Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ ETC647
Mark Doebele

Lesson 2 - Creating a Teacher Website - 0 views

    • Mark Doebele
       
      I know first-hand that editing on Wetpaint can be frustrating at times, but personally these pages are very compacted with information and a bit difficult to follow because of it. To a novice user, this could be a turn off.
  •  
    Yeah, I think you are right. After looking at other people's, I should have spread it out. I was trying to make it shorter than my ETC677 unit. I had 12 lessons in that one. I should have spread out the information and the page layout. One problem I had was I used a large screen to design it. When I viewed it on my laptop, it seemed so much busier.
Mark Doebele

Lesson 3 - Creating a Teacher Website - 0 views

    • Mark Doebele
       
      Is this the only rubric you have for this course? Perhaps I missed another one. Just curious
  •  
    There are two. The second one is created by the groups.
Suzanne Brazzell

Network Learning Environments - Getting Your Feet Wet with Wetpaint - 0 views

    • Suzanne Brazzell
       
      Great explanation of Social bookmarking! I think most people don't "get it" and your explanation is very concise.
Suzanne Brazzell

Learning Environments - Getting Your Feet Wet with Wetpaint - 0 views

    • Suzanne Brazzell
       
      You are so lucky that you can access wetpaint at your school. It is blocked at most schools I know. 
Suzanne Brazzell

Cgmscowen - Dipity Peer Evaluation Schedule - 0 views

    • Suzanne Brazzell
       
      I like how the group eval each other. Your rubric is very specific
Suzanne Brazzell

Cgmscowen - Dipity - 0 views

    • Suzanne Brazzell
       
      Where was this video when we did our presentation!
Ruth Creek

Active-Spring2011 - ETC647 Group - 5 views

  • Flashcard Machine
    • Nathan Wells
       
      This is a really cool site! Nice idea. Does this meet all the ideas of an active classroom? I think it could, but just wanted to see your thoughts. Thanks.
    • Wendy Ellis
       
      It all boils down to the quality in the information shared and the outcome of the collaboration. I suppose I could just read your post and not internalize it by commenting back or thinking about it.
    • Ruth Creek
       
      It is more active than just handing them a voaculary list to memorize...It can be made more active having the student share cards (creating their own study groups to work/study with)...witht he cards shared with the instructor, they can also be saved for future students
    • Wendy Sue Grieg0
       
      Great idea Ruth. The communication and personalization is truly an added feature. We can share and see who says what. Students can benefit from this as they are brain-storming for new ideas as they use this. For example, they can share formulas in math homeworks or discuss social studies projects.
    • Wendy Sue Grieg0
       
      Thanks WendyWu! I like the tips you mention. It helped me figure out how to post to certain people...LIKE THIS! (i think I got it now)
    • Teri Henderson
       
      See sticky response 2.
  • Activity: Students will be engaged in a WebQuest exploration on endangered species. They will create a group PowerPoint reflecting their learning and post it in Google Docs. Content: Endangered Species Delivery Technology: Internet, Google Docs Instructional Strategies: Inquiry-based learning, collaborative learning, online collaborative learning. Evaluation: Self and Group Reflections based on Rubric(s), Instructor designed test based on Rubric
    • Wendy Sue Grieg0
       
      I like your lesson using webquest. The student can participate in direct online interaction through the webquest. Also they use asynchronous communication to send information to peers. The communication is important as they can create ideas and share…and mainly edit their work in Google Docs, prior to sending it off to peers. You chose PowerPoint and find this is totally useful for real-world learning; young people need to learn these skills for various uses (e.g., work) and it adds a bonus of autonomy as they are part of the creation. This brings me to collaboration. Collaboration in this project will be effective as they share and learn about new animals. The topic is awesome as it stimulates curiosity and furthers research ideas. Lastly, I feel the animal topic is also a way to allow students to use multimedia and see images online.
  • ...2 more annotations...
    • Erin Rain
       
      Very interesting activity! Could you also add in a project/presentation as a part of the WebQuest instead of test? I like that you added group and self evaluations too! Will your students be taking on roles in the WebQuest?
    • Teri Henderson
       
      Sure, I love the idea of adding a project. This is part of a larger unit and there are projects and an exploration where students take on roles; including, scientist, journalist, expert, etc.
    • Erin Rain
       
      Sounds great! You could even combine the entire unit into one large webquest possibly? That would be super neat- lots of planning, but then the kids are doing the learning entirely! ;)
    • Nancy Mitchell
       
      Mark, I love the idea of following a blog and then presenting their findings--it sounds like a great way to be exposed to a lot of new information in an engaging way without having to do all the research yourself. I am curious, however, why you might use google docs to present rather than the presentation tool...
    • Brigette Gallus
       
      I agree. Following a blog would be very engaging for students. Could you incorporate expert's blogs somehow?
  •  
    Thanks WendyWu! I like the tips you mention. It helped me figure out how to post to certain people.
Suzanne Brazzell

Unit List Sp11 - ETC647 - 0 views

    • Suzanne Brazzell
       
      Veronica, I am not reviewing your unit but I really like how you did something useful for your class! I enjoyed your unit :) 
tucsonshell

