Skip to main content

Home/ Legal KM/ Group items tagged tools

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Lars Bauer

Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Content Management (Gartner, Sept. 23, 2008) - 0 views

  • This Magic Quadrant represents a snapshot of the ECM market at a particular point in time. Gartner advises readers not to compare the placement of vendors from last year to this year. The market is changing, and the criteria for selecting and ranking vendors continue to evolve. Our assessments take into account the vendors' current product offerings and overall strategies, as well as their future initiatives and product road maps. We also factor in how well vendors are driving market changes or at least adapting to changing market requirements.
  • see "Dataquest Insight: Enterprise Content Management Software Market Share Analysis, Worldwide, 2007"
  • Among the primary trends that IT architects and planners must consider as they develop content management strategies and determine their strategic partners are the following: ECM is increasingly becoming part of IT infrastructure. Compliance and information retention are getting higher profiles at CxO-level. Web 2.0 and mobile technologies, driven by user expectations, are influencing richer user interfaces and capabilities to empower business users. Integration and federation of content repositories will be critical in future. Application specificity — some vendors provide BCS, while others will have to focus on horizontal solutions and content-enabled vertical applications (CEVAs) in order to grow by delivering domain expertise. Alternative delivery models, such as software as a service (SaaS) and open source, are gaining increased interest.
  • ...47 more annotations...
  • Market Shifts Toward Infrastructure Vendors
  • Content management is becoming part of enterprises' infrastructure and consequently is being delivered by large vendors of enterprise infrastructure such as IBM, Microsoft and Oracle.
  • IBM, Oracle and EMC are competing at the high end of the market, while Microsoft is commoditizing the market at the low end. Recently, HP entered the ECM market by acquiring Tower Software, a niche vendor long known for its integrated document and records management.
  • More than 54% of the market, as measured by total software revenue, is held by just three vendors — EMC, IBM and Open Text
  • Pure-play content management vendors and vertical-market specialists such as Interwoven, Xerox, Xythos Software and Vignette are fighting to compete. Bright spots for the pure-play vendors and vertical specialists are the mid-market and CEVAs
  • IBM and Oracle have the potential to drive the market forward by creating a powerful message based on broader enterprise information management (EIM). Since they own the key stack components, such as the database, the information access, business intelligence (BI), analytics and reporting tools (and often line-of-business applications), they can bring together structured data and unstructured content. On the other hand, choosing a suite from a stack vendor may involve tradeoffs as some functional components may not be equivalent to best-of-breed offerings.
  • Of all the infrastructure vendors, Microsoft has driven the most change in the ECM market over the past 18 months with Windows SharePoint Services (WSS) and Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) 2007.
  • Adopting WSS or MOSS for mass deployment, and an ECM suite for high-end, content-centric processes and best-of-breed Web content, will remain a useful strategy for enterprises during the next three to five years. This coexistence strategy could reduce the costs and some of the risks of content management for an entire enterprise.
  • For many organizations, the need to increase workers' productivity and innovation is more important than ever. Critical goals include improving users' Web experience and connecting workers to relevant content and to each other.
  • see "Report Highlight for Dataquest Insight: E-Discovery Market Drives New Search, Content and Records Management Investments"
  • Specialists like Interwoven and Vignette are moving into Web-based CEVAs and interactive marketing and customer experience. They remain among the few choices enterprises have for high-end, enterprise-class, externally-facing Web content management (WCM) solutions. In the mid-market, Hyland Software, SunGard Data Systems and Saperion use their imaging and archiving heritages to address transactional content applications such as medical records, claims processing and accounts payable invoice processing.
