Group items tagged

Japan seeks to ease radiation fears in shipping.

Stricter limits on the sulphur content of shipping fuels are set to improve air quality along European coastlines and reduce the estimated 50,000 premature deaths caused each year by air pollution from ships. Parliament today approved legislation agreed with member states, which requires new general limits to be in place by 2020.

Seafarers 'Bill of Rights' In Force Today.

Venice Tries to Balance Effects of Visits by Big Ships.

US eco-lobby hits Chinese ships for pollution that's far worse inland.

Murky waters: the hidden environmental impacts of your cruise.

Murky waters: the hidden environmental impacts of your cruise.

Arctic ship traffic needs more pollution-reducing measures: report.

Turkey issues restrictions on vessels from WAF countries due to Ebola risk: GAC.

Ship emissions caused more than 1,200 ozone-related and 2,500 particulate-related premature deaths in the Pearl River Delta region in 2015, according to new research in the AGU journal GeoHealth. The new study also predicts that implementing new coastal emission controls could reduce mortality due to fine particulates by 30 percent and ozone by 10 percent by 2030.

Massive Benefits In Reducing Ship Speeds.

Scottish fishers receive additional safety funding.

Report: Climate-Driven Speed Limits Would Also Benefit Whales.

Curbing Deadly Ship Emissions.

Sniffer drones will start patrolling the world's busiest shipping ports.

Emission trading is an efficient measure to combat climate change, which is one of the biggest threats to the international community and human health. The shipping industry has previously been considered an energy-saving industry but the growth rate of its emissions far exceeds that of other industries. On 10 May 2023, the EU enacted Regulation (EU) 2023/957, which officially included the shipping industry in the EU-ETS. Therefore, this may lead to investor-state disputes regarding emission trading in the marine industry due to the conflicts between the obligation to combat climate change and the obligation to protect investments of the host states. This has resulted in the breaching of International Investment Agreements. In this context, this study aimed to propose practical recommendations for global marine market practitioners to avoid the potential risks of disputes by reflecting on the existing practice regarding climate change-related investor-state dispute resolutions and identifying the trends and problems of the current dispute resolution mechanism. These included inconsistency in the review standard, inconsistency in the review scope, and broad interpretation by the tribunal. Finally, this study proposed that by setting public purpose and exception clauses in the preambles of the International Investment Agreements and incorporating the specific obligations of the foreign investors and the regulatory power of the hosting states in the drafting stage, the potential risks for disputes regarding the new EU directive in the global marine industry could be effectively reduced.