Skip to main content

Home/ DISC Inc/ Group items tagged google

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Rob Laporte

Banner Ads & Image Ads On Google Images - 0 views

  • Oct 3, 2008 at 5:37pm Eastern by Danny Sullivan    Banner Ads & Image Ads On Google Images Earlier this week, we noted a report that Google was showing banner ads on Google Images. Now via TechCrunch, a new implementation — an AdWords ad on Google Images with its own thumbnail image. Notice in the screenshot above how a Guinness Logo is appearing next to a Target ad where NHL Buffalo merchandise is being sold on a search for buffalo logos. While a Guiness logo is being used as part of the ad isn’t clear. Here’s the ad in context: While showing an image next to ad is a big step for Google, it’s not that far removed from video they’ve tested with some ads. But an actual banner ad that they’ve tested with some ads. But an actual banner ad that SearchViews spotted on Google Images is another thing entirely: See it down at the bottom of the page? An actual banner ad. We’re checking with Google for more details. Postscript: Google sent this: As part of our ongoing commitment to innovation and to help users find new and better ways of getting the information they’re looking for, we are currently conducting a test to show ads on the results pages for Google Image Search. The experiment is restricted to U.S. advertisers who are using formats including text ads and static image ads. Display Ads Coming In Image Search from us back in May has more details on how Google said this type of test would be coming. There’s also some discussion now developing on Techmeme.
  •  
    Oct 3, 2008 at 5:37pm Eastern by Danny Sullivan Banner Ads & Image Ads On Google Images Google Images & Banner Ads Closeup Earlier this week, we noted a report that Google was showing banner ads on Google Images. Now via TechCrunch, a new implementation - an AdWords ad on Google Images with its own thumbnail image. Notice in the screenshot above how a Guinness Logo is appearing next to a Target ad where NHL Buffalo merchandise is being sold on a search for buffalo logos. While a Guiness logo is being used as part of the ad isn't clear. Here's the ad in context: Google Images & Banner Ads While showing an image next to ad is a big step for Google, it's not that far removed from video they've tested with some ads. But an actual banner ad that they've tested with some ads. But an actual banner ad that SearchViews spotted on Google Images is another thing entirely: Google Image SERPs with banner ad See it down at the bottom of the page? An actual banner ad. We're checking with Google for more details. Postscript: Google sent this: As part of our ongoing commitment to innovation and to help users find new and better ways of getting the information they're looking for, we are currently conducting a test to show ads on the results pages for Google Image Search. The experiment is restricted to U.S. advertisers who are using formats including text ads and static image ads. Display Ads Coming In Image Search from us back in May has more details on how Google said this type of test would be coming. There's also some discussion now developing on Techmeme.
jack_fox

Google My Business now known as Google Business Profile as Google migrates features to ... - 0 views

  • Google Business Profile will be the new name going forward for Google My Business. Google said the reason for the new name is to “keep things simple” and sometime in 2022, Google will retire the Google My Business app completely.
  • before that it was named Google My Business, before that, Google Places, and before that it was Google+ Local, before that it was also Google Places and then prior to that I think it was just Google Local
  • Google lets businesses manage their individual listings directly in the search results or directly in Google Maps, now Google is saying it prefers businesses with single listings manage their businesses in Search or Maps and not in the old Google My Business console.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • the existing Google My Business web experience will transition to primarily support larger businesses with multiple locations, and will be renamed “Business Profile Manager.”
  • new features include: Claim and verify your Google Business Profile directly in Google Search and Google MapsCall History is officially launching in US and Canada (more details here)Messaging can be done directly from Google Search (more details here)Message read receipts can be controlled in Google Search and Maps
  • How do you manage your business. You can either just search for your business name in Google Search or Google Maps for businesses or search for “my business” in Google Search to see the business you have already claimed and verified.
  • For now, the web interface is not changing much, outside of branding, but over the coming months, you can expect more and more of the features in the old Google My Business web interface will work directly in Google Search, Google Maps and the respective apps.
Rob Laporte

Google Starts To Classify Content Types In Web Search - 0 views

  • Oct 9, 2008 at 3:00pm Eastern by Matt McGee    Google Starts To Classify Content Types In Web Search Like other search engines, Google already distinguishes between various types of content. You can search specifically for images, videos, books, blog posts, and so forth. Google has separate search engines for each. But two recent changes suggest that Google is improving its ability to classify different types of content that’s gathered from ordinary web pages. Search Engine Roundtable points to a discussion on WebmasterWorld about the addition of dates at the beginning of some search results — something Michael Gray spotted in mid-September. From my personal experience, this seems to be happening mostly on content that Google can identify as blog posts and news articles — but not exclusively on those types of content. And speaking of identifying types of content, Google Operating System points out that Google is starting to show special forum-related information in search results when it can identify that the result comes from a message board. Author Alex Chitu suggests this could mean new advanced search options in the future: This new feature shows that Google is able to automatically classify web pages and to extract relevant information. Once Google starts to show data for other kinds of web pages, we can expect to see an option to restrict the search results to a certain category (forums, reviews, blogs, news articles). The screenshot above has examples of both cases, the top showing dates in the snippets, and the bottom showing forum information.
  •  
    Oct 9, 2008 at 3:00pm Eastern by Matt McGee Google Starts To Classify Content Types In Web Search Google Snippets Like other search engines, Google already distinguishes between various types of content. You can search specifically for images, videos, books, blog posts, and so forth. Google has separate search engines for each. But two recent changes suggest that Google is improving its ability to classify different types of content that's gathered from ordinary web pages. Search Engine Roundtable points to a discussion on WebmasterWorld about the addition of dates at the beginning of some search results - something Michael Gray spotted in mid-September. From my personal experience, this seems to be happening mostly on content that Google can identify as blog posts and news articles - but not exclusively on those types of content. And speaking of identifying types of content, Google Operating System points out that Google is starting to show special forum-related information in search results when it can identify that the result comes from a message board. Author Alex Chitu suggests this could mean new advanced search options in the future: This new feature shows that Google is able to automatically classify web pages and to extract relevant information. Once Google starts to show data for other kinds of web pages, we can expect to see an option to restrict the search results to a certain category (forums, reviews, blogs, news articles). The screenshot above has examples of both cases, the top showing dates in the snippets, and the bottom showing forum information.
Rob Laporte