  • Integration/Federation Grows in Importance as Organizations Look to Establish an Information-Centric Infrastructure
  • The ideal ECM architecture would enable one repository, or a few repositories with a common database — but this is not an ideal world. Dealing with multiple, siloed content repositories is a fact of life for many organizations. In Gartner's 2008 survey of nearly 400 respondents (see Note 1), 69% of enterprises indicated they had more than six repositories.
  • see "New Standard Will Make Content Repositories Interoperable"
  • Enterprises keep a vast amount of information locked up in documents, spreadsheets and other forms of unstructured data ("content"). To maximize the value of this information, enterprises need to integrate the various types and stores of content, integrate content with structured data, and integrate internal content with content and structured data outside the enterprise.
  • XML is becoming increasingly important for content creation, component management, output and integration with other applications. The term "mashup" has become synonymous with content couplings that were formerly difficult to achieve, even with traditional integration resources. Enterprise mashups that integrate content with business application data or with Web content via Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feeds or APIs remain rudimentary compared with the explosion of consumer mashups.
  • IBM intends to deliver ECM-focused widgets for creating mashups as part of the FileNet P8 platform.
  • User Empowerment vs. Governance
  • A Range of Needs Leads to Application Specificity and a Fragmented Focus From Vendors
  • Social software encourages informal collaborative activities that fall outside the traditional scope of transactional applications, formal workflows or engineered teams. The rapid growth of social network interactions and the desire for open innovation will require IT organizations to develop a new approach that balances the need for corporate security with the requirement to accommodate frequent customer and partner conversations. IT staff will still be expected to manage this content at the back end of the life cycle.
  • Wikis, blogs, podcasts and instant messaging have become staples in many enterprises, especially as marketing tools or as means of communicating with customers, prospects, employees and partners.
  • Enterprise and information architects should assess how able their ECM vendor(s) are when it comes to providing Web 2.0 features or integrating with third-party solutions for collaboration and communication to avoid creating more content silos. Usability remains a critical characteristic of perceived success or failure for ECM.
  • Interwoven, Open Text and EMC are among the ECM vendors focusing development efforts on increased support for mobile clients, such as BlackBerrys and the iPhone, and for offline capabilities.
  • Today, however, all this content creation and sharing typically happens outside any formal content management strategy. Organizations should take advantage of evolving, richer user interfaces and tools for content creation, consumption and multichannel output.
  • Alternative Delivery Models
  • The capital outlay required for ECM, and the internal resources needed to implement and maintain ECM suites, can be daunting. It is not unusual for an organization to spend $1 million or more on software and services for a large deal. In a 2008 survey (see Note 1), 22% of the respondents indicated they were spending over $1 million on content management software purchases in 2008, while 14% were spending between $500,000 and $1 million. In addition, it can take at least six to 18 months to deploy an ECM application.
  • Gartner clients are increasingly asking about SaaS, shared services and open source as alternative delivery approaches to implementing on-premises, commercial software. Yet the penetration of open-source and SaaS solutions today represents less than 5% of the overall ECM software market (based on total software revenue)
  • Market Definition/Description
