entreprise  car se rapproche de logiques d’organisation de production qui lui sont plus familières que les logiques d’usage. Par services j’entend des couples “outils / mode de travail”
  • Le “web en tant que plateforme” au sein de l’entreprise va servir à enrichir les processus existants et donner de l’autonomie au collaborateur pour atteindre ses objectifs dans une entreprise en réseau.
  • Et dans l’entreprise utilisation signifie production et gains de productivité.
  • Un alignement des outils doit donc également être mis en place. Le collaborateur ne peut passer sa vie à servir de gare de triage entre les flux des outils internes, des outils utilisés avec clients et partenaires et des outils permettant de communiquer avec le monde au sens large.
  • En fait la qualité de l’adoption du web dans une entreprise dépend quasi exclusivement de la capacité de celle-ci  à penser conjointement l’évolution de la technologie, des modes de travail et des rapports de l’entreprise à son ecosystème.
  • La preuve que finalement le web en tant que tel n’a aucune importance : il arrive naturellement dans tout projet d’entreprise bien pensé, s’appuyant sur une vraie vision.
  •  
    Finalement beaucoup de débats actuels sont liés à la capacité de l'entreprise à comprendre, apprivoiser et utiliser le web à son profit, en interne. Un sujet a priori anodin puisque purement technologique et nécessitant des compétences autrement plus simples que celles mises en œuvres jusque là sur les infrastructures d'entreprise. Mais au final un sujet pas si anodin que cela.
Willis Wee

5 Social Media Disasters | Penn Olso - 0 views

  •  
    Social media has given consumers a whole new voice. A recent study by Penn State's College of Information Sciences and Technology found that 20% of Twitter updates are either requests for product info, or responses to brand messages. With that, companies better not give consumers anything bad to talk about. As with the 5 case studies below, the consequences can be severe.
Christophe Deschamps

Management guru offers solutions to combat worker disengagement - 0 views

  • Ehin developed his new leadership model which he calls "unmanagement" after analyzing research on human nature which shows that human productivity is at its peak in informal, co-evolving relationships, as opposed to within formal systems where people are stifled by bureaucracy and not allowed to work openly with their counterparts and peers.
  • He has discovered that this sweet spot is the place where the most productive and innovative work of an organization takes place, largely because people tend to want to follow their self-interests and do so through developing informal social networks in the workplace.
  • This cutting edge management book offers guidance to business leaders searching for ways to increase the innovative dynamics, motivation and performance of their knowledge workers.
  •  
    Théorie du non-management pour rendre productif l'informel. Semble particulièrement en phase avec l'entreprise 2.0.
Frank Hamm

Enterprise 2.0 SUMMIT on 10 - 12 November, 2009 - 2 views

  •  
    "The Enterprise 2.0 SUMMIT is organized by Kongress Media and was first been held at CeBIT 2008. The event is about how corporations have to change to be more productive as well as innovative and competitive for their markets by the use of social software. With the presentation of European and international best-practices coupled with a gathering of the international expert's community the Enterprise 2.0 SUMMIT is helping participants in gaining new ideas and inspiration for their projects as well as learning about the real-life opportunities and challenges. The upcoming conference is held on November 11 & 12th, 2009 in Frankfurt with additional pre-conference seminars on November 10th." With Lee Bryant, Markus Bentele, Betrand Duperrin, Craig Hepburn, Dion Hinchcliffe, Oliver Marks, Mark Masterson, Frank Schönefeld, Simon Wardley, Gil Yehuda and others With best practises from * CSC * Dassault Systems * Deutsche Bundeswehr * ISO * Lago * National Suisse * Otto Group * SUN Microsystems * Westaflex
Felipp Crawly

Thank You Onward Process! - 1 views

I'll admit gaining more customers for my online business used to be a problem for me. Although I offer good products, people didn't seem to notice this until I hired Hannah, a very efficient Virtua...

started by Felipp Crawly on 28 Jan 13 no follow-up yet
Nilesh Talaviya

Tips to Select the Perfect iPhone Apps Development Partner - 0 views

  •  
    IPhone application development requires years of experience. A company that has been working with iPhone since its first generation is likely to give you better products as it will know the platform better.
Christophe Deschamps

