Group items tagged

CALEB CHUNG: Of course we could have used micro-servo motors to accomplish the motion of Pleo, but we aren’t able to use expensive motors. So we had to engineer it with a high-speed motor with high gearing and no backlash for control purposes and have it all fit within the muscle envelope of Pleo.

So what we did was go after a lot of ethology research. How do animals really handle the complexity of their environment? We built a virtual brain—a whole system that decides how Pleo will react in various situations.

CALEB CHUNG: Pleo will reset thresholds and adjust his idea of what he thinks is normal. Let’s say you get Pleo and you take him home to your shag carpet. When Pleo walks, the carpet will drag on his feet. So his force feedback sensors will realize that he is spending too much energy to walk around. Pleo will try different things to reduce the energy spent. Eventually, he will have the idea to step higher. Your Pleo compared to my Pleo will walk with a higher step.

The robots do not build a model of their world they simply act in response to the things they encounter whilst existing there.

This form of robotics has proved to be successful in environments that are unknown to the robot, environments that are busy or noisy such as a place with moving objects or people

An important part of the behaviour based theory is "embodiment" This means that a robot must be embodied, have a presence (it is an entity in itself).  In order to react the robot must be surrounded by the real world.

The basis behavior set of a system provides elements that are not further reducible to each other and that, when composed by sequential or concurrent execution, produce the complete behavior repertoire for the system.

Such basis behaviors are constructed, learned, or evolved from stable, robust interaction dynamics between the agent/robot and its environment, and serve as a substrate for the system's more complex behaviors.

My work generalized the notion of basis behaviors to multi-robot interactions, and demonstrated how a small set of basis behaviors per robot can be used to demonstrate a rich repertoire of individual and group-level behaviors, including following, flocking, homing, herding, aggregation, dispersion, and formations.

All Cricket devices have a built-in bidirectional infrared communications channel, which is used for Cricket-to-desktop communication (when downloading programs to a Cricket, or viewing sensor data) and Cricket-to-Cricket communication.

Cricket Logo is based on an iterative, interactive model of project development. It includes a “command center” window; instructions typed into this window are instantaneously compiled, downloaded to a Cricket, and executed, giving the system the flavor of an interpreted software environment such as LISP, BASIC, or FORTH.

The MetaCricket software system is based on a virtual machine, written in PIC assembly language and running on the Cricket, and a compiler for the virtual machine running on a desktop development computer

camera-based vision system (for light detection and navigation) two microphones, binaural hearing beat detection (allows pleo to dance and listen to music) - this feature was removed but may be added on again. eight touch sensors (head, chin, shoulders, back, feet) four foot switches (surface detection) fourteen force-feedback sensors, one per joint orientation tilt sensor for body position infrared mouth sensor for object detection into mouth infrared transmit and receive for communication with other Pleos Mini-USB port for online downloads SD card slot for Pleo add-ons infrared detection for external objects 32-bit Atmel ARM 7 microprocessor (main processor for Pleo) 32-bit NXP ARM 7 sub processor (camera system, audio input dedicated processor) four 8-bit processors (low-level motor control)

stimulus-response

a plan of action

combine the best of both Reactive and Deliberative control

Note that behaviors themselves can have state, and can form representations when networked together. Thus, unlike reactive systems, behavior-based systems are not limited in their expressive and learning capabilities.