Skip to main content

Home/ Web2.0/ Group items tagged peer-reviewed

Rss Feed Group items tagged

mariofiedler21

Buy Glassdoor Reviews - 100% Non-Drop,Safe, Permanent, Cheap ... - 0 views

  •  
    Buy Glassdoor Reviews Introduction Glassdoor is a website that allows you to review different companies and jobs. It's an easy way to find out what other people think about your favorite employers or job opportunities. Glassdoor reviews are important because they can help you make an educated decision about whether or not to work for a particular company or hire someone for a specific position. What is Glassdoor? Glassdoor is a company that allows employees to review their employers anonymously. The purpose of Glassdoor is to give you the information you need to make your best possible decision about where you want to work, so that you can find the job that will fit into your life and career goals. Buy Glassdoor Reviews We're sure there are a lot of people out there who want an honest review about their current or previous employer-and we're happy we can provide this service for them! What are the Benefits of Glassdoor Reviews? Glassdoor Reviews are an excellent way to find out more about a company before you apply for a job there. They can help you decide whether or not to apply for a job at a company, or if the company is right for you. Glassdoor Reviews are also valuable because they give employees an opportunity to voice their opinions on various aspects of their jobs and life at the company. Why is it necessary to obtain Glassdoor reviews? There are many reasons to obtain Glassdoor reviews. The first is that they're a good way to find out what other people think about a company, both from the perspective of how employees feel about it, and also from the perspective of customers who have interacted with them. The second reason is that Glassdoor reviews can help you decide whether or not you want to work for a certain company. They provide insight into: Buy Glassdoor Reviews How successful the company has been (i.e., their revenue growth rate) What kind of culture exists within their organization (i.e., how open-minded are employees about different
Thieme Hennis

Emerald: Article Request - A new generation of tools for search, recovery and quality e... - 0 views

  • A possible solution may be to use quantitative indicators based on the hypertext visibility of the Web sites. The cybermetric measures are valid for quality evaluation if they are derived from indirect peer review by experts with Web pages citing the site. The hypertext links acting as citations need to be extracted from a controlled sample of quality super-sites.
  •  
    Although the Internet is already a valuable information resource in medicine, there are important challenges to be faced before physicians and general users will have extensive access to this information. As a result of a research effort to compile a health-related Internet directory, new tools and strategies have been developed to solve key problems derived from the explosive growth of medical information on the Net and the great concern over the quality of such critical information. The current Internet search engines lack some important capabilities. We suggest using second generation tools (client-side based) able to deal with large quantities of data and to increase the usability of the records recovered. [...] The evaluation of the quality of health information available on the Internet could require a large amount of human effort. A possible solution may be to use quantitative indicators based on the hypertext visibility of the Web sites. The cybermetric measures are valid for quality evaluation if they are derived from indirect peer review by experts with Web pages citing the site. The hypertext links acting as citations need to be extracted from a controlled sample of quality super-sites.
  •  
    hierin wordt beschreven hoe de kwaliteit van online resources wordt bepaald door de citaties, oftewel links, op sites van experts die de resource citeren (en dus naartoe linken). Dat is 1 manier om kwaliteit te beoordelen.
avivajazz  jazzaviva

Microblogging: More Than Fun? | University of Zurich, Graz University of Technology - 3 views

  •  
    Microblogging - more than fun? Martin Ebner Social Learning Computer and Information Services Graz University of Technology Steyrergasse 30, A-8010 Graz, Austria martin.ebner@tugraz.at Mandy Schiefner Center for Teaching and Learning University of Zurich Hirschengraben 84, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland mandy.schiefner@access.uzh.ch
avivajazz  jazzaviva

Research on Twitter and Microblogging | Danah Boyd | zephoria@zephora.org - 3 views

  •  
    "Research on Twitter and Microblogging" (last updated: October 13, 2009)"
Graham Perrin

7.4 aggregated Content distribution - Pubsubhubbub | Google Groups - 0 views

  • aggregated Content distribution
  • the client model for processing a single vs. aggregated distribution might be quite a bit different
  • nervous about the whole notion of PuSH co-opting <source> for its own purposes
  • ...20 more annotations...
  • provenance
  • when you copy an entry from any feed document other than that feed document whose metadata is in the entry's atom:source
  • no way to indicate from which feed document you copied the entry unless you insert some extension element
  • it *is* important to know not only the source feed but *also* where you found the entry
  • Atom spec didn't envision this use case
  • atom:source is almost, but not quite, what's needed
  • confusion is understandable
  • something like a psh:provenance element
  • most recent context
  • like atom:source
  • not aggregate at the PubSubHubbub level until you've proved that
  • (a) you have to
  • (b) multipart/related won't cut it
  • the PSHB use case *was* frequently discussed in the Atom WG
  • pretty much what FeedMesh was intended to provide
  • to show provenence, you need to add an extension element
  • war stories about multipart/related and batching
  • skeptical about ease of subscriber implementation
  • This thread is a great example of peer review
  • I'll file an issue in the bug tracker
1 - 5 of 5
Showing 20 items per page