Google Removes Directory Links From Webmaster Guidelines - 0 views

  • Oct 3, 2008 at 9:48am Eastern by Barry Schwartz    Google Removes Directory Links From Webmaster Guidelines Brian Ussery reported that Google has dropped two important bullet points from the Google Webmaster Guidelines. Those bullet points include: Have other relevant sites link to yours. Submit your site to relevant directories such as the Open Directory Project and Yahoo!, as well as to other industry-specific expert sites. At the same time, Google Blogoscoped reported that Google removed the dictionary link in the search results, at the top right of the results page. Related, I am not sure. I speculated that maybe Google is going to go after more directories in the future. By removing those two bullet points, maybe Google can do this - without seeming all that hypocritical. In addition, I noted a comment from Google John Mueller at a Google Groups thread where he explained the logic behind removing those two points: I wouldn’t necessarily assume that we’re devaluing Yahoo’s links, I just think it’s not one of the things we really need to recommend. If people think that a directory is going to bring them lots of visitors (I had a visitor from the DMOZ once), then it’s obviously fine to get listed there. It’s not something that people have to do though :-). As you can imagine, this is causing a bit of a commotion in some of the forums. Some are worried, some are mad, and some are confused by the change.
  •  
    Oct 3, 2008 at 9:48am Eastern by Barry Schwartz Google Removes Directory Links From Webmaster Guidelines Brian Ussery reported that Google has dropped two important bullet points from the Google Webmaster Guidelines. Those bullet points include: * Have other relevant sites link to yours. * Submit your site to relevant directories such as the Open Directory Project and Yahoo!, as well as to other industry-specific expert sites. At the same time, Google Blogoscoped reported that Google removed the dictionary link in the search results, at the top right of the results page. Related, I am not sure. I speculated that maybe Google is going to go after more directories in the future. By removing those two bullet points, maybe Google can do this - without seeming all that hypocritical. In addition, I noted a comment from Google John Mueller at a Google Groups thread where he explained the logic behind removing those two points: I wouldn't necessarily assume that we're devaluing Yahoo's links, I just think it's not one of the things we really need to recommend. If people think that a directory is going to bring them lots of visitors (I had a visitor from the DMOZ once), then it's obviously fine to get listed there. It's not something that people have to do though :-). As you can imagine, this is causing a bit of a commotion in some of the forums. Some are worried, some are mad, and some are confused by the change.
Rob Laporte

Google Puts New AdSense Ads Under Maps - 0 views

  • Oct 9, 2008 at 4:15pm Eastern by Matt McGee    Google Puts New AdSense Ads Under Maps The continued success of Google Maps gives Google another growing revenue stream to tap into, and that’s what they’re doing with the placement of new AdSense ads immediately under maps on Google Maps. The ads don’t show up on all searches, but they do appear on enough searches to suggest this is more than a limited test. Amit Agarwal is seeing these ads in India, for example. Dave Shaw, who first alerted us via email, is seeing it in the UK. The screenshot above shows how the new ad placement looks on a search in Google Maps for [seattle real estate]. Moving out of a major city into a much smaller city suggests that Google needs to improve its targeting on these ads. A search for [west richland real estate] reveals an ad for a company in Richland, PA. (West Richland is a small city in Washington state.) Unlike the regular Local Business Ads that show up to the left of the map, which take you to the map “popup” for that advertiser, clicking on the ads below the map take you straight to the advertiser’s website. There’s more coverage of this on Techmeme.
  •  
    Oct 9, 2008 at 4:15pm Eastern by Matt McGee Google Puts New AdSense Ads Under Maps Adsense Ads on Google Maps The continued success of Google Maps gives Google another growing revenue stream to tap into, and that's what they're doing with the placement of new AdSense ads immediately under maps on Google Maps. The ads don't show up on all searches, but they do appear on enough searches to suggest this is more than a limited test. Amit Agarwal is seeing these ads in India, for example. Dave Shaw, who first alerted us via email, is seeing it in the UK. The screenshot above shows how the new ad placement looks on a search in Google Maps for [seattle real estate]. Moving out of a major city into a much smaller city suggests that Google needs to improve its targeting on these ads. A search for [west richland real estate] reveals an ad for a company in Richland, PA. (West Richland is a small city in Washington state.) Adsense Ads on Google Maps Unlike the regular Local Business Ads that show up to the left of the map, which take you to the map "popup" for that advertiser, clicking on the ads below the map take you straight to the advertiser's website. There's more coverage of this on Techmeme.
Rob Laporte

