Today, Shavelson, Klein & Benjamin published an online article on Inside Higher Ed entitled, "The Limitations of Portfolios." The comments to that article are even more illuminating, and highlight the debate about electronic portfolios vs. accountability systems... assessment vs. evaluation. These arguments highlight what I think is a clash in philosophies of learning and assessment, between traditional, behaviorist models and more progressive, cognitive/constructivist models.
How do we build assessment strategies that bridge these two approaches? Or is the divide too wide?
Do these different perspectives support the need for multiple measures and triangulation?
1More
Pontydysgu - Bridge to Learning » Blog Archive » Learning in practice - a soc... - 0 views
2More
E-Portfolios for Learning: Limitations of Portfolios - 1 views
1More
Documenting and decoding the undergrad experience | University Affairs - 3 views
1More
Learning from The Wisdom of Crowds | Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching - 1 views
2More
Matthews et al: Selecting influential members of social networks - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
81 - 100 of 223
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page