Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ WSU Virology
Casey Finnerty

We Now Have the Cure for Hepatitis C, but Can We Afford It? - Scientific American - 13 views

  • Later this year the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is expected to approve a new pill that can cure hepatitis C
  • It will contain two drugs, one of which is already available at $1,000 per dose, or $84,000 for a complete 12-week course. The dual-drug combination will likely cost even more
  • They also determined that the virus's genes mutate very fast—a process that has generated several equally successful varieties, called genotypes, and rendered an effective vaccine impossible to create so far.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • its genetic material, which is made up of RNA
  • After several false starts, researchers at Vertex Pharmaceuticals, in collaboration with others, developed a protease inhibitor known as telaprevir, while scientists at Schering-Plough (which merged with Merck in 2009), created one called boceprevir.
  • The medications had harsh side effects and worked only for those patients with a particular genetic variant of the virus known as genotype 1
  • What scientists had learned from their earlier research, however, was that inactivating an enzyme or protein was not enough. To stop hepatitis C, any effective drug also had to incorporate itself into the virus's genetic code, where it would need to halt the virus's ability to make new copies of its genes and thus to make new virus.
  • Michael Sofia, then at Pharmasset, solved the problems by adding two compounds known as esters to the analogue.
  • During sofosbuvir's development, they had studied other drugs that inhibited different viral proteins and that might eliminate the need for continued use of interferon and ribavirin.
  • It is this combination, mixed in a single daily pill, that industry watchers expect the FDA to approve by October 2014. It heralds a new era of curative treatment for patients with hepatitis C. Similar drugs that work equally well for all genotypes are now in the final stages of clinical development.
Sean Hogan

PLOS Pathogens: Different Modes of Retrovirus Restriction by Human APOBEC3A and APOBEC3... - 22 views

  • One such family of restriction factors is the apolipoprotein B editing complex 3 (A3) cellular cytidine deaminases (CDA). While A3 genes are found in all mammals, their number differs from species to species. For example, humans have 7 A3 genes (A3A to A3H) while mice have only one gene. All proteins in this family contain at least one CDA domain that deaminates carbon 4 of cytidine in single-stranded DNA, resulting in a uracil that causes G to A transitions in the opposing strand [3].
    • alexridesducati
       
      Can these genes be exploited for antiviral therapy and if so, can it be done without harm to the host due to mutations?
  • viral cDNA accumulation
  • Packaging of A3G into virions is counteracted by HIV Vif (viral infectivity factor) protein. In virus-producer cells, Vif binds to A3G as well other A3 family members, and recruits cellular E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes, leading to ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation, thereby preventing packaging of A3G into budding virions [12]–[14]. Lentiviral Vif proteins show strong species-specificity. For example, HIV-1 Vif counteracts human A3G but only certain simian A3G homologues [15], [16]; it also does not interact with mouse A3 [17].
  • ...12 more annotations...
  • Other members of the A3 family are believed to affect other exogenous viruses as well as endogenous retrovirus/retroelement movement within the genome. In particular, human A3A is a potent inhibitor of IAP and MusD and other retrotransposons such as LINE-1 and this inhibition is CDA-independent, at least in cultured cells [18]–[20]. A3A also inhibits adeno-associated virus replication, a nuclear-replicating parvovirus, via CDA-independent means [20]. In monocytes, A3A restricts HIV-1 infection and the decrease in A3A levels that occurs during monocyte-to-macrophage development is concomitant with increased susceptibility to HIV-1 infection [21]. A3A is not packaged into HIV virions and is thought to restrict infection by targeting incoming virus [22]–[24]. In contrast, A3A is packaged in human T-lymphotropic virus type-I virions and restricts infection, at least in transfected cells [25]. A3A preferentially deaminates cytidines that are in a TC motif [26].
  • Different A3 family members block infection by diverse retroviruses from different species, including HIV-2 [27], porcine endogenous retrovirus [28], [29], xenotropic, Friend (F-MLV) and Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) [30]–[32] and mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) [33]. Additionally, A3 proteins may restrict other virus families, including parvoviruses [20], [34], hepatitis B virus [35]–[37], papillomaviruses [38] and herpes simplex virus I [39]. Thus, it has been suggested that A3 proteins exist, at least in part, to prevent zoonotic transmission of viruses [40].
  • Here, we show that transgenic mice expressing the human A3A or A3G proteins restrict murine retrovirus infection in vivo in disparate ways. A3G was packaged into virions in vivo, leading to the deamination of both MLV and MMTV viral genomes. In contrast, A3A was not packaged, and appeared to restrict infection in a largely CDA-independent manner. Finally, we show that Vif/A3G interactions can be studied in this in vivo model, thus providing a potentially useful system for the analysis of small molecule inhibitors of A3 proteins and Vif.
  • To determine the level of transgene expression, we first isolated RNA from different tissues, including peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and performed reverse-transcribed real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). RNA from human H9 cultured cells and human and C57BL/6 mouse PBMCs served as controls. For each transgene, there was one high- (A3Ghigh, A3Ahigh) and one low- (A3Glow, A3Alow) expressing strain, defined by their relative expression in lymphoid tissues. The A3Ghigh strain expressed higher levels of the transgene than the endogenous mouse gene in spleen and thymus, but similar A3G levels in mouse and human PBMCs, while the A3Glow strain expressed approximately 10-fold lower levels in these tissues (Figure 1A). In contrast, the A3Ahigh strain expressed similar or lower levels than mouse A3; there was also about 2-fold lower expression of A3A in mouse PBMCs than in human PBMCs (Figure 1B). The A3Alow strain had very low but detectable levels of expression in several tissues. Since the β-actin regulatory region was used, transgene expression was seen in many tissues and in several at levels higher than endogenous mouse A3 (e.g. heart, brain and liver) (Figure 1A and 1B). We also performed western blots on different tissues from the 4 different mouse strains, using antiserum that detects both A3A and A3G. The relative protein expression levels were similar to that seen at the RNA level (Figure S1A and S1B).
  • We next determined if the in vivo-produced A3A and A3G proteins were functionally active. Extracts were prepared from primary splenocyte cultures and equal amounts (total protein concentration/volume) were incubated with FAM-labeled substrates containing the A3A- or A3G-preferred target sequence (S50-TTC and S50-CCC, respectively). As controls, we also performed these assays with extracts prepared from 293T cell lines transfected with A3A or A3G. Activity could be readily detected in transgenic mice expressing high levels of A3A or A3G. Further, in accord with the known specificity of the cytidine deaminases, extracts from the A3Ahigh mice deaminated the TTC- more efficiently than CCC-containing substrates, while those from A3Ghigh mice more efficiently deaminated the CCC substrate (Figure 2). For both A3Alow and A3G low, trace amounts of activity were detectable with the preferred substrates, while no activity was detectable with either endogenous mA3 or from mA3 knockout splenocytes. No deaminase activity was detected with WT mouse extracts, perhaps because the mouse protein has lower overall activity or expression. These data show that the transgenic mice expressed catalytically active human deaminases in these heterologous cells.
  • Humans have 7 APOBEC3 genes and determining how each specifically functions to inhibit retroviruses like HIV is complicated, because all 7 can be produced in a given cell type or tissue.
    • laceemarie
       
