Group items tagged

Qualitative research always focuses on "why" rather than "what". It is a process of naturalistic questioning that seeks comprehension of social phenomena. It relies on the first-hand experience of the people. Qualitative research does not interpret through statistical and logical procedures and uses different inquiry systems. Such systems include case study, biography, grounded theory, discourse analysis and phenomenology. The critiquing qualitative research designs are about their' small scale and biasness. In qualitative research critique, the collection of small samples is on the top. These samples cannot represent the larger population. The impact of such insufficient samples is on the generalizations of outputs. At the same time, it is difficult to consider how the findings are biased

Today I'm going to talk about the one form of fear that students encounter frequently, that is, the fear of writing. Fear of writing stems from the fact that you're going to present your work to someone for critique purposes. Self-evaluation itself is hard in the process of writing. And presenting your work for review, and critique makes it all the more difficult, and fearful. When you doubt your abilities, the fear of writing increases ma

An outlined how-to article on feedback essay writing by an English teacher.

A literature review aims to get insights related to the research problem and dive into the discussion. The structure of literature review is something that needs close attention. Without having a good structure, you cannot ace the milestones, and your literature review cannot stand out. The easiest way to structure literature review is using 5 Cs. These 5 Cs are comprised of cite, compare, contrast, critique, and connect. Each C has a particular set of attributes that help you make a perfect design to structure literature review. If any of the C is found to be missing in your literature review, I assure that you will have to resubmit it after