Tim's Evaluation of our own (group 5 paper) - 3 views
This group is for ETC677 students enrolled in spring 2009 to conduct Treatise paper peer evaluations.
Paper was well organized and addressed the topic well. The information was well presented and it did a great job explaining various tools available to the learner and teacher. However, there was...
Nice job evaluating and overcoming the challenges of online learning as faced by both the students and instructors. You also seemed to concentrate your research on the collegiate setting. This al...
Your conclusion underscores the somewhat compelling argument you made for the role of the instructor in the body of the treatise which was failrly well organized. I would have like to have seen mor...
I felt a real sense of powerful advocacy for the learner in this tretaise. However the organization and grammar were distractions for me. I can see you put a lot of thought into it. I was also ver...
In evaluating my own group's work I have to say that the paper came out very organized and unified, if a bit long. We intended to make a case for the important connectiion between pedagogy and the ...
I gave them a 5. The paper was very well done and was not just the book. The group worked well together to make the paper not only give the information, but also expand on that information.
It appears that we are only allowed a certain number of forum posts and some groups papers are no longer available, so I will put all of my evaluations in one post. Group 3 Our group was able to ...
I think we did a good job at organizing and explaining what we wanted to about Online Learning. We also followed APA guidelines, and used multiple outside of class resources to help back up our pap...
I think you did a really good job considering there are only two in your group. I think your paper could have been a bit more organized and had a bit more resources, but otherwise you had a great a...
This paper had a good use of APA and organization. The quote in the beginning really got you interested in seeing where the paper went. Grade 5
This overall was a good paper. It had good points and a great deal of personal knowledge. I think it could have been organized a bit better (transitions) and it could have had more resources to bac...
This paper get a score of 5. Was clear and well thought out, ideas went smoothly from one to the next, and good resources to support the argument.