Skip to main content

Home/ Legal KM/ Group items tagged 2008

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Lars Bauer

Nachlese zum ECM-Summit 2008 in Offenbach | Von Dirk Röhrborn | Atlassian, Co... - 0 views

  • Dieser Beitrag fasst einige der Vorträge aus meiner Sicht zusammen, die ich besucht habe. Enthalten sind die Keynotes von Ulrich Kampffmeyer, Dieter Rappold und LeeBryant sowie Anwenderberichte von der Schweizerischen Post, MLP Finanzdienstleistungen und REVACOM GmbH.
  • Keynote von Ulrich Kampffmeyer zu Human Impact
  • Was ändert Web 2.0 Marketing an Internet Management ? Diesem Thema widmet sich Dieter Rappold von Knallgrau Media aus Wien
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • Content is made of people: from ECM to E2.0 Der Vortragende Lee Bryant ist CEO von Headshift aus London. Sein Vortrag beschäftigt sich mit der Transition von Enterprise Content Management zum Enterprise 2.0.
  • Bryants Herangehensweise an Enterprise 2.0 fasst er mit folgenden Punkten zusammen: Public feeds & flows: internal and external RSS, feeds based on subjects, persons, group or search Bookmarks & tags: people store, share, tag, vote or comment on useful links and news Blogs & social bookmarks: social objects shared within networks and discussed in blogs Group collaboration: intimate groups/teams organize knowledge in wikis and group systems personal tools: organise your “stuff” by tags; arrange in a portal; manage networks and feeds Dabei geht es ihm vor allem auch darum, diese Dinge als Stimulanz für die pragmatische Umsetzung der alltäglichen - geschäftskritischen - Aufgaben einzusetzen.
  • Lee Bryant stellt kurz die wichtigsten Vertreter der Enterprise 2.0 Tools vor, die wir auch hier beschrieben haben. Dabei spielt auch Atlassian Confluence eine Rolle. Microsoft Sharepoint kommt bei ihm aber eher schlecht weg, was die Akzeptanz als Enterprise 2.0 Plattform angeht.
  • Post Wide Web: Das Intranet der Schweizerischen Post
  • Social Computing bei MLP Finanzdienstleistungen
  • Einsatz eines Unternehmens-Wikis für das Wissensmanagement am Beispiel von IT-Delivery-Prozessen der REVACOM GmbH
  •  
    Nov 12, 2008
Lars Bauer

The Law Goes Open Source - Forbes.com - 0 views

  •  
    by Daniel Fisher, Juny 5, 2008, Forbes Magazine June 30, 2008
Lars Bauer

SocialText Blog: Socialtext Wins Business Journal Award - 0 views

  •  
    Dec 8, 2008
Lars Bauer

TakingAIIM: KM, E2.0 and The Law - 0 views

  •  
    Oct. 3, 2008, by Carl Frappaolo
Lars Bauer

Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Content Management (Gartner, Sept. 23, 2008) - 0 views

