Skip to main content

Home/ Learning Sciences/ Group items tagged expert-novice

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Selçuk Kılınç

Dr. Patricia Benner's Novice to Expert Theory - 1 views

  •  
    Patricia Benner published a book whose name is Novice to Expert in 1982 and at that book she mentioned 5 levels from novice to experts. These levels are; novice, advanced beginner, competent, proficient and the expert. All these levels and the book is about nursing but I want to share this short and funny video to you due to relating with expert and novices. You can examine the definition of these levels from the link below if you want; http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/nursing/projects/Documents/novice-expert-benner.pdf
Ezgi Hazal KÖK

Some Differences Between Experts and Novices - 1 views

  •  
    This excerpt is taken from the book "The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education" Game-based learning have been increasingly used in educational settings in the last 10 years and there is a lot of research on this subject. I wonder if there is any on game-based learning how experts and novices solve certain problems in the game environments. Sounds a promising research area.
  •  
    The example of Making sale in differentiating novices and experts is stunning.While novices focus on making the sale , experts develop relationships. The former aims to think, organize information for a limited time for that thing only.However the latter thinks more elaboratelly, develop ways for a long period of time for future connections which is wiser.Thus, we can see that experts know how to use their long term memory effectively compared to novices.
Emel Güneş

How can we determine a teacher as an expertise? - 9 views

Even there are some examples of expertise seeming to decline with experience, for being an expertise teacher one of the common aspect is being more experienced. According to the idea of "practicing...

started by Emel Güneş on 19 Oct 14 no follow-up yet
Yelda Sarıkaya-Erdem

Novice and Expert Teachers' Conceptions of Learners' Prior Knowledge - 1 views

  •  
    Here is a research on the differences between novice and expert teachers' perceptions about students' prior knowledge and how they differ in making use of it. Linking this article to the topic of this week I believe novice teachers bring up novice learners. It is like a vicious circle, I think.
Serap Sarıkaya

Experts vs Novices - 5 views

  •  
    A brief summary about differences between experts and novices.
  •  
    This was a great summary of this week's reading. Thanks Serap! :)
  •  
    Video mentioned exact same differences between experts and novices. I wondered if these differences are agreed upon
Evrim Baran

Novices and Experts - YouTube - 0 views

  •  
    Here is an interesting research study looking at expert and novice performance with eye tracking technique. 
Murat Kol

Novice or expert: How do consumers increase their knowledge about products? -- ScienceD... - 2 views

  •  
    The study reveals how consumers increase their knowledge when they were posed to extend their existing knowledge and experience. When the learners were assumed to be consumers of knowledge, can this study be a good pathway to understand how people learn?
  •  
    What I understood from this article is that to move from novice position to expert position, one should increase the range of their experiences. That's why novice consumers experience on a particular product. Am I right in my conclusion to this article?
Hatice Çilsalar

What are Novice and Expert Learners? - 4 views

  •  
    You can find a brief summary of how expert can be defined. I think this will helpful for your readings.
  •  
    Is it valid for any kind of knowledge or subject area that expert learners follow some of those guidelines? Are there any previous ideas or "expertise" in such a field to learn as experts? Are expert learners use those learning styles in any topic even they do not have any particular idea about it?
Özlem Duran Ataalp

Novices vs. Experts (on reading maps) - 5 views

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zhe070N-dJE As part of Temple University's Research in Spatial Cognition (RISC) lab group, Dr. Kim Kastens and Dr. Tim Shipley put together a study to test how exper...

