Skip to main content

Home/ WomensLearningStudio/ Group items tagged SSIR

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

A Network Approach to a "No Kill" Nation | Stanford Social Innovation Review - 0 views

  • To accomplish this, we embraced the network principle of “node not hub,” deciding early on not to invest in top-down remedies, but in collaborative models that would remain in tact after our initial financial support ended, usually after a period of 5-7 years.
  • equired that local communities develop a data-gathering system.
  • consensus data model that large segments of our industry could embrace and use to standardize terminology and reporting across all shelters. We invested in building data-gathering systems for the shelter field and saw those early efforts blossom into genuine cultural change.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • gain the support and specialized knowledge of veterinarians trained in shelter medicine.
  •  
    beautiful success story of how no-kill animal shelters got a big boost with networking approaches, uniform data collection, and creation of new medical specialty--shelter veterinary medicine.
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Building Capacity Through Networks | Stanford Social Innovation Review - 0 views

  • place a priority on a capacity building initiative that presents itself wrapped in a bow.
  • use network contacts to determine whether it would be more efficient to organize a user group for network members who use the same database. Tapping the wisdom of the network can save time, aggravation, and perhaps thousands of dollars in fees for consultants to train staff or customize a new database, or to replace software that staff may simply not understand. Conversely, the network may confirm that your nonprofit is an outlier for using that particular database.
  • Leverage your participation in a network to learn from other nonprofit leaders.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • peer-learning cohort
  • plans its next board orientation—and perhaps its success in attracting and retaining a diverse board of directors.
  • Networks are especially well-suited to using web-based knowledge-sharing and collaboration tools that easily allow network members to upload and download evaluation templates, curricula for educational programs, and other tools. Technology also allows network members to connect in real time even though they are geographically distant, and to facilitate educational programs that take advantage of a combination of online and in-person learning components.
  • The one-time workshops nonprofit capacity builders relied on in the past don’t make the same deep impression on program participants as longer-term, peer-learning cohorts, which prompt participants to dig deeply into their personal learning journeys and connect mor
  •  
    excellent article by Jennifer Chandler and Kristen Scott Kennedy on building capacity through networks, February 5, 2016. 
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

The Nonprofit Leadership Development Deficit | Stanford Social Innovation Review - 0 views

  • too many nonprofit CEOs and their boards continue to miss the answer to succession planning sitting right under their noses—the homegrown leader.
  • leadership development deficit.
  • The sector’s C-suite leaders, frustrated at the lack of opportunities and mentoring, are not staying around long enough to move up. Even CEOs are exiting because their boards aren’t supporting them and helping them to grow.
  • ...20 more annotations...
  • 2006 study
  • Bridgespan predicted that there would be a huge need for top-notch nonprofit leaders, driven by the growth of the nonprofit sector and the looming retirement of baby boomers from leadership posts.
  • the need for C-suite leaders5 grew dramatically.
  • the majority of our survey respondents (57 percent) attributed their retention challenges at least partially to low compensation, an issue that can feel daunting to many nonprofits. Lack of development and growth opportunities ranked next, cited by half of respondents as a reason that leaders leave their organizations.
  • those jobs keep coming open.
  • Surprisingly, little is due to the wave of retirement we have all been expecting: only 6 percent of leaders actually retired in the past two years.6
  • major reason is turnover:
  • losing a star performer in a senior development role costs nine times her annual salary to replace.
  • supply grew with it. Organizations largely found leaders to fill the demand.
  • corporate CEOs dedicate 30 to 50 percent of their time and focus on cultivating talent within their organizations.1
  • lack of learning and growth
  • lack of mentorship and support
  • he number one reason CEOs say they would leave their current role, other than to retire, was difficulty with the board of directors.
  • respondents said that their organizations lacked the talent management processes required to develop staff, and that they had not made staff development a high priority
  • combination of learning through doing, learning through hearing or being coached, and learning through formal training.
  • skill development can compensate for lack of upward trajectory. Stretch opportunities abound in smaller organizations where a large number of responsibilities are divided among a small number of people.
  • found that staff members who feel their organizations are supporting their growth stay longer than those who don’t, because they trust that their organizations will continue to invest in them over time.1
  • “When you invest in developing talent, people are better at their jobs, people stay with their employers longer, and others will consider working for these organizations in the first place because they see growth potential.”
  • define the organization’s future leadership requirements, identify promising internal candidates, and provide the right doses of stretch assignments, mentoring, formal training, and performance assessment to grow their capabilities.
  • Addressing root causes may steer funders away from supporting traditional approaches, such as fellowships, training, and conferences, and toward helping grantees to build their internal leadership development capabilities, growing talent now and into the future across their portfolio of grantees.
  •  
    Really wonderful article on nonprofit leadership development and how the lack of it leads to much external executive hiring and high turnover in these roles
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

Decades of Deadlock: Using Network Principles to Break Through | Stanford Social Innova... - 0 views

  • Learning the Network Principles
  • It required mission-driven leaders who put a premium on establishing and nurturing relationships based on trust, humility, and mutual benefit. It also required a radical change in rewards and affirmations from funders and boards. A new system, consistent with subordinating the organization’s brand to the common interest, became paramount.
  • common interest that placed the mission at the center
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • We had to learn how to be a node rather than a hub.
  • Forging a Grand Bargain
  •  
    Seattle Housing Coalition's networking principles story, Marty Kooistra, October 14, 2015.   
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

The Most Impactful Leaders You've Never Heard Of | Stanford Social Innovation Review - 0 views

  • the single most important factor behind all successful collaborations is trust-based relationships among participants. Many collaborative efforts ultimately fail to reach their full potential because they lack a strong relational foundation.
  • Trust not control
  • network entrepreneurs focus on creating authentic relationships and building deep trust from the bottom up. This focus on relationship-building costs relatively little yet ultimately makes a tremendous difference in impact. Network entrepreneurs ensure that the power of others grows while their own power fades, thereby developing capacity in the field and a culture of distributed leadership that dramatically increases the collaboration’s efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • The Four Principles of Network Entrepreneurship
  • The new leaders at the heart of some of today’s most sophisticated, large-scale solutions to the world’s social problems—network entrepreneurs—are undoubtedly some of the most accomplished leaders that you’ve never heard of, and they are ensuring that systems-level, collaborative efforts not only succeed, but thrive. 
  • Humility not brand.
  • Node not hub.
  • Mission not organization.
  •  
    beginning series on network entrepreneurs who thrive, by Jane Wei-Skillern, David Ehrlichman, & David Sawyer, September 16, 2016.  How should WLS embrace these four principles operationally in the networks we participate in?   
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

The Nonprofit Leadership Development Deficit | Stanford Social Innovation Review - 0 views

  •  
    nonprofits are acting like forprofit employers by going outside to other nonprofits to hire away their folks; result--short-term gain because pay does not keep new hires in new organization for very long. They are not developing in-house talent for promotion.
Lisa Levinson

Architecting for Data | Stanford Social Innovation Review - 1 views

  •  
    Four ways nonprofits can cut through the data hype and start using data on purpose. Architecture for Data Management, Architecture for Data Security, Architecture for Building a Data Culture, Architecture for Data Use.
Doris Reeves-Lipscomb

The End of Expertise - 0 views

  •  
    Part of a series on humanity in the digital age and how expertise has become the purview of AI in some ways.  the professional service firm has to bring trust-worthiness which is made up of credibility (words), reliability (actions), intimacy (emotions), and self orientation (motives that can be trusted).  
1 - 9 of 9
Showing 20 items per page