65+ Best Free SEO Chrome Extensions (As Voted-for by SEO Community) - 1 views

  • Link Redirect Trace — Uncovers all URLs in a redirect chain including 301’s, 302’s, etc. Very useful for finding (and regaining) lost “link juice,” amongst other things.Other similar extensions: Redirect Path
  • Scraper — Scrape data from any web page using XPath or jQuery. Integrates with Google Sheets for one-click export to a spreadsheet. Or you can copy to clipboard and paste into Excel.Other similar extensions: Data Scraper — Easy Web Scraping, XPather
  • Tag Assistant (by Google) — Check for the correct installation of Google tags (e.g. Google Analytics, Tag Manager, etc) on any website. Also, record typical user flows on your website to diagnose and fix implementation errors.
  • ...16 more annotations...
  • Ghostery — Tells you how websites are tracking you (e.g. Facebook Custom Audiences, Google Analytics, etc) and blocks them. Very useful for regaining privacy. Plus, websites generally load faster when they don’t need to load tracking technologies.
  • WhatRuns — Instantly discover what runs any website. It uncovers the CMS, plugins, themes, ad networks, fonts, frameworks, analytics tools, everything.
  • Page Load Time — Measures and displays page load time in the toolbar. Also breaks down this metric by event to give you deeper insights. Simple, but very useful.
  • FATRANK — Tells you where the webpage you’re visiting ranks in Google for any keyword/phrase.
  • SEOStack Keyword Tool — Finds thousands of low-competition, long-tail keywords in seconds. It does this by scraping Google, Youtube, Bing, Yahoo, Amazon, and eBay. All data can be exported to CSV.
  • Window Resizer — Resize your browser window to see how a website looks on screens of different sizes. It has one-click emulation for popular sizes/resolutions (e.g. iPhone, iPad, laptop, desktop, etc).
  • Web Developer — Adds a web developer toolbar to Chrome. Use it to check how your website looks on different screen sizes, find images with missing alt text, and more.
  • Ayima Page Insights — Uncovers technical and on-page issues for any web page. It also connects to Google Search Console for additional insights on your web properties.
  • ObservePoint TagDebugger — Audit and debug issues with website tags (e.g. Google Analytics, Tag Manager, etc) on your websites. Also checks variables and on-click events.Other similar extensions: Event Tracking Tracker
  • The Tech SEO — Quick Click Website Audit — Provides pre-formatted links (for the current URL) to a bunch of popular SEO tools. A very underrated tool that reduces the need for mundane copy/pasting.
  • User-Agent Switcher for Chrome — Mimic user-agents to check that your website displays correctly in different browsers and/or OS’.
  • Portent’s SEO Page Review — Reviews the current page and kicks back a bunch of data including meta tags, canonicals, outbound links, H1-H6 tags, OpenGraph tags, and more.
  • FindLinks — Highlights all clickable links/elements on a web page in bright yellow. Very useful for finding links on websites with weird CSS styling.
  • SERPTrends SEO Extension — Tracks your Google, Bing, and Yahoo searches. Then, if you perform the same search again, it shows ranking movements directly in the SERPs.
  • SimilarTech Prospecting — Discovers a ton of useful information about the website you’re visiting. This includes estimated monthly traffic, company information, social profiles, web technologies, etc.
  • SEO Search Simulator by Nightwatch — Emulates Google searches from any location. Very useful for seeing how rankings vary for a particular query in different parts of the world.
  •  
    "Find Out How Much Traffic a Website Gets: 3 Ways Compared"
Rob Laporte

Google; You can put 50 words in your title tag, we'll read it | Hobo - 0 views

  •  
    Google; You can put 50 words in your title tag, we'll read it Blurb by Shaun Anderson Note - This is a test, testing Title Tags in Google. Consider also Google Title Tag Best Practice. We recently tested "how many keywords will Google read in the title tag / element?" using our simple seo mythbuster test (number 2 in the series). And here's the results, which are quite surprising. First - here's the test title tag we tried to get Google to swallow. And it did. All of it. Even though it was a bit spammy; HoboA HoboB HoboC HoboD HoboE HoboF HoboG HoboH HoboI HoboJ HoboK HoboL HoboM HoboN HoboO HoboP HoboQ HoboR HoboS HoboT HoboU HoboV HoboW HoboX HoboY Hob10 Hob20 Hob30 Hob40 Hob50 Hob60 Hob70 Hob80 Hob90 Hob11 Hob12 Hob13 Hob14 Hob15 Hob16 Hob17 Hob18 Hob19 Hob1a Hob1b Hob1c Hob1d Hob1e Hob1f Hob1g Hob1h Using a keyword search - hoboA Hob1h - we were surprised to see Google returned our page. We also tested it using - Hob1g Hob1h - the keywords right at the end of the title - and again our page was returned. So that's 51 words, and 255 characters without spaces, 305 characters with spaces, at least! It seems clear Google will read just about anything these days! ************** Update: Qwerty pointed out an interesting fact about the intitle: site operator in Google. Google results with the intitle: command…..results as expected. But next in the sequence returns the following, unexpected result….. Google results with the intitle: command So what does this tell us? Google seems to stop at the 12th word on this page at least when returning results using the intitle: site operator. Another interesting observation. Thanks Qwerty. ************** We're obviously not sure what benefit a title tag with this many keywords in it has for your page, in terms of keyword density / dilution, and "clickability" in the search engine results pages (serps). 50+ words is certainly not best practice! When creating your title tag bear in
Rob Laporte

