Group items tagged

I am a Disney fan but now knowing a person who works there and seeing their on boarding process (via this website) it is no wonder that they are such a huge and successful company.   The website goes through, what looks like, everything a person would need to know in getting started at Disney.   I could see how helpful a website such as this would be to almost any profession.  Disney obviously has enough money to produce this website and keep it current, but I do not think that would be too hard or expensive for a school district, police agency, banking industry, military, or many other professions to implement.

My niece just completed an intership this summer with Disney. She was pleasantly surprised by how comprehensive the website and training was for interns. Eventhough she was scheduled to intern for six months, everything about the training and experience won her over to want to be a lifetime employee of Disney. Many companies could learn from this model.

I heard that the first two days of employee orientation is strictly story telling. They use the 'cast' members to acclimate employees to the Disney culture using stories. I feel like this is really in sync with Disney culture and would also be a very effective way to get employee excited about their role in the bigger Disney 'story'.

Something like this seems like it may be helpful for any industry and the person conducting the review or being reviewed.

The use of multiple forms of gaming, can produce excellent talent, and improve worklife.

Bob, My organization uses gaming to engage the public to help them understand financial concepts that many find too complex or difficult to understand. We also recently implemented gaming as part of our on-boarding process to educate and engage new employees to learn more about the functions and responsibilities of the organization. The public has embraced the concept of gaming, while its use as an on-boarding tool is receiving mixed reviews. The younger generations loves it, while many of the long-term employees don't see the value and feel it is a waste of people's time and the organization's money. It will be interesting to see if gaming is a fad or not.

My company outsourced to well being company to help employees become more engaged in lifestyle choices. Never dawned on me that the challenges or gamification was being done. I'll be forwarding this article on to others outside our group, very interesting read and informative.

Leadership related-  Not on-boarding so much. Just an interesting article.  The Book may also be good but I need to do a little more research on the author before I will say that it is or will be worth the money.  

Some interesting points

Fun fact - this is actually the system my organization uses. I am on system administrator on the roll out and implementation of Cornerstone into our organization. This year will be the first year our employees are setting goals in the system so next year we will actually being doing performance reviews in the technology. We currently just have a paper performance review process, so using Cornerstone will hopefully be more efficient.

The trends discussed in this interview are ones I have noticed in my organization; vertical development, innovation, group versus individual, and greater emphasis on development being owned by the individual.

We have a game show for everything else...  Again-  Good information, not too old and wants to throw out the rulebook.

Wow! Immediately has an HR person I begin to get nervous about the potential illegal interview questions or practices that these companies could be sued for. It's a risky line between innovative and unethical in terms of hiring. I like the idea and concept of thinking outside the box though!

resources that can be used.

Good resources, interesting what all can be looked into or at.

2013 looks to be a year of global growth, but for HR and talent leaders, it will likely continue to present challenges. Still a relevant article as we go into 2015!

Should we or shouldn't we? 

I found this to be a thought provoking article which seems to perfectly illustrate everything that can go bad with a performance review. I liked the practical approach to encourage open relationship which can provide the honest feedback we each need to address our self-improvement barriers.

This clip highlights the issue around talent management issues being of high-importance but low on preparedness. This is very true in many organizations.

To summarize Walt's leadership lesson: In order to "know what the people want," get out there, be willing to listen, and then institutionalize learning and continuous improvement on behalf of your customers.

I love this - but I worry customer service is losing it's appeal. Now a days many large companies feel if they have a strong product customer service is less than important. I immediately think about Walmart. I rarely have a good customer service experience at Walmart - but that has not stopped me from buying products there....

I agree on the customer service part...I also feel a lot of companies are moving towards "self service" which brings back to less customer service.

Having a career model that is closely tied to business needs can not only enhance retention, but also facilitate the development of professionals to support critical areas that are in danger of being understaffed.

Not sure about who MacKenzie Jones is but one thing that was written was interesting regarding your performance being tired to the person you work for. Not sure I agree but I think a good boss can help make employees better or vise versa. It is up to the employee to not fall into any temptations of "behaving badly" when their boss may act badly or poorly on a regular basis.

Forbes article

Good article, nice to see the 7 C's and an observation point from a leadership level owning up to be a contributing factor for new employee success rate.

There it is again with that compatible non-sense. That is why organizations get jammed up in lawsuits, and lose huge sums of money. Its a whole new generation of employers thinking that they should hire based on "Cultural matches" which are made up in the first place. That is a preference, and it cannot be articulated on the bench in front of a jury of 12. If you can't defend it, then don't make it a core competency or requirement. Make it a subfield, or a preference.

As I read this I was drawn to section on cognitive constructs. I found it very interesting and the openness of which the author references the need for future research makes me wonder if we are getting closer to understanding the cognitive sciences or just beginning to grasp how big this issue could be.

Good ideas for starting an onboarding plan and ideas to being. Will come in use as I develop a plan

Callie - good article - onboarding should start with the first click - I was reviewing my company's website today and for the career section, it's down until the 10th, not a good sign for those seeking opportunities with FFIC.

Seems easy enough...

I love the idea of 360's. This is one thing our company has essentially put on hold since financial times have been more difficult. It can be expensive to administer this type of feedback for employees, especially if it's a large organization. However, I believe getting feedback from your peers can sometimes be more important than your boss. Your peers are those who interact with you everyday and can truly provide a first hand perspective.

While many people have expressed concern about the trend of employers using social media to screen job candidates, can social media actually be a benefit to job seekers or employers? Find out in this Q and A interview with Chirag Nangia, CEO of Reppify.

Speaking of "war for talent"….here is a good article about some "out-of-box" recruiting strategies.

Eric, I would agree…but an organization needs to be careful. I sat on an interview panel one time with 11 people on it; it was so difficult to make a decision with 11 people giving "their opinion". I agree with you, "at least on a small scale".

Oh my, a group of 11 people, I would have been a nervous wreck. I feel that around 3-5 people is a good number, easier to find a nice pace for the interview process to flow and provide the needed information for both sides.