Interactive-Spring2011 - ETC647 Group - 10 views

    • Wendy Ellis
       
      Does anyone know how to take highlighter off?
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      If you highlight it, you can remove it. If it is used by others, we don't have privilege to remove it.
    • Suzanne Brazzell
       
      This would be a cool lesson to share at the beginning of the year or with 2nd graders at the end of the year. It has great networking options! 
  • Cowen, Christine
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Please post your interactive design.
  • ...20 more annotations...
  • Gallus, Brigette
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Please post your interactive design.
  • Lewis, Courtney
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Please post your interactive design.
  • Ramos, Veronica
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Please post your interactive design.
  • Wells, Nathan
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Please post your interactive design.
  • User Generated Content (UGC)
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Why is this UGC? whatever generated are not required to read?!
    • tucsonshell
       
      Other users may evaluate the content, suggest changes, or even make changes. Conversational or two-way media is a key characteristic of Web 2.0. Vyew is a new technology that is accessible, is open to collaboration, skill-building and discovery.The presentation is created by students (users) and those attending are able to interact by using the content along with the students.
  • Elluminate, Vyew
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Why need both? It seems Vyew can do without Elluminate. Jusitfy!
    • tucsonshell
       
      Most certainly, Vyew has the ability to present and collaborate without uploading in Elluminate. Vyew has all the features that Elluminate offers; editing, modifying, voice and video. For the purpose of this lesson, uploading Vyew in Elluminate is a learner-interface instructional strategy as well.
  • Can be collaboration, Students are creating the lesson
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      No ONLE instructional strategies??
  • Students will create a presentation on a math concept. They will be teaching it to the class.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Isn't this considered Constrcutvisim not Connectivism design? Jusitfy!
    • Suzanne Brazzell
       
      They are connecting to prior knowledge and are required to teach the lesson in a different way then they were taught. Not using previous material.
  • Depending on what tools the students use to create their wetpaint review pages, ANY of the strategies may apply.  It is entirely up to the students!
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Be more specific on your ONLE strategies. If it is upto students, then what you anticipate they may be engaged in? Justify!
  • They work collaboratively on an oral debate
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Explain this more?
    • Teri Henderson
       
      There are varying positions; such as, lumber industry, paper industry, construction industry. Students are to research the pros and cons and take a side. The oral debates will be supported, even if the student themselves are not in favor of the position they take, they will still have to justify to make a case.
  • theme based content, cloud computing, learner-learner, community-community, learner-interface, student publishing, reflection, interactive, project-based learning, real-life experiences, online collaborative learning, project-based learning, meaning-making.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      These are constructivism strategies. What ONLE strategies are integrated? Jusitfy!
  • Cloud Computing, folksonomy, UGC, social content sharing 
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      You intend to use Delicious, why social tagging is not part of your strategies? Justify!
    • Nancy Mitchell
       
      Okay, so I'm curious then, maybe I'll have to do a little more research. What is the difference between folksonomy and social content sharing, and social tagging? Aren't they all similar?
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Generally, they are similiar. Social tagging focus on both tagging and social (sharing, networking) while folksonomy focuses on tagging. :-)
    • Ruth Creek
       
      So, If I am understanding this right ...folksonomy is all the tags I find on various pages, from people I've never met...yet I find myself adding replies to their tags....it isn't social networking, but is is social tagging?
  • the school's online research database using Delicious.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      What is your social tagging architecture?
    • Nancy Mitchell
       
      I am assuming you are meaning which types of tags the students would use to share their documents? This is the first semester that I've really thought about tagging architecture, so I'm struggling to think clearly about how I would manage students sharing documents. Any ideas? I would think the architecture would be class name, project title, teacher name, etc. Am I on the right track?
    • Ruth Creek
       
      Good question Nancy. I bookmark so many things and my accounts are a mess with all my tags. Your question made me realize that there really does need to be a framework, structure, or architecture if you will, for easy organization and use. I was thinking about creating a separate account to work with my students....but now I see how Chih has his structured as a framework... :-) Thanks :-)
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Yes, tagging to organize is very critical. For example, if we don't design a good social tagging arhitecture, our students may tag ETC 647 versus ETC647 or PLE vs Personal Learning Environment, vs PersonalLearningEnvironment. Ruth made an excellent point.
  • create content overview for a unit in the course. 
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Are they required readings for others? Why? Why not?
    • Erin Rain
       
      Yes, I'll have the content be required readings before the AIMS test for current and future students.
  • using Dipity to create a timeline for the plot,
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Excellent design!
    • Ruth Creek
       
      :-) Thank you....I got the idea from the Dipity Training presentation :-)
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Great! I like the creative idea that integrate ttechnology into non-traditional way.
  • Older or more advanced students may also analyze the content for authors intent to comment on, or criticize, the culture/politics of the era. The course wiki can then be used by future students to learn about the author's content (each year students create a wiki for a different author)
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Excellent design.
  • Folksonomy (Diigo or Delicious)
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      What kind of social tagging architecture you have?
    • Ruth Creek
       
      Initially I plan to create a class Diigo acount to share with the students and have them do the same (as we have done in this class) post readings and have the students link readings they really like, and we can comment on each others links. As they become more proficient, then I plan to introduce delicious for sharing interesting links with their peers outside the course structure.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      What types of tags? Do you have any effective tagging schemes for learners to follow?
    • Ruth Creek
       