started by Özlem Duran Ataalp on 19 Oct 14 no follow-up yet
Evrim Baran

Donald Clark Plan B: 9 reasons why I am NOT a Social Constructivist - 1 views

  •  
    I am curious about what you think on this. Do you agree?
  • ...1 more comment...
  •  
    Hocam, I think this guy has an introvert personality. If he doesn't, perhaps he took a course from a teacher who made him feel fed up with pair and group work activities :-)) I have read the comments of other people under the article and I liked the one made by Doug. As Doug stated, Donald Clark compares different perspectives in a linear manner, but these thinkers represent different developmental periods of the theory. So he should have made comparisons considering the development of the theory to be more plausible. For his overall comments at the end of his article, I can say that what he mentions ("Those with good digital literacy, literacy, numeracy and other skills will have the social support, especially at home") is not something peculiar to the results of this theory. We used to have more segragations in the societies when former theories were dominant. So his comment doesn't seem logical to me. He also mentions that some learners like studying alone, which is not supported by this theory. Of course sometimes we need some isolation to think, analyze and synthesize, but this doesn't make us forget about the advantages of peer learning. There is a saying, "two heads are better than one". As we discussed in the classroom, we learn better when we are cognitively engaged and in my opinion, "engagement" requires contradictory or contributory comments made by other members of the society. It doesn't take place without interactions. To sum up, the theory may have some limitations, but I prefer it to the older ones :-)
  •  
    While reading I felt that the author is somewhat close to new ideas coming from other people, other thinkers, actually coming from the rest of the world. I mean as I understood at some parts, he is not open to accept the judgements or theories of some thinkers because what they said were already out there, they did not bring anything new. However I would name these people as men of action and thinkers ahead of their time. Because they draw attention to critical points that were ignored or missed by others. Maybe yes what they put forth were already out there or maybe some of their methods are not sufficient compared to our current methodologies but still they were the ones to see the complete picture and summarize things.
  •  
    Thank you Evrim Hocam:) I strongly believe in community, wikinomy, we have to share, we can learn from each other in an informal environment but social constructivism is not working on me:) As he wrote "At University I learned almost everything in the quiet of my own room and the library. In corporate life, I relished the opportunity to learn on trains and planes, havens of forced isolation, peace and quiet. To this day I blog a lot and enjoy periods of intense research, reading and writing. It's not that I've learned everything in these contexts, only that they go against the idea that all learning needs to be social." I always got successful with deliberate practice and with "Learning by Doing". I don't like social media as well, there are many damages than benefits and I'm not so introvert, maybe a little:) but it's not about being introvert or extrovert, it's about talking or doing... I want to tell a real story of my friend who was a novice programmer in a company. There were many experts, novices and they were taking courses, online, offline, with collaboration every time. Everybody were sharing, commenting, discussing but he began a real life project first week by himself and after 6 month they were still asking to each other but he finished his project. After one year he was the best programmer in the company. And everyone began to ask to him. I asked him, he told that he believes in working until suffering and just doing:) And he added this interesting sentence "You will learn and you will be successful when you will be so related, so suffering that one day you will see dreams and solve problems about the topics in your sleep" My friend's opinions are maybe a little bit dramatic but I believe in "doing" too, at least it's working for us:)
afranur

K. Anders Ericsson - 0 views

  •  
    As Burcu and I will be facilitators of discussion on acquisition of expert performance, it is crucial to meet Ericsson as he is one of the leading researchers on expertise target
nehirkv

Situated Cognitive - 0 views

  •  
    This video is about how an expert can lead the novice through learning process
Mustafa İlkhan

What is cognitive load? - 0 views

  •  
    I know it's related to our previous topic, but still I like the way she explains; a clear model of the thousands of little things that have to happen as we move from novice to expert and wanted to share with you.
  •  
    We will talk more about cognitive load theory and its implications in education research later this semester. Thanks for sharing.
Özlem Duran Ataalp

Experts vs. Novices - 4 views

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZ_C6MNryfI Here you can find a summary of the chapter we have read on expertise.

started by Özlem Duran Ataalp on 19 Oct 14 no follow-up yet
mskaraca

Another expertise acqusition model - 3 views

Hi Dreyfus model is another skill acqusition model. http://www.class.uh.edu/cogsci/dreyfus.html Dreyfus & Dreyfus states 5 level of skill acqusition. Novice: Needs context-free rules. He is hop...

Expertise

started by mskaraca on 19 Oct 14 no follow-up yet
1 - 17 of 17
Showing 20 items per page