Skip to main content

Home/ entreprise2.0/ Group items tagged etude

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Christophe Deschamps

Study Points to Enterprise 2.0 Perplexity - 0 views

  •  
    Etude qui laisse un peu perplexe sur l'intégration des technos 2.0 en entreprise. Date de mai 2008, tout cela a dû bcp changer depuis...
Christophe Deschamps

Employers taking chances when blocking Facebook too, says Deacons - 0 views

  • 14 per cent use it at some time to access social networking sites. Usage is significantly higher among younger workers with 32 per cent of 16-24 year olds and 23 per cent of 25-34 year olds reporting frequent or occasional use. 20 per cent said their employer blocked access to social networking sites while 57 per cent said their employer allowed it (23 per cent did not know). 76 per cent of workers who use the Internet at work could see a benefit to their organisation in allowing access to social networking sites believing it showed: - trust in employees (68 per cent);  - gave people a break from day to day work and kept them fresh (48 per cent); and  - allowed them to better network with other employees, customers and suppliers (40 per cent). Among those who use social networking sites, 91 per cent saw a benefit to their organisation from the activity. In general, younger workers were more likely to see these benefits than their older counterparts. 16 per cent overall said an employer’s policy re on-line social networking would influence their decision to join one employer over another. This view was particularly strong among 16 to 24 year olds, with one in four saying it would. 91 per cent say that they use the Internet appropriately at work, with only 1 per cent admitting to frequent inappropriate use.
  •  
    Etude australienne, avril 2008
Christophe Deschamps

How to Use Web 2.0 Inside Your Company | BNET - 0 views

  •  
    Etude de cas: déploiement d'outils 2.0 en entreprise
Eric Salviac

Réseaux Sociaux d'Entreprise - une évolution culturelle en marche - 0 views

  •  
    Etude par USEO des usages, des solutions et des changements induits
Christophe Deschamps

Enterprise Web 2.0: Building the Next-Generation Workplace - the Driving Force behind J... - 0 views

  • Building on the somewhat vague and yet particular usage of the term 'Web 2.0', 'Enterprise Web 2.0' describes a fresh, and some would say new, approach to the design and provision of business applications that incorporates aspects such as social networking, collaboration, and real-time communication. In addition, Enterprise Web 2.0 focuses a great deal of attention on the user's 'experience' or 'joy of use' -- something of a novelty in enterprise IT these days. By comparison, when Butler Group talks about 'Enterprise 2.0', we are focusing on the composition and architecture of the IT ecosystem, and the associated business models that will support Enterprise Web 2.0 applications.
  • Enterprise Web 2.0 is very much concerned with the user experience of corporate systems and applications, and on extracting business value from the social contributions and interactions of the organisation's various stakeholders.
  • The management of customer relationships continues to remain pivotal for most organisations, and so the social aspects of Web 2.0 are mirrored in the corporate world of Enterprise Web 2.0
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • Workforce mobility and changing communication patterns are two more trends that are driving change at the infrastructure layer, and so unified communication and collaboration requirements form an important part of Enterprise 2.0 strategy.
  • Enterprise Web 2.0 might be about putting the user (i.e. employee, customer, or stakeholder) first, but in order to do so it also requires supporting technology. And so at the IT infrastructure level, Enterprise 2.0 means Internet Protocol (IP) everywhere -- voice, video, and data. Enterprise 2.0 also means, 'open' standards rather than proprietary or 'closed' systems. Furthermore, Enterprise 2.0 technology means user-driven technology and not IT-driven technology.
  • Having accepted the fact that 'processes' means 'people', then we have to look for ways in which these people (i.e. processes) can self-organise and reference one another. Then, where possible, we need to somehow incapsulate the processes into a set of business services. One day (we might call it Web 3.0), Artificial Intelligence (AI) will enable organisations to do with computers that which they do via human beings today, but until that day arrives, organisations must do more to aid interdepartment and inter-company collaboration. Workflow has not yet figured largely in the consumer-oriented world of Web 2.0, but Butler Group sees this as pivotal when considering Enterprise Web 2.0.
  • Today applications that embody processes are built by IT professionals, but tomorrow they will be built by a new breed of power user, using mashup builders, software agents, and other Web 2.0 technologies.
  • Business and IT managers must therefore prepare themselves for the new generation of power user who will be creating mashups and situational applications that have a far broader impact than the typical spreadsheet macro of yesteryear, and that if organisations are to avoid a proliferation of unmanageable, siloed, micro-applications, then they must blend the power of personal productivity with an appropriate management layer and a degree of central oversight.
  • Web 2.0 is no longer PC-centric.
  • It is clearly a mistake to think that Web 2.0 is all about technology, and likewise Enterprise Web 2.0, but it is also a mistake to dismiss the technology altogether. Therefore, selecting and implementing enterprise social software solutions, next-generation collaboration solutions, and Rich Internet Applications requires careful thought, consideration, and planning.
  • The driving force behind just about every aspect of Enterprise Web 2.0, is of course, the user -- something that has not always ranked highly on the list of priorities for corporate IT mangers -- and so the challenge for all forward-looking organisations is to refocus on this aspect of their IT strategies.
  •  
    Nouvelle étude de Research & Markets. Pas mal d'infos dans cette synthèse. User-centric
Yan Thoinet

