Dr. Goodyear

The risk of developing PC seems to be related to the diet

In the human prostate, ERβ is expressed in the basal epithelial cells and AR in the luminal epithelium.

For many years, DHT was considered to be the main hormone guiding prostate development and function. However, the idea was challenged when in 2001 Mahendroo et al. showed that mice in which both forms of 5α-reductase had been inactivated, have a normal functional prostate [50]. The question was then raised as to what is the real function of DHT in the prostate. In 1989 we hypothesized that DHT is a precursor of an oestrogen, 5α-androstane-3β,17β-diol (3β-Adiol) and that physiological levels of an oestrogen could be produced in the total absence of aromatase [51]. We later demonstrated that 3β-Adiol is abundant in the prostate and is a good natural ligand for ERβ

The overall effect of oestrogens in the immune system is determined by a balance between ERα and ERβ signalling

The hypothesis of our group is that ERβ plays an important role in regulating the differentiation of pluripotent haematopoietic progenitor cells whereas ERα induces proliferation

In tissues and cell lines of mammary epithelium for example, it has been noticed that E2 in the presence of ERα elicits proliferation, but in the presence of ERβ it inhibits proliferation

ERα and ERβ have distinctive tissue distributions and to the great surprise of endocrinologists [7] many tissues previously thought to be ‘oestrogen-insensitive tissues’ were found to be ERβ positive and oestrogen sensitive. The most notable of the ERα-negative ERβ-abundant tissues were the epithelium of the rodent ventral prostate [8], the granulosa cells of the ovaries [9] and the parenchyma of the lungs

Hall and colleagues44 have reported that ER-β functions as a transdominant inhibitor of ER-α transcription and that it acts to decrease overall cellular sensitivity to estradiol

The expression of ER-β was diminished in high-grade dysplasias when compared to normal glands and lower grade lesions.

The transition from normal to low/moderate dysplastic glands in the peripheral zone was marked by the appearance of ER-β homogeneously immunostained nuclei in secretory as well as basal cells with no changes in the localization of the other receptors.

proliferative signals mediated by AR in basal cells or by ER-α and AR in stromal cells may be opposed by the purported growth-inhibitory action of ER-β25, 26, 27, 28 localized in basal cells.

The diminution of ER-β expression in high-grade dysplasias and grade 4/5 cancers may be therefore related to the alteration of DNA methylation pattern in CpG islands of the promoter, resulting in down-regulation of the receptor at the transcriptional level

based on the proposed anti-proliferative function of the receptor,25, 26, 27, 28 the presence of ER-β in secretory cells of low/moderate-grade lesions may represent a transient abortive attempt to counter growth of these cells

the attrition of receptor-positive basal cells in the high-grade dysplasias may signify a continuing loss of growth inhibitory function mediated by ER-β in these precursor lesions

Our findings in prostate therefore differ from those reported for human colon cancer in which Folley and colleagues48 demonstrated that a selective loss of ER-β protein but not receptor message expression occurs in these neoplasms

Our findings therefore differed from those of Bonkhoff and colleagues33 who found immunostaining for the receptor in high-grade dysplasias and grade 4/5 carcinomas. Using in situ hybridization these authors also reported that a high percentage of dysplasias and carcinomas in their study contained cells that expressed ER-α message