  • Gartner defines today's ECM suites as encompassing the following core components: Document management for check-in/check-out, version control, security and library services for business documents. Document imaging for capturing, transforming and managing images of paper documents. Records management for long-term archiving, automation of retention and compliance policies, and ensuring legal, regulatory and industry compliance. Workflow for supporting business processes, routing content, assigning work tasks and states, and creating audit trails. Web content management for controlling the content of a Web site through the use of specific management tools based on a core repository. It includes content creation functions, such as templating, workflow and change management, and content deployment functions that deliver prepackaged or on-demand content to Web servers. Document-centric collaboration for document sharing and supporting project teams.
  • Though not explicitly identified as a core component, information access, or search, technology has always been a critical component of an ECM suite, and it will play an even bigger role in helping companies sift through structured and unstructured information. All ECM products ship with a search engine embedded as a core component, so that users can create a full-text index and search the content stored in repositories. Most ECM vendors re-license the search engine from another provider, typically Autonomy-Verity or Fast (see "Q&A: ECM and Information Access Technologies Grow Ever-More Entwined").
  • Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Vendor Strengths and Cautions
  • Interwoven
  • Interwoven has increasingly focused its strategy on being a best-of-breed content management vendor, with a strong message around Web-based and vertical-specific solutions.
  • Although Interwoven has all the core ECM capabilities and related components such as DAM, it delivers and emphasizes these as stand-alone offerings for different business scenarios. The suite is only loosely coupled, and cross-selling opportunities are limited.
  • Gartner believes that Interwoven's future lies in high-end WCM, analytics and marketing solutions. It can continue to carve out a successful position with its consistent marketing messages and Web-based solutions, but this won't be easy given the increasing competitive pressures and changing market dynamics. Interwoven must continue to penetrate the accounting, legal and professional services markets and expand into adjacent markets such as the government sector — otherwise, like others, it faces a stagnant future in the traditional document and records management arena.
  • Microsoft
  • More so than any other vendor, Microsoft has driven ECM market transformation with SharePoint 2007. Microsoft has brought BCS to the masses by bringing the cost per seat down and tying simple content management to the familiar desktop tools that users use every day.
  • With MOSS 2007, Microsoft provides an integrated product suite that provides at least basic capabilities in the six core ECM functional components, along with portal and search capabilities. The fact that it is built on the Microsoft stack will appeal to a broad range of organizations for whom Microsoft is a strategic partner.
  • While MOSS 2007 has attracted interest and gained some traction as a records management tool, a WCM solution and a platform for building CEVAs, it still has to mature in these areas.
  • Feedback regarding large, decentralized deployments of MOSS 2007 indicates a need for improvements in scalability and in management and replication functionality. Microsoft has begun providing tools and published guidance to address these challenges.
  • Microsoft must continue to ramp up support, training and partner certification as there is a clear "skills gap" between the demand SharePoint has created and the supply of well-trained implementation personnel.
  • Objective
  • Objective, an Australia-based vendor, has a strong vertical-market focus on the public sector in Asia/Pacific and Europe
  • The Objective suite, which has evolved through development rather than acquisition, is well-integrated and addresses the core ECM functional components.
  • Historically, Objective has delivered most professional services itself, rather than through partners. Recently, it has begun to establish relationships with major system integrators, but it needs to expand further and extend this partner channel.
  •  
    The enterprise content management market is marked by consolidation, a shift toward infrastructure vendors and a focus on solutions. This Magic Quadrant assesses ECM vendors and their software suites.
Lars Bauer