      Not yet....I just realized from another post that I need to clean up my tagging system into an organized architecture
  • community-community
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      How? Why?
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Explain why UGC? How UGC to be carried out? Be specific!
  • Stewart, Emily  Students create an online presentation on "The Way to Survive 3rd Grade..." They will then present their presentation sing elluminate.Content: Technology, WritingDelivery: Google Docs, ElluminateInst. Strategies: community-community, UGCEval: Presentation on elluminate
    • Erin Rain
       
      This sounds like a great activity! Could you even enhance it by having students publish their presentations to the web?
  • Photostory
    • Erin Rain
       
      What is photostory? Not sure I've heard of it. This sounds like an excellent project! Having students publish the presentations to the web and make them available to the public would also be a great activity for our instructional strategies.
tucsonshell

Expository-Spring2011 - ETC647 Group - 3 views

  • Wiki to post reading
    • Nathan Wells
       
      This is a good assignment, do you think you could easily add to this to make it active? I think this could go a lot of different directions!
    • Wendy Ellis
       
      I suppose if we just sat around like sponges and did not participate, it would stay in the expository range. Since we are active thinkers, it moves up a level. As teachers, I do not think we have the capacity to do that. Scratch that, since we are ed techies, we can't. We know too much about the power of participation and the inner calling of collaboration. Thanks for commenting so quickly this week.
    • Ruth Creek
       
      technically, as ed techies....I would think that we would be inclined to take any expository format and adapt it to something more active :-)
    • tucsonshell
       
      Nate...I agree; many ways to make this an active assignment...example: students could make a power point on what their learning style is-present to class
Christine Cowen

iPadApps - Craig Nansen on Diigo - 0 views

  •  
    For those who have iPads
Christine Cowen

iPadInEducation - Craig Nansen on Diigo - 2 views

  •  
    Using the IPad in Education - some suggestions.
Christine Cowen

The Learning Network - The Learning Network Blog - NYTimes.com - 2 views

  •  
    Awesome lesson plans from The New York Times
anonymous

Home - investigatecareers's JimdoPage! - 1 views

    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Common Question I: Aligned Connectivism Principles Please discuss three most important strategies of ONLE/PLE in your unit, identify what aligned Connectivism principle(s) are, and discuss the assessments you integrate. Remember ONLE/PLE strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, blog etc. It is the integrated soft technologies. If you don't remember Connectivism principles, please review our Lesson 1 readings. Hint: be sure to include four components of technology integrations: Content; Technology; Instructional Strategies; Assessment. This strategy should go beyond Constructivist instructional strategy and focus on ONLE/PLE/Connectivism design.
    • Jennifer Starchman
       
      The thee most important strategies of ONLE/PLE in my unit are user generated content, social sharing, and participatory web. By creating content the students will form personal learning connections and extensions that will then be shared and assessed by the other learners. By incorporating these sharing and creating activities into the lessons the learners are no longer given static material to work with and learn from. The activities are tied together and work in harmony to elicit reponses and connections from the students.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Common Question II: UGC Instructional Designs Do you have instructional UGC design in your unit? If yes, why? If no, why not? If you do, be sure to include the discussions covering four components of integrations (technology, instructional strategy, and assessment). Be sure to use Connectivism theory to justify your arguments.
    • Jennifer Starchman
       
      Yes there is instructional user generated content within my unit. The reason that I have user generated content is that students can learn just as much if not more from each other. Websites and wikis allow students to generate content instantaneously and also provides peer review opporitunities. The more connections that the students can make to the learning and to other student's the better the more resilient that knowledge will be.
    • pattirose55
       
      Nice simple graphics. I like that you included website examples in the sidebar (What your website could look like), as well as the non-college options for employment (Lesson 3). Overall, the unit is well organized and includes both NLE technologies and instructional strategies to teach high school seniors about career opportunities and better prepare them for the workplace. The flow and functionality of the three lessons works well together. Students should come away with a lot of useful knowledge.
    • pattirose55
       
      Content Feedback Comments: The unit content of career possibilities, job requirements, and available resources is appropriate for the intended audience (high school seniors). NLE Instructional Strategies Feedback Comments: The unit is self-directed. It contains inquiry-based learning (Internet research), wiki content development (UGC), reflection, and social networking. Interactions include learner-to-learner (discussions), learner-to-content (career websites), and learner-to-instructor (calendar entries). NLE Technologies Feedback Comments: Utilized Jimdo website, Twitter, various career websites, Blogger, Google Docs, Elluminate, Delicious, class wiki posts, and Google Calendar. Evaluations Feedback Comments: Lesson 1 "Create an Informative Web Page" has a Rubric for Career Development and a peer review; however, I didn't see any evaluations for Lessons 2 and 3.
  • ...1 more annotation...
    • Ashley Romanoski
       
      The content presented about careers and future education options is very appropriate for the intended audience of high school seniors. NLE instructional strategies are present through Par, UGC, and CC. These strategies work together to support student learning. Many NLE technologies such as Delicious, Google Documents, Google Calendar, blogging, and Twitter are implemented in this unit. These Web 2.0 tools create a learning environment for students to work successfully. The use of peer review for lesson 1's product as well as the feedback in lesson 2 allows students to collaborate with one another and extend their ideas. The rubric for lesson 1 provides students the opportunity to be aware of expectations ahead of time, and then it effectively evaluates the final product. I did not see an instrument of evaluation for lesson 2 or 3. Be sure to include an instrument to measure the instructional strategies and technologies you are using. Overall, great job! The topic is very relevant and important to your target audience. If you plan on using this in the future, I would add more details as well as additional evaluation methods for the other lessons. Thanks for sharing!
    • Jennifer Starchman
       