L'homophilie peut-elle freiner les dynamiques de réseau? - 3 views

  • Si le concept d'homophilie - les personnes qui se ressemblent ont de fortes chances de se rassembler - peut jouer de façon positive sur les dynamiques des réseaux sociaux, il est également à l'origine d'interférences sur les mécaniques relationnelles
  • Dans les logiques de réseaux professionnels, l'intégration d'un salarié dans un groupe correspond à une validation managériale, qui vise à encourager l'activité réelle et productive des acteurs de l'entreprise", développe-t-il. Ainsi, selon le spécialiste, il s'agit d'une logique beaucoup plus fonctionnelle qu'affinitaire. Cette première différence corrige certains écueils de l'homophilie. "La deuxième différence majeure, qui nuance également ce phénomène, c'est la présence de community managers sur les plates-formes collaboratives professionnelles"
  • Le principal : ces membres perdent contact avec les autres groupes du réseau. En entreprise, des distanciations sont aussi possibles, liées aux mouvements à l'œuvre au sein de l'institution : "si l'on change de service, si l'on cesse de travailler sur un projet, s'il y a une réorganisation des groupes de travail, des connexions peuvent se briser", note le spécialiste. "C'est la raison pour laquelle il faut renforcer les méta-connexions, les nuages de tags, les passerelles entre les secteurs d'activité"
Eric Delcroix

Métier : les savoir-faire du community manager? - 7 views

  •  
    sondage métier : les savoir-faire et compétences du community manager ?
JM Delahais

Sharepoint and Enterprise 2.0: The good, the bad, and the ugly | Enterprise Web 2.0 | ZDNet.com - 0 views

  • These concerns about SharePoint’s ability to be an effective Enterprise 2.0 platform is one I hear echoed a lot with practitioners I talk to. In spite of this, I correspondingly hear that SharePoint is in fact what most organizations are planning on using when it comes to 2.0-style collaboration and knowledge management. Why the apparent disconnect between the perceived suitability (which we’ll dissect in a moment) and actual use? Part of it is SharePoint’s stunning penetration in the software business. T
  • In other words, SharePoint is already in most organizations today:
  • In fact, this is a central lesson in Web 2.0 design, that complexity is the enemy of ease-of-use and adoption; most 2.0 products are almost brutally simple in their user experience.
Miguel Membrado

Web 2.0 : les entreprises n'adoptent pas les outils de collaboration - 0 views

  •  
    Malgré leur succès incontesté dans le domaine grand public, les outils de collaboration en ligne du web 2.0 peinent à s'imposer en entreprise. C'est ce que révèle une récente étude du cabinet d'analyse Forrester. Quelques chiffres : 68 % des employés utilisent toujours email & téléphone pour collaborer (!). Ils sont de plus en plus souvent secondés par la messagerie instantanée (15% des employés) et la web conférence (13 %) (seulement !). Les réseaux sociaux ne sont utilisés que par 8 % des employés, les blogs par 5 % des collaborateurs et les wiki par 4 %. MAIS Les outils de bureautique en ligne (Google Apps, Windows Live, etc.) semblent en revanche décoller puisque 16 % des employés y auraient désormais recourt. La transformation des usages vers les nouveaux outils de productivité bureautique est bien en route :)
Christophe Deschamps

Enterprise Web 2.0: Building the Next-Generation Workplace - the Driving Force behind Just about Every Aspect of Enterprise Web 2.0, is of Course, the User - MarketWatch - 0 views