  • This Magic Quadrant represents a snapshot of the ECM market at a particular point in time. Gartner advises readers not to compare the placement of vendors from last year to this year. The market is changing, and the criteria for selecting and ranking vendors continue to evolve. Our assessments take into account the vendors' current product offerings and overall strategies, as well as their future initiatives and product road maps. We also factor in how well vendors are driving market changes or at least adapting to changing market requirements.
  • see "Dataquest Insight: Enterprise Content Management Software Market Share Analysis, Worldwide, 2007"
  • Among the primary trends that IT architects and planners must consider as they develop content management strategies and determine their strategic partners are the following: ECM is increasingly becoming part of IT infrastructure. Compliance and information retention are getting higher profiles at CxO-level. Web 2.0 and mobile technologies, driven by user expectations, are influencing richer user interfaces and capabilities to empower business users. Integration and federation of content repositories will be critical in future. Application specificity — some vendors provide BCS, while others will have to focus on horizontal solutions and content-enabled vertical applications (CEVAs) in order to grow by delivering domain expertise. Alternative delivery models, such as software as a service (SaaS) and open source, are gaining increased interest.
  • ...47 more annotations...
  • Market Shifts Toward Infrastructure Vendors
  • Content management is becoming part of enterprises' infrastructure and consequently is being delivered by large vendors of enterprise infrastructure such as IBM, Microsoft and Oracle.
  • IBM, Oracle and EMC are competing at the high end of the market, while Microsoft is commoditizing the market at the low end. Recently, HP entered the ECM market by acquiring Tower Software, a niche vendor long known for its integrated document and records management.
  • More than 54% of the market, as measured by total software revenue, is held by just three vendors — EMC, IBM and Open Text
  • Pure-play content management vendors and vertical-market specialists such as Interwoven, Xerox, Xythos Software and Vignette are fighting to compete. Bright spots for the pure-play vendors and vertical specialists are the mid-market and CEVAs
  • IBM and Oracle have the potential to drive the market forward by creating a powerful message based on broader enterprise information management (EIM). Since they own the key stack components, such as the database, the information access, business intelligence (BI), analytics and reporting tools (and often line-of-business applications), they can bring together structured data and unstructured content. On the other hand, choosing a suite from a stack vendor may involve tradeoffs as some functional components may not be equivalent to best-of-breed offerings.
  • Of all the infrastructure vendors, Microsoft has driven the most change in the ECM market over the past 18 months with Windows SharePoint Services (WSS) and Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) 2007.
  • Adopting WSS or MOSS for mass deployment, and an ECM suite for high-end, content-centric processes and best-of-breed Web content, will remain a useful strategy for enterprises during the next three to five years. This coexistence strategy could reduce the costs and some of the risks of content management for an entire enterprise.
  • For many organizations, the need to increase workers' productivity and innovation is more important than ever. Critical goals include improving users' Web experience and connecting workers to relevant content and to each other.
  • see "Report Highlight for Dataquest Insight: E-Discovery Market Drives New Search, Content and Records Management Investments"
  • Specialists like Interwoven and Vignette are moving into Web-based CEVAs and interactive marketing and customer experience. They remain among the few choices enterprises have for high-end, enterprise-class, externally-facing Web content management (WCM) solutions. In the mid-market, Hyland Software, SunGard Data Systems and Saperion use their imaging and archiving heritages to address transactional content applications such as medical records, claims processing and accounts payable invoice processing.
  • Integration/Federation Grows in Importance as Organizations Look to Establish an Information-Centric Infrastructure
  • The ideal ECM architecture would enable one repository, or a few repositories with a common database — but this is not an ideal world. Dealing with multiple, siloed content repositories is a fact of life for many organizations. In Gartner's 2008 survey of nearly 400 respondents (see Note 1), 69% of enterprises indicated they had more than six repositories.
  • see "New Standard Will Make Content Repositories Interoperable"
  • Enterprises keep a vast amount of information locked up in documents, spreadsheets and other forms of unstructured data ("content"). To maximize the value of this information, enterprises need to integrate the various types and stores of content, integrate content with structured data, and integrate internal content with content and structured data outside the enterprise.
  • XML is becoming increasingly important for content creation, component management, output and integration with other applications. The term "mashup" has become synonymous with content couplings that were formerly difficult to achieve, even with traditional integration resources. Enterprise mashups that integrate content with business application data or with Web content via Really Simple Syndication (RSS) feeds or APIs remain rudimentary compared with the explosion of consumer mashups.
  • IBM intends to deliver ECM-focused widgets for creating mashups as part of the FileNet P8 platform.
  • User Empowerment vs. Governance
  • A Range of Needs Leads to Application Specificity and a Fragmented Focus From Vendors
  • Social software encourages informal collaborative activities that fall outside the traditional scope of transactional applications, formal workflows or engineered teams. The rapid growth of social network interactions and the desire for open innovation will require IT organizations to develop a new approach that balances the need for corporate security with the requirement to accommodate frequent customer and partner conversations. IT staff will still be expected to manage this content at the back end of the life cycle.
