Skip to main content

Home/ @Publish/ Group items tagged Metrics

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Pedro Gonçalves

The Dilemma of Social Media Reach « Radian6 - Social media monitoring tools, ... - 0 views

  • Altimeter Group recently studied the internal goals in corporate social strategy. The top priority stated by 48% of companies was “Creating ROI Measurements”. Hypatia Research showed management’s expectations of the return on social communities are rather low. Research by Chief Marketer shows that the number of likes, friends & followers are the most used metrics by 60% of U.S. B2C and B2B marketers.
  • There exists great controversy about the use of ‘reach’ metrics.
  • Popular measures are the 3F’s (friends, fans & followers).
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • Many consider these to be vanity metrics: measures which are easy to understand but on their own explain little about the actionable effect.  They are easily manipulated, and do not necessarily correlate to the numbers that really matter. More actionable metrics are argued to be active users, engagement, the cost of getting new customers, and ultimately revenues and profits
  • Talking about Twitter specifically, Adi Avnit de-emphasizes the importance of followers due to the fact some users follow back others simply because of etiquette. His ‘million follower fallacy’ entails that this etiquette is leveraged by some users to elevate their follower count. The theory is not without evidence. Cha et al. (2010) measured user influence in Twitter and found that retweets and mentions showed great overlap, while followers gained… not so much. However, Kwak et al. (2010) in contrast found followers and page rank to be similar, while ranking by retweets differed.
  • investigated to what extent consumers engaged on brand tweets based on 4 dimensions:  amplification (retweets), reach (followers), conversations (mentions) and attitude (sentiment).
  • I noticed strong correlations between all of the metrics. This means that reach, amplification, conversations and sentiment appear to measure the same kind of digital influence.
  • following a great amount of people primarily affects a brand’s follower count. It doesn’t correlate with the other, more actionable, metrics. In fact, those brands perform worse on the other measures. Ergo, brands that over-focus on increasing their follower count, perform worse based on the other metrics
  • All interactions, whether it be likes, shares or wallposts, increase the EdgeRank which in turn exposes more fans to your content.
  • As the number of fans grew, so did the number of engaged fans (the interactions per mille stayed about the same). These two elements act as a positive spiral constantly growing the other.
  • I pose that the amount of fans, followers or friends is a relevant metric, considering it as the potential interaction userbase. Taking in consideration that your goal is to increase the number of engaged users.
  • Reach, amplification, conversations and sentiment appear to measure the same kind of digital influence. Brands that over-focus on increasing their follower count, perform worse based on the other metrics. Increase your user base – as your fans grow, so will the number of engaged fans
Pedro Gonçalves

