Imperial Strategy and the Anglo-Zulu War of 1879.pdf - 1 views
-
Isandlwana ultimately made things worse for the Zulus because it brought such a storm of political irritation down on Frere that he was unable to carry through his plans for a workable postwar settlement for Zululand.
-
ANGLO–ZULU WAR
-
weapons
- ...11 more annotations...
-
spears
-
gold
-
In Natal, little business confidence existed to encourage investment or immigrants,
-
The choice of Sir Bartle Frere as High Commissioner reinforces the argument that confederation was primarily intended to bring South Africa into a state of defense.
-
Frer
-
Both Carnarvon and his successor Hicks-Beach reinforced this conviction: Carnarvon wrote to him constantly about the developing crisis in the Balkans; 26 Hicks-Beach engaged in a constant correspondence with the Colonial governments, urging them to make preparations for war , 27 and singled out Frere for praise in his efforts to take the Cape defenses in hand. 28 He also told him that if “the treaty of S. Stefano [which Russia imposed on Turkey in early 1878] remains unaltered, I think the ultimate result must be war .” 2
-
his aspect of South African affairs has been entirely neglected in the historiography, which tends to look at Frere almost entirely through the prism of the Anglo–Zulu War of 1879.
-
Cetshwayo
-
Isandlwana