Skip to main content

Home/ entreprise2.0/ Group items tagged User

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Christophe Gauthier

Ten Leading Business Intelligence Software Solutions - 2 views

itmanagement.earthweb.com/...ligence-Software-Solutions.htm

secafi meslectures logiciel BI business intelligence analytics

shared by Christophe Gauthier on 16 Oct 10 - No Cached
  • Christophe Gauthier on 16 Oct 10
     
    "Ten Leading Business Intelligence Software Solutions By Thor Olavsrud May 5, 2010 The Business Intelligence software market is shaping up as a David vs. Goliath struggle. Behemoths like Microsoft, Oracle and IBM offer feature-rich BI suites along with their many other enterprise software products. Meanwhile, pure-play business intelligence software vendors -- such as MicroStrategy and Tableau -- have avid followers and are known for innovating around new features and quickly adjusting to the shifting marketplace. Why is this important? Because Business Intelligence software is used to extract data from disparate sources -- spreadsheets, databases and other software programs -- inside companies and then analyze that business data to better understand a firm's internal and external strengths and weaknesses. A business relies heavily on this data. Bottom line: Business intelligence software enables managers to better see the relationship between different data for critical decision-making -- particularly opportunities for innovation, cost reduction and optimal resource deployment. The list below includes ten industry-leading BI solutions, from vendors large and not-so-large. If you're looking for a bird's eye view of this rapidly evolving market, the following condensed portraits should help. Business Intelligence Software: Ten Solutions Note: This list is NOT ordered "best to worst." The question of what business intelligence software solution is best for a given company depends on an entire matrix of factors. This list is simply an overview of BI solutions, with the debate about quality left to individual clients. SAP Crystal Reports Crystal Reports is part of SAP's Business Objects portfolio of business intelligence software solutions. It allows users to graphically design interactive reports and connect them to virtually any data source, Microsoft Excel spreadsheets, Oracle databases, Business Objects Enterprise business views and local file system info
Christophe Deschamps

Enterprise Web 2.0: Building the Next-Generation Workplace - the Driving Force behind J... - 0 views

www.marketwatch.com/...story.aspx

entreprise 2.0 etudes knowledge workers

shared by Christophe Deschamps on 07 Oct 08 - Cached
  • Building on the somewhat vague and yet particular usage of the term 'Web 2.0', 'Enterprise Web 2.0' describes a fresh, and some would say new, approach to the design and provision of business applications that incorporates aspects such as social networking, collaboration, and real-time communication. In addition, Enterprise Web 2.0 focuses a great deal of attention on the user's 'experience' or 'joy of use' -- something of a novelty in enterprise IT these days. By comparison, when Butler Group talks about 'Enterprise 2.0', we are focusing on the composition and architecture of the IT ecosystem, and the associated business models that will support Enterprise Web 2.0 applications.
  • Enterprise Web 2.0 is very much concerned with the user experience of corporate systems and applications, and on extracting business value from the social contributions and interactions of the organisation's various stakeholders.
  • The management of customer relationships continues to remain pivotal for most organisations, and so the social aspects of Web 2.0 are mirrored in the corporate world of Enterprise Web 2.0
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • Workforce mobility and changing communication patterns are two more trends that are driving change at the infrastructure layer, and so unified communication and collaboration requirements form an important part of Enterprise 2.0 strategy.
  • Enterprise Web 2.0 might be about putting the user (i.e. employee, customer, or stakeholder) first, but in order to do so it also requires supporting technology. And so at the IT infrastructure level, Enterprise 2.0 means Internet Protocol (IP) everywhere -- voice, video, and data. Enterprise 2.0 also means, 'open' standards rather than proprietary or 'closed' systems. Furthermore, Enterprise 2.0 technology means user-driven technology and not IT-driven technology.
  • Having accepted the fact that 'processes' means 'people', then we have to look for ways in which these people (i.e. processes) can self-organise and reference one another. Then, where possible, we need to somehow incapsulate the processes into a set of business services. One day (we might call it Web 3.0), Artificial Intelligence (AI) will enable organisations to do with computers that which they do via human beings today, but until that day arrives, organisations must do more to aid interdepartment and inter-company collaboration. Workflow has not yet figured largely in the consumer-oriented world of Web 2.0, but Butler Group sees this as pivotal when considering Enterprise Web 2.0.
  • Today applications that embody processes are built by IT professionals, but tomorrow they will be built by a new breed of power user, using mashup builders, software agents, and other Web 2.0 technologies.
  • Business and IT managers must therefore prepare themselves for the new generation of power user who will be creating mashups and situational applications that have a far broader impact than the typical spreadsheet macro of yesteryear, and that if organisations are to avoid a proliferation of unmanageable, siloed, micro-applications, then they must blend the power of personal productivity with an appropriate management layer and a degree of central oversight.
  • Web 2.0 is no longer PC-centric.
  • It is clearly a mistake to think that Web 2.0 is all about technology, and likewise Enterprise Web 2.0, but it is also a mistake to dismiss the technology altogether. Therefore, selecting and implementing enterprise social software solutions, next-generation collaboration solutions, and Rich Internet Applications requires careful thought, consideration, and planning.
  • The driving force behind just about every aspect of Enterprise Web 2.0, is of course, the user -- something that has not always ranked highly on the list of priorities for corporate IT mangers -- and so the challenge for all forward-looking organisations is to refocus on this aspect of their IT strategies.
  • Christophe Deschamps on 07 Oct 08
     