How Website Speed Actually Impacts Search Ranking - Moz - 0 views

  • in 2010, Google did something very different. Google announced website speed would begin having an impact on search ranking. Now, the speed at which someone could view the content from a search result would be a factor.
  • Google's Matt Cutts announced that slow-performing mobile sites would soon be penalized in search rankings as well.
  • While Google has been intentionally unclear in which particular aspect of page speed impacts search ranking, they have been quite clear in stating that content relevancy remains king.
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • When people say"page load time" for a website, they usually mean one of two measurements: "document complete" time or "fully rendered" time. Think of document complete time as the time it takes a page to load before you can start clicking or entering data. All the content might not be there yet, but you can interact with the page. Think of fully rendered time as the time it takes to download and display all images, advertisements, and analytic trackers. This is all the "background stuff" you see fill in as you're scrolling through a page.
  • Since Google was not clear on what page load time means, we examined both the effects of both document complete and fully rendered on search rankings. However our biggest surprise came from the lack of correlation of two key metrics! We expected, if anything, these 2 metrics would clearly have an impact on search ranking. However, our data shows no clear correlation between document complete or fully rendered times with search engine rank, as you can see in the graph below:
  • With no correlation between search ranking and what is traditionally thought of a "page load time" we expanded our search to the Time to First Byte (TTFB). This metric captures how long it takes your browser to receive the first byte of a response from a web server when you request a particular URL. In other words, this metric encompasses the network latency of sending your request to the web server, the amount of time the web server spent processing and generating a response, and amount of time it took to send the first byte of that response back from the server to your browser.
  • The TTFB result was surprising in a clear correlation was identified between decreasing search rank and increasing time to first byte. Sites that have a lower TTFB respond faster and have higher search result rankings than slower sites with a higher TTFB. Of all the data we captured, the TTFB metric had the strongest correlation effect, implying a high likelihood of some level of influence on search ranking.
  • The surprising result here was with the the median size of each web page, in bytes, relative to the search ranking position. By "page size," we mean all of the bytes that were downloaded to fully render the page, including all the images, ads, third party widgets, and fonts. When we graphed the median page size for each search rank position, we found a counterintuitive correlation of decreasing page size to decreasing page rank, with an anomalous dip in the top 3 ranks.
  • Our data shows there is no correlation between "page load time" (either document complete or fully rendered) and ranking on Google's search results page. This is true not only for generic searches (one or two keywords) but also for "long tail" searches (4 or 5 keywords) as well. We did not see websites with faster page load times ranking higher than websites with slower page load times in any consistent fashion. If Page Load Time is a factor in search engine rankings, it is being lost in the noise of other factors. We had hoped to see some correlation especially for generic one- or two-word queries. Our belief was that the high competition for generic searches would make smaller factors like page speed stand out more.
  • our data shows there is a correlation between lower time-to-first-byte (TTFB) metrics and higher search engine rankings. Websites with servers and back-end infrastructure that could quickly deliver web content had a higher search ranking than those that were slower. This means that, despite conventional wisdom, it is back-end website performance and not front-end website performance that directly impacts a website's search engine ranking.
  • We suspect over time, though, that page rendering time will also factor into rankings due to the high indication of the importance of user experience.
  • TTFB is affected by 3 factors: The network latency between a visitor and the server. How heavily loaded the web server is. How quickly the website's back end can generate the content.
  • Websites can lower network latency by utilizing Content Distribution Networks (CDNs). CDNs can quickly deliver content to all visitors, often regardless of geographic location, in a greatly accelerated manner.
  • Do these websites rank highly because they have better back-end infrastructure than other sites? Or do they need better back-end infrastructure to handle the load of ALREADY being ranked higher? While both are possible, our conclusion is that sites with faster back ends receive a higher rank, and not the other way around.
  • The back-end performance of a website directly impacts search engine ranking. The back end includes the web servers, their network connections, the use of CDNs, and the back-end application and database servers. Website owners should explore ways to improve their TTFB. This includes using CDNs, optimizing your application code, optimizing database queries, and ensuring you have fast and responsive web servers.
  • Fast websites have more visitors, who visit more pages, for longer period of times, who come back more often, and are more likely to purchase products or click ads. In short, faster websites make users happy, and happy users promote your website through linking and sharing. All of these things contribute to improving search engine rankings.
Pedro Gonçalves

Former Twitter CEO Says Network Needs a Better Metric Than Follower Count - 0 views

  • Williams was asked whether he thinks Twitter should highlight the number of active followers users have rather than just the total follower count.  “I would endorse that,” said Williams, who remains on the network’s board of directors. “I think that’s a great idea.” But he went on to note that even active followers wouldn’t be the ideal metric to represent one’s distribution power on the social network. Instead, he suggested that tallying the number of times a tweet has been viewed and reweeted would be the ultimate measurement — not unlike what services like Klout and Crowdbooster offer.
  • “The dream metric is really how many people see your tweet, which is not even active followers,” he said. “It’s some different metric.”
Pedro Gonçalves

