parents are now less likely to rely on their children for financial support after retirement
less necessary to have a son
low national birth rate (the lowest in the world) means that parents who are planning just one child believe a girl will care for them emotionally in their old age.
igh value given to males decreases the value given to females."
dowry and wedding
to more than a million rupees
average civil servant earns about 100,000 rupees
In many cases, of course, the women are not independent agents but merely victims of a dominant family ideology based on preference for male children."
3,500 abortions of female fetuses annually
Rajasthan,
UNICEF
Bombay in 1984 on abortions after prenatal sex determination stated that 7,999 out of 8,000 of the aborted fetuses were females.
Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh [states], it is usual for girls and women to eat less than men and boys and to have their meal after the men and boys had finished eating.
it is usually boys who have preference in health care
clothing
morbidity.
Indian state governments have sometimes taken measures to diminish the slaughter of infant girls and abortions of female fetuses.
f one parent undergoes sterilization, the government will give the family [U.S.] \\$160 in aid per child.
tate with one or two daughters and no sons
The money will be paid in instalments as the girl goes through school. She will also get a small gold ring and on her 20th birthday, a lump sum of $650 to serve as her dowry or defray the expenses of higher education. Four thousand families enrolled in the first year," with 6,000 to 8,000 expected to join annually (as of 1994
in the form of selective abortion and perhaps even infanticide and female infant neglect - that is the cause of the skewed gender ratio.[6]
If the first child was male, then the sex of the subsequent children tended to follow the regular, biologically determined sex pattern
However, if the first child was female, the subsequent children had a much higher probability of being male, indicating that conscious parental choice was involved in determining the sex of the child.
preference for boys and the resulting shortage of girls was even more pronounced in the more highly developed Haryana and Punjab regions of India than in poorer areas,
high prevalence of this prejudice among the more educated and affluent women (mothers) there.
Only recently and in some countries (particularly South Korea) have the development and educational campaigns begun to turn the tide, resulting in more normal gender ratios.[9]
Punjab
1980s, girls were not receiving inferior treatment if a girl was born as a first child in a given family, when the parents still had high hopes for obtaining a son later. Subsequent births of girls were however unwelcome, because each such birth diminished a chance of the family having a son.
educated women would have fewer offspring, and therefore were under more acute pressure to produce a son as early as possible
affluent families opt for an abortion
r if a girl is born
decrease her chance of survival
One reason for parents, even mothers, to avoid daughters
As parents grow
expect much more help and support from their independent sons, than from daughters, who after getting married become in a sense property of their husbands' families
Women are also often practically unable to inherit real estate, so a mother-widow will lose her family's (in reality her late husband's) plot of land and become indigent if she had had only daughters.
Poor rural families have meager resources to distribute among their children, which reduces the opportunity to discriminate against girls.[9]
South Korea has led to a sweeping change in social attitudes and reduced the preference for sons
rapid economic development, combined with policies that seek to promote gender equality
Anorexics see themselves as obese no matter how much they weigh or how thin they look in the mirror.
This obsession or focus on constant monitoring of calories and weighing themselves helps them block out unwanted feelings and emotions. So it can be seen as a symptom of possible mental health problems, especially around self-esteem or what I prefer to refer to as self-acceptance.
To be acceptable to most Americans, any legislation drafted to legalize doctor-assisted suicide will clearly need to balance the desire to end suffering with the need to protect especially vulnerable patients. Timothy Quill puts forward two conditions for the future of this debate. If we legalize euthanasia, he says, we must ensure that absolutely every treatment and pain-management alternative has been tried before we allow a doctor to assist a patient to die.
if assisted suicide remains illegal, we must give doctors some kind of guidance in dealing with this morally and emotionally wrenching issue that presently rests entirely on their shoulders.