    Nouvelle étude de Research & Markets. Pas mal d'infos dans cette synthèse. User-centric
Christophe Deschamps

Linear is Not Always Best - 0 views

aboveandbeyondkm.com/...linear-is-not-always-best.html

ib km Social software gestion projet 2.0

shared by Christophe Deschamps on 28 May 09 - Cached
  • Users say they know what they want until they get it, and then they want something different.‘
  • I could talk with the users in their own language; go away and develop a module with real data; and create reports, monitoring screens and other processes based on a synthesis of my knowledge, the stated needs of the client and my knowledge of the technology.  The application would work in novel ways, users would find new ways of working, and modifications would be agreed upon.  Over the course of a year, a powerful application emerged that was very different from anything that either the user or I could have defined.
  • In many ways, this is a textbook description of how to implement social media tools within the enterprise.  Work iteratively with your users, create opportunities to learn from each other and from the tool using a series of “safe-fail” experiments, stay in beta for as long as it takes to reflect user reality in your tool, and don’t be afraid to step off the straight and narrow path of linear thinking.  To be clear, this is not a recommendation that you abandon all logic in your design and implementation.  Rather, it is a reminder that there can be great beauty and greater rewards in following a more circuitous route.
  • Christophe Deschamps on 28 May 09
     
    Implémenter les technologies sociales dans l'entreprise
Yan Thoinet

» Nine ideas for IT managers considering Enterprise 2.0 | Enterprise Web 2.0 ... - 1 views

blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe

non-shared

shared by Yan Thoinet on 12 Nov 07 - Cached
  • In addition to Web 2.0 itself however, we have two more important enterprise software trends: Office 2.0 and Enterprise 2.0, coined by Ismael Ghalimi and Andrew McAfee respectively.  Office 2.0 represents the increasing use of browser-based software in the office, while Enterprise 2.0 is more Web 2.0-ish in that it specifically describes the use of freeform, emergent, social software to conduct collaboration and share knowledge.
  • Specifically this means the fact that corporate information tends to be non-shared by default, that the easiest productivity tools to use are the ones that have very little collaboration built-in, and that the information that does exist is often impossible to find and is often structured in some formal, centrally controlled way.
    • Yan Thoinet
      Yan Thoinet on 12 Nov 07
       
      Very true.
  • Certainly, increased transparency, some loss of control over information flow, and outright abuse of low-barrier Intranet publishing tools gives enterprise IT and business leaders pause for thought.
  • ...16 more annotations...
  • And while some of it must remain under strict control, particularly in public companies, much of it is unnessarily — and usually to a fault — hidden, unreused, and unexploited.
    • Yan Thoinet
      Yan Thoinet on 12 Nov 07
       
