Skip to main content

Home/ Knowledge in the Public Interest (KPI)/ Group items tagged Jarche

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Harold Jarche » Communication and working together - 1 views

  • levels of access to various members, depending on the task. Where would that come into your framework? Harold Jarche, on February 11th, 2010 at 19:32 Said: Good question. I wonder if the act of hiding information is a result of an over-controlling organizational communication structure, and not supporting collaboration or cooperation in a more unfettered manner? Cooperative or collaborative learning? « Edmusings, on February 12th, 2010 at 15:01 Said: [...] Harold Jarche &nbsp;uses the two terms with collaboration applied to&nbsp;a model of action for informal groups, such as communities of practice, and cooperation with loose networks. [...] uberVU - social comments, on February 27th, 2010 at 3:14 Said: Social comments and analytics for this post… This post was mentioned on Twitter by omeroz: Communication and working together http://bit.ly/9QDBZx... Leave a Reply Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Website Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree &nbsp;Notify me of subsequent comments to this thread Conversations Harold Jarche on The Networked Workplace Jon Husband on The Networked Workplace ?????? ??????? LMS? « E-learning NET on Formalized informal learning: a blend we don’t need Harold Jarche on New Hire Practices Harold Jarche on Vendor-neutral E-PORTAFOLIOS, del PLN al APRENDIZAJE!!! « juandon. Innovación y conocimiento on All models are flawed but some are useful kaleem on New Hire Practices Kare Anderson on Vendor-neutral Harold Jarche on Social learning for collaborative work Mack on Social learning for collaborative work Twitter Faves rdeis: Transparency + Clarity = Understanding. @aronsolomon http://www.aronsolomon.com/t-c-u/ rdeis: Good employers don't work against human nature http://t.co/ZbhwVve via @globeandmail &gt;&gt; Paying attention to 4 human needs. jukkaam: Mistaken beliefs business leaders have about innovation: know the competition, best way of doing things http://onforb.es/klE9ej #innovation hjarche: KM shifts from ‘content &amp; collection’ to ‘context &amp; connection’ by @panklam http://ur1.ca/4avm9 #PKM hjarche: Excellent #PKM &amp; networked learning ref list by @hreingold http://ur1.ca/4av6x Introduction to Mind Amplifiers Archives<SELECT onchange=document.location.href=thttp://www.jarche.com/his.options[this.selectedIndex].value; name
  • Something I am trying to get a handle on in my dissertation has to do with communication (and communication formats) that are imposed on a group/team and those in which groups or teams are able to develop their own forms and forms of communication. What I found is that a team might have “hidden” communication, withholding from some, developing different spaces and different &nbsp;levels of access to various members, depending on the task. Where would that come into your framework? Harold Jarche , on February 11th, 2010 at 19:32 Said: Good question. I wonder if the act of hiding information is a result of an over-controlling organizational communication structure, and not supporting collaboration or cooperation in a more unfettered manner? Cooperative or collaborative learning? « Edmusings , on February 12th, 2010 at 15:01 Said: [...] Harold Jarche &nbsp; uses the two terms with collaboration applied to &nbsp; a model of action for informal groups, such as communities of practice, and cooperation with loose networks. [...] uberVU - social comments , on February 27th, 2010 at 3:14 Said: Social comments and analytics for this post… This post was mentioned on Twitter by omeroz: Communication and working together http://bit.ly/9QDBZx . . . Leave a Reply Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Website Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree &nbsp; Notify me of subsequent comments to this thread Conversations Harold Jarche on The Networked Workplace Jon Husband on The Networked Workplace ?????? ??????? LMS? « E-learning NET on Formalized informal learning: a blend we don’t need Harold Jarche on New Hire Practices Harold Jarche on Vendor-neutral E-PORTAFOLIOS, del PLN al APRENDIZAJE!!! « juandon. Innovación y c on ocimiento on All models are flawed but some are useful kaleem on New Hire Practices Kare Anders on on Vendor-neutral Harold Jarche on Social learning for collaborative work Mack on Social learning for collaborative work Twitter Faves rdeis: Transparency + Clarity = Understanding. @aronsolomon http://www.aronsolomon.com/t-c-u/ rdeis: Good employers don't work against human nature http://t.co/ZbhwVve via @globeandmail &gt;&gt; Paying attention to 4 human needs. jukkaam: Mistaken beliefs business leaders have about innovation: know the competition, best way of doing things http://onforb.es/klE9ej #innovation <A clas
  •  
    An earlier blog by Harold Jarche referring to Lillie Efimova's work. Note how structure/goal oriented moves over to informal/opportunity-driven network with personal drivers taking over. Perhaps most MCNC groups reside in the opportunity-driven, informal networking place--not so much coordination but cooperation keeps them together, weakly? Has an impact also on facilitator's role.
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Harold Jarche » Increased complexity needs simplified design - 0 views