Google Confirms RSS For Web Search Results - 0 views

  • Oct 8, 2008 at 3:02pm Eastern by Matt McGee    Google Confirms RSS For Web Search Results Google has confirmed for Search Engine Land that they’ll soon start offering RSS feeds for web search results. When it happens, the RSS feeds will be an extension of Google Alerts, which currently only allow notification by email. The addition of RSS alerts was first picked up by Amit Agarwal, who found it mentioned in an October 1st Wall Street Journal article where author Katherine Boehret wrote, “In about a month, Google will begin delivering these alerts to users via feeds, as well as emails.” In an email today, a Google spokesperson told us: “While I can’t be more specific about an ETA, I can confirm the launch.” Google Alerts offers email-only notifications on results from News, Web, Blogs, Video and Groups. Google is currently the only major search engine not offering RSS feeds of web search results.
  •  
    Oct 8, 2008 at 3:02pm Eastern by Matt McGee Google Confirms RSS For Web Search Results Google has confirmed for Search Engine Land that they'll soon start offering RSS feeds for web search results. When it happens, the RSS feeds will be an extension of Google Alerts, which currently only allow notification by email. The addition of RSS alerts was first picked up by Amit Agarwal, who found it mentioned in an October 1st Wall Street Journal article where author Katherine Boehret wrote, "In about a month, Google will begin delivering these alerts to users via feeds, as well as emails." In an email today, a Google spokesperson told us: "While I can't be more specific about an ETA, I can confirm the launch." Google Alerts offers email-only notifications on results from News, Web, Blogs, Video and Groups. Google is currently the only major search engine not offering RSS feeds of web search results.
Rob Laporte

Google Rolling Out "SearchWiki"? Move Results Up, Hide Them Or Suggest Your Own - 0 views

Rob Laporte

Google Says Domain Registrations Don't Affect SEO, Or Do They? - 0 views

  •  
    Google Says Domain Registrations Don't Affect SEO, Or Do They? Sep 9, 2009 at 2:01pm ET by Matt McGee Over at Search Engine Roundtable today, Barry Schwartz writes about the latest comments from Google about domain registration and its impact on SEO/search rankings. In this case, it's Google employee John Mueller suggesting in a Google Webmaster Help forum thread that Google doesn't look at the length of a domain registration: A bunch of TLDs do not publish expiration dates - how could we compare domains with expiration dates to domains without that information? It seems that would be pretty hard, and likely not worth the trouble. Even when we do have that data, what would it tell us when comparing sites that are otherwise equivalent? A year (the minimum duration, as far as I know) is pretty long in internet-time :-). But let's look at some more evidence. Earlier this year, Danny spoke with Google's Matt Cutts about a variety of domain/link/SEO issues. In light of the claims from domain registrars that longer domain registrations are good for SEO, Danny specifically asked "Does Domain Registration Length Matter?" Matt's reply: To the best of my knowledge, no search engine has ever confirmed that they use length-of-registration as a factor in scoring. If a company is asserting that as a fact, that would be troubling. But wait, there's more! Shortly after the Q&A with Danny that we posted here, Matt published more thoughts on the matter in a video on the Google Webmaster Central Channel on YouTube. If you don't have time to watch the video, Matt says, "My short answer is not to worry very much about that [the number of years a domain is registered], not very much at all." He reiterates that the domain registrar claims "are not based on anything we said," and talks about a Google "historical data" patent that may or may not be part of Google's algorithm. He sums it up by saying, "make great content, don't worry nea
  •  
    Google Says Domain Registrations Don't Affect SEO, Or Do They? Sep 9, 2009 at 2:01pm ET by Matt McGee Over at Search Engine Roundtable today, Barry Schwartz writes about the latest comments from Google about domain registration and its impact on SEO/search rankings. In this case, it's Google employee John Mueller suggesting in a Google Webmaster Help forum thread that Google doesn't look at the length of a domain registration: A bunch of TLDs do not publish expiration dates - how could we compare domains with expiration dates to domains without that information? It seems that would be pretty hard, and likely not worth the trouble. Even when we do have that data, what would it tell us when comparing sites that are otherwise equivalent? A year (the minimum duration, as far as I know) is pretty long in internet-time :-). But let's look at some more evidence. Earlier this year, Danny spoke with Google's Matt Cutts about a variety of domain/link/SEO issues. In light of the claims from domain registrars that longer domain registrations are good for SEO, Danny specifically asked "Does Domain Registration Length Matter?" Matt's reply: To the best of my knowledge, no search engine has ever confirmed that they use length-of-registration as a factor in scoring. If a company is asserting that as a fact, that would be troubling. But wait, there's more! Shortly after the Q&A with Danny that we posted here, Matt published more thoughts on the matter in a video on the Google Webmaster Central Channel on YouTube. If you don't have time to watch the video, Matt says, "My short answer is not to worry very much about that [the number of years a domain is registered], not very much at all." He reiterates that the domain registrar claims "are not based on anything we said," and talks about a Google "historical data" patent that may or may not be part of Google's algorithm. He sums it up by saying, "make great content, don't worry nea
Rob Laporte