R.I.P. Enterprise RSS - ReadWriteWeb - 0 views

  • For me the absence of Enterprise RSS (and perhaps along with other key infrastructure, like Enterprise Search and social tagging tools) in environments where we find wikis, blogs and social networking tools is a sign of tactical or immature implementations of enterprise social computing. We are just at the beginning of this journey.
  • n this respect, I can actually see many opportunities for integrating Enterprise RSS features into Enterprise Search solutions or into existing portal platforms (actually, Confluence is a great example of a feed friendly wiki platform - both to create and consume).
  • that people are talking too much about technology and products and not enough about real-world use cases. Simply stating how great RSS is and that it could be very useful won't get you much buy-in, not from management nor most importantly end-users.
  • ...17 more annotations...
  • In two of our projects with large law firms we included an RSS feedreader in the social software mix (among wiki, blogs, social bookmarking). We introduced it primarily to Knowledge Management Lawyers (KML) that needed to gather a lot of content from various sources. They also use it to subscribe to updates from the wiki and blogs. They appreciate the fact that it is much easier to plow through a stream of updates rather than going from email to email and deleting every one of them.
  • Have a look at two case studies: Dewey & LeBoeuf and Allen & Overy
  • In our company, we had a survey in April (2008), asking managers if they needed a RSS Reader. Some figures: 72 managers responded, 68 managers subscribed to more than one (company) blog. 9 managers already used iGoogle or a RSS Reader, 13 managers replied they did not need a RSS Reader, 50 managers replied they need a RSS Reader. As a result we planned a project to select and deliver a company RSS Reader. The project will be executed mid 2009.
  • Once CRM, DMS, Intranet and other proprietary system vendors thoroughly implement RSS functionality, it will get a big push.
  • I think a tipping point might come if ERP apps providers (SAP, Oracle, etc.) started publishing RSS feeds of ERP data!
  • In another project with a large law firm we took a very close look at the production (and consumption) of current awareness material. Current awareness included for example information on current developments within legal practices, latest court decisions etc. The firm made extensive use of newsletters to disseminate that kind of information. There was a multitude of newsletters available, some of them covering similar grounds. Maintaining email lists was very time-consuming and frustrating. Consumers did not know which newsletter were available. Also, newsletters were not personalised nor very timely, as they had a specific publishing date. We therefore recommended using RSS as delivery format, which would make the process of producing and consuming content more efficient and in the end more cost-effective as shown in a business case
  • It's with a heavy heart and a sense of bewilderment that we conclude that the market for enterprise-specific RSS readers appears to be dead. Two years ago there were three major players offering software that delivered information to the computers of business users via RSS. Today it looks to us like the demand simply never arose and that market is over.
  • It's insane - a solid RSS strategy can be a huge competitive advantage in any field. We have no idea why so relatively few people see that.
  • Neglecting RSS at work seems to us like pure insanity.
  • If dashboards take off, then maybe RSS will gain traction as the wiring? This probably requires: secure feed displaying widgets, good filters.
  • Enterprises are scared to disrupt their own structure and command lines by introducing uncontrolled information flows both internally (which can route around management) and externally (which can route around the official PR outputs and sales inputs of the company)
  • Look at the headline you used.. RIP Enterprise RSS. Now read that from the point of view of a manager in an enterprise. WTF does "Enterprise RSS" mean? What are the business reasons to care? What does it do for them? People don't care adopt RSS, just as people don't adopt XHTML, Javascript etc. They adopt products that use technology to do something that they value. No one cares about the technologies used to display this page... they want to read the page.
  • Enterprise RSS doesn't mean much. When RSS companies start talking about secure communications channels that intelligently and automatically route relevant information to the people who need/want it, light bulbs start lighting up.
  • I think Microsoft SharePoint could be the killer app for RSS in the enterprise. SharePoint has RSS built in and uses it to syndicate changes that happen within the SharePoint ecosphere and notify enterprise workers that something significant has happened. Of course, SharePoint RSS could work with third-party RSS readers, but it's really designed to be used with Microsoft's Office Suite, where enterprise workers can interface with SharePoint, through RSS and other means, directly
  • One thing missing from this (great) post is the cost of these tools. Looking at Newsgator & Attensa, these are expensive enterprise tools and trying to sell them to IT managers that don't fully understand RSS is next to impossible. Imagine saying to a CIO, who barely understands what RSS is, that you need $175,000 for Enterprise RSS software... it isn't an easy sell.
  • In this part of the world (SE Asia) we're seeing more & more top management wanting tools for themselves and their teams to connect to "Facebook and these social network things". Feeds and aggregation/search tools are the perfect wiring for this. But the front end? There's a lot of choice and individual needs vary. A decently setup igoogle/netvibes page can work wonders..so why pay?
  • Also, reading RSS is likely viewed as not work related, and so its frowned upon within the enterprise (remember, those enterprise folks have "real" work to do, they don't get paid to read BoingBoing all day long).
  •  
    Jan. 12, 2009
Lars Bauer

