Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ DISC Inc
1More

SEO Challenges of Restructuring a Site - Search Engine Watch (SEW) - 0 views

  • When you must prioritize, here are a few techniques you can use to make sure you've truly covered the most important pages: Go into your Web analytics tool and identify the top pages receiving traffic. Go into Google Webmaster Tools and get a list of your external links, so you can identify all pages that have received external links. Use Yahoo Site Explorer to identify the top pages listed there. Site Explorer tends to list the most important pages first. Next, make sure that the search engines find your 301 redirects. While it's common advice to update your sitemap to the new site on day one, consider leaving the old site's sitemap in place for a period of time, to help the search engines see the 301 redirects (hat tip to Stephan Spencer for this idea). How long should you leave it that way? That depends primarily on the size of your site and the number of pages that the search engines crawl on a daily basis. At a minimum, make sure that the prioritized pages list we developed above has been thoroughly crawled.
1More

Combining Trust and Relevance - Search Engine Watch (SEW) - 0 views

  • What Happens When You Launch a New Site Section? If there's a close relationship between your new site section and the historical trusted aspect of the site, you'll likely pick up some traffic quite quickly. However, sites stall a bit after that. They get a little taste of the good traffic for their new section, but then it stops growing. Over a period of time, it will remain frozen, but then if you're doing the right things (developing quality content, link building), you may see a jump in traffic. My own conjecture is that a combination of quality inbound links and time raises the trust level of the new site section. Once you cross a trust threshold, you enable a new period of growth until you hit the next threshold. Then the cycle repeats. I've seen this behavior several times now during the development and promotion of new sections of content on existing sites. How Can You Speed Things Along? We already mentioned the two most important things above. Developing quality content was one of them. While search engine crawlers can't measure content quality in a direct sense, they can understand the relevance and depth of a Web page, provided you put enough text out there for them to chew on. Also, if a new site section is really thin on content, you can send negative signals to the search engines. The other thing you need to do? Our old friend, link building. At least some of the signals for evaluating trust are based on link analysis. Getting high quality links from high quality sites will help you establish that trust. The above is a sandbox scenario, but applied to new content section on an existing site, it operates much the same way. You benefit from the inherent trust of the existing domain, but still need to prove it to the search engines by getting new links to the new section itself.
1More

Invest Time in Twitter Now for Long-Term Rewards - Search Engine Watch (SEW) - 0 views

  • In terms of short-term gain, this can lead to links from outside of Twitter (links within Twitter are nofollowed). Those links can drive a handsome return on the time you invested. Links are still the short-term payout. Will there come a time where "social media mentions" are a factor in search engine rankings? Or will Twitter ever be able to send thousands or tens of thousands of visitors per day to Web sites? Probably, but for most people it isn't here yet. But links are available now. Focus on building a topic-matter-specific Twitter account, publish quality content, network with influencers, and you'll get links. If you do this well, and have a bit of luck, some of them may be from highly trusted and authoritative sources. In addition, you'll put yourself in a position where your direct Twitter traffic can grow as Twitter moves towards the mainstream. Publishing this type of quality content in sufficient volume is hard work. You can't dip your toe in the water, you need to dive in, and you need to be patient because the process takes time. Focus your goals on the right objectives and your chances of success go up significantly.
2More