Google Webmaster Central Hosting "Link Week" - 0 views

  • Oct 7, 2008 at 8:11am Eastern by Barry Schwartz    Google Webmaster Central Hosting “Link Week” This week at the Google Webmaster Central blog, Google has a series of blog posts all about links. The first two blog posts are live and are named: Links information straight from the source Importance of link architecture Google explains that they will be writing about three main topics this week. (1) Internal links, the links that you have within your site. That post is already live and is about the how you should structure your link structure for best search engine visibility. (2) Outbound links or the links you post on your pages to other sites. I assume Google will discuss the value of these links and who you should and should not link to. Clearly, think about your user here and not the search engine. (3) Inbound links or the external sites that are linking to your site. I assume Google left this for last, because this may be the most interesting topic. Google plans to bust some myths, so it will be interesting to see what they say on the topic of links hurting your site. Time will tell - but stay tuned for more information. Postscript: Here is Google’s post on linking outbound, which has useful tips for beginners on who and when to link out. In addition, it tells you how to handle user generated content links. Postscript 2: I was a bit let down by Google’s inbound link post.
  •  
    Oct 7, 2008 at 8:11am Eastern by Barry Schwartz Google Webmaster Central Hosting "Link Week" This week at the Google Webmaster Central blog, Google has a series of blog posts all about links. The first two blog posts are live and are named: * Links information straight from the source * Importance of link architecture Google explains that they will be writing about three main topics this week. (1) Internal links, the links that you have within your site. That post is already live and is about the how you should structure your link structure for best search engine visibility. (2) Outbound links or the links you post on your pages to other sites. I assume Google will discuss the value of these links and who you should and should not link to. Clearly, think about your user here and not the search engine. (3) Inbound links or the external sites that are linking to your site. I assume Google left this for last, because this may be the most interesting topic. Google plans to bust some myths, so it will be interesting to see what they say on the topic of links hurting your site. Time will tell - but stay tuned for more information. Postscript: Here is Google's post on linking outbound, which has useful tips for beginners on who and when to link out. In addition, it tells you how to handle user generated content links. Postscript 2: I was a bit let down by Google's inbound link post.
Rob Laporte

Google Now Working With Click Forensics - 0 views

  • Oct 13, 2008 at 9:53am Eastern by Barry Schwartz Google Now Working With Click Forensics Google allies with click-fraud-detection firm Click Forensics from ComputerWorld reports Google has now agreed to work with Click Forensics to aid in the detection and reporting of search ad click fraud. Specifically, Google said they would now accept click fraud submissions through the product, FACTr. FACTr is a product Click Forensics created with the help of Yahoo to gather and submit click-quality reports. Google will now be accepting these reports electronically, hopefully streamlining the process for advertisers to get refunds for approved click fraud. Looksmart and Miva are also now accepting them, along with Google, in news that Click Forensics announced last week. As you may remember, Google and Click Forensics have not always seen eye-to-eye. But this is a nice step to see from both parties involved. As a matter of history, Yahoo partnered with Click Forensics back in March of this year.
  •  
    Oct 13, 2008 at 9:53am Eastern by Barry Schwartz Google Now Working With Click Forensics Google allies with click-fraud-detection firm Click Forensics from ComputerWorld reports Google has now agreed to work with Click Forensics to aid in the detection and reporting of search ad click fraud. Specifically, Google said they would now accept click fraud submissions through the product, FACTr. FACTr is a product Click Forensics created with the help of Yahoo to gather and submit click-quality reports. Google will now be accepting these reports electronically, hopefully streamlining the process for advertisers to get refunds for approved click fraud. Looksmart and Miva are also now accepting them, along with Google, in news that Click Forensics announced last week. As you may remember, Google and Click Forensics have not always seen eye-to-eye. But this is a nice step to see from both parties involved. As a matter of history, Yahoo partnered with Click Forensics back in March of this year.
Rob Laporte

Limit Anchor Text Links To 55 Characters In Length? | Hobo - 0 views

  •  
    Limit Anchor Text Links To 55 Characters In Length? Blurb by Shaun Building LinksAs a seo I wanted to know - how many words or characters does Google count in a link? What's best practice when creating links - internal, or external? What is the optimal length of a HTML link? It appears the answer to the question 'how many words in a text link" is 55 characters, about 8-10 words. Why is this important to know? 1. You get to understand how many words Google will count as part of a link 2. You can see why you should keep titles to a maximum amount of characters 3. You can see why your domain name should be short and why urls should be snappy 4. You can see why you should rewrite your urls (SEF) 5. It's especially useful especially when thinking about linking internally, via body text on a page. I wanted to see how many words Google will count in one 'link' to pass on anchor text power to a another page so I did a test a bit like this one below; 1. pointed some nonsense words in one massive link, 50 words long, at the home page of a 'trusted' site 2. each of the nonsense words were 6 characters long 3. Then I did a search for something generic that the site would rank no1 for, and added the nonsense words to the search, so that the famous "This word only appear in links to the site" (paraphrase) kicked in 4. This I surmised would let me see how many of the nonsense words Google would attribute to the target page from the massive 50 word link I tried to get it to swallow. The answer was….. 1. Google counted 8 words in the anchor text link out of a possible 50. 2. It seemed to ignore everything else after the 8th word 3. 8 words x 6 characters = 48 characters + 7 spaces = a nice round and easy to remember number - 55 Characters. So, a possible best practice in number of words in an anchor text might be to keep a link under 8 words but importantly under 55 characters because everything after it is ignored
Rob Laporte