      Thank you for your feedback!
  •  
    ETC647 Fall 2010 Units
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Technology for New Teachers - 0 views

    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Common Question I: Aligned Connectivism Principles Please discuss three most important strategies of ONLE/PLE in your unit, identify what aligned Connectivism principle(s) are, and discuss the assessments you integrate. Remember ONLE/PLE strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, blog etc. It is the integrated soft technologies. If you don't remember Connectivism principles, please review our Lesson 1 readings. Hint: be sure to include four components of technology integrations: Content; Technology; Instructional Strategies; Assessment. This strategy should go beyond Constructivist instructional strategy and focus on ONLE/PLE/Connectivism design.
    • Amy Matteson
       
      Participants are intended to take this 'course' as new teachers, but the resources and connections they use / make here will continue to be available to them well beyond the time frame of the class. While the initial learnings are individual things, the smartboard units and server resources are more collaborative and will be the meat of what participants continue to use. The shared server is a host of these learnings and will contiune to be a space for sharing. Participants will add their own materials and be able to access those of others to increase their own resources.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Common Question II: UGC Instructional Designs Do you have instructional UGC design in your unit? If yes, why? If no, why not? If you do, be sure to include the discussions covering four components of integrations (technology, instructional strategy, and assessment). Be sure to use Connectivism theory to justify your arguments.
    • Amy Matteson
       
      Participants are required to show that they have integrated the technologies into their dailey practice not only for the scope of the course, but also throughout the year via principal observations. Participants are not learning to assess technology use or gaining much in the way of new instructional strategies here, becuase that it not the objective of the course. This course is to help them navigate the initial USE of the technologies for themselves. Integration and assessment would be the next course in the series.
    • Rebecca Fitch
       
      Evaluation 1: Author's Name: Amy Matteson Unit Title: ISD196 New Teacher Technology Training Course Provide feedback to the author for each of the following unit components. Be comprehensive on your feedback/comments. "Good job! Well done" types of feedback/comments are NOT acceptable. Content: Content that supports organizational learning network environments. Areas: * Content is appropriate for the targeted audiences. Feedback Comments: The content is perfect for your teacher audience. You have set up many tools that will help teachers learn technology NLE Instructional Strategies: Integrate Constructivism instructional strategies and activities or other relevant strategies and activities to support the unit. NLE Instructional Strategies Areas: * Integrate multiple NLE instructional strategies in additional to constructivist instructional strategies. * Focus on "network" instructional strategies, not just "online (distributed)" instructional technologies. Feedback Comments: You have included constructivism where teachers are building on previous technology knowledge as well as linkage and UGC. NLE Technologies: Web 2.0 tools, social media, and/or network media. Areas: * All NLE technologies integrate effectively & appropriately? * Focus on "network" technologies, not just "online" technologies. Feedback Comments: Tools used include email, cloud computing and Diigo. This was effective with demonstrating these tools as well as allowing the staff to use them. Evaluations: Evaluate the goals and objectives of at least one lesson. Perform a pilot test on one lesson by asking a targeted audience of three and/or your classmates. Area to evaluate: * Evaluation methods (Projects, Reflections, Peer evaluations, Collaborative evaluations, Presenations…etc.) * Evaluation instruments (Rubrics, criteria, checklist, survey…etc.) * All goals, objectives, activities are measured? * All content, NLE instructiona
  •  
    ETC647 Fall 2010 Units
  •  
    Excellent unit to introduce new teachers to technologies. I thought lesson 4 integration of cooperative was a good strategy for reviewing web 2.0 tools. Addition of personal reflections are beneficial, do you think you could have used peer evaluations anywhere in the unit?
Chih-Hsiung Tu

Home - Educating the Educators - 0 views

    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Common Question I: Aligned Connectivism Principles Please discuss three most important strategies of ONLE/PLE in your unit, identify what aligned Connectivism principle(s) are, and discuss the assessments you integrate. Remember ONLE/PLE strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, blog etc. It is the integrated soft technologies. If you don't remember Connectivism principles, please review our Lesson 1 readings. Hint: be sure to include four components of technology integrations: Content; Technology; Instructional Strategies; Assessment. This strategy should go beyond Constructivist instructional strategy and focus on ONLE/PLE/Connectivism design.
    • Rebecca Fitch
       
      The strategies I incorporated include linkage, UGC, and mashup. Linkage is essential strategy to all online sites for ease of operation. Students were to generate a document that was then used by other students to experience the actual editing of a Google Doc and mashup was used to show the students how to create their own PLE
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Common Question II: UGC Instructional Designs Do you have instructional UGC design in your unit? If yes, why? If no, why not? If you do, be sure to include the discussions covering four components of integrations (technology, instructional strategy, and assessment). Be sure to use Connectivism theory to justify your arguments.
    • Rebecca Fitch
       