  • Wikis, blogs, podcasts and instant messaging have become staples in many enterprises, especially as marketing tools or as means of communicating with customers, prospects, employees and partners.
  • Enterprise and information architects should assess how able their ECM vendor(s) are when it comes to providing Web 2.0 features or integrating with third-party solutions for collaboration and communication to avoid creating more content silos. Usability remains a critical characteristic of perceived success or failure for ECM.
  • Interwoven, Open Text and EMC are among the ECM vendors focusing development efforts on increased support for mobile clients, such as BlackBerrys and the iPhone, and for offline capabilities.
  • Today, however, all this content creation and sharing typically happens outside any formal content management strategy. Organizations should take advantage of evolving, richer user interfaces and tools for content creation, consumption and multichannel output.
  • Alternative Delivery Models
  • The capital outlay required for ECM, and the internal resources needed to implement and maintain ECM suites, can be daunting. It is not unusual for an organization to spend $1 million or more on software and services for a large deal. In a 2008 survey (see Note 1), 22% of the respondents indicated they were spending over $1 million on content management software purchases in 2008, while 14% were spending between $500,000 and $1 million. In addition, it can take at least six to 18 months to deploy an ECM application.
  • Gartner clients are increasingly asking about SaaS, shared services and open source as alternative delivery approaches to implementing on-premises, commercial software. Yet the penetration of open-source and SaaS solutions today represents less than 5% of the overall ECM software market (based on total software revenue)
  • Market Definition/Description
  • Gartner defines today's ECM suites as encompassing the following core components: Document management for check-in/check-out, version control, security and library services for business documents. Document imaging for capturing, transforming and managing images of paper documents. Records management for long-term archiving, automation of retention and compliance policies, and ensuring legal, regulatory and industry compliance. Workflow for supporting business processes, routing content, assigning work tasks and states, and creating audit trails. Web content management for controlling the content of a Web site through the use of specific management tools based on a core repository. It includes content creation functions, such as templating, workflow and change management, and content deployment functions that deliver prepackaged or on-demand content to Web servers. Document-centric collaboration for document sharing and supporting project teams.
  • Though not explicitly identified as a core component, information access, or search, technology has always been a critical component of an ECM suite, and it will play an even bigger role in helping companies sift through structured and unstructured information. All ECM products ship with a search engine embedded as a core component, so that users can create a full-text index and search the content stored in repositories. Most ECM vendors re-license the search engine from another provider, typically Autonomy-Verity or Fast (see "Q&A: ECM and Information Access Technologies Grow Ever-More Entwined").
  • Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Vendor Strengths and Cautions
  • Interwoven
  • Interwoven has increasingly focused its strategy on being a best-of-breed content management vendor, with a strong message around Web-based and vertical-specific solutions.
  • Although Interwoven has all the core ECM capabilities and related components such as DAM, it delivers and emphasizes these as stand-alone offerings for different business scenarios. The suite is only loosely coupled, and cross-selling opportunities are limited.
  • Gartner believes that Interwoven's future lies in high-end WCM, analytics and marketing solutions. It can continue to carve out a successful position with its consistent marketing messages and Web-based solutions, but this won't be easy given the increasing competitive pressures and changing market dynamics. Interwoven must continue to penetrate the accounting, legal and professional services markets and expand into adjacent markets such as the government sector — otherwise, like others, it faces a stagnant future in the traditional document and records management arena.
  • Microsoft
  • More so than any other vendor, Microsoft has driven ECM market transformation with SharePoint 2007. Microsoft has brought BCS to the masses by bringing the cost per seat down and tying simple content management to the familiar desktop tools that users use every day.
  • With MOSS 2007, Microsoft provides an integrated product suite that provides at least basic capabilities in the six core ECM functional components, along with portal and search capabilities. The fact that it is built on the Microsoft stack will appeal to a broad range of organizations for whom Microsoft is a strategic partner.
  • While MOSS 2007 has attracted interest and gained some traction as a records management tool, a WCM solution and a platform for building CEVAs, it still has to mature in these areas.
  • Feedback regarding large, decentralized deployments of MOSS 2007 indicates a need for improvements in scalability and in management and replication functionality. Microsoft has begun providing tools and published guidance to address these challenges.
  • Microsoft must continue to ramp up support, training and partner certification as there is a clear "skills gap" between the demand SharePoint has created and the supply of well-trained implementation personnel.
  • Objective
  • Objective, an Australia-based vendor, has a strong vertical-market focus on the public sector in Asia/Pacific and Europe
  • The Objective suite, which has evolved through development rather than acquisition, is well-integrated and addresses the core ECM functional components.
  • Historically, Objective has delivered most professional services itself, rather than through partners. Recently, it has begun to establish relationships with major system integrators, but it needs to expand further and extend this partner channel.
  •  
    The enterprise content management market is marked by consolidation, a shift toward infrastructure vendors and a focus on solutions. This Magic Quadrant assesses ECM vendors and their software suites.
Lars Bauer