      Unexploited sources. Action: Implement a Wiki so as to share and keep up to date this wealth of information e.g. manuals, meeting agenda, minutes of meeting. This would act as the memory of the enterprise
  • Explain the reasoning behind retaining more knowledge, in making it public, searchable, and organizing it via tagging.  Describe the benefits of being able to access much fresher and more up-to-date information elsewhere in the organization because their colleagues are managing more of their projects, tasks, and other work via social tools. 
  • Provide useful templates for common activities and reference material such as projects, tasks, resource management, policies, procedures, standards, and so on.  You still have to keep template layouts and template usage simple; excessive structure tends to kill the golden goose of contributions quickly.  But a little basic structure goes a long way and prevents contributors from having to figure out how to structure all the white space and provide a simple layer of consistency.
  • The enterprise has not caught up, largely because most enterprise information doesn't allow a hyperlink structure, and links aren't encouraged very much when it does
  • setting up blog and wiki directories as well as good enterprise search based on link ranking (which is what Google does to make the right information come up in the first few pages of search results.) 
  • Provide your own search engine in the tools only if you must.
  • , the real issue, day in and day out, with getting Enterprise 2.0 to take off is to educate, evangelize, demonstrate, and most importantly, evolve the interface and structure of your tools until you pick the right formula that resonates with your audience.
  • This boils down to having some form of moderation, either human or automated, to ensure that the level of discourse remains at some bare minimimum acceptable standard. 
  • A high-profile executive sponsor that obviously uses the tools can also help in a big way.
  • Triggering an Enterprise 2.0 ecosystem quickly is likely an early activity driver.  This can mean a lot of things but the link structure of Web tools allows information to quickly flow, circulate, and mesh together.  You can leverage this in a almost infinite number of ways to drive user activity, interesting content, create awareness of what the company is "thinking", and more.  For example, create a blog for every employee in the company and mail the link to them with instructions on how to use it. >  Create a social bookmarking site for the enterprise where everyone can see what is being bookmarked by everyone else that day. >  Create an internal Wikipedia that contains a seperate copy of all Intranet content and let users edit away. >  The possibilities are endless and provide a much greater number of "entry points" where people can get started with these tools.
  • The problems will be with the business culture, not the technology. 
  • For example, create a blog for every employee in the company and mail the link to them with instructions on how to use it. 
  • Create a social bookmarking site for the enterprise where everyone can see what is being bookmarked by everyone else that day.
  • Create an internal Wikipedia that contains a seperate copy of all Intranet content and let users edit away.
  • Allowing the output of SQL queries to be inserted into wikis when they load, calling Web services or using Flash badges that access data resources can turn Enterprise 2.0 tools from pure knowledge management into actual hybrids of software and data
  • And the reverse should be true as well, getting data back out into traditional tools including Office documents, PDFs, and XML must be easy to inspire trust and lower barriers to use.
Christophe Deschamps

Intellipedia suffers midlife crisis - 0 views

gcn.com/...Intellipedia.aspx

ib renseignement Social software entreprise 2.0 enterprise 2.0

shared by Christophe Deschamps on 19 Feb 09 - Cached
  • The problem? The growth of the collective intelligence site so far largely has been fueled by early adopters and enthusiasts, according to Rasmussen. About all those who would have joined and shared their knowledge on the social networking site have already done so. If the intelligence agencies want to get further gains from the site, they need to incorporate it into their own formal decision making process, he contended. Until that happens, the social networking aspect of Intellipedia is "just a marginal revolution," he said.
  • Established in 2005, Intellipedia, now managed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence,  has approximately 100,000 user accounts. Open to anyone with a government e-mail account, it has social bookmarking tool, a document repository, a home page for each user, and collaboration spaces.
  • For true change to occur, other agencies must use Intellipedia as their official conduit, at least for some functions, Rasmussen said. Otherwise, it is just creating additional work for contributors.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Another problem is that managers may not worry that their employees would not be comfortable contributing information to a social-networking tool. Rasmussen said he talked with one executive who said employees may not want to contribute personal items to their home page.
  • " 'Are you kidding?' " Rasmussen responded. "This is work. We force people to do stuff [they don't want to do] all the time — we make people come in sober and wear clothes. In certain cases top-down may not work, but in certain cases it does."
  • Contributors need to learn to accept "an agency-neutral non-ownership" stance to their articles, he said.
  • "If you bring too many locks into an overly cautious culture, that's all you get: locks," Rasmussen said. He also mentioned that mashups remain to be too difficult for non-programmers to create, and social networks continue to be held, presumably unfairly, by higher standards than other technologies.
  • Christophe Deschamps on 19 Feb 09
     
    Intelipedia, le réseau social des agences de renseignement US mis en place en 2005, connaît quelques difficultés. Intéressant retour d'expérience sur un projet 2.0 déjà ancien.
Miguel Membrado

