At this stage, the obvious response is to say that the models keep getting better, but this misses the point. Are you telling me that today’s model gets this table 85% right and the next version will get it 85.5 or 91% correct? That doesn’t help me. If there are mistakes in the table, it doesn’t matter how many there are - I can’t trust it. If, on the other hand, you think that these models will go to being 100% right, that would change everything, but that would also be a binary change in the nature of these systems, not a percentage change, and we don’t know if that’s even possible.
Integrate GEO & SEO - 0 views
ScienceDirect AI: Eureka, every day - 0 views
New Conversation - 0 views
Reasoning models - OpenAI API - 0 views
Models - OpenAI API - 0 views
Reasoning best practices - OpenAI API - 0 views
-
"How to use reasoning for validation"
Reddit SEO: Everything you need to know - 0 views
-
'Monitor key metrics like karma growth, engagement on your posts, and referral traffic.'
How to use ChatGPT Tasks for SEO - 0 views
Microsoft Bing/Copilot use schema for its LLMs - 0 views
-
Also see contrarian SEO response: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/markseo_seo-activity-7308488319846264833-ZABG
4 SEO practices with diminishing returns - 0 views
‹ Previous
21 - 40 of 3597
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page