      As stated above, UGC was used in order for students to learn how to edit documents.
  •  
    ETC647 Fall 2010 Units
  •  
    Educating the Educator - Author: Becky Fitch This Unit was simple, clean, and easy to follow. The only suggestion I have is for Becky to use Dr. Tu and Dr. Blocher's paper on "Social Network Linkage Design Model for Building ONLE & PLE" to help explain the purpose of ONLE & PLEs. I would like to have read that paper in lesson 1 of ETC647. It would be helpful before giving your lesson. 1. Your introduction paragraph was helpful. The content was all about creating PLEs and using Google Docs. Content is appropriate for the targeted audiences. Yes, content is designed to teach teachers and prepare the teachers to teach their students the same content. Feedback Comments: 1. Google Docs was used to create a collaborative story (constructivism). 2. Access to the unit was provided after unit was executed. 3. Hands-on create your own PLE with specified requirements. 4. A sample PLE was provided for support (like a template). 5. Individual research was required to discover the benefits of both creating a PLE and using Google Docs. Feedback Comments: 1. Tools used: a. Google Docs b. Forums c. IGoogle = PLE Feedback Comments: 1. Lesson 1- required the learner to create their PLE. 2. Lesson 2 - required the learner to collaborate one a story in Google Docs. 3. Lesson 3 - provided access to the unit with interaction and questions satisfied on a forum. The forum was provided in the Wiki. 4. An exit survey was created for instructor's feedback 5. Learners were expected to demonstrate that they could access the info after the Unit was completed.
  •  
    This was a good unit for educators, is was clear and simple. I think it could have included more collaborative and cooperative activities. However all objective were met.
esthermitchellnau

Lesson 3 - Patient Confidentiality - Patient Privacy - 0 views

    • esthermitchellnau
       
      This was a great lesson to review. The instructional strategies are very apparent with this lesson as well as the other two.
    • Kelly Nightengale
       
      Thank you for your kind feedback. I appreciate it.
esthermitchellnau

Patient Privacy Home - Patient Privacy - 3 views

    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Common Question I: Aligned Connectivism Principles Please discuss three most important strategies of ONLE/PLE in your unit, identify what aligned Connectivism principle(s) are, and discuss the assessments you integrate. Remember ONLE/PLE strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, blog etc. It is the integrated soft technologies. If you don't remember Connectivism principles, please review our Lesson 1 readings. Hint: be sure to include four components of technology integrations: Content; Technology; Instructional Strategies; Assessment. This strategy should go beyond Constructivist instructional strategy and focus on ONLE/PLE/Connectivism design.
    • Kelly Nightengale
       
      The three most important instructional strategies of ONLE/PLE incorporated in my unit are: Content: HIPAA Defined Technology: Wiki Instructional Strategy: User Generated Content (UGC) Principle: Learning and knowledge rests in diversity of opinions Assessment: Rubric and Survey UGC allows for learning by working with and discussing differing opinions of HIPAA. This knowledge is posted for the world to see. People that read this knowledge can take it and teach others with it, and so on. This connected learning transcends time allowing learning to continue past traditional scheduled classes, making this content even more valuable. Content: HIPAA Defined Technology: Delicious Instructional Strategy: Folksonomy Principle: Learning is a process of connecting specialized nodes or information sources. Assessment: Rubric and Survey Folksonomy makes it easy to share and find information. By having so much information available so easily, learning is enhanced by making connections with these resources. Content: Patient Confidentiality Technology: Twitter Search Instructional Strategy: Linkage Design Principle: Learning may reside in non-human appliances Assessment: Rubric and Survey Participants can interact in a network and see what everyone is discussing and learning. These ideas bounce off each other creating more ideas and thoughts enhancing learning. The Twitter search gadget provides a place for this collaboration to happen. It allows for ease in connecting to and following the participant's network.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Common Question II: UGC Instructional Designs Do you have instructional UGC design in your unit? If yes, why? If no, why not? If you do, be sure to include the discussions covering four components of integrations (technology, instructional strategy, and assessment). Be sure to use Connectivism theory to justify your arguments.
    • Kelly Nightengale
       
      UGC was incorporated into my unit for multiple reasons. First of all, since the connectivism principle states that learning and knowledge rest in the diversity of opinions, having the participants work together to create a wiki would not only help them learn individually, it would help the entire group learn and grow by discussing these opinions. Another reason I wanted the participants to have UGC instructional design is so a place existed for them to revisit and refresh their memories of the content of HIPAA defined. Having the information online provides an easy place to find the information anytime and from anywhere. Finally, incorporating UGC in my unit was important to provide a place for students, faculty, and especially new instructors to view and learn about HIPAA to ensure patient's protected health information was kept private. This knowledge can then transfer to others connecting potentially everyone to this HIPAA information. Rubrics and Surveys were created to assess the content, instructional strategy of UGC, and the technology of wiki utilization.
    • Amy Matteson
       
      Great job on this! As someone who has taken 'traditional' HIPPAA training in the past, kudos to you for making it interesting and interactive. Your participants will be engaged by the content and far more likely to remember the high points!
    • Kelly Nightengale
       
      Thank you Amy. I'm glad my effort paid off!
  • ...1 more annotation...
    • esthermitchellnau
       