infoarch: Where Do I Share and Store My Information? - 0 views

  • Most companies have loads of tools to help employees share and store information. Because we have so many of these tools, it can be hard to decide where to share and store my information.
  • (Our) Current IT solutions To support (our) employees the following solutions are provided: FTP servers Shared network directories (SND) Wiki’s Blogs Discussion fora Compass Sharepoint Document Archive/Vault
  • When to use what solution?
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • In summary To give a clear overview of the different solutions, we summarize their commonalities and differences in the table below.
  •  
    Nov 25, 2008
Lars Bauer

Wiki++ in 2009: Moving Toward Suites With Wiki at the Core - 0 views

  •  
    Dec 17, 2008
Lars Bauer

SocialText Blog: DMS and Collaboration Suite: Friends not Foes - 0 views

  • What's the relationship between a document management system (DMS) and an enterprise collaboration suite like Socialtext?
  • Would Socialtext replace the DMS? Would the two work together?
  • The first thing that companies should understand is that document management and collaboration are distinct activities.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • Document management is all about workflow, control, and risk mitigation. Its objective is summarized perfectly by the two words in its name: "documents" and "management". It got its start in the legal departments of pharmaceutical companies, who were concerned to make sure that their companies were producing documentation in full compliance with regulatory requirements. A DMS thrives where there are a) documents already being created as part of a business process; and b) those documents need to be closely checked in, checked out, supervised, edited, approved, and stored following a consistent and audit-proof process.
  • Collaboration, by contrast, is all about people working together to share ideas, notes, questions, comments, etc. Collaboration does not typically follow a standard process; it is much more free-form and free-flowing. Documents are not typically the format of choice. Asking a question or creating a meeting agenda or to-do list doesn't require a document; it just requires typing some words and putting them where other people can see and edit them. That's why so many people simply fire off an email when they collaborate; it spares them the unnecessary step of creating a document.
  • When asked about the relationship between DMS and collaboration tools, what I said was that some of the content in a typical DMS really belongs there. These are the documents associated with highly regulated processes. But most of the content in a typical DMS--to-do lists, meeting notes, press clippings, conversations, working papers, personal observations--doesn't really belong there. It's in the DMS because there was no good place to put it. That's where a collaboration suite can do a much better job. A good collaboration suite can liberate that content from the tyranny of documents and nested folders, and will encourage people to use it for actual working materials.
  • In many cases, you will want to integrate the two. Law firms, for example, are absolutely dependent on their document management systems to manage their filings and other legal documents. But we're increasingly seeing them set up collaboration suites to capture all the discussion around the documents, how to use them, what they mean, and so on. The two systems are integrated with links from the collaboration suite into the corresponding DMS records.
  • What I'm saying amounts to this: Use your document management system to manage documents, and use your collaboration suite to collaborate.
  • unfortunately SocialText is not very good at linking to the documents in the obvious place (attachments).
  •  
    Sept. 8, 2008, by Michael Idinopulos of Socialtext
Lars Bauer

