Skip to main content

Home/ ETAP640/ Group items tagged Feedback

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Diana Cary

University Libraries | Article Linker - 0 views

  • (1) functionalist, which is directive and advice-driven, (2) engagement, which uses a nondirective approach, (3) revolutionary, which promotes radical change, and (4) evolutionary, which uses reflective dialogue to identify and challenge the prevailing discourse. The course under study incorporated two types of coaching: functionalist and evolutionary.
Diana Cary

file://H:\UIS%20Stuff\Blackboard\LIS%20301%20Fall%2003%20Mary\h - Article - 7 Principle... - 0 views

  • Good Practice Encourages Student-Faculty Contact
  • Good Practice Encourages Cooperation among Students
  • Good Practice Encourages Active Learning
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Good Practice Gives Prompt Feedback
  • Good Practice Emphasizes Time on Task
  • Good Practice Communicates High Expectations
  • Good Practice Respects Diverse Talents and Ways of Learning
Luke Fellows

Gamification of Education | Gamification.org - 0 views

  • Most games are naturally social, which means gamification depends on that other ubiquitous web trend, social networking.
  • The first type of games were willing to entertain kids to keep them engaged -- the "just-make-it-fun" school of thought.
  • "fun"
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Gamification, by contrast, doesn't rely on internal motivation. Instead, it's using the oldest tricks in the book: providing instantaneous feedback, egging on the competition, and rewarding even tiny steps of progress.
Heather Kurto

Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility | Daniel | Jo... - 0 views

  • The first course carrying the name MOOC was offered in 2008, so this is new phenomenon. Second, the pedagogical style of the early courses, which we shall call cMOOCs, was based on a philosophy of connectivism and networking. This is quite distinct from the xMOOCs now being developed by elite US institutions that follow a more behaviourist approach. Third, the few academic studies of MOOCs are about the earlier offerings because there has been no time for systematic research on the crop of 2012 xMOOCs. Analysis of the latter has to be based on a large volume of press articles and blogs. Fourth, commentary on MOOCs includes thinly disguised promotional material by commercial interests (e.g. Koller, 2012) and articles by practitioners whose perspective is their own MOOC courses.
  • The term MOOC originated in Canada. Dave Cormier and Bryan Alexander coined the acronym to describe an open online course at the University of Manitoba designed by George Siemens and Stephen Downes. The course, Connectivism and Connective Knowledge, was presented to 25 fee-paying students on campus and 2,300 other students from the general public who took the online class free of charge (Wikipedia, 2012a).
  • Can xMOOCs make money?
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • technology has been about to transform education for a long time
  • In 1841 the 'inventor of the blackboard was ranked among the best contributors to learning and science, if not among the greatest benefactors to mankind'. A century later, in 1940, the motion picture was hailed the most revolutionary instrument introduced into education since the printing press. Television was the educational revolution in 1957. In 1962 it was programmed learning and in 1967 computers. Each was labelled the most important development since Gutenberg's printing press.
  • But first, we agree with Bates (2012) that what MOOCs will not do is address the challenge of expanding higher education in the developing world. It may encourage universities there, both public and private, to develop online learning more deliberately, and OER from MOOC courses may find their way, alongside OER from other sources, into the teaching of local institutions.
  • He notes (Siemens, 2012) that 'MOOCs are really a platform' and that the platforms for the two types of MOOC that we described at the beginning of the paper are substantially different because they serve different purposes. In Siemens' words 'our cMOOC model emphasises creation, creativity, autonomy and social networking learning.
  • teaching methods 'are based on very old and out-dated behaviourist pedagogy, relying primarily on information transmission, computer-marked assignments and peer assessment'.
  • Another myth is that computers personalise learning. Bates (2012) again: 'No, they don't. They allow students alternative routes through material and they allow automated feedback but they do not provide a sense of being treated as an individual.
  • With such support MOOCs provide a great opportunity to develop new pedagogy. In a world of abundant content, courses can draw from a pool of open educational resources (OER) and provide their students with better and more varied teaching than individual instructors could develop by themselves. The University of Michigan (2012) (which made history by using OER from Africa in its medical school) uses OER extensively in its Coursera course Internet History, Technology and Security. UC Berkeley (2012) draws extensively on OER in its course on Quantum Computing.
  • pedagogy is not a familiar word on the xMOOC campuses. It is a myth that professors distinguished by their research output are competent to create online courses without help.
  • This, in turn, will put a focus on teaching and pedagogy to which these institutions are unaccustomed, which will be healthy. At the same time academics all around the world will make judgements about the intellectual quality and rigour of the institutions that have exposed themselves in this way.
  • With such support MOOCs provide a great opportunity to develop new pedagogy. In a world of abundant content, courses can draw from a pool of open educational resources (OER) and provide their students with better and more varied teaching than individual instructors could develop by themselves.
Alicia Fernandez