Google's neural matching versus RankBrain: How Google uses each in search - Search Engi... - 0 views

  • Google said in September 2018 that neural matching impacts about 30 percent of all queries. We asked Google if that has increased, but have not received an update.What is RankBrain? Isn’t it similar? Google told us in 2016 that RankBrain (see our RankBrain FAQ) is also an AI, machine learning-based system that helps Google understand queries.Google said a good way to think about RankBrain is as an AI-based system it began using in 2016 primarily to understand how words are related to concepts.So what’s the difference between Neural matching and RankBrain? Google put it this way:RankBrain helps Google better relate pages to concepts.Neural matching helps Google better relate words to searches
  • Why it matters. The truth is, there isn’t much a search marketer can do to better optimize for RankBrain, as we said in 2016. The same seems to apply for neural matching, there doesn’t seem like you can do anything special to do better here. This is more about Google understanding queries and content on a page better than it currently does right now.That said, it seems to indicate that search marketers need to worry a bit less about making sure specific keywords are on their pages because Google is getting smarter at figuring out the words you use naturally on your pages and matching them to queries.We asked Google if it has additional recommendations around neural matching and RankBrain and were told its advice has not changed: Simply “create useful, high quality content.”
  • Google’s neural matching versus RankBrain: How Google uses each in searchNeural matching helps Google better relate words to searches, while RankBrain helps Google better relate pages to concepts.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • What is neural matching? Google explained “Neural matching is an AI-based system Google began using in 2018 primarily to understand how words are related to concepts.”“It’s like a super synonym system. Synonyms are words that are closely related to other words,” Google added.
Rob Laporte

Beyond conventional SEO: Unravelling the mystery of the organic product carousel - Sear... - 0 views

  • How to influence the organic product carouselIn Google’s blog post, they detailed three factors that are key inputs: Structured Data on your website, providing real-time product information via Merchant Center, along with providing additional information through Manufacturer Center.This section of the article will explore Google’s guidance, along with some commentary of what I’ve noticed based on my own experiences.
  • Make sure your product markup is validatedThe key here is to make sure Product Markup with Structured Data on your page adheres to Google’s guidelines and is validated.
  • Submit your product feed to Google via Merchant CenterThis is where it starts to get interesting. By using Google’s Merchant Center, U.S. product feeds are now given the option to submit data via a new destination.The difference here for Google is that retailers are able to provide more up-to-date information about their products, rather than waiting for Google to crawl your site (what happens in step 1).Checking the box for “Surfaces across Google” gives you the ability to grant access to your websites product feed, allowing your products to be eligible in areas such as Search and Google Images.For the purpose of this study we are most interested in Search, with the Organic Product Carousel in mind. “Relevance” of information is the deciding factor of this feature.Google states that in order for this feature of Search to operate, you are not required to have a Google Ads campaign. Just create an account, then upload a product data feed.Commentary by PPC Expert Kirk Williams:“Setting up a feed in Google Merchant Center has become even more simple over time since Google wants to guarantee that they have the right access, and that retailers can get products into ads! You do need to make sure you add all the business information and shipping/tax info at the account level, and then you can set up a feed fairly easily with your dev team, a third party provider like Feedonomics, or with Google Sheets. As I note in my “Beginner’s Guide to Shopping Ads”, be aware that the feed can take up to 72 hours to process, and even longer to begin showing in SERPs. Patience is the key here if just creating a new Merchant Center… and make sure to stay up on those disapprovals as Google prefers a clean GMC account and will apply more aggressive product disapproval filters to accounts with more disapprovals. ”– Kirk WilliamsFor a client I’m working with, completing this step resulted in several of their products being added to the top 10 of the PP carousel. 1 of which is in the top 5, being visible when the SERP first loads.This meant that, in this specific scenario, the product Structured Data that Google was regularly crawling and indexing in the US wasn’t enough on it’s own to be considered for the Organic Product Carousel.Note: the products that were added to the carousel were already considered “popular” but Google just hadn’t added them in. It is not guaranteed that your products will be added just because this step was completed. it really comes down to the prominence of your product and relevance to the query (same as any other page that ranks).
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • 3. Create an additional feed via Manufacturer CenterThe next step involves the use of Google’s Manufacturer Center. Again, this tool works in the same way as Merchant Center: you submit a feed, and can add additional information.This information includes product descriptions, variants, and rich content, such as high-quality images and videos that can show within the Product Knowledge Panel.You’ll need to first verify your brand name within the Manufacturer Center Dashboard, then you can proceed to uploading your product feed.When Google references the “Product Knowledge Panel” in their release, it’s not the same type of Knowledge Panel many in the SEO industry are accustomed.This Product Knowledge Panel contains very different information compared to your standard KP that is commonly powered by Wikipedia, and appears in various capacities (based on how much data to which it has access).Here’s what this Product Knowledge Panel looks like in its most refined state, completely populated with all information that can be displayed:Type #1 just shows the product image(s), the title and the review count.Type #2 is an expansion on Type #1 with further product details, and another link to the reviews.Type #3 is the more standard looking Knowledge Panel, with the ability to share a link with an icon on the top right. This Product Knowledge Panel has a description and more of a breakdown of reviews, with the average rating. This is the evolved state where I tend to see Ads being placed within.Type #4 is an expansion of Type #3, with the ability to filter through reviews and search the database with different keywords. This is especially useful functionality when assessing the source of the aggregated reviews.Based on my testing with a client in the U.S., adding the additional information via Manufacturer Center resulted in a new product getting added to a PP carousel.This happened two weeks after submitting the feed, so there still could be further impact to come. I will likely wait longer and then test a different approach.
  • Quick recap:Organic Product Carousel features are due to launch globally at the end of 2019.Popular Product and Best Product carousels are the features to keep an eye on.Make sure your products have valid Structured Data, a submitted product feed through Merchant Center, along with a feed via Manufacturer Center.Watch out for cases where your clients brand is given a low review score due to the data sources Google has access to.Do your own testing. As Cindy Krum mentioned earlier, there are a lot of click between the Organic Product Carousel listings and your website’s product page.Remember: there may be cases where it is not possible to get added to the carousel due to an overarching “prominence” factor. Seek out realistic opportunities.
Rob Laporte

