Group items tagged

The productivity and sustainability of coastal, marine, and estuarine ecosystems are heavily reliant on the quality of coastal waters (JHA et al., 2013; JHA et al., 2015; DHEENAN et al., 2016). These locations are thought to have greater biodiversity than open ocean zones (GRAY, 1997). Among the biological components of soft bottom sediments, macrobenthic organisms are essential for ecosystem functioning (Pandey et al., 2022). They play a vital role in secondary production and nutrient exchange between the pelagic and benthic realms and therefore constitute essential elements of estuarine and coastal habitats (SNELGROVE, 1998) and are a reliable indicator for assessing the biotic integrity of the coastal ecosystem (RYU et al., 2011; Pandey et al., 2021). Due to their sedentary lifestyle, long life cycle, and differential response against the perturbation, they also serve as useful bio-indicator (GESTEIRA-GOMEZet al., 2003) for health monitoring and assessment of coastal ecosystems (GANESH et al., 2014) and evaluating the success of conservation efforts (WINBERGT et al., 2007). Identification of factors responsible for spatiotemporal patterns in macrofaunal assemblages is the primary goal amongst many marine benthic ecological studies (BOLAM et al., 2008; DUTERTRE et al., 2013; PANDEY and GANESH , 2019b). However, such pattern in the benthic community is often hard to predict due to the complex interplay between environmental parameters and biological interactions (ELLIS et al., 2006). The relationship between natural environmental factors and macrobenthos is reported to help delineate faunal distribution patterns, characterising benthic habitats, establish baseline knowledge, and enabling the detection of spatial and temporal variations (BOLAM et al., 2008; SHUMCHENIA and King, 2010; Dutertre et al., 2013). Numerous studies (Van Hoey et al., 2004; Hily et al., 2008; DUTERTRE et al., 2013; Pandey and Ganesh, 2019b) have identified sediment properties as a significan

There is growing awareness of the need for greater acknowledgement of underwater prehistoric cultural resources as part of management and regulation of the seabed around many maritime countries, especially those with large indigenous populations and history such as Australia. Prehistoric cultural places and landscapes inundated by Post-glacial sea-level rise on Australia's continental shelf remain largely out-of-sight and out-of-mind, hence awareness and hence legal protection of this resource is lacking. There is a clear need for greater integration of archaeology and cultural heritage management within the marine sciences as well as a greater awareness of this resource as part of a common heritage more generally. This paper explores some of the dichotomies between Western and Indigenous cultures in valuing and managing the seabed. We argue that in developing science-policy, an attempt at least needs to be made to bridge both the gap between the nature and culture perspectives, and the jurisdictional divide between land and sea. Part of the answer lies in a convergence of Indigenous knowledge with Western science approaches, focused around our understanding of physical processes impacting past and present coastal landscapes and on the seabed itself. We explore several case studies from northern and Western Australia that are trying to do this, and which are helping to provide a greater appreciation of the inundated landscapes of the inner shelf as part of a common heritage.

New research suggests the source of morphologic variation on mid-ocean ridges might be deeper than scientists thought.

Seagrass meadows are prominent in many coastal zones worldwide and significant contributors to global primary production. The large bottom roughness (or canopy) created by seagrass meadows substantially alters near-bed hydrodynamics and sediment transport. In this study, we investigate how a seagrass meadow in a low-energy environment (forced by local winds) modifies near-bed mean and wave-driven flows and assess how this relates to suspended sediment concentration (SSC). A two-week field study was conducted at Garden Island in southwestern Australia, a shallow and sheltered coastal region subjected to large diurnal sea-breeze cycles, typical of many low-energy environments where seagrasses are found. The mean and turbulent flow structure, along with optical estimates of SSC, were measured within both a seagrass canopy and over an adjacent bare bed. Near-bed mean current velocities within the seagrass canopy were on average 35% of the velocity above the canopy. Oscillatory wave velocities were less attenuated than mean current velocities, with near-bed values on average being 83% of those above the canopy. Mean and maximum shear velocities inferred from currents and waves above the canopy frequently exceeded the threshold for sediment resuspension, but no significant variation was observed in the SSC. However, a significant correlation was observed between SSC and bed shear stress estimated using near-bed velocities inside the canopy. When sediment was resuspended, there were substantial differences between the SSCs within and above the canopy layer, with higher levels confined within the canopy. This study demonstrates the importance of measuring near-bed hydrodynamic processes directly within seagrass canopies for predicting the role seagrass meadows play in regulating local rates of sediment resuspension.

Repeat multibeam mapping of two slope-confined canyons on the northwest Australian margin provides new understanding of the processes that are active in shaping these environments. The Cape Range and Cloates canyons initiate on the mid to lower continental slope but are now known to be connected to the shelf via small channels and gullies. Both canyons have areas of steep walls, with evidence of slides, and large depressions on the canyon floors. These canyons were first mapped systematically with multibeam sonar in 2008 and were remapped in 2020 during a biodiversity survey that also collected high-resolution imagery and biological samples. Comparison of seabed features between these two time periods indicates active sliding, minor headwall retreat and continued excavation of deep depressions on the canyon floor. Significantly, intact blades of displaced seagrass imaged at various depths up to 4200 m throughout both canyons indicates that material sourced from the adjacent continental shelf is being transported through these canyon systems. Turbidity currents are actively modifying canyon walls and floor depressions, while also providing a sediment source that has resulted in minor accretion on the canyon floor. Sedimentation likely regulates benthic communities in these canyons, with imagery showing highest densities of sessile invertebrates in habitats protected from sedimentation (e.g. rock overhangs, cliff edges). Since steep canyon habitats are rare within these canyons, and support high benthic abundance, they likely represent biologically significant areas of the Gascoyne Marine Park. Repeat mapping provides an understanding of the dynamics of these canyons and a context for assessing and monitoring the stability of the seabed habitats within this marine reserve.

During feeding and burrowing, many epibenthic and infaunal animals bioturbate sediments and form a range of traces called lebensspuren (German for 'life traces'), defined as any type of sedimentary structure produced by a living organism. During a 2020 survey along western Australia in the Gascoyne Marine Park, a distinct trace was observed several times, identical to the 'spider trace' observed in a 2007 survey along eastern Australia, over 4000 km away. The purpose of this brief note is to document and describe the occurrence of this unique and distinctive type of lebensspuren and to discuss ways in which similar observations may be effectively shared to increase our understanding of deep-sea biology.