HOW TO: Use Wikis for Business Projects | Mashable on Jul 1, 2009 - 0 views

  • Nearly all wikis dispense with advanced page and text formatting, instead embracing a “just the facts” approach to documentation, that can actually be refreshing.
  • Removing the ability to spend time formatting content removes the feeling that the content needs more than basic formatting. Where people aren’t spending time on formatting they’re likely to spend it on just writing and moving on.
  • So in addition to learning the new wiki software and the cultural shift that comes with it, team members must also unlearn what they already know about how projects are documented and information is organized.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Email is most often the channel that the wiki-wary fall back on during this kind of transition, and the most dangerous for locking knowledge into a recipient list.
  • Mashable () has also published two large round ups of available wiki software in the past year: 30+ Solutions to Start Your Own Wiki and 100+ More Wiki Tools and Resources.
  •  
    "One of the best web tools available to businesses for enabling teamwork and collaboration is the wiki. (...) Though Wikis have been around since the 90s, their potential for business collaboration has made them more popular in the business world over the past few years. While a wiki can let project documentation grow organically as a project unfolds, it is like any tool and needs to be used the right way to get the most out of it. If you're thinking about using a wiki in your team's toolkit for the first time, keeping a few points in mind will help everyone get up and running without tripping over the changes that the wiki way brings to project documentation."
Lars Bauer

Research Summary: Enterprise Content Management, from State of California - White Paper... - 0 views

  •  
    Jan. 2007, PDF, 15 pages - Overview: This paper was prepared in response to a requests for information on enterprise document management systems which are now most generally marketed and packaged as a component of an Enterprise Content Management (ECM) solution. The Enterprise Content Management Association (AIIM) has defined ECM as "The technologies, tools, and methods used to capture, manage, store, preserve, and deliver information, content and documents related to organizational processes. ECM tools and strategies allow the management of an organization's unstructured information, wherever that information exists." The document management component of ECM generally focuses on managing unstructured content so that it is more easily managed and accessible to enterprise resource users.
Lars Bauer

Second-wave adopters are coming. Are you prepared? Part 2 / 3 | Headshift Blog - 0 views

  • For example, a very common argument is that people are unwilling to share what they know. Well, they may not be necessarily unwilling to do so, but it does take low priority when people try to meet their goals and deadlines. That was the fallacy of the early KM era, in which employees were asked to step outside their work and 'contribute' to a fancy KM tool (aka database).
  • People need to realize that in most cases, knowledge-sharing is not an activity but in fact a by-product of people's work. That's why it is so important to implement these kind of tools into people's workflow.
  • This leaves us with the last three barriers (applications not part of user's workflow, time effort > personal value, complex applications).
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • As much as we dislike it, people live in their inbox and this fact is not going away over night by telling them about the benefits of using social tools! Given the lack of appropriate tools in the past, people have grown accustomed to (ab)use email for everything, e.g. public conversations (e.g. cc'd), collaboration, awareness (e.g. newsletters, updates), connecting with others.
Lars Bauer

Portals and KM: Wikis in Knowledge Management at Law Firms - Part One: ThoughtFarmer Ex... - 0 views

  • following session about wikis use in law firms, primarily for knowledge management. It was led by two experienced knowledge management professionals with major firms. They shared their experiences within their firms.
  • The first example was a Canadian law firm with 100 lawyers and 100 support staff. Prior to the wiki, documents were stored individually in folders on a shared drive with no consistency.
  • They were already using Domino so they choose the Domino wiki for their initial effort.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • There were wikis for different practice groups and they were searchable.
  • Their early success created a big demand. Every group wanted wikis. Updating was given to assistants, clerks & associates. However the technology was not perfect. You had to sign on separately for each wiki and they were creating silos of information. To solve this issue they looked at a number of enterprise tools and found most too feature rich and complex for lawyers to use them.
  • They went with Thought Farmer for its simplicity and ease of interface. (see my review - ThoughtFarmer – Intranet 2.0). It has Web 2.0 features – staff profile, tagging, RSS, social networking, email publishing, - also search with relevancy ranking.
  • The presenter’s thoughts on lessons learned include: select an easy to use tool, do not force participation, transfer the process of updating to groups and develop a process for each group. You should also offer training and share success stories. They held individual training in 10 to 15 minute sessions.
  • They have found that not all users will be active contributors and the ROI is hard to measure. The tool should also be more Blackberry friendly. However, overall it seems to be a great success.
Lars Bauer

