Group items tagged

Not sure about who MacKenzie Jones is but one thing that was written was interesting regarding your performance being tired to the person you work for. Not sure I agree but I think a good boss can help make employees better or vise versa. It is up to the employee to not fall into any temptations of "behaving badly" when their boss may act badly or poorly on a regular basis.

Succession planning is perhaps the most important job of corporate boards. Without a strong succession-planning program, companies are not prepared to fill openings created by retirements or unexpected departures, nor are they able to meet demands of the organization.

To me the importance of succession and cross-training within departments is very crucial. Yet I think still many times today people view these things as a loss of job security. Many time individuals may feel a false sense of security if they are the only person that knows how to do 'x'.

I could not agree more with your comments. I hear it on a daily basis, if I am the only one who knows this information; the organization has to keep me. Much of the fear comes from massive layoffs and reorganization-if they need the knowledge they will need me.

milleniels

Good reminder not to stereotype Gen Y, or any other group. The article shared this phrase "This isn't entitlement - it's being personally accountable for your own career," which I think many people leap to the conclusion that Gen Y's are not willing to work for what they get. It is not true at all.

I agree, good information on the younger folks in the workforce and their perspective.

By now, we've all heard about how employers scope out the Tweets and Facebook profiles of job seekers to winnow down the field of applicants. But job seekers may be surprised to hear just how many recruiters now use social media throughout the hiring process.

Ah, the joys of social media! It truly does expand the meaning that "big brother" is watching. I've found myself pulling back on Facebook posts by trying to stick to only positive things. LinkedIn, I feel I need a to hire a PR rep to make sure everything is in order there. Twitter, I'm not a fan of it period. But from the sounds of the article, I better learn to like and use it. Thanks for the link to the article, very good information.

I always enjoy this dynamic. It is a double edged sword and not every organization should want the use of social media in their candidates. I have conducted surveillance in law enforcement, research on teachers while working in the education field, and pre-screened inbound young Officers in the military. Its important to see what you are getting. It has become suspicious if someone doesn't have a linked in account. If a person has too many accomplishments on their linked in account however while simultaneously not having an active personal social media account as senior management I find it suspicious. We are all aware that if you want to know who a person truly is, the last place to look is linked in.

We have a game show for everything else...  Again-  Good information, not too old and wants to throw out the rulebook.

Wow! Immediately has an HR person I begin to get nervous about the potential illegal interview questions or practices that these companies could be sued for. It's a risky line between innovative and unethical in terms of hiring. I like the idea and concept of thinking outside the box though!

I would not choose Pepsi on a normal basis but this is good supplemental material and background to the information in our text.

Smooth CEO and C-suite transitions are critical so why do the majority of companies state they do not have ample talent pool to fill them?

"Organizational development is successful when it is seen as a business necessity and not just another department within an organization,"

You only get one chance to onboard a person so make it the best you got!

First impressions last a lifetime.

People remember all of their "first" experiences, so it is surprising that so many companies do not focus on an employees "first" with them. This may leave an impression that causes an employee not to reach their "first" anniversary with the company.

Managers, not HR, must lead the charge to engage employees. Senior Management touts the value of employee engagement so why is the responsibility often delegate to the HR department?

Lengthy article but full of good information on the study and findings.

All companies can provide an orientation program that does not forget the small things like greeting a new employee warmly, taking her or him to lunch, and providing a functioning workstation on Day 1.

I am a Disney fan but now knowing a person who works there and seeing their on boarding process (via this website) it is no wonder that they are such a huge and successful company.   The website goes through, what looks like, everything a person would need to know in getting started at Disney.   I could see how helpful a website such as this would be to almost any profession.  Disney obviously has enough money to produce this website and keep it current, but I do not think that would be too hard or expensive for a school district, police agency, banking industry, military, or many other professions to implement.

My niece just completed an intership this summer with Disney. She was pleasantly surprised by how comprehensive the website and training was for interns. Eventhough she was scheduled to intern for six months, everything about the training and experience won her over to want to be a lifetime employee of Disney. Many companies could learn from this model.

I heard that the first two days of employee orientation is strictly story telling. They use the 'cast' members to acclimate employees to the Disney culture using stories. I feel like this is really in sync with Disney culture and would also be a very effective way to get employee excited about their role in the bigger Disney 'story'.

Engaged workers stand apart from their not-engaged and actively disengaged counterparts because of the discretionary effort they consistently bring to their roles. These employees willingly go the extra mile, work with passion, and feel a profound connection to their company. They are the people who will drive innovation and move your business forward.

Having a career model that is closely tied to business needs can not only enhance retention, but also facilitate the development of professionals to support critical areas that are in danger of being understaffed.

Week 2 related

Week 2 related

The article identifies a couple of pieces that are important to creating a strong culture in an organization. They include building relationships, trust, the meaning of the work, and the relationship with colleagues. This aligns with much of the previous literature we have read within this course. I have also witnessed this within my organization and department. The department spends a lot of time recruiting people and making sure they will fit the culture of the department. If they have the right credentials but do not seem to align with the culture, we will not hire them. Culture is important in the workplace.

Employee evaluations are like painting a room: If you do the prep work diligently, the last step in the process is easy... and not all messy.

Cost-conscious firms are missing out. Few prioritize onboarding programs, yet they expect new employees to drive results within 90 days.

Leadership related-  Not on-boarding so much. Just an interesting article.  The Book may also be good but I need to do a little more research on the author before I will say that it is or will be worth the money.  

Interesting (not really related to on boarding at all but good talk)

Chain of command is not limited to the battlefield. Knowing who comes next in the line and having a plan is critical for mission success.