Skip to main content

Home/ eme6403/ Group items tagged is2009

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
woonjee lee

http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/schunn/research/papers/nelson-schunn-is2009.pdf - 4 views

www.lrdc.pitt.edu/...nelson-schunn-is2009.pdf

is2009

shared by woonjee lee on 07 Oct 09 - Cached
Char Wendel liked it
  • Char Wendel on 07 Oct 09
     
    I am still trying to figure out Diigo.
  • ...2 more comments...
  • Barbara Davis on 07 Oct 09
     
    Interested in learning more about SWoRD, an online peer review system. Article highlights: -praise, punisment/reward, direction -learning vs. performance (transfer) -cognitive and affective domains -summary, specificity, problem identification, proposed solution, localization -MODEL: summarization, feedback specificity, explanations, scope, affective language -coding scheme: Table 2 -FINDINGS: Problem understanding: a writer was more likely to understand the problem if a solution was offered, the location of the problem/solution was given, or the feedback included a summary; but the writer was more likely to misunderstand the problem if an explanation for that problem is included (negative effect). -FINDINGS: Implementation: feedback was more likely to be implemented if a solution was provided. -Feedback: information at a higher level is more important than focusing on local issues, and affective language is not very important for performance; goals & reflection also important -CONCLUSION: Feedback should include a summary of the performance, specific instances in which the problematic behavior occurred, and suggestions in how to improve performance. -CONCLUSION: instructor feedback explanations may help; peer feedback explanations appears unhelpful. -REVIEWING GUIDELINES with rubrics -- Appendix A Thanks for sharing!
  • Barbara Davis on 07 Oct 09
     
    Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline (SWoRD) SWoRD STUDENT FAQ: http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/sword/studentfaq.htm Cho & Schunn. (2005). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education. http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/schunn/research/papers/cho-schunn-CE.pdf Cho &. Schunn. (2004). The SWoRD is Mightier than the Pen: Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline. Fourth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'04), pp.545-549. Mulder & Pierce. (2007). PRAZE: Innovating teaching through online peer review. ascilite. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mulder.pdf interesting tangent on peer review: Blogosphere beats peer review in the case of stealth creationist paper: http://rationallyspeaking.blogspot.com/2009/02/blogosphere-beats-peer-review-in-case.html
  • Linda Ellington on 07 Oct 09
     
    This research study examined the relationship between various types of feedback and the likelihood of implementing feedback to improve writing.
  • woonjee lee on 10 Oct 09
     
    This is the one that i found too. This study is interesting that feeback features affect the mediators which are problem or solution understanding and problem or solution agreement, and then mediator leads to the final outcome. Diigo cannot make bookmark on the PDF file itself.
1 - 1 of 1
Showing 20▼ items per page