Group items tagged

"April 14, 2013 by Claude Almansi Questo post risponde alla richiesta di Andreas Formiconi in Apriamo il blog #ltis13: Cose da fare… : (…) Iniziate a trasferire il diario che avete scritto sino ad ora nel blog, strutturandolo come preferite in uno a più post. | 5 aprile 2013 | | 7 aprile, mattina | | 7 aprile sera | | 11 aprile pomeriggio (Non solo luci)| | 12 aprile 2013 (Coursera/Amara - Non solo luci ) | | 13 aprile 2013 ( Blog - Digital Divide Network - RSS ) |"

"Il villaggio #ltis13 e i commenti (1) April 15, 2013 by Claude Almansi | 11 Comments Per Constantino Soudaz ;-) Gulliver in Liliput, Bremen"

Descrizione di una ricerca sull'efficacia dei MOOC

(di Anna Lisa Bonfranceschi | Pubblicato il 22 Novembre 2013 . Alla fine: Via: Wired.it ( http://daily.wired.it/news/internet/2013/11/21/mooc-corsi-gratuiti-chi-frequenta-290384.html ) Credits immagine: World Bank Photo Collection/Flickr ( http://www.flickr.com/photos/worldbank/ ) L'articolo di Wired.it è lo stesso per il testo ma le illustrazioni sono diverse. Inoltre è sotto una licenza Creative Commons BY-NC-ND, mentre quello di galileo.net è sotto copyright stretto. Per l'articolo di Ezekiel J. Emanuel su Nature, del 20 novembre 2013, vedi http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v503/n7476/full/503342a.html : abstract e possibilità di comprare la versione completa, oppure di visualizzarla gratuitamente). Annarita, scusa la parentesi aggiunta sopra: mi serve per un post che sto rimunginando sulla traduzione di ipertesti. Sul fondo: la cosa buffa è che Emanuel aveva scritto un ditirambo sui fondatori di Coursera ad aprile, http://time100.time.com/2013/04/18/time-100/slide/andrew-ng-and-daphne-koller/ , concludendo: "After I taught my first class through Coursera, I got this beautiful postcard from Sri Lanka in the mail, thanking me. I just thought that was crazy and amazing. There's no chance I would have reached that student just by what I was doing before." E quella cartolina di cui andava così fiero, cfr. anche http://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2012/11/20/College-of-Future-Could-Be-Come-One-Come-All.print Per un'altra recensione di "Online education: MOOCs taken by educated few" di Emanuel , cfr. http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/moocs-are-reaching-only-privileged-learners-survey-finds/48567 di Steve Kolowich, 20 nov. 2013.

Attorney General Eric Holder Speaks at the E-books Press Conference Washington, D.C. ~ Wednesday, April 11, 2012 "Earlier today, we filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, against Apple and five different book publishers - Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin and Simon & Schuster. In response to our allegations, three of these publishers - Hachette, HarperCollins and Simon & Schuster - agreed to a proposed settlement. If approved by the court, this settlement would resolve the Department's antitrust concerns with these companies, and would require them to grant retailers - such as Amazon and Barnes & Noble - the freedom to reduce the prices of their e-book titles. The settlement also requires the companies to terminate their anticompetitive most-favored-nation agreements with Apple and other e-books retailers. In addition, the companies will be prohibited for two years from placing constraints on retailers' ability to offer discounts to consumers. They will also be prohibited from conspiring or sharing competitively sensitive information with their competitors for five years. And each is required to implement a strong antitrust compliance program. These steps are appropriate - and essential in ensuring a competitive marketplace. Beginning in the summer of 2009, we allege that executives at the highest levels of the companies included in today's lawsuit - concerned that e-book sellers had reduced prices - worked together to eliminate competition among stores selling e-books, ultimately increasing prices for consumers. As a result of this alleged conspiracy, we believe that consumers paid millions of dollars more for some of the most popular titles. During regular, near-quarterly meetings, we allege that publishing company executives discussed confidential business and competitive matters - including Amazon's e-book retailing practices - as part of a conspiracy

"luciab Posted April 29, 2013 at 11:49 pm | Permalink @Andreas #70 (e Claude altrove) Comincio a sospettare che ci siano molte cose invisibili sotto il cielo, soprattutto sotto il cielo di WordPress. Avevo provato a fare l'embedding di un video in un post di WordPress, incollando il codice per l'embedding (gentilmente fornito dalla fonte), appunto, direttamente sul "lato" Text del mio post. Controllato sul lato "visual", non appariva nulla. Tornando al lato Text, trovavo il codice… letteralmente moltiplicato! Non si trattava solo di un "no follow", bensì di un sacco di scritte misteriose. Alcune sospetto volessero far apparire la "attribution", ovvero la citazione della fonte del video. Non ha funzionato. Mi chiedevo perché, ma ora comincio a capire che "WordPress" non è uno spazio "vuoto" neppure nel lato Text, o forse il codice che tentavo di importare si trascinava appresso un po' di alieni… Immagino che piano piano capirò la logica che sta dietro a tutto questo. Spero, almeno."

By Matthew Hughes MakeUseOf.com April 5, 2013 "... Dire Consequences For An Administrative Error The one thing that stuck out for me when speaking to Amber was how catastrophic being removed from Facebook could be. Her suspension almost derailed a social media campaign for a large, multinational company. It resulted in her losing some of her oldest friends. It resulted in a loss of trust in an institution which almost all of us use to handle our social interactions. If an administrative error on a website can result in someone losing old friends and potentially losing their professional reputation, we should be questioning the role that Facebook has in our lives, and if we're too dependent on it. We reached out to Facebook and asked them to comment on this story. When asked how they identify breaches of their terms of service, they said "People report content or accounts to Facebook via the reporting links you can find on every page of Facebook. After you submit a report, Facebook will investigate the issue and determine whether or not the content should be removed based on Facebook's policies". They also said that their policies for dealing with people who breach their TOS depend on the particular rule broken. "If a content violates our policies then we will remove it. For example if a photo breaks our nudity guidelines we would remove it and let the person who posted it know. If someone is using Facebook under a false identity then we remove the profile." (...) Matthew Hughes is a writer, blogger and programmer from Liverpool, England. He's rarely found without a cup of coffee in his hand and loves making beautiful things. You can read his scribblings at matthewhughes.co.uk. " (Ottima spiegazione di come Facebook funziona - e a volte NON funziona -vedi anche i numerosi commenti)

Ho esitato a dare il link nei commenti a http://iamarf.org/2013/04/11/non-solo-luci-ltis13/ . Poi ho deciso di no, perché i commenti già vertevano molto (troppo?) su Facebook.