R.I.P. Enterprise RSS - ReadWriteWeb - 0 views

  • For me the absence of Enterprise RSS (and perhaps along with other key infrastructure, like Enterprise Search and social tagging tools) in environments where we find wikis, blogs and social networking tools is a sign of tactical or immature implementations of enterprise social computing. We are just at the beginning of this journey.
  • n this respect, I can actually see many opportunities for integrating Enterprise RSS features into Enterprise Search solutions or into existing portal platforms (actually, Confluence is a great example of a feed friendly wiki platform - both to create and consume).
  • that people are talking too much about technology and products and not enough about real-world use cases. Simply stating how great RSS is and that it could be very useful won't get you much buy-in, not from management nor most importantly end-users.
  • ...17 more annotations...
  • In two of our projects with large law firms we included an RSS feedreader in the social software mix (among wiki, blogs, social bookmarking). We introduced it primarily to Knowledge Management Lawyers (KML) that needed to gather a lot of content from various sources. They also use it to subscribe to updates from the wiki and blogs. They appreciate the fact that it is much easier to plow through a stream of updates rather than going from email to email and deleting every one of them.
  • Have a look at two case studies: Dewey & LeBoeuf and Allen & Overy
  • In our company, we had a survey in April (2008), asking managers if they needed a RSS Reader. Some figures: 72 managers responded, 68 managers subscribed to more than one (company) blog. 9 managers already used iGoogle or a RSS Reader, 13 managers replied they did not need a RSS Reader, 50 managers replied they need a RSS Reader. As a result we planned a project to select and deliver a company RSS Reader. The project will be executed mid 2009.
  • Once CRM, DMS, Intranet and other proprietary system vendors thoroughly implement RSS functionality, it will get a big push.
  • I think a tipping point might come if ERP apps providers (SAP, Oracle, etc.) started publishing RSS feeds of ERP data!
  • In another project with a large law firm we took a very close look at the production (and consumption) of current awareness material. Current awareness included for example information on current developments within legal practices, latest court decisions etc. The firm made extensive use of newsletters to disseminate that kind of information. There was a multitude of newsletters available, some of them covering similar grounds. Maintaining email lists was very time-consuming and frustrating. Consumers did not know which newsletter were available. Also, newsletters were not personalised nor very timely, as they had a specific publishing date. We therefore recommended using RSS as delivery format, which would make the process of producing and consuming content more efficient and in the end more cost-effective as shown in a business case
  • It's with a heavy heart and a sense of bewilderment that we conclude that the market for enterprise-specific RSS readers appears to be dead. Two years ago there were three major players offering software that delivered information to the computers of business users via RSS. Today it looks to us like the demand simply never arose and that market is over.
  • It's insane - a solid RSS strategy can be a huge competitive advantage in any field. We have no idea why so relatively few people see that.
  • Neglecting RSS at work seems to us like pure insanity.
  • If dashboards take off, then maybe RSS will gain traction as the wiring? This probably requires: secure feed displaying widgets, good filters.
  • Enterprises are scared to disrupt their own structure and command lines by introducing uncontrolled information flows both internally (which can route around management) and externally (which can route around the official PR outputs and sales inputs of the company)
  • Look at the headline you used.. RIP Enterprise RSS. Now read that from the point of view of a manager in an enterprise. WTF does "Enterprise RSS" mean? What are the business reasons to care? What does it do for them? People don't care adopt RSS, just as people don't adopt XHTML, Javascript etc. They adopt products that use technology to do something that they value. No one cares about the technologies used to display this page... they want to read the page.
  • Enterprise RSS doesn't mean much. When RSS companies start talking about secure communications channels that intelligently and automatically route relevant information to the people who need/want it, light bulbs start lighting up.
  • I think Microsoft SharePoint could be the killer app for RSS in the enterprise. SharePoint has RSS built in and uses it to syndicate changes that happen within the SharePoint ecosphere and notify enterprise workers that something significant has happened. Of course, SharePoint RSS could work with third-party RSS readers, but it's really designed to be used with Microsoft's Office Suite, where enterprise workers can interface with SharePoint, through RSS and other means, directly
  • One thing missing from this (great) post is the cost of these tools. Looking at Newsgator & Attensa, these are expensive enterprise tools and trying to sell them to IT managers that don't fully understand RSS is next to impossible. Imagine saying to a CIO, who barely understands what RSS is, that you need $175,000 for Enterprise RSS software... it isn't an easy sell.
  • In this part of the world (SE Asia) we're seeing more & more top management wanting tools for themselves and their teams to connect to "Facebook and these social network things". Feeds and aggregation/search tools are the perfect wiring for this. But the front end? There's a lot of choice and individual needs vary. A decently setup igoogle/netvibes page can work wonders..so why pay?
  • Also, reading RSS is likely viewed as not work related, and so its frowned upon within the enterprise (remember, those enterprise folks have "real" work to do, they don't get paid to read BoingBoing all day long).
  •  
    Jan. 12, 2009
Lars Bauer