      What cell/tissue type(s) are these APOBEC3 genes naturally turned on in? 
  • To overcome this limitation, we made transgenic mice that express two of the human proteins, APOBEC3A and APOBEC3G in mice that do not express their own APOBEC3. These mice were able to effectively block infection by several mouse retroviruses
    • laceemarie
       
      What cell type(s) did they use? Does it matter which?
  • We were unable to perform similar assays with in vivo produced MMTV, because the only cell-free virus in mice is found in milk and mammary tumors and we have not yet established breeding colonies of virus-infected human A3 transgenic mice.
    • laceemarie
       
      Was this a screw up, or is it not that important to look at assays with in vivo produced MMTV. And by "not yet," does that mean they are going to? I feel like if your going to use this virus in your experimental studies, you should figure out ways to perform the assays, regardless of how you get the virus. It would appear that they knew this information before hand, so maybe an assay on MMTV is less relevant. 
    • laceemarie
       
      *you're
  • A3G and A3A inhibit retrovirus infection by different means.
    • becky214
       
      Since they use different means of inhibition, do they work together to prevent infection? Or is an and either/or type scenario?
  • Two A3A and A3G mouse strains each were generated, expressing levels of these proteins within the range or at levels lower than that seen in human cells. This likely has relevance to what occurs in individual humans, where non-coding region polymorphisms in A3 genes alter expression levels and may influence progression to HIV-induced disease
    • laceemarie
       
      Could this have something to do with how HIV works in the HIV controllers? Where they still exhibit virus particles, but at a lower amount, don't necessarily spread the virus as much, and don't exhibit as intense of HIV symptoms?
    • ameliaobert
       
      If A3A is less clear, but does not get packaged, where must the A3A involvement with the incoming virus be located (for myeloid cells)? As well as if it is known to use retroelement retotransposition and replication inhibiton in paraoviruses by nh2 to oh independent means, how does the A3A know to be signlle to change the structure of cystine?
  • An additional limitation of previous studies done on human A3 proteins is the reliance on transfecting constructs expressing A3 proteins, which may not reflect the endogenous levels of a protein expression found in vivo
    • Sean Hogan
       
      Couldn't they mimic the in vivo environment by overexpressing necessary proteins in the host?
  •  
    Focus paper for retrovirus presentation.
  •  
    This will be the focus paper for 11/14.
Casey Finnerty

Correlation Between Infectivity and Physical Virus Particles in Human Cytomegalovirus - 0 views

  • Unlike the high particle-infectivity ratio of 106 to 108 previously reported for these viruses, the number of total particles per PFU ranged from 160 to 490 with strain AD-169 and from 176 to 1,050 for strain C-87.
apopp10

Rabies Virus Hijacks and Accelerates the p75NTR Retrograde Axonal Transport Machinery - 2 views

  • the RABV phosphoprotein P directly interacts with a dynein light chain [11], [12], suggesting a mechanism whereby this interaction is key to RABV's retrograde trafficking. However, studies on the retrograde transport of RABV enveloped virions [14] and infection of the CNS from the periphery with dynein light chain binding defective virus mutants [13] already showed that such an interaction is not essential for retrograde axonal transport of the virus
    • jpolanco10
       
      It says that this mechanism is key, yet the mutations with the defect show this is not essential. Is something else that is facilitating the trafficking with the phosphoprotein P?
  • In order to illustrate the differences leading to faster transport of RABV compared to NGF, we proceeded to inquire whether internalization of these ligands occurs over similar time frames. To this end, we performed a series of live imaging experiments using TIRF microscopy, and tracked fluorescent RABV or NGF particles at the axonal growth cone. Distinct features of the TIRF evanescent wave allow us to limit our view to the basal surface, an ideal set up for viewing internalization processes occurring at axon tips.
    • apopp10
       
      Why is the basal surface ideal for viewing internalization processes? It also seems that the RABV is faster by just a few seconds according to figure 3. What implications does this have for the virus
« First ‹ Previous 121 - 140 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page