The timeline of when things were first bookmarked becomes essential when I'm recalling and stringing together random but related things from weeks, months or years ago.
Key point: at the time of bookmarking, the relationships between such things not easy to define. In the absence of a defined relationship:
* the time line becomes my one, my only cloud of tags.
If you break the timeline, if you move a bookmark from the date on which it entered the person's life, you break this beautifully easy way of recalling a part of one's life.
The more I think about it, the more I realise:
* the timeline is my most used cloud - the cloud is ultra-simple (line, linear, one-dimensional) and unmistakable.
The timeline is a critically important feature.
Side note: stuff like this is probably not interpreted through server-side logs, mouse clicks and the like. (If you suspect otherwise, I'd welcome any pointers.)
If you edit bookmarks in diigo site, the system will not change the date. However, if you make highlight in an old bookmarks, or rebookmark the page from the toolbar, the system will change the time. We want to solve the following problem by this design: Scenario: 1) A user visits a page which was bookmarked months ago 2) He/she forgets the page was bookmarked before 3) He/she rebookmark the page, or add some highlights 4) If they can't find it in first page of my library, they may think the bookmark was lost.
Agree - noticed the same problem and it is annoying. Maybe it can be set in the general preferences?
As editing using the Diigolet updates the bookmarked time - it also gets re-submitted to the feed. (I'm subscribed to my recent bookmarks - caus I often need to get back to stuff I've just added) I generally edit tags using the Diigolet, that's where I see the content and know best which tags to use.
PS: line height is too small when writing here - it makes me want to add line breaks.
I don't intend to plough through over 6,000 past bookmarks tagging them in that way, but for future bookmarks I'll have a tag-based method of sorting by date that's otherwise missing from my library.
Still: 2005 bookmarks are misfiled under 2009, and so on :-(
I hate the triple-tag workaround for this problem — and adding tags for every date, month and year will make the cloud crowded and ugly — but I'm not willing to have my bookmarks falling out of order. At least I can use
In a real public library — in a real building full of reference material — you wouldn't suddenly move a thing from one corner of the library to the opposite corner. Please, don't do it in Diigo.
Please, oh please, can the library first be put back in order? Then introduce an option/preference for users who want to sort it in another way.
I'm usually patient, but this problem drives me nuts, and will only get worse over time.
- bookmarked in August 2005
- misfiled under October 2009
Inconsistency = over four years!
Terrible.
Key point: at the time of bookmarking, the relationships between such things not easy to define. In the absence of a defined relationship:
* the time line becomes my one, my only cloud of tags.
If you break the timeline, if you move a bookmark from the date on which it entered the person's life, you break this beautifully easy way of recalling a part of one's life.
The more I think about it, the more I realise:
* the timeline is my most used cloud
- the cloud is ultra-simple (line, linear, one-dimensional) and unmistakable.
The timeline is a critically important feature.
Side note: stuff like this is probably not interpreted through server-side logs, mouse clicks and the like. (If you suspect otherwise, I'd welcome any pointers.)
Scenario:
1) A user visits a page which was bookmarked months ago
2) He/she forgets the page was bookmarked before
3) He/she rebookmark the page, or add some highlights
4) If they can't find it in first page of my library, they may think the bookmark was lost.
Maybe it can be set in the general preferences?
As editing using the Diigolet updates the bookmarked time - it also gets re-submitted to the feed.
(I'm subscribed to my recent bookmarks - caus I often need to get back to stuff I've just added)
I generally edit tags using the Diigolet, that's where I see the content and know best which tags to use.
PS: line height is too small when writing here - it makes me want to add line breaks.
http://www.diigo.com/search?adSScope=my&what=%2A&tab=200&sort=updated
finds 6588 of 6609 bookmarks, and is sorted by date, but the sort is wrong; I need it sorted by
added
(not updated).
It's really, really infuriating.
Please, please, please, please, please put things back in order (sorted by date added) or add the option to sort in the required order.
* year added
* month added
* date added
so for example:
* http://www.diigo.com/user/grahamperrin/2009
* http://www.diigo.com/user/grahamperrin/2009-10
* http://www.diigo.com/user/grahamperrin/2009-10-24
I don't intend to plough through over 6,000 past bookmarks tagging them in that way, but for future bookmarks I'll have a tag-based method of sorting by date that's otherwise missing from my library.
Post to Diigo
that includes the three tags: http://groups.diigo.com/group/Diigo_HQ/content/1028273
This is TERRIBLY WRONG!
library: bookmark: date is wrong in management view (pro edit display mode)
Nightmare for me.
> three more tags to every bookmark
Since Post to Diigo has stopped working the workaround is even more tedious. I have to add the tags by hand.
I hate the triple-tag workaround for this problem — and adding tags for every date, month and year will make the cloud crowded and ugly — but I'm not willing to have my bookmarks falling out of order. At least I can use
http://www.diigo.com/user/grahamperrin/2005-08
to find things that were bookmarked in August 2005.
In a real public library — in a real building full of reference material — you wouldn't suddenly move a thing from one corner of the library to the opposite corner. Please, don't do it in Diigo.
Please, oh please, can the library first be put back in order? Then introduce an option/preference for users who want to sort it in another way.
I'm usually patient, but this problem drives me nuts, and will only get worse over time.
Thanks
Graham
http://www.diigo.com/user/Grahamperrin/2009-10-20
The stuff that I did on 21st October belongs next to stuff that I did on the 20th.
Someone else asking for things to be sorted by date created:
http://groups.diigo.com/group/Diigo_HQ/content/1714185
Please, can you add an option to sort by date added?
Oldest first, please (normal order, not reversed).
Losing the ability to see things in chronological order by date added (it was a feature of Diigo 3.x) is really annoying.
Another request for bookmarks to be
sorted by date added: http://groups.diigo.com/group/Diigo_HQ/content/1755358
I'm 99% certain that some users will prefer the Diigo 4.0 beta behaviour
- sort by date edited, reverse order (most recent at top)
so what I'm requesting
- sort by date added
should probably be an option/preference, not the only way of sorting.
The option might appear in one or both of these ways:
a) as a Sort menu in the library, e.g. Filter… | Sort… | View…
or
b) as a set of radio buttons under Viewing Preferences in Settings
In a perfect world, four radio buttons:
Library sort order
[ ] date added
[ ] date edited
[*] date added, reverse order (most recent at top)
[ ] date edited, reverse order