Skip to main content

Home/ ETAP640/ Contents contributed and discussions participated by Catherine Strattner

Contents contributed and discussions participated by Catherine Strattner

Catherine Strattner

Sensation-Seeking | Psychology Today - 0 views

  • Sensation-seeking, also called excitement-seeking, is the tendency to pursue sensory pleasure and excitement. It's the trait of people who go after novelty, complexity, and intense sensations, who love experience for its own sake, and who may take risks in the pursuit of such experience.
  •  
    This explains what Sensation Seeking is.
Catherine Strattner

http://www.vark-learn.com/english/page.asp?p=categories - 0 views

  • The acronym VARK stands for Visual, Aural, Read/write, and Kinesthetic sensory modalities that are used for learning information. Fleming and Mills (1992) suggested four modalities that seemed to reflect the experiences of the students and teachers. Although there is some overlap between them they are defined as follows.
  •  
    This webpage outlines the VARK modalities of learning.
Catherine Strattner

Teaching in the 21st Century - YouTube - 0 views

  •  
    Another video shared in my blog.
Catherine Strattner

The Evolution of Technology and the Human Race - YouTube - 0 views

  •  
    Interesting video shared on my blog.
Catherine Strattner

Five_Roles_I_Play_in_Online_Courses.pdf (application/pdf Object) - 0 views

  •  
    An interesting account of how to organize on online course and create an online learning community by assuming five different roles.
Catherine Strattner

a_series_of_unfortunate_online_events.pdf (application/pdf Object) - 1 views

  •  
    Assume nothing! Excellent advice for new online instructors.
  • ...2 more comments...
  •  
    "Explicit orientations to each module with due dates, time frames, and details about what the module contains, as well as redundant, clear, explicit expectations and instructions are necessary to ensure students are at all times well oriented to the content, activities, and tasks in the course."
  •  
    "My best advice the first time through is -- keep it simple. Go for vanilla the first time and work your way up to rocky road. : )"
  •  
    Quoted with regard to the 24/7 faux pas.
  •  
    Many common threads with the Ragan article.
Catherine Strattner

The problem with Bloom's taxonomy | On Teaching Online - 0 views

  •  
    Is there a problem with Bloom's Taxonomy and 21st century learning?
Catherine Strattner

Applying Bloom's Taxonomy to teach thinking skills in e-learning « Jen e-blogger - 0 views

  • 4. ANALYSIS: This level is defined as the ability to break down material to identify its components and to analyze its organizational structure and content. E- Learning activities that focus on scaffolding thinking at this level includes those that guide students to identify different components of a particular object, to better appreciate the relationships between the parts. It requires students to identify different aspects of a process to appreciate the working principle behind the process.
  • 4. ANALYSIS: This level is defined as the ability to break down material to identify its components and to analyze its organizational structure and content. E- Learning activities that focus on scaffolding thinking at this level includes those that guide students to identify different components of a particular object, to better appreciate the relationships between the parts. It requires students to identify different aspects of a process to appreciate the working principle behind the process.
  • 4. ANALYSIS: This level is defined as the ability to break down material to identify its components and to analyze its organizational structure and content. E- Learning activities that focus on scaffolding thinking at this level includes those that guide students to identify different components of a particular object, to better appreciate the relationships between the parts. It requires students to identify different aspects of a process to appreciate the working principle behind the process.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • 4. ANALYSIS: This level is defined as the ability to break down material to identify its components and to analyze its organizational structure and content. E- Learning activities that focus on scaffolding thinking at this level includes those that guide students to identify different components of a particular object, to better appreciate the relationships between the parts. It requires students to identify different aspects of a process to appreciate the working principle behind the process.
  • 4. ANALYSIS: This level is defined as the ability to break down material to identify its components and to analyze its organizational structure and content. E- Learning activities that focus on scaffolding thinking at this level includes those that guide students to identify different components of a particular object, to better appreciate the relationships between the parts. It requires students to identify different aspects of a process to appreciate the working principle behind the process.
  • 4. ANALYSIS: This level is defined as the ability to break down material to identify its components and to analyze its organizational structure and content. E- Learning activities that focus on scaffolding thinking at this level includes those that guide students to identify different components of a particular object, to better appreciate the relationships between the parts. It requires students to identify different aspects of a process to appreciate the working principle behind the process.
  • 4. ANALYSIS: This level is defined as the ability to break down material to identify its components and to analyze its organizational structure and content. E- Learning activities that focus on scaffolding thinking at this level includes those that guide students to identify different components of a particular object, to better appreciate the relationships between the parts. It requires students to identify different aspects of a process to appreciate the working principle behind the process.
  • 4. ANALYSIS: This level is defined as the ability to break down material to identify its components and to analyze its organizational structure and content. E- Learning activities that focus on scaffolding thinking at this level includes those that guide students to identify different components of a particular object, to better appreciate the relationships between the parts. It requires students to identify different aspects of a process to appreciate the working principle behind the process.
  • 4. ANALYSIS: This level is defined as the ability to break down material to identify its components and to analyze its organizational structure and content. E- Learning activities that focus on scaffolding thinking at this level includes those that guide students to identify different components of a particular object, to better appreciate the relationships between the parts. It requires students to identify different aspects of a process to appreciate the working principle behind the process.
  • 4. ANALYSIS: This level is defined as the ability to break down material to identify its components and to analyze its organizational structure and content. E- Learning activities that focus on scaffolding thinking at this level includes those that guide students to identify different components of a particular object, to better appreciate the relationships between the parts. It requires students to identify different aspects of a process to appreciate the working principle behind the process.
  • guide students to arrive at a certain concept, rule, principle or method and use the concept, rule, principle or method in a workplace or simulated workplace environment.
  • require students to construct a new product from the components given or apply different aspects of their prior learning to put together a product.
  • require students to critic or review materials or ideas.
  •  
    This blog post outlinse different learning activities that address the different levels of Bloom's Taxonomy.
Catherine Strattner