E-Mail: Evaluating Dedicated vs. Shared IP Addresses - ClickZ - 0 views

  •  
    The downside to having a dedicated IP address is the cost. Most ESPs charge an initial set-up fee of $500 to $1,000 for a dedicated IP address; there's also often a $250 monthly fee for maintaining it. This directly impacts your e-mail ROI (define). For large quantity senders the additional cost is minimal, but for those sending small volumes of e-mail it can make a dent in your profit margin. A shared IP address is just what it sounds like -- you're sharing the IP address with other organizations. Every company sending from the IP address has the potential to impact, positively or negatively, its reputation. If your IP address neighbors are good guys, the reputation shouldn't be damaged. But if one of them (or if you) does something that raises a red flag, the IP address' reputation will be tarnished and all e-mail sent from it could be blacklisted. Why Might You Want to Share an IP Address? The ESP I spoke with recently raised another valid positive about shared IP addresses, at least for low-volume senders. When we talk reputation, we talk about positive, neutral, and negative. To get on the reputation radar, the IP address needs to be sending a certain amount of e-mail each month. If your sends are small, your dedicated IP address may be below the radar and never "qualify" for a positive or a negative reputation -- you'll be stuck with a "neutral" reputation or no reputation at all. This isn't all bad, but it's also not all good. By having companies share IP addresses, this ESP contends it is able to get enough volume to earn positive IP address reputations, which helps its customers' e-mail get to the inbox. This is a valid point, as long as everyone using the IP address behaves and avoids red flags. It's a calculated strategy, one which requires the ESP to provide education about e-mail best practices and closely monitor every IP address to ensure customers are in compliance. If you're sending from your own in-house system, these same pros and cons apply
  •  
    The downside to having a dedicated IP address is the cost. Most ESPs charge an initial set-up fee of $500 to $1,000 for a dedicated IP address; there's also often a $250 monthly fee for maintaining it. This directly impacts your e-mail ROI (define). For large quantity senders the additional cost is minimal, but for those sending small volumes of e-mail it can make a dent in your profit margin. A shared IP address is just what it sounds like -- you're sharing the IP address with other organizations. Every company sending from the IP address has the potential to impact, positively or negatively, its reputation. If your IP address neighbors are good guys, the reputation shouldn't be damaged. But if one of them (or if you) does something that raises a red flag, the IP address' reputation will be tarnished and all e-mail sent from it could be blacklisted. Why Might You Want to Share an IP Address? The ESP I spoke with recently raised another valid positive about shared IP addresses, at least for low-volume senders. When we talk reputation, we talk about positive, neutral, and negative. To get on the reputation radar, the IP address needs to be sending a certain amount of e-mail each month. If your sends are small, your dedicated IP address may be below the radar and never "qualify" for a positive or a negative reputation -- you'll be stuck with a "neutral" reputation or no reputation at all. This isn't all bad, but it's also not all good. By having companies share IP addresses, this ESP contends it is able to get enough volume to earn positive IP address reputations, which helps its customers' e-mail get to the inbox. This is a valid point, as long as everyone using the IP address behaves and avoids red flags. It's a calculated strategy, one which requires the ESP to provide education about e-mail best practices and closely monitor every IP address to ensure customers are in compliance. If you're sending from your own in-house system, these same pros and cons apply
1More

Are PPC Ads Now Counting in Google Organic Backlinks? - Search Engine Watch (SEW) - 0 views

  • In the past, I've said there's no direct correlation between editorial rankings and paid advertisements. Well, it seems I was wrong. Paid search really can affect organic search. My team recently noticed this in one of our client's Google Webmaster Tools accounts. They saw instances of backlink anchor text that we knew we weren't optimizing against (not requesting links with these keywords) and they seemed very promotional in nature. When we reviewed these links, we saw that they were coming from paid search efforts. They were the titles of the ads on both Overture/Yahoo Search Marketing and Google AdWords. Yet, Google Webmaster Tools was (and still is) showing these as anchor text of backlinks to the Web site.
1More

Top Signs Your Site Isn't Ready for Prime Time, Part 2 - Search Engine Watch (SEW) - 0 views

  • You can find domains that may be available by checking out these resources: Go Daddy has an expired domain name auction. Justdropped.com lets you search for deleted domain names. FreshDrop.net lets you search all of the domain name auctions.
1More

PPC Click Fraud Rate Drops to 12.7% in Q2 2009 - Search Marketing News Blog - Search En... - 0 views

  • July 27, 2009 PPC Click Fraud Rate Drops to 12.7% in Q2 2009 Click Forensics has released data regarding pay-per-click (PPC) fraud for the second quarter of 2009. The news is good. Not only is click fraud down from the first quarter of 2009, it's down year-over-year as well. This year's second quarter click fraud rate came in at 12.7%, which is an almost 8% decrease from the first quarter, which was 13.8% The second quarter of 2008 came in at 16.2.%, which means Q2 2009 came in 22% lower than the year prior. Click fraud did increase from certain programs and sources.
1More

Demystifying Google Webmaster Tools Reports, Part 1 - ClickZ - 0 views

  • The "Status" column will contain either a green checkmark graphic or a red "x" graphic. This tells you whether your file is valid (green checkmark) or invalid or missing (red "x"). Remember that a green checkmark does not necessarily mean that all your URLs are correct or indexed. It means only that the site map file you submitted contains valid XML.
1More

Google Analytics Tracks Fresh YouTube Viewer Data - MarketingVOX - 0 views

  • The vast majority of these views are served by Youtube, which ranked No. 5 in the top 10 web brands for April 2009 (behind Google, Yahoo, MSN/Windows Live and Microsoft).
1More

Bing May Power Yahoo Search - MarketingVOX - 0 views

  • Google, which enjoyed 78.48% of June search share compared to Yahoo's 11.04%.
1More

Raven Internet Marketing Tools for SEO & Social Media Marketing - 0 views

  •  
    This looks like a rocking reporting tool. To consider for resale later.
« First ‹ Previous 3281 - 3300 of 3597 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page