Evaluating Google's Response To Mapspam Reports - 0 views

  •  
    Conclusions * Local business owners seem to be confused about what actually constitutes spam, but can you blame them? The world of the Local search engines is often confusing even to those of us who study them on a daily basis! * Google's creation of a public forum for reporting anomalies in Maps has helped a lot of businesses recover traffic lost via Maps, and has probably helped Google identify weaknesses in its own algorithm as well. The responsiveness of the Maps team has been relatively admirable, even without providing verbal confirmation in the thread that changes have been made. (Of course, business owners whose situation hasn't been addressed are irate over the lack of response...) * The on-again/off-again bulk upload feature of Google Maps seems to be a particular favorite tool of mapspammers. * Local business owners: claim your listing at Google to avoid being victimized by hijackers and to decrease the likelihood of conflation with someone else's listing. If you don't have a website, direct your Local Business Listing at Google to one of your listings featuring the same information on another portal, such as Yahoo, Citysearch, or Yelp. * The large percentage of reported record conflations also underlines the importance of giving Google a strong signal of your business information (i.e. spiderable HTML address and phone number) on your own website. The more closely Google can associate that particular information with your business, the lower the chance of identifying someone else's business with the same information. In all honesty, I was surprised that the total number of bona-fide instances of spam reported in two months was so low, and I'm not quite sure what to make of it. It's possible that the quality of Local results has improved dramatically since the advent of the 10-pack in January. However, more likely is that the typical local business owner doesn't know where to report possible spam. It'll be interesting to see whether
Rob Laporte

Wake Up SEOs, the New Google is Here | SEOmoz - 0 views

  •  
    Rel="author" and Rel="publisher" are the solution Google is adopting in order to better control, within other things, the spam pollution of the SERPs. If you are a blogger, you will be incentivized in marking your content with Author and link it to your G+ Profile, and as a Site, you are incentivized to create your G+ Business page and to promote it with a badge on you site that has the rel="publisher" in its code. Trusted seeds are not anymore only sites, but can be also persons (i.e.: Rand or Danny Sullivan) or social facets of an entity… so, the closer I am in the Social Graph to those persons//entity the more trusted I am to Google eyes. As we can see, Google is not trying to rely only on the link graph, as it is quite easy to game, but it is not simply adding the social signals to the link graph, because they too can be gamed. What Google is doing is creating and refining a new graph that see cooperating Link graph, Social graph and Trust graph and which is possibly harder to game. Because it can be gamed still, but - hopefully - needing so many efforts that it may become not-viable as a practice. Wake up SEOs, the new Google is here As a conclusion, let me borrow what Larry Page wrote on Google+ (bold is mine): Our ultimate ambition is to transform the overall Google experience […] because we understand what you want and can deliver it instantly. This means baking identity and sharing into all of our products so that we build a real relationship with our users. Sharing on the web will be like sharing in real life across all your stuff. You'll have better, more relevant search results and ads. Think about it this way … last quarter, we've shipped the +, and now we're going to ship the Google part. I think that it says it all and what we have lived a year now is explained clearly by the Larry Page words. What can we do as SEOs? Evolve, because SEO is not dieing, but SEOs can if they don't assume that winter - oops - the
Rob Laporte

