Skip to main content

Home/ eme6403/ Group items tagged review

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
woonjee lee

http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/schunn/research/papers/nelson-schunn-is2009.pdf - 4 views

www.lrdc.pitt.edu/...nelson-schunn-is2009.pdf

is2009

shared by woonjee lee on 07 Oct 09 - Cached
Char Wendel liked it
  • Char Wendel on 07 Oct 09
     
    I am still trying to figure out Diigo.
  • ...2 more comments...
  • Barbara Davis on 07 Oct 09
     
    Interested in learning more about SWoRD, an online peer review system. Article highlights: -praise, punisment/reward, direction -learning vs. performance (transfer) -cognitive and affective domains -summary, specificity, problem identification, proposed solution, localization -MODEL: summarization, feedback specificity, explanations, scope, affective language -coding scheme: Table 2 -FINDINGS: Problem understanding: a writer was more likely to understand the problem if a solution was offered, the location of the problem/solution was given, or the feedback included a summary; but the writer was more likely to misunderstand the problem if an explanation for that problem is included (negative effect). -FINDINGS: Implementation: feedback was more likely to be implemented if a solution was provided. -Feedback: information at a higher level is more important than focusing on local issues, and affective language is not very important for performance; goals & reflection also important -CONCLUSION: Feedback should include a summary of the performance, specific instances in which the problematic behavior occurred, and suggestions in how to improve performance. -CONCLUSION: instructor feedback explanations may help; peer feedback explanations appears unhelpful. -REVIEWING GUIDELINES with rubrics -- Appendix A Thanks for sharing!
  • Barbara Davis on 07 Oct 09
     
    Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline (SWoRD) SWoRD STUDENT FAQ: http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/sword/studentfaq.htm Cho & Schunn. (2005). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education. http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/schunn/research/papers/cho-schunn-CE.pdf Cho &. Schunn. (2004). The SWoRD is Mightier than the Pen: Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline. Fourth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'04), pp.545-549. Mulder & Pierce. (2007). PRAZE: Innovating teaching through online peer review. ascilite. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mulder.pdf interesting tangent on peer review: Blogosphere beats peer review in the case of stealth creationist paper: http://rationallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2009/02/blogosphere-beats-peer-review-in-case.html
  • Linda Ellington on 07 Oct 09
     
    This research study examined the relationship between various types of feedback and the likelihood of implementing feedback to improve writing.
  • woonjee lee on 10 Oct 09
     
    This is the one that i found too. This study is interesting that feeback features affect the mediators which are problem or solution understanding and problem or solution agreement, and then mediator leads to the final outcome. Diigo cannot make bookmark on the PDF file itself.
Char Wendel

Peer-Review Online - 3 views

writing.colostate.edu/...online.cfm

peer review

shared by Char Wendel on 07 Oct 09 - Cached
    • Char Wendel
      Char Wendel on 07 Oct 09
       
      This is a great introduction to peer review.
  • Some word-processing software also has a highlighting feature that might be helpful.
    • Char Wendel
      Char Wendel on 07 Oct 09
       
      Obviously, this author was not aware of - or it didn't yet exist - Diigo.
    • Char Wendel
      Char Wendel on 07 Oct 09
       
      I am not sure I can distinguish between when to use a floating sticky note and when to just use a sticky note.
Char Wendel

EBSCOhost: To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the revie... - 4 views

search.ebscohost.com.nplibrary.hodges.edu/login.aspx

peer feedback

shared by Char Wendel on 07 Oct 09 - No Cached
  • woonjee lee on 10 Oct 09
     
    Making bookmark doesn't mean that all group members have access to the resources. How can we make accessible link with highlights ?
  • Kendall St Hilaire on 11 Oct 09
     
    Based on your summary in the Google spreadsheet, it sounds like both of our articles argue that particpating in peer review benefit students more than just receiving the feedback.
Kem Siddons

Course Home (EME6403Assign3) - 0 views

sites.google.com/...home

shared by Kem Siddons on 17 Oct 09 - No Cached
    • Kem Siddons
      Kem Siddons on 17 Oct 09
       
      I'm assuming the writing assignment inferred in this brief overview on the course home page is a literature review, correct? In other words, is the final writing assignment a literature review?
    • Kem Siddons
      Kem Siddons on 17 Oct 09
       
      I hadn't scrolled down and now see you have some of the objectives. I suggest you have 2 - 4 main, overarching objectives, with sub-objectives that provide more detail to each of the main objectives. Otherwise, all of these listed appear to be equally important.
Char Wendel

Week 7 Readings - 3 views

spreadsheets.google.com/ccc

shared by Char Wendel on 08 Oct 09 - No Cached
    • Char Wendel
      Char Wendel on 08 Oct 09
       
      Barbara - Great review of the literature, pre-computerized assessment. I think that technology is changing so quickly, yet the fundamentals constant - at least, somewhat so!
woonjee lee

Weekly sessions (Plagiarism Awareness) - 0 views

sites.google.com/...weekly-sessions

shared by woonjee lee on 08 Nov 09 - Cached
  • Overview:  
    • Cindy Chen
      Cindy Chen on 08 Nov 09
       
      woo~this table is very organize and make all tasks clear to students
    • Allan Jeong
      Allan Jeong on 09 Nov 09
       
      Good decision to use both individual and collaborative work on the flowcharts given that Nesbit's (2006) review and meta analysis of the research on concept mapping showed that mixed approaches is what produces the largest increase in student learning. :-)
    • woonjee lee
      woonjee lee on 10 Nov 09
       
      Student may follow their task based on thie one table. Very nice ~
  • Subpages (3): Week 1: Plagiarism Concept Maps Week 2: Academic Integrity Flow Charts Week One Activities
  • Barbara Davis on 09 Nov 09
     
    Did you notice that the table links to subpages? Kendall points this out in her Jing video and I have now added "(right click on links to access instructions in new tab or window)." This is my only problem with items not being listed in the sidebar. The learner has to know how to get there from individual pages instead of just clicking down the sidebar. --Barbara
woonjee lee

Week 1 Activities (EME 6403-Assignment 4 (Group A3)) - 0 views

sites.google.com/...week-1-activities

shared by woonjee lee on 08 Nov 09 - Cached
    • Dimas Prasetyo
      Dimas Prasetyo on 08 Nov 09
       
      It is not clear whether student will learn 'Causal Factors Influencing Global Warming' or learn how to use Gliffy for the overall lesson
  • Activity 1.3 - Create Group Concept Map
    • Allan Jeong
      Allan Jeong on 09 Nov 09
       
      Does students start by individually creating a diagram? What approach reported in Nesbit's (2006) review of the research produced the largest learning gains?
    • Allan Jeong
      Allan Jeong on 09 Nov 09
       
      Can two or more people edit the same diagram in Gliffy at the same time? If not, what procedures will you need to put in place to avoid potential problems?
  • using Gliffy in a brainstorming and research exercise
    • woonjee lee
      woonjee lee on 10 Nov 09
       
      I like this idea. Drawing concept map helps brainstorming.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Begin to build your concept map with research data that will provide the group
    • woonjee lee
      woonjee lee on 10 Nov 09
       
      Not clear about this part. I understood begin with individual concept map will help extending group concept map.
  • Barbara Davis on 09 Nov 09
     
    FYI -- my comments added to the page wouldn't show and aren't showing here. I have added feedback comments on discussion board under Group Project Discussion Board.
1 - 7 of 7
Showing 20▼ items per page