Les applications Web 2.0 pénètrent l'entreprise - 0 views

  • Les applications Web 2.0 pénètrent l'entreprise
Yan Thoinet

Le Web 2.0 en entreprise - Les freins à l'adoption - 0 views

  • Les évangélistes du Web 2.0 ont donc encore des efforts à produire en termes d'éducation et de communication, notamment afin de clarifier les avantages métiers.
Christophe Deschamps

Enterprise 2.0 To Become a $4.6 Billion Industry By 2013 - ReadWriteWeb - 0 views

  •  
    Retour sur l'étude Forrester. Graphiques intéressants.
Miguel Membrado

La culture par objectif favorise le télétravail - 0 views

  •  
    La crise du pétrole va peut-être enfin favoriser l'émergence du télétravail et donc des outils et organisations collaboratives à distance. Il serait temps... Là aussi l'entreprise 2.0, ses outils et son organisation, est taillée pour relever ce défi, bien mieux qu'une organisation traditionnelle
Yan Thoinet

Les outils 2.0 en entreprise exigent un temps d'adaptation - 0 views

  • L'usage des Wikis, des blogs, des flux RSS, des podcasts ou des réseaux sociaux est à peu près partout en augmentation
  • Paradoxalement, les Etats-Unis sont le continent où le web 2.0 suscite le plus de réserves avec environ un tiers de personnes insatisfaites
  • à l'enthousiasme des débuts succède souvent une prise de conscience des difficultés qu'il y a à tirer parti de ces outils qui ne sont pas une fin en soi.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • percée sur de nouveaux marchés
  • développer l'interactivité avec ses clients et ses partenaires.
Christophe Deschamps

How companies are benefiting from web 2.0: McKinsey Global Survey Results - 0 views

  • 69 percent of respondents report that their companies have gained measurable business benefits, including more innovative products and services, more effective marketing, better access to knowledge, lower cost of doing business, and higher revenues. Companies that made greater use of the technologies, the results show, report even greater benefits.
  • We found that successful companies not only tightly integrate Web 2.0 technologies with the work flows of their employees but also create a “networked company,” linking themselves with customers and suppliers through the use of Web 2.0 tools. Despite the current recession, respondents overwhelmingly say that they will continue to invest in Web 2.0.
  • When we asked respondents about the business benefits their companies have gained as a result of using Web 2.0 technologies, they most often report greater ability to share ideas; improved access to knowledge experts; and reduced costs of communications, travel, and operations. Many respondents also say Web 2.0 tools have decreased the time to market for products and have had the effect of improving employee satisfaction.
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • Respondents also say they have been able to burnish their innovation skills, perhaps because their companies and customers jointly shape and cocreate products using Web 2.0 connections.
  • The median level of gains derived from internal Web 2.0 use ranged from a 10 percent improvement in operational costs to a 30 percent increase in the speed at which employees are able to tap outside experts.
  • Web 2.0 delivers benefits by multiplying the opportunities for collaboration and by allowing knowledge to spread more effectively. These benefits can accrue through companies’ use of automatic information feeds such as RSS2 or microblogs, of which Twitter is the most popular manifestation. Although many companies use a mix of tools, the survey shows that among all respondents deriving benefits, the more heavily used technologies are blogs, wikis, and podcasts—the same tools that are popular among consumers
  • Similarly, among those capturing benefits in their dealings with suppliers and partners, the tools of choice again are blogs, social networks, and video sharing. While respondents tell us that tapping expert knowledge from outside is their top priority, few report deploying prediction markets to harvest collective insights from these external networks.
  • Comparing respondents’ industries, those at high-technology companies are most likely to report measurable benefits from Web 2.0 across the board, followed by those at companies offering business, legal, and professional services
  • These survey results indicate that a different type of company may be emerging—one that makes intensive use of interactive technologies. This networked organization is characterized both by the internal integration of Web tools among employees, as well as use of the technologies to strengthen company ties with external stakeholders—customers and business partners.
  • As such, companies reporting business benefits also report high levels of Web 2.0 integration into employee workflows. They most often deploy three or more Web tools, and usage is high throughout these organizations
  • Respondents reporting measurable benefits say their companies, on average, have Web 2.0 interactions with 35 percent of their customers. These companies forged similar Web ties to 48 percent of their suppliers, partners, and outside experts. An organizational structure that’s more porous and networked may make companies more resilient and adaptive, sharpening their ability to access knowledge and thus innovate more effectively.
  • The survey results confirm that successful adoption requires that the use of these tools be integrated into the flow of users’ work (Exhibit 5). Furthermore, encouraging continuing use requires approaches other than the traditional financial or performance incentives deployed as motivational tools.
  • They also say role modeling—active Web use by executives—has been important for encouraging adoption internally.
    • Christophe Deschamps
       
