1. Open site with slash at end 2. press Bookmark this page 3. URL path in dialog is without shash ( / ) 4. URL is stored in Diigo without slash even when I add slash to end manually
This is annoying trouble for sites with dynamic urls
Firefox 3 beta 5 current night build, Diigo Toolbar addon 3.1.5.4, Windows XP SP3
I've had this problem with a few bookmarks. You've read the RFC wrong, it explicitly states in the section you point to -
This kind of technique is only appropriate when equivalence is clearly indicated by both the result of accessing the resources and the common conventions of their scheme's dereference algorithm (in this case, use of redirection by HTTP origin servers to avoid problems with relative references).
Moreover, the section 6.2.3 also suggest that
In general, a URI that uses the generic syntax for authority with an empty path should be normalized to a path of "/".
And personally I would also prefer empty path URLs normalized with trailing slash.
2. press Bookmark this page
3. URL path in dialog is without shash ( / )
4. URL is stored in Diigo without slash even when I add slash to end manually
This is annoying trouble for sites with dynamic urls
Firefox 3 beta 5 current night build, Diigo Toolbar addon 3.1.5.4, Windows XP SP3
http://groups.diigo.com/Diigo_HQ/bookmark/tag/3984 refers to
http://www.moviezone.cz/clanek/14359-derrickson-a-dalsi-velke-sci-fi
(no solidus at tail) which works fine in Safari 3.2.1 (5525.27.1) and Firefox 3.0.5 on Mac OS X 10.5.6.
> Firefox 3 beta 5 current night build, Diigo Toolbar addon 3.1.5.4, Windows XP SP3
Maybe an issue with your Firefox or Windows?
> Firefox 3 beta 5 current night build, Diigo Toolbar addon 3.1.5.4, Windows XP SP3
Your Diigo is considerably outdated, please use the Tools menu of Firefox to gain the update to 3.1.6.13.
Regards
Graham
Website moviezone is now "fixed", shash at end is not necessary.
But try to bookmark your own profile page:
http://www.diigo.com/profile/grahamperrin/ (with slash at end). You will see that you can't store ending slash.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-6.2.4
http://www.diigo.com/profile/grahamperrin and
http://www.diigo.com/profile/grahamperrin/ are equivalent, as far as I can tell.
Do you have a problem with a particular bookmark?
Example:
http://groups.diigo.com/Diigo_HQ/forum/topic/41995
Probable consequence:
http://groups.diigo.com/Diigo_HQ/forum/topic/41994
Related:
http://groups.diigo.com/Diigo_HQ/forum/topic/41996
> Re: URI comparison, see
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-6.2.4
>
> http://www.diigo.com/profile/grahamperrin and
> http://www.diigo.com/profile/grahamperrin/ are equivalent, as far as I can tell.
>
> Do you have a problem with a particular bookmark?
I've had this problem with a few bookmarks. You've read the RFC wrong, it explicitly states in the section you point to -
This
kind of technique is only appropriate when equivalence is clearly
indicated by both the result of accessing the resources and the
common conventions of their scheme's dereference algorithm (in this
case, use of redirection by HTTP origin servers to avoid problems
with relative references).
Moreover, the section 6.2.3 also suggest that
In general, a URI that uses the generic syntax for authority with an
empty path should be normalized to a path of "/".
And personally I would also prefer empty path URLs normalized with trailing slash.
Let's await a response from Diigo.
What the hell?
I mean, isn't it essential to be able to bookmark the URL untrimmed?