Skip to main content

Home/ WomensLearningStudio/ Group items tagged reputation

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Digital Footprints - Managing Your Online Reputation - 1 views

  •  
    Good slide presentation on managing your online reputation by Susan Bearden at Holy Trinity Episcopal Academy
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

75% of B2B decision makers use social media to learn - 0 views

  •  
    Blog by Kevin O'Keefe, "Real Lawyers Have Blogs," on the topic of the law, firm marketing, social media, and baseball, February 23, 2014. O'Keefe reviews a study by Gerry Moran on using social media to teach, not to sell. Other key points that O'Keefe makes: Build a large social network of people modeled after your customers and their influencers. 75% of B2B decision makers use social media to learn. (wonder where this stat comes from?) Pass on valuable information. Don't use your social media and networking channels to promote yourself. You want to be known for handing out knowledge and not brochures. Use social so that people will want to visit with you in person. 73% of customers are willing to engage with you on social media, so the opportunity is there. Use social media to teach, not sell. Selling is best done face-to-face. However, Social Media Today reports B2B buyers look at an average of over 10 digital resources before ever making a purchase. Since customers need to learn before they buy, use this opportunity on social media to connect. Teach and connect with today's technology. Connect and get on the radar of your customers and potential networks by retweeting, sharing, commenting and favoriting others' content. Develop Insights. Before you teach and connect with your customers, you need to listen to the customer and their customers. Social is an excellent listening tool. Be a publisher. In addition to curating and passing on the great content to your network, create your own assets on a blog. Organizations who blog get clients. Later Excerpt: Over the years LexBlog as been all about helping lawyers understand how to use the Internet in a real and effective fashion so as to grow their practices. By sharing information from third parties along our own insight via blogs and other social media we established a reputation as trusted advisors. Even when I reach out to meet with lawyers and law firms I have never met f
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Digital Footprints - Managing Your Online Reputation - 1 views

  •  
    A highly visual 21 slide program on creating/mainaining your digital footprint
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

'Overnight, everything I loved was gone': the internet shaming of Lindsey Stone | Techn... - 0 views

  •  
    Completely devastating article on how one's reputation can be lost (and maybe receovered with some redevelopment work online to defeat the Google algorithms) with a stupid prank captured and put online in a tweet or facebook page. Unbelievable and scary.
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Do not confuse writing an article with blogging - 0 views

  •  
    Interesting distinction between blogging and writing articles. Kevin O'Keefe's blog on January 16, 2014 Blogging is done to engage others in a conversation by recognizing the post is one in a series on a topic. Writing an article is to get your point of view out there. Excerpt: I have always viewed blogging as all together different than writing an article. Blogging is a conversation where by listening to relevant discussion you engage those in the conversation. Social media consultant, Jayne Navvare (@jaynenavvare), made the point as well as anyone in her post today. If you want to post "articles" to the web using a blog platform, fine, but do not confuse that with blogging. Articles are static. Blogging is dynamic. Bloggers do more than just write posts. They socialize. Articles are one way. I write it. I distribute it. You read it. Think magazines, newspapers, and newsletters. Circulation and eyeballs are measures of success. Blogs engage. Blogs mix it up with readers and other bloggers. Relationships and word of mouth reputation are measures of success.
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Hear and now: social media listening for operational decision-making - NixonMcInnes - 0 views

  • Social media listening is not a new idea. But it’s usually done in the interests of marketing, reputation, research or customer service. Here – from a serious government body – is recommendation that organisations could use social media listening as real data to inform and assist with operations. It’s recognition that the data shared online, in realtime, by passengers, has more value than as mere reputational currency or customer service fodder.
  • How much useful information is being offered that might not be formally addressed to an organisation’s Twitter or Facebook presence?
  •  
    blog post by Clive Andrews at NixonMcInnes, creating meaning in business. 9/26/2013 on using immediacy of messages being shared on social media to make operational choices.
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Online Reputation, Personal Branding. BrandYourself: Control Your Google Results at Bra... - 0 views

  •  
    brand yourself tool for use in rebranding oneself online.
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Making Dumb Groups Smarter - HBR - 0 views

  • The key is information aggregation: Different people take note of different “parts,” and if those parts are properly aggregated, they will lead the group to know more (and better) than any individual.
  • informational signals.
  • reputational pressures, which lead people to silence themselves or change their views in order to avoid some penalty—often, merely the disapproval of others.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • When they make poor or self-destructive decisions, one or more of these problems are usually to blame: Groups do not merely fail to correct the errors of their members; they amplify them. They fall victim to cascade effects, as group members follow the statements and actions of those who spoke or acted first. They become polarized, taking up positions more extreme than those they held before deliberations. They focus on what everybody knows already—and thus don’t take into account critical information that only one or a few people have.
  • Silence the leader.
  • “Prime” critical thinking.
  • Reward group success.
  • Assign roles.
  • Appoint a devil’s advocate.
  • Establish contrarian teams.
  • The Delphi method.
  •  
    interesting article by Cass Sunstein and Reid Hastie, November 4, 2014 on how to help groups make better decisions. Eight suggestions are made: 1. Silence the leader 2. Prime critical thinking 3. Reward group success 5. Assign roles 6. Appoint a devil's advocate 7. Establish contrarian teams 8. Delphi Method
1 - 8 of 8
Showing 20 items per page