Deduping Duplicate Content - ClickZ - 0 views

  •  
    One interesting thing that came out of SES San Jose's Duplicate Content and Multiple Site Issues session in August was the sheer volume of duplicate content on the Web. Ivan Davtchev, Yahoo's lead product manager for search relevance, said "more than 30 percent of the Web is made up of duplicate content." At first I thought, "Wow! Three out of every 10 pages consist of duplicate content on the Web." My second thought was, "Sheesh, the Web is one tangled mess of equally irrelevant content." Small wonder trust and linkage play such significant roles in determining a domain's overall authority and consequent relevancy in the search engines. Three Flavors of Bleh Davtchev went on to explain three basic types of duplicate content: 1. Accidental content duplication: This occurs when Webmasters unintentionally allow content to be replicated by non-canonicalization (define), session IDs, soft 404s (define), and the like. 2. Dodgy content duplication: This primarily consists of replicating content across multiple domains. 3. Abusive content duplication: This includes scraper spammers, weaving or stitching (mixed and matched content to create "new" content), and bulk content replication. Fortunately, Greg Grothaus from Google's search quality team had already addressed the duplicate content penalty myth, noting that Google "tries hard to index and show pages with distinct information." It's common knowledge that Google uses a checksum-like method for initially filtering out replicated content. For example, most Web sites have a regular and print version of each article. Google only wants to serve up one copy of the content in its search results, which is predominately determined by linking prowess. Because most print-ready pages are dead-end URLs sans site navigation, it's relatively simply to equate which page Google prefers to serve up in its search results. In exceptional cases of content duplication that Google perceives as an abusive attempt to manipula
  •  
    One interesting thing that came out of SES San Jose's Duplicate Content and Multiple Site Issues session in August was the sheer volume of duplicate content on the Web. Ivan Davtchev, Yahoo's lead product manager for search relevance, said "more than 30 percent of the Web is made up of duplicate content." At first I thought, "Wow! Three out of every 10 pages consist of duplicate content on the Web." My second thought was, "Sheesh, the Web is one tangled mess of equally irrelevant content." Small wonder trust and linkage play such significant roles in determining a domain's overall authority and consequent relevancy in the search engines. Three Flavors of Bleh Davtchev went on to explain three basic types of duplicate content: 1. Accidental content duplication: This occurs when Webmasters unintentionally allow content to be replicated by non-canonicalization (define), session IDs, soft 404s (define), and the like. 2. Dodgy content duplication: This primarily consists of replicating content across multiple domains. 3. Abusive content duplication: This includes scraper spammers, weaving or stitching (mixed and matched content to create "new" content), and bulk content replication. Fortunately, Greg Grothaus from Google's search quality team had already addressed the duplicate content penalty myth, noting that Google "tries hard to index and show pages with distinct information." It's common knowledge that Google uses a checksum-like method for initially filtering out replicated content. For example, most Web sites have a regular and print version of each article. Google only wants to serve up one copy of the content in its search results, which is predominately determined by linking prowess. Because most print-ready pages are dead-end URLs sans site navigation, it's relatively simply to equate which page Google prefers to serve up in its search results. In exceptional cases of content duplication that Google perceives as an abusive attempt to manipula
Rob Laporte

Google SEO Test - Google Prefers Valid HTML & CSS | Hobo - 0 views

  •  
    Well - the result is clear. From these 4 pages Google managed to pick the page with valid css and valid html as the preffered page to include in it's index! Ok, it might be a bit early to see if the four pages in the test eventually appear in Google but on first glance it appears Google spidered the pages, examined them, applied duplicate content filters as expected, and selected one to include in search engine results. It just happens that Google seems to prefer the page with valid code as laid down by the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium). The W3C was started in 1994 to lead the Web to its full potential by developing common protocols that promote its evolution and ensure its interoperability. What is the W3C? * W3C Stands for the World Wide Web Consortium * W3C was created in October 1994 * W3C was created by Tim Berners-Lee * W3C was created by the Inventor of the Web * W3C is organized as a Member Organization * W3C is working to Standardize the Web * W3C creates and maintains WWW Standards * W3C Standards are called W3C Recommendations How The W3C Started The World Wide Web (WWW) began as a project at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), where Tim Berners-Lee developed a vision of the World Wide Web. Tim Berners-Lee - the inventor of the World Wide Web - is now the Director of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). W3C was created in 1994 as a collaboration between the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), with support from the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) and the European Commission. W3C Standardising the Web W3C is working to make the Web accessible to all users (despite differences in culture, education, ability, resources, and physical limitations). W3C also coordinates its work with many other standards organizations such as the Internet Engineering Task Force, the Wireless Application Protocols (WAP) Forum an
Rob Laporte

Google AdWords Finally Breaking Out Search Traffic From Partners - 0 views

  • Oct 17, 2008 at 5:41am Eastern by Barry Schwartz    Google AdWords Finally Breaking Out Search Traffic From Partners The Google AdWords blog announced they have added a method to the AdWords console to break out search traffic between Google and search partners. Beforehand, you were only able to see a breakout between your content campaigns and search campaigns. Now, you can breakout your AdWords results based on your content campaigns, Google search campaigns and search partner campaigns. How do you do this? Log into your AdWords console, navigate to a campaign and click on the “Statistics” drop down. Then select “Split: Google search/search partners/content network.” You will then get three rows of summary data by Google, Search Partner and Content network. This level of detail can be found in the ad group or campaign levels. Google said this level of detail is coming to the Report Center soon. Advertisers have been asking for this for a long time! For more information, see this help page.
1 - 20 of 1657 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page