  • Building on the somewhat vague and yet particular usage of the term 'Web 2.0', 'Enterprise Web 2.0' describes a fresh, and some would say new, approach to the design and provision of business applications that incorporates aspects such as social networking, collaboration, and real-time communication. In addition, Enterprise Web 2.0 focuses a great deal of attention on the user's 'experience' or 'joy of use' -- something of a novelty in enterprise IT these days. By comparison, when Butler Group talks about 'Enterprise 2.0', we are focusing on the composition and architecture of the IT ecosystem, and the associated business models that will support Enterprise Web 2.0 applications.
  • Enterprise Web 2.0 is very much concerned with the user experience of corporate systems and applications, and on extracting business value from the social contributions and interactions of the organisation's various stakeholders.
  • The management of customer relationships continues to remain pivotal for most organisations, and so the social aspects of Web 2.0 are mirrored in the corporate world of Enterprise Web 2.0
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • Workforce mobility and changing communication patterns are two more trends that are driving change at the infrastructure layer, and so unified communication and collaboration requirements form an important part of Enterprise 2.0 strategy.
  • Enterprise Web 2.0 might be about putting the user (i.e. employee, customer, or stakeholder) first, but in order to do so it also requires supporting technology. And so at the IT infrastructure level, Enterprise 2.0 means Internet Protocol (IP) everywhere -- voice, video, and data. Enterprise 2.0 also means, 'open' standards rather than proprietary or 'closed' systems. Furthermore, Enterprise 2.0 technology means user-driven technology and not IT-driven technology.
  • Having accepted the fact that 'processes' means 'people', then we have to look for ways in which these people (i.e. processes) can self-organise and reference one another. Then, where possible, we need to somehow incapsulate the processes into a set of business services. One day (we might call it Web 3.0), Artificial Intelligence (AI) will enable organisations to do with computers that which they do via human beings today, but until that day arrives, organisations must do more to aid interdepartment and inter-company collaboration. Workflow has not yet figured largely in the consumer-oriented world of Web 2.0, but Butler Group sees this as pivotal when considering Enterprise Web 2.0.
  • Today applications that embody processes are built by IT professionals, but tomorrow they will be built by a new breed of power user, using mashup builders, software agents, and other Web 2.0 technologies.
  • Business and IT managers must therefore prepare themselves for the new generation of power user who will be creating mashups and situational applications that have a far broader impact than the typical spreadsheet macro of yesteryear, and that if organisations are to avoid a proliferation of unmanageable, siloed, micro-applications, then they must blend the power of personal productivity with an appropriate management layer and a degree of central oversight.
  • Web 2.0 is no longer PC-centric.
  • It is clearly a mistake to think that Web 2.0 is all about technology, and likewise Enterprise Web 2.0, but it is also a mistake to dismiss the technology altogether. Therefore, selecting and implementing enterprise social software solutions, next-generation collaboration solutions, and Rich Internet Applications requires careful thought, consideration, and planning.
  • The driving force behind just about every aspect of Enterprise Web 2.0, is of course, the user -- something that has not always ranked highly on the list of priorities for corporate IT mangers -- and so the challenge for all forward-looking organisations is to refocus on this aspect of their IT strategies.
  •  
    Nouvelle étude de Research & Markets. Pas mal d'infos dans cette synthèse. User-centric
Miguel Membrado

L'entreprise 2.0 à l'épreuve de la productivité - Blogs - ZDNet.fr - 0 views

  • L’entreprise 2.0 à l’épreuve de la productivité
  • Tout cela reflète les multiples et insoupçonnés usages susceptibles de se développer à partir d’applications dont l’utilisateur est le centre de gravité
  • Pas encore gagné pour les évangélistes de l’entreprise 2.0 de convaincre des carences de l’e-mail en matière de productivité. L'improductivité est un bon argument pour ne pas s’égarer dans les méandres de l’entreprise 2.0
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Comment rendre compte de la qualité des échanges ? Comment passer d'une notion quantitative de l'action à une notion qualitative de l'"inter-action" ?
  • Si ces nouveaux outils génèrent les mêmes réactions que le téléphone, l'email et l'usage du web en leur temps, probablement faut-il aussi y voir le fait que la technologie, et ses usages, progresse beaucoup plus vite que les habitudes des décideurs, et qu'ils ont parfois du mal (légitimement) à comprendre l'intérêt de certains outils qu'ils n'ont jamais utilisés... par ailleurs, nombreux sont ceux qui ne jurent que par la relation directe, et qui restent méfiant vis-à-vis des apports des outils électroniques.
  • Le jour où la perte de productivité dûe aux réseaux sociaux ou plus généralement à l'utilisation d'internet dans l'entreprise sera quantifiée au delà du gain permit par ces mêmes outils, je reprends mon souffle car cette phrase est longue, des solutions seront amenées par des prestataires de services pour le contrôle de l'utilisation du réseau
  • Travaillant dans une société qui a mis en place un indicateur sur les mails je suis moins persuadfé que tous les employeurs voient le mail comme un outil de prtoductivité. Je crois qu'il y a un biai commun c'est de confondre l'outil et le besoin. Finalement un messenger, une formation et (même) une machine a café sont à la fois des causes de productivités et de non productivuté. Tous ceci ne sont que des outils et c'est la manière de les utiliser qui changent. Par exemple, aussi bien les mails que les messengers sont des causes d'interruptions dans le travail quotidien. Une interruption sur une tache sur laquelle vous êtes en cours est une cause de non productivité mais aussi souvent de stress ce qui est encore pire. Au global ce qui me soucie dans cette manière d'aborder les choses c'est qu'au lieu de réfléchir outillage il faudrait réfléchir condition et méthodes de travail en premier.
Yan Thoinet