Small Blue Suite Research Site - 0 views

  •  
    "This is the future site of the SmallBlue World version, which is under construction. SmallBlue is a privacy-preserving data mining tool which unlocks the power of social network. An IBM Intranet production version has been indexing social network of 300,000+ IBMers in more than 100 countires. A commercial version of SmallBlue, called IBM Atlas (for Lotus Connections), has been deployed in several companies. If you are interested in Atlas, please contact IBM Lotus Software Services."
Lars Bauer

Legal Technology - Adopting Wikis in Law Firms - 0 views

  • This article will explore ways in which Microsoft SharePoint wikis can provide the control and structure that legal professionals require, along with the benefits of open collaboration that wikis afford.
  • use SharePoint's built-in security to control who may create, edit and view wiki pages
  • Another built-in SharePoint feature is content approval. You can use this feature to have SharePoint notify an approver when new or edited content is submitted and require an approval prior to making the content generally available.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Alerts are another tool in your content control arsenal. Any wiki user may request an alert at the wiki or page level.
  • One aspect of SharePoint wikis that is not readily apparent is that each wiki page is a specially formatted Web-part page. As such, given the appropriate permissions, you can add your own Web parts to create a hybrid wiki page. At my firm we've used this trick, in conjunction with a custom workflow, to automatically add Web parts to each new wiki page as it is created
  • The adoption and use of wikis within law firms follows an evolutionary path from indifference to skepticism, to partial, then full adoption. The rate at which a firm moves along this adoption curve will depend both on how quickly legal professionals embrace the belief that collaborative authorship can efficiently produce high-quality reference materials, as well as how effectively technical professionals implement the tools for control and organization of the authorship process that lawyers demand.
  •  
    Mark Gerow, IT professional with the Fenwick & West law firm in San Francisco, Law.com, Feb 20, 2009
Lars Bauer

The Nature of Enterprise 2.0 (SocialComputingMagazine.com) - 0 views

  • Enterprise 2.0 is not about implementing Web 2.0 tools inside a company. It is about the transformation of a company to be aligned in this new world of work.
  • The real transformation it is about a new architecture of companies and help them make ready for the next 20 years of business.
  • To understand that the adoption of Enterprise 2.0 is more than the implementation of a single or a set of tools, think about these 10 themes around Enterprise 2.0. These themes envision the angles of every company that needs to be changed to fully adopt the Enterprise 2.0 vision.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • An external consultancy firm cannot change everything. Companies must rely on their own vision, their ability to execute and on different types of companies to integrate the full vision of Enterprise 2.0. InterimIC can help on different areas to help them on the most challenging parts of the evolution towards Enterprise 2.0.
  • Together with Nexocial we can extend that reach with Information Liquidity, Information Technology and the practical side of Knowledge and Human Capital.
  •  
    Hugo Leijtens, March 8, 2009
Lars Bauer

Legal Technology - Digital Dialogue Revs Up at Top Firms - 0 views

  •  
    LawFirmInc, Sep 10, 2007, via law.com - 12th AmLaw Tech survey shows Am Law 200 firms are connecting with more use of online collaboration and wireless tools
Lars Bauer

infoarch: Where Do I Share and Store My Information? - 0 views

  • Most companies have loads of tools to help employees share and store information. Because we have so many of these tools, it can be hard to decide where to share and store my information.
  • (Our) Current IT solutions To support (our) employees the following solutions are provided: FTP servers Shared network directories (SND) Wiki’s Blogs Discussion fora Compass Sharepoint Document Archive/Vault
  • When to use what solution?
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • In summary To give a clear overview of the different solutions, we summarize their commonalities and differences in the table below.
  •  
    Nov 25, 2008
Lars Bauer

The Enterprise Social Software & Collaboration Report 2009 from CMS Watch - 0 views