      This unit on patient privacy not just met all the requirements of the assignment but gave a very engaging approach to a topic that was personally quite interesting.
    • Kelly Nightengale
       
      Oh good! I am glad it is engaging and interesting:) Thank you.
  •  
    ETC647 Fall 2010 Units
  •  
    Overall I really liked your unit! I work in a physical therapists office so it was nice to see something I was actually familiar with! Great job! I would only recommend laying out your goals and objectives better so the reader can find them easier and not have to guess.Other than that you utilize network learning environments very well and they are appropriate for your unit.
  •  
    Kelly Knightengale's Unit on Patient Privacy http://patientprivacy.wetpaint.com/ Content: The content is in the unit is very well structured and appropriately meets the needs of your audience including novice audience/unit participants such as myself. The unit provides an effective online network learning environment. NLE Instructional Strategies: The unit integrates many NLE strategies including Linkage Design, Folksonomy, and Social Content Sharing. Very effective strategy choices for the unit! NLE Technologies: The unit is integrated extensively with Web 2.0 tools including VoiceThread, Twitter, and Blogs. Evaluations: The way your unit was designed to focus on the lessons by using specific rubrics such as with lesson 3's Twitter Rubric. There is also an exit survey, which provided an opportunity to evaluation the effectiveness of the unit. Additional Comments: I really enjoyed your unit. It was interesting to review the aspects of patient privacy along side of the aspects required on the unit for this course. Very comprehensive unit!
anonymous

CONHI Faculty Learning Community - Exploring the fun side of teaching and learning exce... - 1 views

shared by anonymous on 08 Dec 10 - No Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Common Question I: Aligned Connectivism Principles Please discuss three most important strategies of ONLE/PLE in your unit, identify what aligned Connectivism principle(s) are, and discuss the assessments you integrate. Remember ONLE/PLE strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, blog etc. It is the integrated soft technologies. If you don't remember Connectivism principles, please review our Lesson 1 readings. Hint: be sure to include four components of technology integrations: Content; Technology; Instructional Strategies; Assessment. This strategy should go beyond Constructivist instructional strategy and focus on ONLE/PLE/Connectivism design.
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Common Question II: UGC Instructional Designs Do you have instructional UGC design in your unit? If yes, why? If no, why not? If you do, be sure to include the discussions covering four components of integrations (technology, instructional strategy, and assessment). Be sure to use Connectivism theory to justify your arguments.
    • Kelly Nightengale
       
      The content provided is appropriate for the targeted audiences. I love how the events page is set up and can be accessed on the home page. The workshops, webinars, and clinics are numerous and offer variety so everyone can find something they are interested in learning. The members can RSVP to events directly from that page or watch archived events to learn. Multiple NLE instructional strategies are utilized. These include- Linkage Design, UGC, Community-Community Interaction, Agg, Mashup, social content sharing, Remix, RSS, Participatory web, folksonomy, social networking, mobile learning, and cloud computing. Network was the focus! Multiple web 2.0 tools utilized- twitter, voicethread, and blog. Social media is integrated- facebook. I have not joined facebook yet but this unit seems to me it would be like a facebook for CONHI. The focus was on network and all of the technologies were integrated effectively and appropriately. There were no defined lessons, however, this unit fit all of the criteria about creating a NLE. I have struggled with how to create units for the adult coworkers I work. It is difficult "making" them go through lessons like they were in school. This unit has opened my eyes on how to incorporate my learning with facilitating my coworkers learning. The evaluation methods are weak. Most of this has to do with the learning environment itself. It is not set up as traditional lessons which make it harder for evaluation. The checklist is a great way to assess the NLE's utilization, however, learning isn't measured (again due to the adult environment this is set up for). Also, the instructional strategies and technologies are not evaluated. I would just create another checklist for members to complete regarding the instructional strategies and technologies to help evaluate their effectiveness. It doesn't look as if the goals and objectives are directly measured. Even though this environment doesn't necessarily call for it, a survey
  • ...3 more annotations...
    • pattirose55
       
      Content Feedback Comments: The content is appropriate for the target audience of adults and faculty. Having access to events, videos, forum, etc. from the home page (tabs or sidebar) is very convenient. I didn't see any specific lessons; therefore, the unit appears to be more of a framework or guideline for online collaborative learning. * NLE Instructional Strategies Feedback Comments: The unit is basically self-directed and self-paced somewhat (instructed to logon twice a week for 15 minutes). It contains social bookmarking, collaborative learning, RSS feeds, and cloud computing. Interactions include learner-to-learner (discussions), learner-to-instructor (voice threads), and learner-to-content (videos). * NLE Technologies Feedback Comments: Utilized Ning (social website), RSS feeds (Twitter feed of "What's Happening at ASU"), Delicious bookmarks, discussion forum, Blogger, calendar/events (allowing RSVP), voice threads, chat, and videos. Google Sites, Google Docs, and concept mapping tools (Webspiration, DropMind, and Cmap) were all mentioned as possible options for teaching and learning at ASU. Evaluations Feedback Comments: No specific measurement of learning or evaluation of instructional strategies and technologies. Without specific lessons, evaluation is difficult. Surveys or questionnaires would be appropriate for an adult audience Additional Comments: I don't care for the entering of personal information like birthday, gender, and zip code to wait for approval to enter the site; however, I liked the personal touch of being welcomed to the site by name. The "Getting Started" orientation page and the customization options of "My PLE" are great! Overall, the unit is comprehensive with both NLE technologies and instructional strategies to teach the necessary concept of collaborative learning online. My resources and tool options were available for the student.
    • pattirose55
       
