A substantial literature documents large variation in teacher effectiveness at raising student achievement, providing motivation to identify highly effective and ineffective teachers early in their careers. Using data from New York City public schools, we estimate whether subjective evaluations of teacher effectiveness have predictive power for the achievement gains made by teachers’ future students. We find that these subjective evaluations have substantial power, comparable with and complementary to objective measures of teacher effectiveness taken from a teacher’s first year in the classroom.
Contents contributed and discussions participated by Sarah Schaller Welsh
The Official Social Engineering Framework - Psychological Principles: The Human Buffer ... - 17 views
http://olms.cte.jhu.edu/9517 - 55 views
css Zen Garden: The Beauty in CSS Design - 2 views
Universal Design for Learning: A framework for access and equity - 5 views
Common Core State Standards Initiative | Frequently Asked Questions - 61 views
Freakonomics » Evaluating Teachers: What About Doing it the Old-Fashioned Way? - 88 views
Freakonomics » What Should Be Done About Standardized Tests? A Freakonomics Q... - 42 views
-
Gaston Caperton
-
Standardized tests have much in common with French fries. Both of them differ in composition as well as quality. French fries are available in numerous incarnations, including straight, curly, skins-on, skins-off, and, in recent years, with sweet potatoes. Regarding quality, of course, the taste of French fries can range substantially – from sublime to soggy. It’s really the same with standardized tests.
-
Take the No Child Left Behind Act, for instance, a federal accountability law requiring scads of standardized tests to be used in evaluating schools. Do you know that almost all of the standardized tests now being employed to judge school quality are unable to distinguish between well taught and badly taught students?
- ...8 more annotations...
1 - 12 of 12
Showing 20▼ items per page