Online Instructional Effort Measured through the Lens of Teaching Presence in the Commu... - 1 views

  • The focus of this paper is teaching presence, which has been defined as “the design, facilitation and direction of cognitive and social processes for the purpose of realizing personally meaningful and educationally worthwhile outcomes” (Garrison et al., 2000).
  • Instructor teaching presence is hypothesized to be an indicator of online instructional quality.  Empirical research has supported this view with evidence indicating strong correlations between the quality of teaching presence and student satisfaction and learning (Bangert, 2008; Picciano, 2002; Shea, Pickett, & Pelz, 2003)
  • First, there is a need to revisit two of the original three teaching presence elements.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • The second limitation relates to design and organization (DE).
  • The third limitation relates to the locus of research investigating teaching presence which has been limited largely to threaded discussions.
  • Lastly, a careful review of the original teaching presence indicators developed by Anderson et al. (2001) reveals that they are largely reliant upon the threaded discussion activities of the instructor and thus fall short in identifying and articulating the full range of online collaborative tasks and effort demonstrated by both instructors and students.
  • If students’ perceptions indicate that they place a premium on instructor interaction (Anderson, 2003; Shea et al., 2006) instructors must actively manage students’ expectations about the nature of online learning and the role of the instructor in this process. Online instructors can accomplish this by taking the time to communicate that online courses are not teacher-centered models of learning and by explaining the rationale behind student-to-student interaction in negotiating shared meaning through discourse.
  • These results suggest that students’ teaching presence may have a “floor” threshold level and when the instructor's participation within the threaded discussion drops to zero students attempt to recreate “instructional equilibrium.”
  • When accounting for instructor teaching presence in all areas of a course, we see that there is a certain ebb and flow to teaching presence.
  • restricting analysis of teaching presence to discussion areas may present too narrow a view of individual instructor’s effort. Some instructors may take a strategic approach by participating in early discussions to model how to formulate probing questions and by providing direct feedback with the goal of withdrawing once this scaffolding is completed
  • These results also document a significant correlation between instructional effort reflected in frequency of teaching presence behaviors and learning outcomes evidence through instructor-assigned grades on closely related assignments. 
  • Where does teaching presence occur in online courses? 2. How do instructors employ communicative functionality within the course to   demonstrate teaching presence? 3. In what ways do students demonstrate teaching presence? 4. Does teaching presence shift over time? 5. Does teaching presence correlate with learning outcomes reflected in instructor-assigned grades?
  • In this study we found that the effectiveness of the instructor did not depend on participation within the threaded discussion per se, but that responsiveness and effective interaction with students was carried out through a variety of forums, including the ask-a-question area, email, and other modes of communication.  We suggest that benchmarks for effective interaction be communicated to instructors and that institutions provide training and support for online faculty around teaching presence. 
  •  
    With more than 4 million students enrolled in online courses in the US alone (Allen & Seaman, 2010), it is now time to inquire into the nature of instructional effort in online environments. Reflecting the community of inquiry (CoI) framework (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000) this paper addresses the following questions: How has instructor teaching presence (Anderson, Rourke, Garrison, & Archer, 2001) traditionally been viewed by researchers? What does productive instructor effort look like in an entire course, not just the main threaded discussion? Results suggest that conventional research approaches, based on quantitative content analysis, fail to account for the majority of teaching presence behaviors and thus may significantly under represent productive online instructional effort.
Jessica M