ThoughtFarmer Blog » Best Enterprise 2.0 Launch Ever? Penn State's ThoughtFar... - 0 views

www.thoughtfarmer.com/...pennstate

enterprise2.0 goodpractices casestudy

shared by Miguel Membrado on 27 Feb 09 - Cached
  • Miguel Membrado on 27 Feb 09
     
    a case study of enterprise 2.0 implementation (1500 users)
Miguel Membrado

Understanding Zoho, the Quiet Company Taking on Google and Microsoft - CIO.com - Busine... - 0 views

www.cio.com/...Taking_on_Google_and_Microsoft

benchmark googleapps office2.0 zoho

shared by Miguel Membrado on 01 Aug 08 - Cached
  • Miguel Membrado on 01 Aug 08
     
    I don't fully agree with this analysis. I'm one of the first users of Zoho, and even if they were functionnally in advance, they had too much bugs to be used seriously for a real business. Google is working hard and they are on the path to be better than Zoho on a lot of modules, with the guarantee of quality of service. But I hope Zoho will have the energy and the financial background to compete with Google, because competition is the best driver for innovation.
Christophe Deschamps

Toward a Pattern Language for Enterprise 2.0 - 0 views

andrewmcafee.org/blog

ib entreprise 2.0 enterprise 2.0

shared by Christophe Deschamps on 14 Jun 09 - Cached
  • I’ve had for some time now the vague sense that the iPhone, Twitter, Gmail, Googling, Facebook, Wikipedia, Delicious, and other runaway successes are trying to tell us something about how we want to use technology in our lives and in our work, and if we enterprise technologists listen carefully we’ll hear what that something is.
  • I started jotting down some comparisons based on what I’ve seen, read, and experienced for myself, then realized that I was identifying patterns
  • I’m dividing my 2.0 vs. 1.0 comparisons into two groups. First is a set of patterns where 2.0 is just better than 1.0
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • Second is a set in which 2.0 is an alternative or addition to 1.0, not a replacement for it.
  • the primary goal of enterprise IT is not to delight users, but rather to increase the value of the company. But do these two outcomes have to be in conflict?
  • The biggest challenge will probably be to get corporate technologists (a group that includes IT departments, vendors, and consultants) to stop thinking like monopolists that can dictate tools to users with great confidence that, because of the lack of alternatives, they’ll get used.
  • I can think of four negative consequences of ignoring these patterns and continuing to act like a 1.0 enterprise technology monopolist.
  • enterprises will deploy technologies that are disliked and/or not used
  • employees will use ’stealth IT’ and any knowledge / information captured therein will not be retained by the enterprise
  • employees and customers will leave because of their frustration with poor enterprise technologies
  • the enterprise will be handicapped or crippled  –  less productive, innovative, collaborative, agile, ‘wise,’ foresightful, insightful, transparent, clear than it could be otherwise, or than its competitor is.
  • Christophe Deschamps on 14 Jun 09
     
    Excellent article d'Andrew McAfee sur ce que les technos 2.0 apportent de plus que les précédentes aux organisations.
mesbah095

Guest Post Online - 0 views

guestpostonline.com

entreprise 2.0 entreprise2.0 enterprise 2.0 web2.0 enterprise2.0 collaboration ib management computer KnowledgeManagement

shared by mesbah095 on 03 Apr 14 - No Cached
  • mesbah095 on 03 Apr 14
     
    Article Writing & Guestpost You Can Join this Site for Your Article & guest post, Just Easy way to join this site & total free Article site. This site article post to totally free Way. Guest Post & Article Post live to Life time only for Current & this time new User. http://guestpostonline.com
JM Delahais

Sharepoint and Enterprise 2.0: The good, the bad, and the ugly | Enterprise Web 2.0 | Z... - 0 views

blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe

sharepoint enterprise2.0

shared by JM Delahais on 21 Mar 09 - Cached
  • These concerns about SharePoint’s ability to be an effective Enterprise 2.0 platform is one I hear echoed a lot with practitioners I talk to. In spite of this, I correspondingly hear that SharePoint is in fact what most organizations are planning on using when it comes to 2.0-style collaboration and knowledge management. Why the apparent disconnect between the perceived suitability (which we’ll dissect in a moment) and actual use? Part of it is SharePoint’s stunning penetration in the software business. T
  • In other words, SharePoint is already in most organizations today:
  • In fact, this is a central lesson in Web 2.0 design, that complexity is the enemy of ease-of-use and adoption; most 2.0 products are almost brutally simple in their user experience.
Yan Thoinet

Wikipatterns - Wiki Patterns - 0 views

www.wikipatterns.com/...Wikipatterns

adoption wiki

shared by Yan Thoinet on 11 Nov 07 - Cached
  • Looking to spur wiki adoption? Want to grow from 10 users to 100, or 1000? Applying patterns that help coordinate people's efforts and guide the growth of content, and recognizing anti-patterns that might hinder growth - can give your wiki the greatest chance of success
  • Social Tagging
Yan Thoinet

