We know that technology belongs to the classroom. Have you ever asked whether technology belongs in your workplace? Technology is a tool that helps us develop and apply skills we all value – curiosity, problem-solving, persistence, collaboration, information literacy.
Think about when you go to Starbucks to complete some work. Why do you choose to work there? Where do you choose to sit? I usually gravitate towards the comfy seating choices like the couches and big chairs, and yet, I see people choose the tables and chairs over and over again.
A great case-study from a teacher who published his first novel by himself. Lots of helpful lessons along the way, including how he got his cover designed, and suggestions on marketing.
Research suggests that the most creative children are the least likely to become the teacher’s pet, and in response, many learn to keep their original ideas to themselves.
What holds them back is that they don’t learn to be original. They strive to earn the approval of their parents and the admiration of their teachers.
only a fraction of gifted children eventually become revolutionary adult creators,
The parents of ordinary children had an average of six rules, like specific schedules for homework and bedtime. Parents of highly creative children had an average of fewer than one rule.
“Emphasis was placed on the development of one’s own ethical code.”
parents didn’t dream of raising superstar kids. They weren’t drill sergeants or slave drivers. They responded to the intrinsic motivation of their children. When their children showed interest and enthusiasm in a skill, the parents supported them.
A majority of the tennis stars remembered one thing about their first coaches: They made tennis enjoyable.
Research reveals that the more we practice, the more we become entrenched — trapped in familiar ways of thinking.
what motivates people to practice a skill for thousands of hours? The most reliable answer is passion — discovered through natural curiosity or nurtured through early enjoyable experiences with an activity or many activities.
In fashion, the most original collections come from directors who spend the most time working abroad.
winning a Nobel Prize is less about being a single-minded genius and more about being interested in many things.
Relative to typical scientists, Nobel Prize winners are 22 times more likely to perform as actors, dancers or magicians; 12 times more likely to write poetry, plays or novels; seven times more likely to dabble in arts and crafts; and twice as likely to play an instrument or compose music.
“Love is a better teacher than a sense of duty,” he said.
You can’t program a child to become creative. Try to engineer a certain kind of success, and the best you’ll get is an ambitious robot.
If you want your children to bring original ideas into the world, you need to let them pursue their passions, not yours.
"Research suggests that the most creative children are the least likely to become the teacher's pet, and in response, many learn to keep their original ideas to themselves."
Gifted kids don't often produce something new but excel in the
This is the case for instructional coaches. 90% retention vs. 10% retention. Incredible.
up to 90% of what teachers learn alongside coaches will be retained. This means, that unlike traditional professional development where Knight's research shows that teachers lose 90% of what they learn, coaching can provide an enormous impact.
As early as I can remember, we were told to take notes.
during that conversation, I paid attention to more than just what was being said; I watched eye movement, body language, and every other form of nonverbal communication. I wasn’t just listening, I was engaging in an interaction. It was then that I found myself wondering, how much was I missing in other classes because I was too busy taking notes?
I started to challenge myself not to take notes during other classes and to actively listen, instead
It is amazing to me that the practice of note-taking in class is so widespread, given how ineffective it is
Unfortunately, if you try to take notes while you are listening, and then try to study from your notes later, you are receiving half-way exposure twice that doesn’t even add up to a whole
The philosophy of note-taking is patently absurd when you really think about it. The idea is that in class, the teacher verbally recites relevant facts, while students are supposed to split their attention between listening and writing them down, essentially taking dictation and creating a very low-fidelity personal copy of their textbook on the fly. Then the students are supposed to go home and re-learn (or learn for the first time) the information that the teacher gave them in class from this hastily constructed replica.
If you have spent your time in class trying to write things down rather than listening fully, of course you won’t remember what was said, and will feel later like you have to rely on your notes.