Skip to main content

Home/ Sosiaalinen media opetuksessa/ Group items tagged comparison

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Johanna T

Facebook Finland Network revealed + IRC-Galleria comparison | Taneli Tikka - 0 views

  •  
    Taneli Tikka vertaa Facebookin ja IRC-gallerian käyttäjätilastoja, ikäjakaumia ja muuta.
Tarmo Toikkanen

Free and Commercial Stock Photography Sites | Developer's Toolbox | Smashing Magazine - 0 views

  •  
    Comprehensive list and comparison of dozens of free and commercial stock photo sites
  •  
    Ilmaisia ja maksullisia valokuvapalveluita esim. esitysgrafiikan kuvitukseen.
Tarmo Toikkanen

Social Bookmarking: Delicious Vs Diigo | Integrating Technology in the Primary Classroom - 2 views

  •  
    Comparison of Delicious and Diigo social bookmarking sites.
  •  
    Diigon ja Deliciousin toimintojen vertailu.
Tero Toivanen

Blogs Wikis Docs Chart - 2 views

  •  
    Blogien, Wikien ja Google Docsin vertailu koulukäyttöä varten.
Tarmo Toikkanen

Testing of mobile video streaming services - 1 views

  •  
    "In this site we compare several different video streaming services. Main focus will be in live mobile video broadcasting."
  •  
    Mobiilivideopalveluiden testausta ja vertailua eri laitteilla ja palveluilla.
Tarmo Toikkanen

Social Media is Killing the LMS Star - A Bootleg of Bryan Alexander's Lost Presentation... - 0 views

  • Hence the title of my talk. CMSes lumber along like radio, still playing into the air as they continue to gradually shift ever farther away on the margins. In comparison, Web 2.0 is like movies and tv combined, plus printed books and magazines. That’s where the sheer scale, creative ferment, and wife-ranging influence reside. This is the necessary background for discussing how to integrate learning and the digital world.
  • Moreover, unless we consider the CMS environment to be a sort of corporate intranet simulation, the CMS set of community skills is unusual, rarely applicable to post-graduation examples. In other words, while a CMS might help privacy concerns, it is at best a partial, not sufficient solution, and can even be inappropriate for already online students.
  • Think of a professor bringing a newspaper to class, carrying a report about the very subject under discussion. How can this be utilized practically? Faculty members can pick a Web service (Google News, Facebook, Twitter) and search themselves, sharing results; or students can run such queries themselves.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • And so we can think of the CMS. What is it best used for? We have said little about its integration with campus information systems, but these are critical for class (not learning) management, from attendance to grading. Web 2.0 has yet to replace this function. So imagine the CMS function of every class much like class email, a necessary feature, but not by any means the broadest technological element. Similarly the e-reserves function is of immense practical value. There may be no better way to share copyrighted academic materials with a class, at this point. These logistical functions could well play on.
  • Can the practice of using a CMS prepare either teacher or student to think critically about this new shape for information literacy? Moreover, can we use the traditional CMS to share thoughts and practices about this topic?
  • A second emergent field concerns social media literacy. An increasing amount of important communication occurs through Web 2.0 services.
  • Students can publish links to external objects, but can’t link back in.
  •  
    Discussion on how LMS and CMS are fading into the margins, and social media is taking the center stage.
  •  
    Tiukkaa analyysiä LMS:ien (oppimisen hallintajärjestelmien) auttamattomista rajoituksista nykyisessä viestintäyhteiskunnassa.
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20 items per page