Teaching in the 21st Century - YouTube - 0 views

  •  
    What and how will we teach in the 21st century?
Catherine Strattner

Here are the demographics I promised at the TLT MIDmeeting - 1 views

  • 0.0010233               48             Afghanistan 0.0004477               21             Albani 0.0002984               14             Algeria 0.0002132               10             Andorra 0.0001279               6                Angola 0.0001066               5                Antigua and Barbuda 0.0000426               2                Armenia 0.0000852               4                Australia 0.0000426               2                Austria 0.0000213               1                Azerbaijan 0.0000213               1                Bangladesh 0.0000213               1                Barbados 0.0001492               7                Belarus 0.0000213               1                Belize 0.0000213               1                Bhutan 0.0000639               3                Bulgaria 0.0000213               1                Burundi 0.0000213               1                Cambodia 0.0008741               41             Canada 0.0001492               7                China 0.0000213               1               
  •  
    I am amazed at how many countries are represented by the students involved in the SLN.
Catherine Strattner

Self-Regulation-Research - 0 views

  • Current research indicates that some gifted students possess better self-regulated learning strategies than their peers, however gifted students may have done very well in school without using good self-regulation strategies because of a combination of their high abilities and/or an unchallenging curriculum. If learning is relatively easy for someone, less effort, organization and other self-regulated activities are expended. Social conditions or personal issues may prevent students from developing self-regulated learning strategies. For some students who already have some of these strategies, social or personal issues may prevent them from using them regularly, and thus, they need to be helped and encouraged to do so. Some gifted and talented students display perfectionism and need to learn to strive for excellence (their personal best) rather than perfection. Some talented students with high potential may find it difficult to learn self-regulation when it is not taught, modeled, or rewarded by the adults in their home and family. Even if students interact regularly with adults who demonstrate self-regulation, they may fail to use these skills themselves due to peer pressure or refuse to use the strategies their parents or teachers regularly employ at home or school. Compared with low achieving students, high achievers set more specific learning goals, use a variety of learning strategies, self-monitor more often, and adapt their efforts more systematically. The quality and quantity of self-regulation processes is crucial. We must recognize that one self-regulation strategy will not work for all students, and that the use of only a few strategies will not work optimally for a person on all tasks or occasions. It is important that students learn to use multiple self-regulatory learning skills rather than single strategies. They must also learn that their goals and their choice of self-regulation strategies have to be continually adjusted.
  •  
    This is an excellent resource to provide guidance in developing self-regulated learning skills in students. It is geared toward the talented and gifted population, but I believe it can be used with other populations as well.
Catherine Strattner

Critical Thinking Testing and Assessment - 0 views

  • Rubrics for assessing student reasoning abilities. A useful tool in assessing the extent to which students are reasoning well through course content.  
  • Critical Thinking Grid.doc
  •  
    This is a great source for utilizing critical thinking in designing instruction as well as assessing students' critical thinking skills.
Catherine Strattner

Online learning costs for K-12 schools « California Dreamin' by Rob Darrow - 0 views

  • Some researchers suggest that teaching online costs less than teaching face-to-face, while others suggest that teaching online costs about the same.
  •  
    Addresses cost differences in f2f and virtual learning.
Catherine Strattner

MoodleDocs - 0 views

  •  
    Moodle Docs main page
Catherine Strattner

Groups FAQ - MoodleDocs - 0 views

  •  
    How to use groups.
Catherine Strattner

Groupings - MoodleDocs - 0 views

  •  
    What are groupings?
Catherine Strattner

Using Moodle: Moodle Groups vs. Groupings - 0 views

  •  
    Groups vs. Groupings
Catherine Strattner

MoodleToolGuideforTeachers_May2010_JS.pdf (application/pdf Object) - 0 views

  •  
    Great visual Moodle tool guide.
Catherine Strattner

02-Moodle.pdf (application/pdf Object) - 0 views

  •  
    Tutorial on building a course through Moodle
« First ‹ Previous 61 - 80 of 90 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page