KPI: What Is a Key Performance Indicator? - 0 views

  • In online advertising, some KPIs include click-through rates, brand awareness and engagement
  • the typical online marketing campaign these days usually has about five KPIs
  • Until recently, the default metric was the click-through rate (CTR), which gave a clear indication of an ad's engagement. The staggering success of search advertising in the 2000s led to the rise of the CTR
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • With the rise of social media, companies like Facebook have charged that the CTR is a meaningless metric for branding campaigns. Opponents of CTR as a default metric argue that you can see an ad, not click on it and still be influenced by it. After all, that's the way most advertising has worked until now. You don't interact with a billboard, but it might introduce you to a new brand or product which you eventually might try.
  • KPIs vary depending on what stage of the purchase funnel your target customer is at. In the beginning, you may just want to raise awareness, in which case you'd rely on surveys to gauge success. Further along, you might be looking for interaction. Did the customer watch your video? Did she interact with your ad in some way?
Pedro Gonçalves

Facebook rolls out Page Insights with simpler metrics, better publishing tools, and eng... - 0 views

  • Tools to publish better content: All the metrics for positive interactions (likes, comments, shares and clicks) and negative interactions (hide post, hide all posts, report as spam, unlike page) have been aggregated into a post-specific score card. Facebook says this lets marketers evaluate positive and negative metrics side-by-side for each post. Insights about people interacting with your page: Page Insights now allows administrators see not only who they’ve reached but also who they have engaged. This should be useful for figuring out how content resonates with different audiences.
Pedro Gonçalves

Cost Per Like: A Subjective Valuation of Your Facebook Fans - 0 views

  • Earlier this month, Facebook unveiled a new metric for evaluating advertising campaigns on Facebook, called "cost per action" (CPA). Now, advertisers can pay not just for impressions or click-throughs, but for specific actions they want consumers to perform once they've seen an ad — including becoming a fan of a Page. For example, an advertiser could specify it is willing to pay $2.00 for a "Like" — that is, for a new fan on its company or product Page — and only pay when the Page gets a new fan. Other actions include Offer claims and clicks on links to third-party sites.
  • a fan is worth an average of $174 to a company. But as the chart below shows, the value of a fan can differ widely across companies:
  • "Marketers should define the value of a fan based on how it impacts the key criteria that determines the success or failure of their business," says Kalehoff. Specifically, marketers should measure the spending habits of fans versus non-fans, to see if fans are more likely to make a purchase, make purchases at great amounts and/or purchase repeatedly. Advocacy — the probability of a customer recommending a product to others, and the probability of that recommendation to affect sales — is another key metric. Another area that is more difficult to measure is brand affinity — that is, the emotional draw that a customer feels towards a brand because of the relationship that develops between brands and fans over Facebook. If positive brand affinity tends to be a powerful sales indicator on other channels, it may be worth cultivating on Facebook, too.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Once a company has determined how much a certain target prospect worth, it needs to decide the amount of money it wants to spend to acquire and continue to communicate with that fan. "[Marketers] really need to bring it down to a cost equation," says Kalehoff. "No one else can say what a fan is worth except the brand itself, and then it has to decide what to spend to acquire fans, and what it costs to communicate with them once a day or week to remind them to buy throughout the year."
  • A luxury fashion brand's fanbase, for instance, might be made up a small percentage of actual buyers and a greater number of aspirational consumers who will never purchase any goods from the company. Likewise, a T-shirt company may have some fans that will only ever purchase one T-shirt, while other fans may purchase repeatedly over months and years. Thus, it's important to target the consumers most likely to purchase, and to measure the behavior of fan groups over a long time period of time to get a better picture of their lifetime value.
  • acquiring a fan is just one part of the cost equation. Once a fan has been acquired, companies need to calculate the costs of developing compelling content to keep that fan coming back. Once these costs have been measured, it's then important for a company to see if fan acquisition is the most efficient way to achieve its goal, versus, say, paying for click-throughs to third-party sites. "You might see 1% of your homepage click-throughs end up converting, while 20% of people who watch a tutorial on your Facebook page end up converting,"
  • Don't acquire for the sake of acquiring — use metrics to support your Facebook strategy.
Pedro Gonçalves