      Cf le président de Cisco
  •  
    L'entreprise 2.0 n'est pas qu'un concept et cette étude menée sur 1700 dirigeants le prouve.
Christophe Deschamps

Management.fr Vs 21ième siècle : le coût de la hiérarchie et du contrôle - 2 views

  • Right now, your company has 21st-century Internet-enabled business processes, mid-20th-century management processes, all built atop 19th-century management principles. (Gary Hamel – The Future Of Management)
  • Cette étude visait à démontrer que la culture d’entreprise ne pouvait pas être la même dans toutes les filiales car elle ne faisait nullement disparaître la culture nationale ; dans le meilleur des cas, elle se juxtaposait à elle.
  • Dans le cadre de cette étude, Hofstede mesure les distances hiérarchiques des différentes filiales. Pour un indice médian de 57, il mesure des distances hiérarchiques faibles dans les pays scandinaves (moins de 31) et anglo-saxons (moins de 40) et élevé en France (68).
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Dans cette même étude, Hofstede mesure le contrôle d’incertitude.Le contrôle faible suppose davantage d’acceptation des situations comme ambiguës, réversibles dans leurs malheurs et leurs bonheurs. Les personnes sont acceptées comme pouvant changer d’humeur et de décision. Le contrôle fort veut s’appuyer sur des bases assurées qui peuvent aller de précautions concrètes à des précautions juridiques voire religieuses. Le contrôle fort est très en rapport avec le développement de la culture scientifique et techniqueEncore une fois, la France se classe en haut du tableau avec un contrôle fort de l’incertitude (un score de 86) tandis que les pays anglo-saxons ou nordiques affichent des résultats faibles attestant d’un contrôle faible de l’incertitude.
  • la primauté de la hiérarchie va à l’encontre des valeurs ayant emergé de la culture collaborative internet
  • Depuis au moins dix ans, la France est en retard sur les principaux pays de l’OCDE en matière de développement du télétravail (notamment dans l’administration), quelles que soient les sources ou les approches statistiques. Dans les pays scandinaves et anglo-saxons notamment, il concerne deux à trois fois plus de salariés.
  • ce détail a un coût. Cisco a ainsi publié un rapport intitulé the The Economics of Collaboration, et dans lequel l’entreprise explique comment en mettant en oeuvre des outils collaboratifs et en facilitant la mobilité des employés avec entre autres une démocratisation du télétravail, celle-ci a obtenu des résultats étonnants : Cisco IBSG analysis shows that Cisco realized net benefits of $691 million/year through its Web 2.0 and visual collaboration investments in FY08. (…) These benefits represent a 4.9 percent productivity increase for Cisco. We believe this is just the beginning of the value creation we will see around the new collaborative web.
  • These solutions achieve their remarkable benefits by removing the costs and inefficiencies with which our employees have been struggling. Eliminating these inefficiencies not only brings financial benefits to the company; it also increases employees’ work/life balance, reduces stress and fatigue from extensive travel, and increases job satisfaction.
  •  
    Analyse d'études sur le contrôle et la hiérarchie dans les entreprises. Le modèle français est-il encore adapté?
Christophe Deschamps

Yammering away at the office - 6 views

  •  
    Bon article généraliste de The Economist sur les avantages des réseaux sociaux en entreprise
Ray Dacteur

