scholars are watching Carpenter’s case closely because it may require the supreme court to address the scope and continuing relevance of the “third-party-records doctrine”, a judicially developed rule that has sometimes been understood to mean that a person surrenders her constitutional privacy interest in information that she turns over to a third party. The government contends that Carpenter lacks a constitutionally protected privacy interest in his location data because his cellphone was continually sharing that data with his cellphone provider.
Twitter - 1 views
Pressing Issues: When First U.S. Reporter Reached Nagasaki--and His Reports Suppressed - 1 views
« First
‹ Previous
201 - 220
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page