Wikipatterns en français - Wiki Patterns - 0 views

  • Comment passer de 10 à 100 puis à 1000 membres ? Ce site propose des "patterns", des stratégies d'action permettant de faire croître le contenu d'un wiki . Mais il ne s'arrête pas là : s'il détaille des stratégies d'action, il décrit aussi des stratégies contre-productives ou "anti-patterns" qui peuvent, elles, constituer des facteurs d'échec ou de ralentissement.
  •  
    Conseils d'expert pour la mise en place d'un Wiki
Yan Thoinet

» Nine ideas for IT managers considering Enterprise 2.0 | Enterprise Web 2.0 | ZDNet.com - 1 views

  • In addition to Web 2.0 itself however, we have two more important enterprise software trends: Office 2.0 and Enterprise 2.0, coined by Ismael Ghalimi and Andrew McAfee respectively.  Office 2.0 represents the increasing use of browser-based software in the office, while Enterprise 2.0 is more Web 2.0-ish in that it specifically describes the use of freeform, emergent, social software to conduct collaboration and share knowledge.
  • Specifically this means the fact that corporate information tends to be non-shared by default, that the easiest productivity tools to use are the ones that have very little collaboration built-in, and that the information that does exist is often impossible to find and is often structured in some formal, centrally controlled way.
    • Yan Thoinet
       
      Very true.
  • Certainly, increased transparency, some loss of control over information flow, and outright abuse of low-barrier Intranet publishing tools gives enterprise IT and business leaders pause for thought.
  • ...16 more annotations...
  • And while some of it must remain under strict control, particularly in public companies, much of it is unnessarily — and usually to a fault — hidden, unreused, and unexploited.
    • Yan Thoinet
       
      Unexploited sources. Action: Implement a Wiki so as to share and keep up to date this wealth of information e.g. manuals, meeting agenda, minutes of meeting. This would act as the memory of the enterprise
  • Explain the reasoning behind retaining more knowledge, in making it public, searchable, and organizing it via tagging.  Describe the benefits of being able to access much fresher and more up-to-date information elsewhere in the organization because their colleagues are managing more of their projects, tasks, and other work via social tools. 
  • Provide useful templates for common activities and reference material such as projects, tasks, resource management, policies, procedures, standards, and so on.  You still have to keep template layouts and template usage simple; excessive structure tends to kill the golden goose of contributions quickly.  But a little basic structure goes a long way and prevents contributors from having to figure out how to structure all the white space and provide a simple layer of consistency.
  • The enterprise has not caught up, largely because most enterprise information doesn't allow a hyperlink structure, and links aren't encouraged very much when it does
  • setting up blog and wiki directories as well as good enterprise search based on link ranking (which is what Google does to make the right information come up in the first few pages of search results.) 
  • Provide your own search engine in the tools only if you must.
  • , the real issue, day in and day out, with getting Enterprise 2.0 to take off is to educate, evangelize, demonstrate, and most importantly, evolve the interface and structure of your tools until you pick the right formula that resonates with your audience.
  • This boils down to having some form of moderation, either human or automated, to ensure that the level of discourse remains at some bare minimimum acceptable standard. 
  • A high-profile executive sponsor that obviously uses the tools can also help in a big way.
  • Triggering an Enterprise 2.0 ecosystem quickly is likely an early activity driver.  This can mean a lot of things but the link structure of Web tools allows information to quickly flow, circulate, and mesh together.  You can leverage this in a almost infinite number of ways to drive user activity, interesting content, create awareness of what the company is "thinking", and more.  For example, create a blog for every employee in the company and mail the link to them with instructions on how to use it. >  Create a social bookmarking site for the enterprise where everyone can see what is being bookmarked by everyone else that day. >  Create an internal Wikipedia that contains a seperate copy of all Intranet content and let users edit away. >  The possibilities are endless and provide a much greater number of "entry points" where people can get started with these tools.
  • The problems will be with the business culture, not the technology. 
  • For example, create a blog for every employee in the company and mail the link to them with instructions on how to use it. 
  • Create a social bookmarking site for the enterprise where everyone can see what is being bookmarked by everyone else that day.
  • Create an internal Wikipedia that contains a seperate copy of all Intranet content and let users edit away.
  • Allowing the output of SQL queries to be inserted into wikis when they load, calling Web services or using Flash badges that access data resources can turn Enterprise 2.0 tools from pure knowledge management into actual hybrids of software and data
  • And the reverse should be true as well, getting data back out into traditional tools including Office documents, PDFs, and XML must be easy to inspire trust and lower barriers to use.
1 - 20 of 36 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page