On Mobile, Google Demotes The Click | Fast Company - 0 views

  • You click. You buy. An advertiser pays. In an over-simplified sense, that’s how desktop digital advertising works. That system doesn’t work as well on mobile, however, where an estimated 40% of clicks are accidents (or fraudulent) and advertisers are still wary of their value. Research firm eMarketer projects that advertisers will dedicate just 2% of their budgets to mobile advertising this year--even though customers are increasingly logging in through their mobile devices.
  • At Google and other companies that sell advertising, the golden question has become not how to get consumers to simply click more mobile ads, but how to measure effectiveness beyond the click--even if that means tracking offline actions or purchases made on another screen.
  • “There’s this incredibly new, incremental engagement point called ‘out and about’ or called ‘sitting on public transportation’ or called ‘at home on the couch in front of the TV' and these are places where we didn’t used to be connected,” Jason Spero, Google's head of mobile ads for the Americas, tells Fast Company.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • In these new mobile settings, maybe success for an ad doesn’t mean lots of clicks or even lots of online purchases. Maybe it means phone calls, or foot traffic to stores. Maybe it means someone searches for something now and later follows up on a desktop computer. Google has been exploring ways to measure all of these possibilities.
  • aims to turn foot traffic into a measurable outcome of mobile ads, something that it has already done with phone calls. With a click-to-call ad offering, users can click a phone number within their search results to call an advertiser who has sponsored the term.
  • A Google spokesperson says that on average, campaigns see on average a 6% to 8% increase in average click-through rate when brands include a click-to-call phone number in an ad.
  • About 30% of restaurant searches and 25% of movie searches take place on mobile devices. About 25% of YouTube traffic is mobile. But according to earnings reports the company filed with the SEC, its cost-per-click fees and profit margins are smaller for mobile advertising products than for similar advertising on its websites.
  • He argues that it makes more sense to measure effectiveness of mobile advertising by metrics such as reach, frequency, and recall--like TV--than by the same click-through metric on which desktop digital advertising relies.
  • Facebook's Head of Measurement and Insights, Brad Smallwood, recently made a similar argument for all digital advertising, desktop included. He wrote in a blog post that when brands focus on reach rather than clicks on Facebook, they have 70% higher return on investment from their campaigns. T
Pedro Gonçalves

Will Twitter Replace Your Follower Count? - 0 views

  • The sheer weight of fake and inactive followers is not great for the company’s image. Even the @Twitter account itself has 33% fake followers, according to one count.
  • The latest active user count, back in March: 140 million. An unofficial count of total Twitter users, including the fakes: half a billion.
  • Lady Gaga and Barack Obama, two of Twitter’s most-followed users, would both see their counts drop by 70%. Mitt Romney wouldn’t fare much better, with a 50% drop. If Twitter did this before the election, it would be headline news across the planet, and the company would be accused of stepping into the race.
Pedro Gonçalves

Facebook Real-time Marketing: 50% Post Reach Happens in 30min | Social Media Statistics... - 0 views

  • Almost 50 percent of engagement – happens in the first 30 minutes of posting, with 80 percent of engagement within the first 180 minutes.
Pedro Gonçalves

There's Not Much Tumblr Advertising for Yahoo to Screw Up - 0 views

  • the company's ad units are so new. But Tumblr faces other obstacles as well including an ambivalence towards advertising, a lack of metrics and a platform that lets you do lots of marketing outreach for free.
  • Tumblr's huge reach — the platform claims 18 billion pageviews a month — the ads only brought in $13 million or possibly even less last year.
Pedro Gonçalves

Twitter Vines Get Shared 4x More Than Online Video | Adweek - 0 views

  • Unruly Media's research reveals that branded Vines (see Doritos example below) are shared four times as often as branded Internet videos. What's more, Unruly found that five Vines are shared every second on Twitter—so the non-advertising world apparently digs the six-second videos, too.
  • 4 percent of the top 100 shared Vines were made by brands. Comparatively, according to the New York-based firm, only 1 percent of Top 100 viral online videos were the work of brands.
  • Vines are tweeted more during the weekend than all of the weekdays combined. Also, between 10 a.m. and 11 a.m ET is when Vine activity peaks.
Pedro Gonçalves

