Group items tagged

When it was necessary for education to be performed face to face, a number of services were bundled together. When it becomes digital and online, this may no longer be the case, as we have seen in most content industries, such as music and newspapers (education has some similarities with content and also some significant differences). The first round of learning tools replicated the centralised model, but as the tools have become easier to use, and the methods for integrating them simpler, so this centralised approach seems less applicable. Clay Shirky (2008) argues that the ‘cost’ of organising people has collapsed, which makes informal groupings more likely to occur and often more successful:"By making it easier for groups to self-assemble and for individuals to contribute to group effort without requiring formal management, these tools have radically altered the old limits on the size, sophistication, and scope of unsupervised effort"Part of the function of universities is to provide this organisation, for example by grouping individuals together to form a student cohort who are interested in the same subject. But as this grouping becomes easier to do online, it becomes less of a valued function of the university - ie you don’t need to go to a university to find like minded people. Education then faces the same challenges regarding the cost of organisation that, say, the Encyclopedia Brittanica faced from wikipedia. Returning to the theme of this paper, Shirky’s argument can also be applied to technology, namely that the ‘cost’ of integrating technology has drastically reduced, meaning it is now feasible for individuals to do this, thus alleviating the need for centrally provided pre-integrated solutions. For example, we could reword the above quote to read:By making it easier for tools to (self) assemble and for applications to contribute to the environment without requiring integration, these approaches have radically altered the old limits on the size, sophistication, and scope of any individual to create their own environmentProjects such as SocialLearn, illustrate that the conceptualisation of a learning environment goes beyond technical, or even pedagogical considerations. In a digital society it comes to represent the institutional response to changes in the nature of knowledge creation, sharing, and participation, in short to the nature of education itself. Shirky argues that ‘when we change the way we communicate, we change society’, and the new socially based technologies we have today are doing this in fundamental ways. It is only by exploring their potential that universities can remain relevant to the society they are helping to shape.

Opetusaineistojen jakaminen edellyttää kuitenkin uusia pelisääntöjä. Opettajat tuskin innostuvat avaamaan arkistojaan, ennen kuin tekijänoikeuksista, kannusteista ja työnjaosta päästään sopuun.

Tarve parantaa koululaisten tietoyhteiskuntavalmiuksia ei ole kadonnut 1980-luvun jälkeen mihinkään, päinvastoin. Enää ei kuitenkaan puhuta ohjelmoinnista, vaan medialukutaidosta ja uudesta sosiaalisesta pääomasta, nettiviestinnässä tarvittavista sosiaalisista taidoista.

Opettajien paras mahdollisuus kehittää tietoyhteiskuntataitonsa tarpeen tasalle on ottaa nettimedioiden mahdollisuudet käyttöön omassa työssään. Näin opettajat oppivat kantapään kautta ne samat läksyt, joita heidän oppilaansa kohtaavat netissä päivittäin.