  • As Jay has said, informal learning is a better approach for more complex environments. Given the above, here are some guidelines for what informal learning development could look like: Spend less time on design and more on ongoing evaluation to allow emergent practices to be developed. Build learning resources so that they can be easily changed or modified by anyone (allow for a hacker mentality) Allow everything to be connected, so that the work environment is the learning environment (but look for safe places to fail) There is no clearly defined start or finish so enable connections from multiple access points. Information is no longer scarce and our connections are now many. If an organizational informal learning effort lets people connect more easily and communicate more effectively, then it will have a chance of success. Connecting &amp; Communicating are central roles for organizational leaders whose workplaces are becoming more complex, either in terms of evolving practices, changing markets or advances in technology. Enabling the integration of collaborative learning with work is a more flexible model than designing courses that are outdated as soon as they’re published.
  •  
    Exellent article on formal learning designs and why they don't work so well
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Harold Jarche » Social media for senior managers - 0 views

  •  
    Blog by Harold Jarche on how social networks and social media will keep companies who use them alive and prospering and those who don't use them will die of knowledge deprivation and inability to meet clients' expectations.
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Harold Jarche » Technologies for collaboration and cooperation - 0 views

  •  
    Look at graph below to show goal oriented to opportunity driven, from informal to
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Harold Jarche » Emergent practices need practice - 1 views

  •  
    "But many of the problems we face today are COMPLEX, and methods to solve simple and complicated problems will not work with complex ones. One of the ways we addressed simple & complicated problems was through training. Training works well when you have clear and measurable objectives. However, there are no clear objectives with complex problems. Learning as we probe the problem, we gain insight and our practices are emergent (emerging from our interaction with the changing environment and the problem). Training looks backwards, at what worked in the past (good & best practices), and creates a controlled environment to develop knowledge and skills."
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Harold Jarche » United by networked and social learning - 0 views

  •  
    A glimpse at learning networks vs. work teams vs. communities of practice.
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Harold Jarche » Consulting - 0 views

  • and how
  • how
  • Business or Operational Model: how the initiative fits into the organization’s ecosystem. Social Architecture: how collaboration is facilitated and what aspects should supported, such as performance support; communities of practice; knowledge management, informal learning or distributed work teams. Technology Platform: identifying and implementing technologies that are best-suited for the organization’s business and collaboration objectives and
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • they can be integrated within existing constraints.
  •  
    excellent introduction to what the alliance does. see description below: Business or Operational Model: how the initiative fits into the organization's ecosystem. 2.Social Architecture: how collaboration is facilitated and what aspects should supported, such as performance support; communities of practice; knowledge management, informal learning or distributed work teams. 3.Technology Platform: identifying and implementing technologies that are best-suited for the organization's business and collaboration objectives and how they can be integrated within existing constraints.
  •  
    I like his division of services into business or operational model, social architecture, and technology platform
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Harold Jarche » A case for social learning in business - 0 views

  •  
    Excellent video on how businesses need to redesign their systems to support listening, learning, sharing--more people you know, the more things you can do--"next practices" drawn from Jarche's blog
  •  
    Very interesting yet short video on social learning as it relates to business but at first glance, they seem to apply to nonprofits/educational groups, too.
1 - 8 of 8
Showing 20 items per page