Skip to main content

Home/ Pédagogie universitaire/ Group items tagged évaluation

Rss Feed Group items tagged

anonymous

Applying a framework to evaluate assignment marking software: a case study on Lightwork... - 0 views

  •  
    « This article presents the findings of a qualitative evaluation on the effect of a specialised software tool on the efficiency and quality of assignment marking. The software, Lightwork, combines with the Moodle learning management system and provides support through marking rubrics and marker allocations. »
Pédagogie universitaire UQ

Peut-on parler de recherche en pédagogie universitaire, aujourd'hui, en Franc... - 0 views

  •  
    "En partant d'une définition opérationnelle de ce que l'on peut entendre par pédagogie universitaire en France et en s'appuyant sur une recherche documentaire effectuée à partir de la base de données Francis ainsi que la consultation de programmes complets de différents colloques, cet article vise à mettre en perspective et à illustrer les principaux axes de recherche qui s'en sont dégagés."
anonymous

Assignment Strategies: Giving Student Choices on How Assignments Are Weighted (Faculty ... - 0 views

  •  
    «The June-July issue of The Teaching Professor newsletter highlights a study in which MBA students were given weighting choices and doing so increased their interest in the course and in taking subsequent courses, as compared with MBA students not given a choice. It would seem sensible to assume that "interest" in a course means more time devoted to study and that should result in more learning. However, in this particular study, the grades of students with choice about assignment weights were virtually identical to the grades of those students without the choice. »
anonymous

Quality assurance in e-learning: PDPP evaluation model and its application (The Interna... - 0 views

  •  
    «E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of e-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of e-learning courses. This paper constructs a four-phase evaluation model for e-learning courses, which includes planning, development, process, and product evaluation, called the PDPP evaluation model. Planning evaluation includes market demand, feasibility, target student group, course objectives, and finance. Development evaluation includes instructional design, course material design, course Web site design, flexibility, student-student interaction, teacher/tutor support, technical support, and assessment. Process evaluation includes technical support, Web site utilization, learning interaction, learning evaluation, learning support, and flexibility. Product evaluation includes student satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, learning effectiveness, and sustainability. Using the PDPP model as a research framework, a purely e-learning course on Research Methods in Distance Education, developed by the School of Professional and Continuing Education at the University of Hong Kong (HKU SPACE) and jointly offered with the School of Distance Learning for Medical Education of Peking University (SDLME, PKU) was used as a case study.»
anonymous

Les étudiants rendent la pareille à leurs professeurs (Le Droit) - 0 views

  •  
    « Les conclusions de son étude sont étonnantes, et le constat est sans équivoque : l'étudiant universitaire qui se fait donner de mauvaises notes est de 10 à 19 fois plus susceptible de formuler des commentaires négatifs, voir hostiles à l'endroit de son professeur, en plus de lui attribuer une cote médiocre. »
1 - 5 of 5
Showing 20 items per page