Report: Google+ Visitors Spent an Average of About 7 Minutes on the Site in March - 0 views

  • Google+ is catching up on a lot of fronts to Facebook, but it's still lagging in one key metric: Time spent.
  • The average visitor to the social network spent 6 minutes 47 seconds on Google+'s site in March vs. 6 hours, 44 minutes on Facebook.com according to figures Nielsen supplied to Mashable. However, that number is down for Facebook. In March 2012, the average was 7 hours, 9 minutes per person. For Google, the figures are a substantial jump over the 3.3 minutes visitors spent on average on the site in February 2012, according to comScore. The figures do not include traffic via apps.
  • Nielsen reports that 20 million unique visitors in the U.S. used Google+'s Android and iPhone apps, a 238% rise over March 2012. On desktop, G+'s monthly uniques jumped 63% vs. the year before to 28 million.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • The figures compare to 142.1 million uniques for Facebook's desktop site during the same time and 99 million uniques who visited Facebook via their mobile devices. Twitter had 34 million unique visitors on desktop and 29 million uniques visiting from their official mobile app.
Pedro Gonçalves

Facebook Exchange Retargeting In the News Feed | Optim.al - 0 views

  • Facebook recently announced that it will be extending Facebook Exchange (FBX) Retargeting into the News Feed, bringing the placement of these targeted ads beyond the network’s right-hand panel
  • Known as one of the strongest forms of targeting available in digital media, FBX helps marketers reach users on Facebook who have demonstrated interest through browsing behavior. By targeting users in a timely and contextually relevant manner, FBX can effectively drive sales, improve customer engagement, and promote brand awareness.
  • Ads in the News Feed have historically resulted in some of the strongest metrics compared with other locations.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Ads in the News Feed are Page Post Link Ads.  To develop them, keep in mind the following specifications: 500 characters of allotted text, anything beyond that will be truncated Attached links contain an image, title, and the domain in the body text Depending on the length of the body text, 2 to 3 lines can be filled within the ad Images should be 90 x 90 pixels
  • News Feed CTR’s can be up to 10x higher than standard Facebook ads.
Pedro Gonçalves

Branded Content Is A Winning Part Of The New Marketing In Europe | Forrester Blogs - 0 views

  • Connect to consumers in context. Having great content is not enough. Consider the context in which it will be consumed. Are your consumers looking for quick-hit information on their smartphones, snackable content on Facebook, or in-depth information on your website?  Create visible value. What topics can you credibly provide value on, through information, education, or entertainment? Don't just create it; make it clear where the value is provided. Continuously measure and optimize results. Go beyond tracking data to measuring impact. Tie results like brand lift, content shares, and unaided recognition of the content to metrics that run the business like leads or sales.
Pedro Gonçalves

Cutting Through the Crowds on Facebook News Feeds | Social Media Statistics & Metrics |... - 0 views

  • In 2009, a Facebook account holder Liked, on average, 4.5 Pages. In just four years, this number increased to an average of 40 Pages! Not only that, but brands have been expanding their use of social media in their marketing campaigns, raising the number of Facebook posts that they make from an average of five times per month to 36. This means that in 2009, Facebook users only had to keep up with a manageable 23 updates per month, whereas they are currently bombarded with around 1 440 updates per month!
  • Some countries Like even more Pages than the 40 Page average, making them even harder to penetrate. The US takes the lead, Liking a whopping 70 Pages! The UK and France are tied, with their Facebook users Liking 48 Pages, on average. Mexican Facebook users follow closely, Liking an average of 41 Pages.
  • Our figures show that FMCG brands in the US may find it especially difficult to reach their fans, as this industry has the most Liked Pages.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • more posts don’t always mean higher engagement. Fans may get overwhelmed if your posts are cluttering their News Feeds and it may ultimately result in them Unliking your Page.
  • You must also determine which content is most engaging for your business, and create posts geared toward this. Photos are generally the most engaging type of Facebook post and will be all the more important once the new Facebook News Feed is launched, as as your photos will be more conspicuous. Creating content that your fans can engage with (Share, Comment, and Like) and that will, in turn, increase the reach of the post. The more engaging posts will appear more prominently in the News Feeds of the friends of your fans, allowing you to grow your fan base, and spread your message to more Facebook users.
  • The huge increase in brands’ posts over the years makes it all the more difficult to engage your fans. With the congestion users receive in their New Feeds, brands must pay attention to the content they are posting, the frequency, and the times of day.
Pedro Gonçalves

