To justify their campaign, ed reformers repeat, mantra-like, that U.S. students are trailing far behind their peers in other nations, that U.S. public schools are failing. The claims are specious. Two of the three major international tests—the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study and the Trends in International Math and Science Study—break down student scores according to the poverty rate in each school. The tests are given every five years. The most recent results (2006) showed the following: students in U.S. schools where the poverty rate was less than 10 percent ranked first in reading, first in science, and third in math. When the poverty rate was 10 percent to 25 percent, U.S. students still ranked first in reading and science. But as the poverty rate rose still higher, students ranked lower and lower. Twenty percent of all U.S. schools have poverty rates over 75 percent. The average ranking of American students reflects this. The problem is not public schools; it is poverty. And as dozens of studies have shown, the gap in cognitive, physical, and social development between children in poverty and middle-class children is set by age three.
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url
3More
No, algebra isn't necessary - and yes, STEM is overrated - The Answer Sheet - The Washi... - 69 views
1More
Testing education: Pisa envy | The Economist - 22 views
1More
Learning Never Stops: Futility Closet - An Entertaining Collection of Curiosities - 6 views
Free Technology for Teachers: Smart Tutor - K-5 Math and Reading Activities - 78 views
‹ Previous
21 - 40 of 107
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page