TEACHING PEER REVIEW AND THE PROCESS OF SCIENTIFIC WRITING | Advances in Physiology Edu... - 0 views

  • improved grades, much higher quality in the final manuscript,
    • Teresa Dobler
       
      Benefits of peer editing on student work
  • reducing instructor workload
    • Teresa Dobler
       
      Everyone wins! Students learn more, students get more feedback, and professor has less on his or her plate
  • e graded on the quality of their reviews, not on the reviews their papers received
    • Teresa Dobler
       
      So students are held accountable for giving accurate reviews.
  •  
    Benefits of peer editing
sherrilattimer

Alan Carniol: Inside the STAR Interview Approach: What You Need to Know - 0 views

  • Oftentimes, the hardest part of the entire four-part process is describing the actions you took. Explaining the sequence of actions and the thought process for each step can be challenging. However, it's essential that you do this effectively
  • How were you able to turn this situation into an opportunity?
  • What were the steps you took to solve this challenge? How did you think about any problems? How did you overcome roadblocks and follow the situation through to get results? Was there anything unique about your actions or your method worth mentioning?
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • quantifiable
  • Percentages, before and after comparisons, and even client feedback are all helpful to prove the value of your work.
Teresa Dobler

Peer Edit With Perfection: Effective Strategies - ReadWriteThink - 0 views

  • be specific
    • Teresa Dobler
       
      My students quickly fall into the habit of saying "good job, it was good" rather than being specific - this would also be applicable to constructive feedback.
  • make corrections on the sample by checking for spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
Teresa Dobler

Formative vs Summative Assessment - Teaching Excellence & Educational Innovation - Carn... - 0 views

  • he goal of formative assessment is to monitor student learning to provide ongoing feedback that can be used by instructors to improve their teaching and by students to improve their learning
  • strengths and weaknesses and target areas that need work
efleonhardt

elearn Magazine: 10 Things I've Learned About Teaching Online - 0 views

  • I want them to know I'm there if they need help
  • with me asking the students to introduce themselves, and I always begin by posting my own introduction and a photo first.
  • conscientiously respond to each introduction individually
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • students should receive timely feedback about their progress in the course.
cpcampbell88

Evaluating Flipped Classrooms - 2 views

  •  
    Flipped Classrooms provide students with lecture before entering the classroom. This article provides feedback for teachers on how to implement a flipped classroom but also asks thought provoking questions about the practice.
Jessica M

Critical Literacy, Digital Literacies, and Common Core State Standards: A Workable Union? - 0 views

  • Citation of evidence” and“analysis” are malleable activities, and this mal-leability provides opportunities for educators tocurve them to include a stronger critical literacycomponent.
  • Analyze a complex set of ideas or sequenceof events and explain how specific individuals,ideas, or events interact and develop over thecourse of the text
  • (d)emonstrate command of technology, includ-ing the Internet, to produce, publish, and updatework in response to ongoing feedback, includingfresh arguments or new information
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Cite strong and thorough textual evidenceto support analysis of what the text saysexplicitly as well as inferences drawn fromthe text, including determining where the textleaves matters uncertain
  • Analyze and evaluate the effectiveness ofthe structure an author uses in his or herexposition or argument, including whether thestructure makes points clear, convincing, andengaging
  • Determine an author’s point of view or pur-pose in a text in which the rhetoric is partic-ularly effective, analyzing how style and con-tent contribute to the power, persuasiveness,or beauty of the text.
efleonhardt