Is Your Business Benchmarking its Engagement Rate? | Social Media Statistics & Metrics ... - 0 views

  • he more fans you have, the more challenging it gets to engage and reach more Facebook users. It´s only natural that engaging a larger fan base is more difficult, as it sets higher demands on the quality of the content – you need more people to Like, Comment on, and Share your posts in order to be successful.
  • Car brands have once again proven that they know how to engage their community on Facebook. As you can see in the table below, they dominate the ranking with a 0.86% average Page Engagement Rate, followed by alcohol, and airline brands
  • Photos are the most engaging post type shared by page admins
Pedro Gonçalves

Tweeting too Much? Find Out the Ideal Tweet Frequency for Brands | Social Media Statist... - 0 views

  • Some brands tend to overwhelm Twitter followers and post around 20 tweets a day, while others post only occasionally. To keep your audience engaged, you should avoid both extremes and stay somewhere in the middle.
  • We found out that their average Engagement Rate had a tendency to decline after the 3rd tweet they posted during one day. And as you can see from looking at the blue curve, the number of their total interactions (for all the tweets collectively) has grown only slightly after three tweets.
  • Total Engagement Rate= ((total number of replies + retweets + favorites)/ the number of followers on the given day) x 100 Average Engagement Rate= ((total number of replies + retweets + favorites/ number of tweets posted that day)/ number of followers on the given day) x 100
Pedro Gonçalves

Know Your Place! Where to Put Ads on Facebook | Social Media Statistics & Metrics | Soc... - 0 views

  • Currently, there are six different ad placements available to advertisers: Homepage All Facebook News Feed (desktop, mobile) Typeahead Logout Page (available only through Facebook IO)
  • Selecting “Homepage” as a placement will display your ads on the News Feed on desktop, right-hand side on homepage, and on News Feed for mobile.
  • Ads under the “All Facebook” place option may be shown on the right-hand side of Facebook, the desktop News Feed, or the Mobile News Feed. Facebook will decide exactly where to display your ad in order to drive the most clicks and actions, according to your budget.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • By selecting “News Feed” as a placement option, your ads will be displayed on both desktop and mobile.
  • Typeahead This is one of the most used features on Facebook. It gives advertisers the ability to target searches.
Pedro Gonçalves

The Folly of Stretch Goals - Daniel Markovitz - Harvard Business Review - 0 views

  • In his classic article, "Small Wins," psychologist Karl Weick argued that people often become overwhelmed and discouraged when faced with massive and complex problems. He advocated recasting larger problems into smaller, tractable challenges that produce visible results, and maintained that the strategy of "small wins" can often generate more action and more complete solutions to major problems because it enables people to make slow, steady progress.
  • Ever wonder why people will so often write down an item they've already completed on their to-do list? It's so that they can have the satisfaction of immediately crossing it off and experiencing the sense of progress.
  • Stretch goals have a dangerous tendency to foster unethical behavior. In the early 1990s, Sears gave a sales quota of $147 per hour to its auto repair staff. Faced with this target, the staff overcharged for work and performed unnecessary repairs. Sears' Chairman at the time, Ed Brennan, acknowledged that the stretch goal gave employees a powerful incentive to deceive customers.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Focusing on small wins in combination with process improvement will drive your organization forward without the negative consequences of stretch goals. However, this approach requires a willingness to abandon the "ready, fire, aim" approach to problem solving. The heavy lifting has to be done at the outset — a deep understanding of the current condition is a prerequisite for true improvement. This approach also requires a subtle — but critical — shift in focus from improving outcome metrics to improving the process by which those outcomes are achieved.
1 - 20 of 30 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page