Something I am trying to get a handle on in my dissertation has to do with
communication (and communication formats) that are imposed on a group/team and
those in which groups or teams are able to develop their own forms and forms of
communication.
What I found is that a team might have “hidden” communication, withholding
from some, developing different spaces and different
levels of
access to various members, depending on the task.
Where would that come into your
framework?
Harold Jarche
,
on
February
11th, 2010 at 19:32
Said:
Good question. I wonder if the act of hiding
information is a result of an
over-controlling organizational communication
structure, and not supporting
collaboration or cooperation in a more
unfettered manner?
Cooperative or collaborative learning? «
Edmusings
,
on
February
12th,
2010 at 15:01
Said:
[...] Harold Jarche
uses the
two terms with collaboration applied
to
a model
of action for informal groups, such as communities of practice,
and
cooperation with loose networks. [...]
uberVU - social
comments
, on
February 27th, 2010 at 3:14
Said:
Social comments and analytics for this
post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by omeroz:
Communication and working
together
http://bit.ly/9QDBZx
.
.
.
Leave a Reply
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published)
(required)
Website
Spam
Protection by
WP-SpamFree
Notify me of subsequent comments to this
thread
Conversations
Harold Jarche
on
The
Networked
Workplace
Jon Husband on
The
Networked
Workplace
?????? ??????? LMS? « E-learning NET
on
Formalized
informal
learning: a blend we don’t need
Harold Jarche
on
New
Hire
Practices
Harold Jarche
on
Vendor-neutral
E-PORTAFOLIOS, del PLN al APRENDIZAJE!!! «
juandon.
Innovación y c
on
ocimiento
on
All
models
are flawed but some are useful
kaleem
on
New
Hire
Practices
Kare Anders
on
on
Vendor-neutral
Harold Jarche
on
Social
learning
for collaborative work
Mack
on
Social
learning
for collaborative work
Twitter
Faves
rdeis:
Transparency +
Clarity = Understanding. @aronsolomon
http://www.aronsolomon.com/t-c-u/
rdeis: Good employers
don't work against human nature
http://t.co/ZbhwVve via @globeandmail >>
Paying
attention to 4 human needs.
jukkaam:
Mistaken
beliefs business leaders have about innovation:
know the competition, best way
of doing
things http://onforb.es/klE9ej #innovation
<A clas
KPI_Library Bookmarks on 05 Mar 12By Frank Mattes, on Innovation Management. June 22, 2011.This article, and others offered on the site, feature for profit organizations. "R&D-driven open innovation is a powerful lever for enhancing the firm's innovativeness since it multiplies the firm's R&D resources. Two examples may highlight the point: Procter&Gamble has 9,000 people employed in its various R&D units - and estimates the global number of experts in its technology fields to be two million. And Merck Inc. estimates that although it is a global leader in its field it produces only one percent of the relevant global patents every year. Both of these firms see open innovation as an effective way for engaging the innovative potential of the thousands of brilliant minds outside the firm."