Group Work Online | online learning insights - 0 views

  • I emphasize the why of the activity—what’s in it for the students
  • weighty, not necessarily in grades but in terms of complexity
  • synthesize, analyze and create a product
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Have students create a team charter
  • Provide an outlet for students to get help with group collaboration and conflict. Include on the course site
  • Create small group
  • Provide a mechanism for students to give feedback and reflection on group participation and the experience overall.
  • Recommend that the group select a project or team leader.
Hedy Lowenheim

Section 1: Course Structure and Content - 1 views

  • Martinez (2001) has documented some key design considerations for personalized learning on the web. Martinez makes the following suggestions: “For transforming learners, design environments that are sophisticated, discovery-oriented, mentoring environments where learners who want to be assertive, challenged by complex problem solving situations, and able to self-manage learning and self-monitor progress can attain higher standard, long-term goals. For performing learners, design environments that are project- or task-oriented, energizing, competitive, interactive (hands on) environments, which use coaching, practice, and feedback to encourage self-motivation, holistic thinking, problem solving, self-monitoring progress, and task sequencing, while minimizing the need for extra effort and difficult standards. For conforming learners, design environments that are simple, scaffolded, structured, non-risk environments that use explicit, careful guidance. They should help individuals learn comfortably in an easy, step-wise fashion. These environments should also encourage learners to take assertive, challenging steps towards more independent, self-motivated achievement.”
  •  
    "Section 1: Course Structure and Content"
Joan Erickson

The absolute basics about assessment - 0 views

  • assessment instruments or measures.)
    • Joan Erickson
       
      "assessment instruments or measures"----hmm, have to look it up. What are other assessment measures I can use?
  • analyze
    • Joan Erickson
       
      Don't forget to ask the students to give feedback
  • results
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • employ the results
    • Joan Erickson
       
      3 R's: results, reflect, refine
  • Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding and improving student learning
  • decide what skills, knowledge, and/or attitudes
  • performance indicators
  • results
  • consider the results of your assessment.
  • results
  • results
  • results
  • results
  • reflection
  • refinement
alexandra m. pickett

Teaching with rubrics - 27-31 Andrade Win 05 - 2 views

  •  
    A good reminder, since I plan to use rubrics downloaded from websites to guide my students in their projects: "Anyone can download a rubric from the Web, but using it to support good instruction is another matter" because "...rubrics are not a replacement for good instruction. Even a fabulous rubric does not change the fact that students need models, feedback, and opportunities to ask questions, think, revise, and so on."
Joy Quah Yien-ling

Wetoku - 0 views

  •  
    Wonderful for recording interviews.
Joan Erickson

Grade Inflation Article - Teaching Resources - Center for Excellence in Teaching and Le... - 0 views

  • definition is that grade patterns change so that the overwhelming majority of students in a class, college, or university receive higher grades for the same quantity and quality of work done by students in the past
  • corollary to this definition is the same GPA obtained by students with poorer academic skill
  • less well known version of grade inflation is "content deflation" where students receive the same grades as students in the past but with less work required and less learning
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • Poor grades exposed male students to the military draft
  • colleges and universities mandate frequent student evaluations of faculty
  • These same evaluations play an increasingly important role in tenure and promotion decisions
  • Factors such as student effort, student persistence, student improvement, and class attendance count in favor of the students who possess these desirable characteristics
  • faculty member who believes that grades are a vehicle to please students rather than to recognize and reward performance will tend to give higher grades
  • Similarly a professor less willing to distinguish superior work from good or average work will tend to impart an upward bias to grades
  • large number of non-traditional students, and a large number of working students all tempt professors to lower their expectations by reducing the number of textbooks
  • current trend for classroom assessment by external authorities as an attempt to obtain again meaningful feedback on the quality of student performance.
  • use of just five categories of grades (A-F) has, in the minds of some, contributed to overall grade inflation
  •  
    insightful explanation the reasons why grades are inflated
« First ‹ Previous 121 - 140 of 178 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page