Autonomy after Winning the Enterprise Search Wars : Beyond Search - 0 views

  • Connectors, in my experience, are one of the surprises that often bedevil licensees. These code chunks make it possible for the licensee to index information that reside in systems or files within an organization. A vendor who does not provide connectors leaves the customer with some stark options; for example, don’t index the content or pay for a new connector. If Mr. Stamper is correct, Autonomy’s connectors are a definite plus for the IDOL system.
  •  
    Dec 25, 2008
Lars Bauer

Slaw: Document Management for the Smaller Firm - 0 views

  •  
    June 5, 2008
Lars Bauer

Ten Security and Reliability Questions to Address Before Implementing ECM, from Digitec... - 0 views

  •  
    March 2008, PDF, 9 pages - Overview: Whether one outsources the information with an on-demand Enterprise Content Management (ECM) service or one manage the data storage in-house with an on-premise ECM system, information security and reliability should be the first priorities. Make sure one should understand which companies, software and network system configurations are best qualified to securely store and safeguard the information.
Lars Bauer

Caselines: KM and The Modern Law Firm: Formal Law Firm KM Strategy - 0 views

  • The next session at the Ark KM Conference saw Mark Young, Managing Partner, and John S. Gillies, Director of Practice Support, at Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP address development of a KM strategy.
  • He indicated that he often hears partners claim they could get more work in the door if they had more time; KM offered them more time, and hence more opportunity for more business.
  • He also feels that KM provides an opportunity to demonstrate greater value to clients.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • John outlined some specifics of the firm’s KM Strategy. The three primary prongs of their plan were an effective Document Management System (DMS); a way to manage precedents; and good DMS search.
  • They chose Interwoven for their DMS and adopted a unified “folder structure” as a way of fostering collaboration between practice groups.
  • For their search, they used comments from focus groups and the strategic plan to develop a 100-feature set of requirements, with each of the requirements weighted ranking from 1-5. Despite the extensive quantitative work, the two competitors, Recommind and Interwoven Universal Search (IUS), came out with an identical ranking. They went with IUS because of its tighter integration with Interwoven. John mentioned that Recommind did a better job of expertise identification, but that this feature was less important to them as a one-office shop.
  •  
    Oct. 30, 2008
Lars Bauer

SharePoint Summit - resolving the information challenges - 0 views

  •  
    14 October 2008, The Wellcome Collection Conference Centre, London
Lars Bauer

Shook, Hardy & Bacon Selects Recommind for Firmwide Information Management | Reuters - 0 views

