Hello everybody. I'd like to get your feedback on the course to improve it for the second half of the course. Please fill in the attached form and provide your comments and insights on the course.
Let's congragulate Sedef for her success in getting the TUBİTAK grant. She will conduct TPACK workshop with the in-service teachers. Check out the link!
Reagrding the differences between traditional and digital technologies:
--Virtually all the traditional technologies share three characteristics: specificity, stability, and transparency (see Figure 3). traditional classroom technologies have specific uses, are relatively stable over time, and are transparent or easy to understand.
The truth of Koehler & Mishra's (2009) statement that ―digital technologies-such as computers, handheld devices, and software applications-by contrast, are protean (usable in many different ways . . .); unstable (rapidly changing); and opaque (the inner workings are hidden from users)‖ is demonstrated daily in preservice and inservice teacher
development programs where teachers struggle to understand how to use a range of digital technologies and why they should
Matti, using TPACK in the context of "Technology Teacher Education" is quite interesting. This is where the boundaries and intersections become fuzzy. For instance in the Computer Education Teacher Education or Craft/Technology Teacher Education contexts, the technology is the content. I am curious to hear about our students from the CEIT department. Do you see any distinctions from the TCK, TPK, and TPACK within the domain of technology/craft teacher education? If yes, could you give some examples?
Is it the inherent characteristics of the technology (power point) that makes these lectures boring, or is it us? Think about affordances and limitations.