      Content Feedback Comments: The content is appropriate for the target audience of adults and faculty. Having access to events, videos, forum, etc. from the home page (tabs or sidebar) is very convenient. I didn't see any specific lessons; therefore, the unit appears to be more of a framework or guideline for online collaborative learning. * NLE Instructional Strategies Feedback Comments: The unit is basically self-directed and self-paced somewhat (instructed to logon twice a week for 15 minutes). It contains social bookmarking, collaborative learning, RSS feeds, and cloud computing. Interactions include learner-to-learner (discussions), learner-to-instructor (voice threads), and learner-to-content (videos). * NLE Technologies Feedback Comments: Utilized Ning (social website), RSS feeds (Twitter feed of "What's Happening at ASU"), Delicious bookmarks, discussion forum, Blogger, calendar/events (allowing RSVP), voice threads, chat, and videos. Google Sites, Google Docs, and concept mapping tools (Webspiration, DropMind, and Cmap) were all mentioned as possible options for teaching and learning at ASU. Evaluations Feedback Comments: No specific measurement of learning or evaluation of instructional strategies and technologies. Without specific lessons, evaluation is difficult. Surveys or questionnaires would be appropriate for an adult audience Additional Comments: I don't care for the entering of personal information like birthday, gender, and zip code to wait for approval to enter the site; however, I liked the personal touch of being welcomed to the site by name. The "Getting Started" orientation page and the customization options of "My PLE" are great! Overall, the unit is comprehensive with both NLE technologies and instructional strategies to teach the necessary concept of collaborative learning online. My resources and tool options were available for the student.
    • Ashley Romanoski
       
      Content: Your content is very well organized and appropriately meets the needs of your audience of faculty members. You have provided an online network learning environment. NLE Instructional Strategies: You integrated numerous NLE strategies such as Linkage Design, UGC, Agg, Mashup, Social Content Sharing, RSS, Par, Folk, and Network. This allows your faculty members to effectively interact and learn from one another. NLE Technologies: Your Web 2.0 tools were nicely integrated into your unit. You included Twitter, VoiceThread, Blogger, Delicious, RSS feeds, and Facebook. Evaluations: The way your unit was designed it does not appear that traditional lessons are available as they would not appropriately meet the needs of your audience. In your goals you included a checklist of expectations for participants as a means for evaluation. This should be a very effective method, but I did not find it on your site. Was it there or is the checklist something faculty members would receive ahead of time? Also, you might want to include a survey to evaluate your instructional strategies and technologies. Great job Jinnette! Your unit was very cohesive, and it appears that it will work effectively as a way for faculty members to communicate with each other. Thanks for sharing!
anonymous

ETC 647 Intro to Computers - 1 views

shared by anonymous on 07 Dec 10 - No Cached
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Common Question I: Aligned Connectivism Principles Please discuss three most important strategies of ONLE/PLE in your unit, identify what aligned Connectivism principle(s) are, and discuss the assessments you integrate. Remember ONLE/PLE strategies are not your contents or "technologies," such as wiki, blog etc. It is the integrated soft technologies. If you don't remember Connectivism principles, please review our Lesson 1 readings. Hint: be sure to include four components of technology integrations: Content; Technology; Instructional Strategies; Assessment. This strategy should go beyond Constructivist instructional strategy and focus on ONLE/PLE/Connectivism design.
    • Pat Agrait
       
      a) Lesson Plan #1 - Develop computer vocabulary with a collage of pictures in Google Sites. Indicate part name, learners research for the pictures and definition of each part and adds their info to the appropriate web page. One table cell for each student https://sites.google.com/site/etc647introtocomputers/project-definition Instructional strategies: User Generated Content (UGC) Activity: Online research (Refer to vocabulary list in Appendix C) Technology: Google Sites Dimension: Asynchronous Assessment: Each student contributes to each web page a picture and a definition, thereby building an online dictionary. b) Lesson Plan #2 - Watch videos - Dissecting a computer & Upgrading Ram: The students are asked to rate the videos and tag the video to share. Instructional strategies: Face-to-Face Enhancement - Connect to relevant human learning resources, social tagging and social content sharing strategies. Activity: Watch YouTube videos Technology: Internet - YouTube.com, Delicious.com Dimension: Synchronous or Asynchronous Assessment: Each student will rate the videos and tag the video to share a) http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=4GMCghYExZM&vq=small#t=18 b) Upgrading Ram: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDQ5hydK4ZI&feature=related c) www.mywebspiration.com - 1) Your team will create a concept map with the computer in the center connected to 4-core concepts: input, output, hardware, software. Add as many items as you can in each category and link their connections to each other. 2) Save concept map as Word doc, upload to Google Docs and label it Team#-Webspiration. Share with your instructor (pagrait@gmail.com). 3) Add Google Doc link to your Delicious account - Tag: intotocomp+team#+Webspiration 4) Students will get extra credit points if they can add to another group's concept map. Instructional strategies: Learner-learner interaction/User Generated Content (UGC) Activity: Content Mapping Technology: Onli
    • Pat Agrait
       