  •  
    510 pages; standard ed. for team use: $1,650 -- "Find out how major Social Software and Collaboration technologies really work. Researched by the same CMS Watch team that has been providing buyers with unbiased advice for the past 8 years, The Enterprise Social Software & Collaboration Report will help your team decide whether and where and how to apply which social media and collaboration tools in your enterprise. "
Lars Bauer

headshift > Projects > Legal Division - Major International Investment Bank - 0 views

  • With the high levels of innovation and complexity in banking products, our client wanted to ensure that people involved in the negotiation and implementation of associated transactions could stay abreast of change and be better connected with relevant expertise and information.  In that context, we have been working in a consultancy capacity with members of pilot groups from distinct operational areas and communities, to identify key processes/business needs to be supported by well-positioned social tools.
  • Implementing social tools that fit the use cases
  • Our recommended solution combined, amongst other things, a wiki, shared blogs, book-marking, tagging and personalised pages.
Lars Bauer

headshift > Projects > "Magic Circle" law firm injects life into intranet using a botto... - 0 views

  • Using a wiki platform, the international law firm made it easy to create and maintain "subwebs".
  • Using a wiki platform, the international law firm made it easy to create and maintain "subwebs". Subwebs are microsites on the firm's intranet, devoted to a specific subject such as a specialty within a practice or key client information. Headshift helped the firm explore how to broaden the participation in providing subweb content and how to move away from a process that required pages to be prepared individually in FrontPage, a web page design tool.
  • Headshift recommended an enterprise wiki platform, customised to feature dynamic navigation and designed to match the intranet look-and-feel.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • The wiki is the first step of the firm's adoption of social tools behind the firewall. There are plans to roll out a firm-wide RSS infrastructure and an enterprise blogging platform, supported by a business case to simplify the publishing process for internal and external current awareness content
Lars Bauer

Nachlese zum ECM-Summit 2008 in Offenbach | Von Dirk Röhrborn | Atlassian, Co... - 0 views

  • Dieser Beitrag fasst einige der Vorträge aus meiner Sicht zusammen, die ich besucht habe. Enthalten sind die Keynotes von Ulrich Kampffmeyer, Dieter Rappold und LeeBryant sowie Anwenderberichte von der Schweizerischen Post, MLP Finanzdienstleistungen und REVACOM GmbH.
  • Keynote von Ulrich Kampffmeyer zu Human Impact
  • Was ändert Web 2.0 Marketing an Internet Management ? Diesem Thema widmet sich Dieter Rappold von Knallgrau Media aus Wien
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • Content is made of people: from ECM to E2.0 Der Vortragende Lee Bryant ist CEO von Headshift aus London. Sein Vortrag beschäftigt sich mit der Transition von Enterprise Content Management zum Enterprise 2.0.
  • Bryants Herangehensweise an Enterprise 2.0 fasst er mit folgenden Punkten zusammen: Public feeds & flows: internal and external RSS, feeds based on subjects, persons, group or search Bookmarks & tags: people store, share, tag, vote or comment on useful links and news Blogs & social bookmarks: social objects shared within networks and discussed in blogs Group collaboration: intimate groups/teams organize knowledge in wikis and group systems personal tools: organise your “stuff” by tags; arrange in a portal; manage networks and feeds Dabei geht es ihm vor allem auch darum, diese Dinge als Stimulanz für die pragmatische Umsetzung der alltäglichen - geschäftskritischen - Aufgaben einzusetzen.
  • Lee Bryant stellt kurz die wichtigsten Vertreter der Enterprise 2.0 Tools vor, die wir auch hier beschrieben haben. Dabei spielt auch Atlassian Confluence eine Rolle. Microsoft Sharepoint kommt bei ihm aber eher schlecht weg, was die Akzeptanz als Enterprise 2.0 Plattform angeht.
  • Post Wide Web: Das Intranet der Schweizerischen Post
  • Social Computing bei MLP Finanzdienstleistungen
  • Einsatz eines Unternehmens-Wikis für das Wissensmanagement am Beispiel von IT-Delivery-Prozessen der REVACOM GmbH
  •  
    Nov 12, 2008
1 - 20 of 62 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page