Many who oppose the legalization of doctor-assisted suicide acknowledge that the practice goes on every day--and feel that society should tolerate it, but not legalize it
Judge Guido Calabresi reasoned, "It may well be that a society may prefer subterfuge and covert practice to trying to draw lines that are extraordinarily difficult to draw." A similar view against legalization was expressed in a Detroit News editorial (May 18, 1995): "Sometimes families and doctors will quietly try to frustrate a ban, but society must err on the side of life by officially declaring the practice off-limits."
they must either openly break the law, or explicitly hide what they are doing, neither of which are comfortable options.
Hogan argued, "With state sanctioned and physician-assisted death at issue, some 'good results' cannot outweigh other lives lost due to unconstitutional errors and abuses."
The Oregon act would have been first in the U.S. to allow doctors to assist patients in dying. The law would have let doctors prescribe (but not administer) a lethal dose of drugs to terminally ill patients who had formally requested to die.
The law required that the patient request to die three times, the last time in writing, and that doctors wait 15 days after receiving the final request to prescribe the lethal dose. A minimum of two physicians would have had to determine that the patient had six months or less to live.
patients' involvement in treatment decisions has been increased debate over doctor-assisted suicide, in which patients seek help in dying from their physician.
A November 1993 Louis Harris Associates poll found that a majority of Americans (58%) approve of Dr. Jack Kevorkian, a controversial retired Michigan pathologist who has made a mission of assisting terminally ill people to die
The issue of doctor-assisted suicide has touched off highly publicized dialogue on how to care for the terminally ill, and specifically, how to manage pain.
Euthanasia is defined as "the bringing about of a gentle and easy death for a person suffering from a painful incurable disease," while suicide is "the intentional killing of oneself.
active euthanasia, which is at the center of the current controversy. Passive euthanasia is defined as "allowing to die," and is used to describe a decision to withhold treatment, or remove life support, from a patient who may be in a coma or vegetative state.
If brain activity can sound
like music, might it be possible to begin to understand the neural
activity by working in reverse and observing how the brain responds
to music?
Mozart
selection showed an increase in spatial IQ test scores. A further
test showed that listening to other types of music (non-specified
"dance" musis) did not have the same effect.
listener's preference--to either music or the narration of a story,
and not particularly listening to Mozart, made for improved test
performance.
"There's
nothing wrong with having young people listen to classical music, but
it's not going to make them smarter."
the
experiments that compared listening to Mozart to silence, and which
had not included listening to other compositions.
Music is aural stimulation. The "successful"
Mozart effect studies at best indicated that one area of cognitive
processing increased only for a very short time, after listening to
music for a short period of time.
Euthanasia literally means “good death”. It is basically to bring about the death of a terminally ill patient or a disabled. It is resorted to so that the last days of a patient who has been suffering from such an illness which is terminal in nature or which has disabled him can peacefully end up his life and which can also prove to be less painful for him.
Active euthanasia means putting an end to the life of an individual for merciful reason by a medical practitioner by giving a lethal dose of medication to the patient. Passive euthanasia takes place where methods such as removing artificial life support systems such as ventilators, hydration, etc are resorted to.
On the other hand voluntary euthanasia means where a patient who is suffering a lot asks a medical practitioner to end his life whereas involuntary euthanasia is just the opposite of voluntary euthanasia that is where there is no consent of the patient but for it there can be many reasons such as if he is not mentally competent to give his consent and other such reasons.
A person has a right to live a life with at least minimum dignity and if that standard is falling below that minimum level then a person should be given a right to end his life.
Supporters of euthanasia also point out to the fact that as passive euthanasia has been allowed, similarly active euthanasia must also be allowed.
A patient will wish to end his life only in cases of excessive agony and would prefer to die a painless death rather than living a miserable life with that agony and suffering.
According to them its not granting ‘right to die’ rather it should be called ‘right to kill’.
Opponents also point out that when suicide is not allowed then euthanasia should also not be allowed.
he conference offered some hope that the fashion industry's disastrous obsession with the uber-thin and its cavalier disregard for the consequences of eating disorders may be coming to an end.
Anna Wintour admitted that models' attitudes towards food have long been hush-hush subjects for modeling agencies and designers, who prefer to shove the topic under the rug and continue subtly reminding the models to keep off the pounds.