Group items tagged

This article is about the evolution of language and its correlation to music throughout the ages. Levman goes on to continue to explore the definition of music, and how to distinguish music and language

Thought-provoking article on the absorption of drag slang and AAVE into mainstream language, and the legitimacy of "crossing over." Much of our everyday language has roots in various subcultures. With the rise of social media, the lines between "subculture" and "mainstream" are starting to blur further. As just one example, drag slang and AAVE words are absorbed into mainstream slang with an almost clockwork-like consistency. But does this terminology belong to the communities who created it? What's the boundary between the natural evolution of language and cultural appropriation? Author Eleanor Tremeer notes, "In an ideal world, the fusion of social groups and cultures would organically lead to the merging of dialects. The problem, as always, lies in oppression. Black individuals and LGBT people are marginalized: Their cultures are seen as unprofessional, they frequently live below the poverty line, they are targeted for prosecution. Yes, words are just words. But as long as people are still oppressed because they belong to certain groups, the usage of their vernacular by those on top - white people, rich people, corporations - will always have sinister undertones."

A book investigating the history of profanity, and the evolution of society's attitude towards profanity. The description of the book (on ProQuest, which can be accessed through your Punahou credentials), summarizes it as "a fascinating, comprehensive insight into an increasingly popular area, [which] provides an explanation, and not simply a description, of how modern attitudes to bad language have come about." Written by Tony McEnery and published in 2005. A potentially interesting jumping-off point for people interested in exploring the ever-evolving societal perspective on profanity. (Reposted because of incomplete tags; previous post deleted)

I thought this was an intersting article that builds upon the topic we've learned in class. With the evolution of language overtime, there is a trend that it get simpler and simpler. It's fascinating to see as we look back on past variations of English to see how complicated it is for us to understand but 200 years from now, people will be looking back at our time and wondering why we spoke the way we do now.

In this article, researches hypothesize how the expansion of dopaminergic systems may have contributed to the development of many of our unique cognitive abilities including language.

super interesting! read, read, read !

"A new study of word frequencies in political blogs finds that equations describing earthquake evolution fit the eruption of topics onto political blogs."

Thanks, Ryan! We're going to read this for homework, since it relates to what we've been doing with computational tools and language.

From 'Odsbodikins' to 'belly,' the banned words of our ancestors look as bizarre today as tribal rituals At street level and in popular culture, Americans are freer with profanity now than ever before-or so it might seem to judge by how often people throw around the "F-bomb" or use a certain S-word of scatological meaning as a synonym for "stuff."

Ann Curzan, a professor at the University of Michigan, discusses the possible benefits of the language used in electronically mediated conversation (EMC), and how it is not "ruining English."

Article examines the changing public attitudes towards words: is Redskins a pejorative racial slur? Is acceptability dependent on the user?

Video featuring British historical linguist and Early Modern English scholar, David Crystal, and his son, Ben Crystal, speaking about their work in re: speaking Shakespeare's words as they originally sounded.

Interesting NPR story on the use of "ax"--apparently not simply the oft-maligned African-American Vernacular English version of "ask". That particular pronunciation of the word has a more distinguished pedigree, dating back to Chaucer.

"... a group of us have been studying ways to make sense of large amounts of language data generated by people on the ground in Libya. ... You won't be surprised when I tell you what event coincides with the most obvious peak in positive emotion as well as in volume of tweet traffic: Gaddafi's death. Specifically, the vertical dashed black line marks the time when news of Gadaffi's capture and death were first made public." Their report, Evolution of Sentiment in the Libyan Revolution, is here (PDF): https://webspace.utexas.edu/dib97/libya-report-10-30-11.pdf

Courtesy Merriam-Webster: 10 U.S. Presidential (and other politicians') gaffes: even presidents commit word crimes. But are they? Some are blatant bloopers, e.g. "Sometimes you misunderestimated me." - George W. Bush, News Conference, 12 Jan. 2009, yet others, like Warren Harding's use of "normalcy" or Barack Obama's "enormity" have become acceptable. Welcome to language evolution.

Article looks at the linguistic shift away from the older generation "you're welcome" to "no problem" or "no worries." The article notes that formal language is unquestionably falling by the wayside, likely due to the increasing use of digital technology. Instant messaging and texting have compelled many young people to forgo punctuation altogether, since receiving a message with a period or question mark at the end of it can induce anxiety for some. This is because punctuation is now considered "formal," which roughly translates to "serious."The same is true for "you're welcome," according to linguists, and it might explain why younger generations are using less formal phrases when someone thanks them. While some people might mistakenly think that doing so suggests that the service was irksome or inconvenient, the linguists cited in the article contribute this phenomenon largely to linguistic mirroring. This basically means if the people you interact with on a day-to-day basis often say "you're welcome" or "no problem," then you'll likely mirror whatever phrase is more frequently being used around you. "I believe that this is just part of the evolution of language," adds Saccardi. "The majority of speakers will not intellectualize the connotative meanings of their utterances. Rather, they are more likely to just use particular phrases instead of others because that's what they have grown into." Interestingly, the phrase "you're welcome" has acquired a new meaning for younger generations, as many use it sarcastically to point out that another person forgot to thank them, as in Maui's song in _Moana_.