Group items tagged

Part 2 -- the lesson *Day 1 -- close read, discussion, -- differentiated , and 1 side presentation back to group to sum up discussion *Day 2 -- Socratic Seminar & Blogging Lesson Objective: Identify the main idea and make arguments about a text Length 12 min Questions to Consider: Notice the distinct parts to this lesson. How does Mr. Hanify scaffold and differentiate this lesson? How does the fishbowl strategy promote rich discussions? Why does Mr. Hanify choose to have students write a blog? Common Core Standards ELA.RI.9-10.2, ELA.W.9-10.6, ELA.SL.9-10.1a Close read with annotation = "Thinking Notes" Differentiation during close read and their small group tasks based on their strengths Socratic Seminar Blogging to write to authentic audience

close reading sample lessons -- it has literature and nonfiction -- some is for science, some for Social Studies, some for Eng class... so scroll through the list for your grade level and content area Note: I haven't gone through all of them and I don't know if they have all the steps, but it's a start to work with

"In Close Read Complex Text, and Annotate with Tech--Part 1, the focus was how to do a close reading. In Part 2, the focus is how to annotate with iPads, and insights gained from a lesson done with students in first through third grades."

"Common Core Close Reading Sample Lessons These exemplars contain full materials for two to five lessons each, including: Readings with teacher and student instructions Text dependent questions Student discussion activities Vocabulary and syntax tasks for challenging words and phrases Writing-based formative assesments Fiction and non-fiction lessons, searchable by grade levels. "

The Common Core strands of Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening are captured in the standards for learning  languages' goal area of Communication, by emphasizing the purpose behind the communication:  Interpersonal (speaking + listening or writing + reading)  Interpretive (reading, listening, viewing)  Presentational (writing, speaking, visually representing) ------------------------- The Common Core strand of Language is described for language learners through proficiency levels that outline three key  benchmarks achieved in world language programs given sufficient instruction over time:  Novice (the beginning level, regardless of age or grade)     Intermediate  Advanced

Great STEM reading passages with CCSS questions -- Click on link to see passage and click on links for Teacher's Guide K-8th grade passages (Scroll down for middle school science) - Reading passages for students (STEM) -- with Teacher Guide (click on links to see) for Common Core

An interesting article from The Reading Teacher

This is based on the PD we did on Tuesday morning with AJHS.

So often we forget the "Write" at the end! Writing MUST be part of the reading process. It's not a separate subject or time of day.

Big Idea # 1 - The Common Core Standards have new emphases and require a careful reading. Big Idea # 2 - Standards are not curriculum. Big Idea # 3 - Standards need to be "unpacked." When working with the Common Core, we recommend that educators "unpack" them into four broad categories - 1) Long term Transfer Goals, 2) Overarching Understandings, 3)  Overarching Essential Questions, and 4) a set of recurring Cornerstone Tasks. Big Idea # 4 - A coherent curriculum is mapped backwards from desired performances. Big Idea #5 - The Standards come to life through the assessments.

I love this document. Great way of simplifying and showing what the shifts are.

reading lessons aligned with common core

"Dear Arizona Educator,   In an effort to foster the successful transition to Arizona's Common Core Standards and the PARCC assessment, the Arizona Department of Education is providing the following information regarding the Spring 2013 and 2014 AIMS assessments and the changes that are necessary to effectively transition to the PARCC assessment.   Changes to the Spring 2013 and 2014 AIMS Assessments Although the AIMS assessment will remain the same concerning the blueprints and format, the passages and items will have several changes as outlined below.  The focus of the AIMS test will be to move closer to the expectations of the PARCC assessment. --------------------- Passages In order to prepare for the expected rigor of the PARCC passages, the AIMS passages will contain an increase in text complexity as well as higher Lexile levels.  The language used will have sophisticated text, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Items Many of the AIMS items are written at the Concept level, allowing for multiple Performance Objectives within a Concept to be addressed in a single item.  The item's complexity will be raised through selecting items at the Depth of Knowledge (DOK) levels of 2 and 3. Please note the attachment - Webb's Depth of Knowledge Levels (Table 1) and Hess' Cognitive Rigor Matrix (Table 2). To further support the transition from the AIMS assessment to the PARCC assessment, the test items have been aligned to the 2003 (Reading), 2004 (Writing), and 2008 (Mathematics) Standards as well as to Arizona's Common Core Standards for Mathematics and Language Arts. -----------------------   Transitioning to Arizona's Common Core Standards and the PARCC Assessment Since Arizona's Common Core Standards are the building blocks of the PARCC assessment, the following documents are provided to help make the transition a little smoother from the old standards/AIMS assessment to the new Common Core Standards/PARCC assessment.  The English Languag

A webinar on Implementing ELA in Classroom Reading Instruction Some good ideas!