SourceForge.net: Scuttle - 0 views

sourceforge.net/scuttle

bookmarking

shared by Yan Thoinet on 16 Feb 08 - Cached
  • Web-based social bookmarking system. Allows multiple users to store, share and tag their favourite links online.
  • Scuttle
Yan Thoinet

10 Semantic Apps to Watch - 0 views

www.readwriteweb.com/...10_semantic_apps_to_watch.php

definition semanticweb

shared by Yan Thoinet on 01 Dec 07 - Cached
  • A key element is that the apps below all try to determine the meaning of text and other data, and then create connections for users.
Yan Thoinet

Collaborative Thinking: Enterprises Not One Dimensional - Technology Not the Only Influ... - 0 views

mikeg.typepad.com/...enterprises-not.html

entreprise2.0

shared by Yan Thoinet on 03 Feb 08 - Cached
  • Business leaders often view social software through the lens of consumer market trends (e.g., user-generated content) and media coverage of popular Internet sites (i.e., Facebook).
  • Expressing technology value in a business context is fundamental for strategists to gain credibility as they explore new work models made possible through social systems.
  • IT strategists often view social software quite differently, considering such tools as part of the natural progression of existing collaboration and content platforms
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Transforming social structures within an organization to leverage community relationships across a network of customers, partners, suppliers, and employees has become a key competency demonstrated by high performing enterprises.
  • Enterprises Not One Dimensional - Technology Not the Only Influence on the Future Enterprise
Yan Thoinet

Christian Fauré » Blog Archive » Introduction à l'Entreprise 2.0 - 0 views

www.christian-faure.net/...introduction-a-lentreprise-20

shared by Yan Thoinet on 11 May 08 - Cached
  • les sites web proposent de stocker les données des internautes (le fameux User Generated Content),
    • Yan Thoinet
      Yan Thoinet on 11 May 08
       
      This is it!
  • c’est que le web 2.0 n’est que la partie visible de l’iceberg, la partie immergée étant le Software as a service.
  • Une seule instance du logiciel pour x clients. Ce qui signifie que l’environnement de production est mutualisé et virtualisé
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • Les développements sont incrémentaux, c’est le règne du Beta, de l’essai et de l’expérimentation permanents pour coller au plus prêts du marché et générer le plus d’innovation possible
  • le système d’information d’une entreprise va être de plus en plus déporté de ses locaux vers les plates-formes web en mode SaaS
  • muscler la qualité réseau de la connexion internet (qui est généralement médiocre dans les entreprises)
  • La Road Map (modifications et ajout de nouvelles fonctionnalités) d’une solution SaaS est quelque chose que l’entreprise ne va plus maîtriser.
  • La confidentialité des données est bien sûr un sujet de discussion majeur. Mais il est en grande partie psychologique de mon point de vue.
  • Autre point à aborder avant de passer au SaaS : le Off Line.
  • la législation européenne qui interdit à certaines entreprises de déléguer la gestion et le stockage des données à des tiers.
  • évaluer les modalités de sortie de la solution SaaS
  • Les solutions SaaS choisies devront être interopérables avec d’autres offres SaaS et bien évidemment continuer à être articulées avec les application patrimoniales (
Yan Thoinet

Parlons wiki : CeBIT 2008 et AUG Paris - padawan.info/fr - 0 views

padawan.info/...i_cebit_2008_et_aug_paris.html

evenements-web

shared by Yan Thoinet on 04 Mar 08 - Cached
  • Parlons wiki : CeBIT 2008 et AUG Paris Je serai la semaine prochaine au CeBIT pour deux conférences, et un focus particulier sur les wikis d’entreprise avec deux exemples de wikis que j’ai réalisés pour mes clients : Mardi au Enterprise 2.0 Summit, Cédric Blum de SFR Service Client va présenter le wiki pilote utilisé dans le contexte du service client Mercredi au Forum Content Management Arena@CeBIT, je présenterai le wiki que j’ai réalisé pour Publicis Consultants Ces deux wikis ont été réalisés avec Confluence d’Atlassian. Vous aurez une autre occasion d’entendre ces deux cas présentés en juin pendant l’Atlassian User Group Paris que je co-organise avec Publicis Consultants et Atlassian. Si vous êtes dans les parages, venez dire bonjour :-). Publié le 29 février 2008 dans Informatique
Yan Thoinet