Entreprise Collaborative - Social media learning principles - 2 views

  • My conclusion was that we develop tools to represent the complexity of learning (such as LAMS), but that the social media/web 2.0 approach t
  • My conclusion was that we develop tools to represent the complexity of learning (such as LAMS), but that the social media/web 2.0 approach
  •  <embed> is the universal acid of the web – we should build around it.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Start simple and let others build on top
Christophe Deschamps

Rise of the networked enterprise: Web 2.0 finds its payday - 4 views

  •  
    L'étude McKinsey
Christophe Deschamps

Les études de cas nous disent "c'est possible" et rien de plus ! | Bloc-Notes... - 5 views

  • au fur et à mesure que les premiers cas solides arrivent à propos des projets étiquetés “social media”, on a l’impression qu’un doute subsiste, ou que les cas ne semblent pas assez nombreux ou assez proches de leurs lecteurs pour les convaincre. Combien de fois entend on “ils n’ont pas notre culture, notre passé, nous ne sommes pas sur le même marché, nos produits sont différents, nos clients sont différents”.
  • D’ailleurs, tout le monde y croyait d’autant plus que toutes les entreprises étant sur un même secteur ou ayant les mêmes besoins déployaient peu ou prou les mêmes logiciels, accompagnées par les mêmes consultants qui en utilisant les mêmes méthodes en arrivaient aux mêmes implémentations.
  • i toutes les entreprises implémentaient les mêmes choses de la même manière, faisaient les mêmes choix, c’est également parce qu’on leur demandait d’être comparables. Les investisseurs avaient bien compris qu’ils ne pouvaient comparer des pommes et des poires alors ils exerçaient, même de manière inconsciente, une pression amenant à l’uniformisation des pratiques et des technologies. Qui aurait pris le risque de se retrouver montré du doigt en raison de choix manageriaux, technologies ou organisationnels non conformistes qui auraient fait qu’on aurait pas pu comparer ses résultats avec les autres, point par point, en utilisant les mêmes indicateurs dans le même contexte.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Le cas “entreprise 2.0″ se distingue par deux aspects. Le premier c’est que le logiciel en question ne fait rien par lui-même, que tout dépend des variables humaines, managériales, etc… qui étaient la variable cachée des cas des années 2000.
  • es réponses apportées par une entreprise A à ces questions sont peut être aux antipodes de celles qui conviennent à une entreprise B.
  • Souvenons nous d’un des principes de base, un des fondements du social media en entreprise. “Rendre les entreprises moins semblables”. Il est donc normal de ne pas trouver de réponse standardisée et standardisable à la manière de réussir.
  • l’apport de l’outil dépend de facteurs qui sont quasi uniques à chaque entreprise. Savoir, culture, capital humain, potentiel innovant…c’est ce qui différencie deux entreprises même lorsqu’elles ont l’air a priori identiques. Ce qui laisse à penser qu’une bonne implémentation de solutions de social software sera beaucoup plus différenciante que d’autres projets informatiques ont pu l’être par le passé. Mais s’agit il encore de projets informatiques ?
  •  
    Billet essentiel de Bertrand Duperrin pour comprendre la logique qui doit animer les projets 2.0 et qui est radicalement différente des projets de type ERP.
Christophe Deschamps

Portals and KM: Forrester on Enterprise 2.0 for KM Professionals - 1 views

  • Some of these tools can be cloud based but they also need to be business based.
  • They picked the same 11 technologies studied in the vendor report: blogs, forums, mashups, microblogs, podcasts, prediction markets, RSS, social bookmarks, social networks, widgets, and wikis
  • But microblogging will only become valuable to the enterprise once it truly integrates with other enterprise processes and applications, and only after a whole set of additional tools are added to help filter content and refine the value of aggregated information.
    • Christophe Deschamps
       
      Est-ce vraiment la solution? Est-ce que l'intérêt du micro-blogging n'est pas justement dans le fait de plugger ces solutions sur l'existant et d'attendre... Micro-blogging as usual.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • On the other hand, in talking with a few implementers, they have not yet seen the big wave of demand for enterprise 2.0 tools.
  • I think the preconditions for making microblogging useful will appear sooner than later
  •  
    Bill Ives revient sur un rapport de Forrester consacré aux technologies du web social pour l'entreprise qui s'adresse aux responsables KM et souligne les opportunités qu'ils peuvent en tirer.
1 - 20 of 20
Showing 20 items per page