      Lesson Plan #1 - Develop computer vocabulary with a collage of pictures in Google Sites. Indicate part name, learners research for the pictures and definition of each part and adds their info to the appropriate web page. One table cell for each student https://sites.google.com/site/etc647introtocomputers/project-definition Instructional strategies: User Generated Content (UGC) Activity: Online research (Refer to vocabulary list in Appendix C) Technology: Google Sites Dimension: Asynchronous Assessment: Each student contributes to each web page a picture and a definition, thereby building an online dictionary. Lesson Plan #2 - Watch videos - Dissecting a computer & Upgrading Ram: The students are asked to rate the videos and tag the video to share. Instructional strategies: Face-to-Face Enhancement - Connect to relevant human learning resources, social tagging and social content sharing strategies. Activity: Watch YouTube videos Technology: Internet - YouTube.com, Delicious.com Dimension: Synchronous or Asynchronous Assessment: Each student will rate the videos and tag the video to share a) http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=4GMCghYExZM&vq=small#t=18 b) Upgrading Ram: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDQ5hydK4ZI&feature=related Lesson Plan #3 - www.mywebspiration.com - 1) Your team will create a concept map with the computer in the center connected to 4-core concepts: input, output, hardware, software. Add as many items as you can in each category and link their connections to each other. 2) Save concept map as Word doc, upload to Google Docs and label it Team#-Webspiration. Share with your instructor (pagrait@gmail.com). 3) Add Google Doc link to your Delicious account - Tag: intotocomp+team#+Webspiration 4) Students will get extra credit points if they can add to another group's concept map. Instructional strategies: Learner-learner interaction/User Generated Content (UGC) Activity: Content Mapping Technolo
    • Chih-Hsiung Tu
       
      Common Question II: UGC Instructional Designs Do you have instructional UGC design in your unit? If yes, why? If no, why not? If you do, be sure to include the discussions covering four components of integrations (technology, instructional strategy, and assessment). Be sure to use Connectivism theory to justify your arguments.
    • Pat Agrait
       
      Lesson plan #1 employs the Online Inquiry Based Learning in User Generated Content (UGC), a Connectivism instructional strategy. According to the Ohio Department of Education (2010) research department, technology plays an important role in inquiry-based teaching. Computers and the Internet provide students access to information and the ability to manage multiple and complex sources; they also enhance students' interest, motivation and engagement in active learning and content development. Technology further aids inquiry projects by allowing students to make connections between the classroom and the "real world," as well as produce high-quality presentations of their results. Learners may also work at their own pace and complete the project from home if necessary. a) Lesson Plan #1 - Develop computer vocabulary with a collage of pictures in Google Sites. Indicate part name, learners research for the pictures and definition of each part and adds their info to the appropriate web page. One table cell for each student https://sites.google.com/site/etc647introtocomputers/project-definition Instructional strategies: User Generated Content (UGC) Activity: Online research (Refer to vocabulary list in Appendix C) Technology: Google Sites Dimension: Asynchronous Assessment: Each student contributes to each web page a picture and a definition, thereby building an online dictionary. The instructional design strategies incorporated into this unit were based on the Principles of Connectivism & Instructional Strategies (Siemens, 2005): ● Learning and knowledge rests in the diversity of opinions ● Learning is a process of connecting specialized nodes or information sources ● Ability to see connections between fields, ideas, and concepts as a core skill ● Decision-making and choosing what to learn and the meaning of incoming information References Ohio Department of Education, Research. (2010). Using effective instructional strategies: inquiry-based teaching. C
    • pattirose55
       
      Content Feedback Comments: Computer vocabulary, PC components, PC upgrading, and PC purchasing are all appropriate and related topics for students, parents, teachers, and co-workers; however, age and/or grade level could be an issue due to concept, vocabulary, reading level, and dexterity. * NLE Instructional Strategies Feedback Comments: The unit is self-directed and self-paced. It contains active learning, reflection, project-based learning, Wiki content development (UGC), discovery learning, and inquiry-based learning. Interactions include learner-to-learner (collaborative) and learner-to-content (videos). * NLE Technologies Feedback Comments: Utilized Google Sites, Google Docs, Webspiration, Delicious, and Blogger, as well as Microsoft Word and Excel. Various websites were also accessed for tests, flashcards, and games (matching and Who Wants to Be a Computer Genius). Evaluations Feedback Comments: Unit included pretest, post-test, vocabulary quiz, completed worksheets, rubrics, and peer evaluation form. Lesson Plan #1 develops computer vocabulary by completing a collage of pictures and respective definitions in Google Sites based on a rubric (Appendix C). Additional Comments: Textual layout wasn't what I had expected. "Unit Content Outline" section basically contains the course/unit (or syllabus). Font styles, sizes, and colors are different in places and were rather distracting. On one screen a sentence or two are unreadable (whited out). At first I thought it was done for emphasis but that didn't pan out. I noticed some grammatical and spelling errors. Overall, the unit is very comprehensive with both NLE technologies and instructional strategies to teach necessary concepts. I liked that a substitute lesson plan (an online crossword puzzle) was included.
  •  
    ETC647 Fall 2010 Units
« First ‹ Previous 101 - 120 of 133 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page