PARC (Palo Alto Research Center, Inc.) - 0 views

www.parc.com/default.php

enterprise2.0 entreprise2.0

shared by Yan Thoinet on 03 Mar 08 - Cached
  • "PARC: Seeding Innovation" download brochure [pdf, 754 KB] PARC (Palo Alto Research Center, Inc.) works closely with varied enterprises and new ventures to discover breakthrough business and technology concepts that solve real needs, and transform how enterprises deliver value to customers. PARC takes an agile, multidisciplinary approach to open innovation – by bringing together physical, computer, biological, and social scientists who have the vision, expertise, and instinct to convert groundbreaking scientific findings into industrial-strength prototypes. Incorporated in 2002 as an independent research business, PARC is celebrated for such innovations as laser printing, distributed computing and Ethernet, the graphical user interface (GUI), object-oriented programming, and ubiquitous computing. PARC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Xerox Corporation. To inquire about working with PARC, please contact info@parc.com. [client services]
Christophe Deschamps

How companies are benefiting from web 2.0: McKinsey Global Survey Results - 0 views

www.mckinseyquarterly.com/article_print.aspx

ib entreprise 2.0 enterprise 2.0 Etudes

shared by Christophe Deschamps on 03 Sep 09 - Cached
  • 69 percent of respondents report that their companies have gained measurable business benefits, including more innovative products and services, more effective marketing, better access to knowledge, lower cost of doing business, and higher revenues. Companies that made greater use of the technologies, the results show, report even greater benefits.
  • We found that successful companies not only tightly integrate Web 2.0 technologies with the work flows of their employees but also create a “networked company,” linking themselves with customers and suppliers through the use of Web 2.0 tools. Despite the current recession, respondents overwhelmingly say that they will continue to invest in Web 2.0.
  • When we asked respondents about the business benefits their companies have gained as a result of using Web 2.0 technologies, they most often report greater ability to share ideas; improved access to knowledge experts; and reduced costs of communications, travel, and operations. Many respondents also say Web 2.0 tools have decreased the time to market for products and have had the effect of improving employee satisfaction.
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • Respondents also say they have been able to burnish their innovation skills, perhaps because their companies and customers jointly shape and cocreate products using Web 2.0 connections.
  • The median level of gains derived from internal Web 2.0 use ranged from a 10 percent improvement in operational costs to a 30 percent increase in the speed at which employees are able to tap outside experts.
  • Web 2.0 delivers benefits by multiplying the opportunities for collaboration and by allowing knowledge to spread more effectively. These benefits can accrue through companies’ use of automatic information feeds such as RSS2 or microblogs, of which Twitter is the most popular manifestation. Although many companies use a mix of tools, the survey shows that among all respondents deriving benefits, the more heavily used technologies are blogs, wikis, and podcasts—the same tools that are popular among consumers
  • Similarly, among those capturing benefits in their dealings with suppliers and partners, the tools of choice again are blogs, social networks, and video sharing. While respondents tell us that tapping expert knowledge from outside is their top priority, few report deploying prediction markets to harvest collective insights from these external networks.
  • Comparing respondents’ industries, those at high-technology companies are most likely to report measurable benefits from Web 2.0 across the board, followed by those at companies offering business, legal, and professional services
  • These survey results indicate that a different type of company may be emerging—one that makes intensive use of interactive technologies. This networked organization is characterized both by the internal integration of Web tools among employees, as well as use of the technologies to strengthen company ties with external stakeholders—customers and business partners.
  • As such, companies reporting business benefits also report high levels of Web 2.0 integration into employee workflows. They most often deploy three or more Web tools, and usage is high throughout these organizations
  • Respondents reporting measurable benefits say their companies, on average, have Web 2.0 interactions with 35 percent of their customers. These companies forged similar Web ties to 48 percent of their suppliers, partners, and outside experts. An organizational structure that’s more porous and networked may make companies more resilient and adaptive, sharpening their ability to access knowledge and thus innovate more effectively.
  • The survey results confirm that successful adoption requires that the use of these tools be integrated into the flow of users’ work (Exhibit 5). Furthermore, encouraging continuing use requires approaches other than the traditional financial or performance incentives deployed as motivational tools.
  • They also say role modeling—active Web use by executives—has been important for encouraging adoption internally.
    • Christophe Deschamps
      Christophe Deschamps on 03 Sep 09
       
      Cf le président de Cisco
  • Christophe Deschamps on 03 Sep 09
     
    L'entreprise 2.0 n'est pas qu'un concept et cette étude menée sur 1700 dirigeants le prouve.
1 - 20 of 23 Next ›
Showing 20▼ items per page