  • Recommind, a leading provider of enterprise search, automatic categorization and eDiscovery systems for enterprises and law firms, today announced that Shook, Hardy & Bacon, a top international law firm, has chosen Recommind's MindServer(TM) Legal platform to power its internal information retrieval system. The MindServer Legal platform enables Shook, Hardy & Bacon's partners, associates, analysts, and paralegals in nine offices around the world to more effectively search, access and manage information to support client objectives in a cost-effective manner.
  • "We selected Recommind's MindServer Legal platform because our lawyers, analysts, and legal staff found it intuitive to use, identifying not only relevant documents and files, but also the on-point expertise of individual lawyers and analysts in the firm," said John Anderson, CIO at Shook, Hardy & Bacon. "In comparison with other platforms, Recommind's platform was more effective and will take employees less time in the searching process, leaving more time for clients."
  • Shook, Hardy & Bacon has chosen to deploy the following MindServer Legal components: -- Enterprise Search, which utilizes powerful, concept-based search capabilities to connect relevant information in document management, records management, portal and e-mail systems and myriad other applications and databases with the attorneys that need it. -- Matters & Expertise which provides a comprehensive, firm-wide view of matters, deals, cases, and the vast array of expertise contained within a firm by tapping into a variety of information sources such as time and billing systems, CRM applications, intranets, internal firm databases and other information repositories.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P. is an international law firm with a legal legacy spanning more than a century. Established in Kansas City in 1889, today the firm has grown to more than 1,507 employees worldwide, with 502 attorneys and 262 research analysts and paraprofessionals. Many of the research analysts hold advanced degrees, in biochemistry, neuroscience, engineering, genetics and physiology. The firm has nine offices strategically located in Geneva; Houston; Kansas City, Missouri; London; Miami; Orange County, California; San Francisco; Tampa, Florida; and Washington, D.C.
  • Recommind customers include the Australian Government, Bertelsmann, BMW, Cleary Gottlieb, Davies Arnold Cooper, Lewis Silkin, Novartis and Shearman & Sterling. Recommind is headquartered in San Francisco and has offices in New York, Chicago, Boston, Atlanta, London, and Bonn, Germany.
  •  
    Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:01am EST
Lars Bauer

ILTA Conference 2008 - Wikis in Law Firms - 0 views

  •  
    Knowledge Management Track at ILTA Conference 2008
Lars Bauer

Enterprise Search - Impact on how we do business | Knowledge Management « Law... - 0 views

  • If you’re reading this, you’ll likely be interested in the LinkedIn Group called Knowledge Management for Legal Professionals
  •  
    Notes from ILTA Conference, Aug. 25, 2008
Lars Bauer

Collaborative Thinking: 2009: Planning Considerations For Enterprise 2.0 - 0 views

  • "SharePoint Next": Call, Raise Or Fold
  • Communities & Social Networks: Think "Adoption", Not "Deployment"
  • Social Platforms: Managing The Gap
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • "Enterprise RSS": It's A Middleware Decision
  • Social Analytics: Redefining Business Intelligence
  • Enterprise 2.0: Long-term Issues
  • Enterprise 2.0: Vendors To Watch (alpha order)
  • Jive: Perhaps the most successful "mini suite" in the market right now and a good option for organizations that don't want to commit to SharePoint and have reservations about IBM.
  • Telligent: Telligent could be the "Jive of 2009" given its latest release (which rounds out the features), its integration with SharePoint, and alignment with a Microsoft environment overall.
  • Enterprise 2.0: Open Source Efforts To Watch
  • Mindtouch: A vendor I hope more organizations consider - sound underling architecture that perhaps is over-branded as a wiki solution but is more of a mash-up server (kinda) based on a hypertext and service-oriented platform.
  •  
    Dec 24, 2008 -- "Rather than list off a "top ten" list of predictions for 2009, I thought I would briefly layout some topics and areas that business and IT decision-makers should pay attention to when formulating Enterprise 2.0 plans"
Lars Bauer

SocialText Blog: Social Productivity Tips: Status Reports - 0 views

  •  
    Dec 10, 2008
1 - 20 of 90 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page